¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: 8510C: 8340B vs 83631B


 

834XX is a boxed synthesized 83592/5X where all aligments are made with potentiometers. 836XXX is a DAC based system with all aligments made with the RPG on the front panel. Beware of the various 836XXX : every piece is different with/out tracking filter/amplifier ; pulse modulator with or without amplifier... The 836XXX without front panel --devoted to the 8510X-- are poor signal generators (no tracking filter, relaxed specs and RF deck very different from a standard on). In a 8510X system the only difference is a better amplitude stability with time from the 836XXX and a quicker step sweep. Keep in mind the sp¨¦cifications about the temperature and the amplitude accuracy : it is ridiculous to mesure a 110 db step attenuator with a 8510X and give data to 1/10th of db. Use a 8902A opt 050 with downconverter
On Saturday, February 29, 2020, 01:49:45 PM GMT+1, Chuck Harris <cfharris@...> wrote:


When Jim Ford replies from his Samsung phone, he wipes out
all of the formatting.? When he replies from his Windows box,
(em client) formatting is preserved.

His reply was the first to have destroyed the formatting.

-Chuck Harris

Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Feb 2020, Jim Ford wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Sergey.? I have updated my "wishlist" HP 8340 entry to add "best with no
>> options".
>>
>> BTW, do you see your own text below?? When I reply, I see the previous text on my
>> screen, and when I receive my own reply as posted to the group, it contains the
>> other text as well.? Therefore, I haven't made any effort to copy text from
>> previous posts.? But I've often wondered if others see the previous text.? It bugs
>> the crap out of me to see somebody else's "Yeah, I agree" post, for example, with
>> no context.
>
> Those people who post a single "Me too!" letters are mentally ill and it is
> a sin to insult them. Thou shalt forgive them; for they know not what they
> do...
>
> Your quoting is fine; it is somebody else that screwed up earlier message
> text making it all one long line without breaks.
>
>>
>> Jim
>>

>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Sergey Kubushyn" <ksi@...>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: 2/28/2020 10:13:42 PM
>> Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] 8510C: 8340B vs 83631B
>>
>>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Jim Ford wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't know who had all that message thread screwed up (guys, _PLEASE_
>>> setup proper quoting -- it is impossible to read) but as of 8340B I can tell
>>> that the best one is instrument without _ANY_ options.
>>>
>>> Unlike 99.9999% of other measurement equipment _EVERY_ option in 8340B is
>>> "Remove something" or "Make it worse" (moving connectors to the rear falls
>>> in the latter category.)
>>>
>>> There is no options in 8340B that would've added something or made it better
>>> than basic instrument without options.
>>>
>>>> Option 007 is relaxed phase noise, page 1-10.? I guess James Bond wasn't
>>>> concerned about phase noise!? 3 dB worse across the board except is the same at
>>>> 100 kHz offset (not surprising as that's probably the PN floor), and 30 Hz offset
>>>> not specified. Thanks, Bruce. JimSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>>> -------- Original message --------From: Bruce <bruce@...> Date: 2/28/20?
>>>> 4:43 PM? (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re:
>>>> [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] 8510C: 8340B vs 83631B Some of the 8340 series
>>>> that were used with the 8510C have more phase? noise than the "normal" unit - I
>>>> think this is the Opt 5 version - be? careful and try to avoid Opt 5 if you can -
>>>> check the documentation to? be sure my mmemory is correct.Quoting Jim Ford
>>>> <james.ford@...>:> Interesting, Vladan, that the 8340/8341 synths share
>>>> circuitry with? > the 8566 spec an.? I figured the bottom part of the 8566 was
>>>> pretty? > much just a synthesized sweeper anyway.? I don't have an 8340 or? >
>>>> 8341 (yet), but there are a few of the lower frequency versions in? > one of the
>>>> labs at work, and they do look like the bottom of the? > 8566.? The sloped bottom
>>>> part of the front panel gives them away.? I? > believe the standalone synths are
>>>> 5 rack units, though, vs. 3 or 4? > for the bottom of the 8566.>> Jim>> ------
>>>> Original Message ------> From: "pianovt via Groups.Io"
>>>> <pianovt=[email protected]>> To: [email protected]> Sent:
>>>> 2/28/2020 1:20:20 PM> Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] 8510C: 8340B
>>>> vs 83631B>>> Here is a brief history. The 8340A was designed in parallel with? >>
>>>> the 8510A and was intended for use with it. There was no 8360? >> series back
>>>> then. With time, the 8510 A became the 8510B and at? >> some point the 8340A?
>>>> become a "B" too. The biggest difference? >> between the A and B versions of the
>>>> two instruments was the change? >> from a HP proprietary processor to the 68000.
>>>> Eventually, the 8510B? >> was reworked into the 8510C. While this was going on, a
>>>> new? >> sweeping syntehsizerseries? was released, the 8360.>>>> The 8360 series
>>>> had some models which were stripped down,? >> specifically for use with the 8510.
>>>> Stripped down means they didn't? >> have a standard front panel user interface.
>>>> They were meant to? >> interact with the 8510 via the system bus only. That kept
>>>> the cost? >> down for customers who didn't need a stand-alone sweeper or? >>
>>>> synthesizer.>>>> In the meantime, a lower cost version of the 8340 was
>>>> introduced,? >> the 8341. It was a 20 GHz synthesizer. However, if you are
>>>> willing? >> to study the differences and do some work late at night, you can? >>
>>>> probably make the 8341 do much of what the 8340 does and get it to >> work to
>>>> 26.5 GHz. The 8341 will work with the 8510 system, but I am? >> not sure which
>>>> firmware works with what.>>>> The 8340/41 is very heavy, and it has a jet engine
>>>> style cooling? >> fan. Inside, the frequency synthesis circuits are pretty much
>>>> the? >> same as what was used in the 8566 spectrum analyzer, but there is? >>
>>>> also an output section with a multiplier, leveling circuits,? >> modulation etc.,
>>>> in other words all the stuff that's needed to get? >> the signal out. The upside
>>>> is, many 8566 LO parts can be had for? >> next to nothing, so spare parts are
>>>> largely available for the? >> synthesizer portion. Documentation is also
>>>> available. Not so much? >> for the 8360. As far as I know, the alignment and
>>>> calibration? >> software for the 8360 has not been released to the general
>>>> public? >> either.>>>> Vladan>>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> *
>>> *? KSI@home??? KOI8 Net? < >? The impossible we do immediately.? *
>>> *? Las Vegas?? NV, USA?? < >? Miracles require 24-hour notice.?? *
>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---
> *
> *? KSI@home??? KOI8 Net? < >? The impossible we do immediately.? *
> *? Las Vegas?? NV, USA?? < >? Miracles require 24-hour notice.?? *
> *
>
>
>
>


Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.