开云体育

Sorry but it is an unnecessary work : everything you look at is in the MMS_system_specs as the MMS was an open system like Tek TM500/5000 and a lot of companies (Comstron --very impressive ultrafast 4 slots synthesyzer--, Tern Technologies...) built modules for the MMS.
I have most of the documents about the system and I sent all in 2014 to a guy Stewart Cobb, asking just for a feedback and prototype. No hear from him...

Part of the mails with SC

JF,
Another interesting idea. It would actually be fairly easy to build a USB-to-MSIB interface box. The external bus is not clocked, it's done with handshaking, so any processor could implement the protocol with bit-banging. You'd need two 37-pin connectors, a bunch of RS-422 driver chips, and a microcontroller with USB. For speed, you'd want USB 2.0. There are plenty of ARM M3 microcontrollers with USB. The hardware would not be hard. Microcontroller software might be harder. The PC display end would be all software, but a lot of it.

I wonder how many people would want something like that? Enough to help program it? Enough to buy one?

Cheers!
--Stu



On Dec 17, 2014 8:30 AM, "JF PICARD" <jfphp@...> wrote:

Stu

Your idea about the CPLD for the bus is very interesting : bus transfers in the MMS system is governed by custom IC in the mainframe et in the plug ins, no longer supplied, and I have allready got the idea to replace these by CPLD, just an idea for me because I have no knowledge in this domain and I found nobody interested by such a project. There is perhaps a small market to offer substitute for this very special ICs.
There is another very interesting subjet you will get in touch with your work : the MMS control by a PC . HP offered the 70207A/B (with various options depending of the bundled softwares and accessories : HPBasic, HPIB board...) allowing the total control of any MMS system from a PC running Windows NT. It uses an MSIB interface and a dedicated software. I am hunting it since years without any success, neither in parts nor in software... It could be a side result of your project.

73.

JF

On Friday, April 24, 2020, 06:27:20 AM GMT+2, Dave McGuire <mcguire@...> wrote:

? I for one think that's a fantastic idea.? I'm a heavy user of MSIB
stuff, and would love to see it extended a bit.

? ? ? ? ? ? -Dave

On 4/23/20 3:59 PM, Jan de Jongh wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> While building my 3rd hp70k-mms system, I want to assess the interest in
> a project idea I've had for the past two years or so: A
> *sniffer/injector* for the hp70k module-interconnection protocol
> (*msib*). All (hardware/software) open source; this is not a commercial
> proposal (apart from e.g. cost-price PCB delivery).
>
> The very rough basic idea is to take a single-width hp70k module
> (likely, for-parts-only), strip everything inside apart from the msib
> interface and mechanical interfaces, and put inside one or more PCBs that:
>
>? * Interface with the msib bus such that 'basic bus transactions' can
>? ? be captured;
>? * Store these 'transactions' into (e.g.) a pcap file on an ssd
>? ? connected to a (say) an embedded Raspberry Pi;
>? * Transfer these 'transactions' over 1 Gbps Ethernet (copper/Fiber
>? ? Optic) from the Raspberry Pi;
>? * Interface over Ethernet both from the front and the rear;
>? * Import the pcap 'transaction' into Wireshark (on a remote machine);
>? * Interpret the 'transactions' using an hp70k-msib dissector;
>? * Perhaps add power monitoring, etc.;
>? * ...
>
>
> This would be the basic first-order requirements of the project. In
> subsequent phases, injection of messages/transactions on the bus and
> running HP calibration (HP-BASIC) software from virtualized containers
> could be implemented.
>
> *My questions:*
>
>? * Is any project already working on something like this that I can
>? ? join (I could not find any)?
>? * Would this be interesting enough to the amateur hp70k community? Is
>? ? there sufficient added value to a tool like this over merely
>? ? swapping modules in order to get things to work?
>? * Does a tool like this have the potential to increase the public
>? ? knowledge on the hp70k mms? Could it reveal calibration data? Is it
>? ? worth it?
>? * *Would anyone be willing to help?* I figure that even a first
>? ? attempt at a working prototype would take over a year, but various
>? ? components of the project (like the pcap format definition,
>? ? wireshark dissectors, web-based interfacing, RPi firmware, KiCAD PCB
>? ? design of bus interfacing, ...) could be isolated and
>? ? designed/implemented in a team-effort... Needless to say this
>? ? project would required >=4 committed enthusiast aficionados...
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your thoughts/vision on this, BR,
> Jan - pa3gyf
>


--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA