Re: LCS statement for windows CTC
zpmain wrote:
[...]
Where are you seeing this?
1. CTC is not the same as LCS.
2. I know nothing about how networking is configured on MVS, but all information regarding Hercules's networking
By
Fish Fish
·
#4894
·
|
LCS statement for windows CTC
Hello
I am working on to establish communication between two hercules in same PC.
I can see the LCS statement for Linux but my PC is on windows.
Does someone has sample LCS statement to create a CTC
By
zpmain
·
#4893
·
|
Re: Tape mount UNIT not brought online
Looks like the backup ran fine, but the output dataset wasn't cataloged.
That doesn't matter unless you're planning to read the tape back in by
using the catalog instead of the explicit volume
By
Jay Maynard
·
#4892
·
|
Re: Tape mount UNIT not brought online
12:26:58 HHC01603I devinit 551 a01001.aws
12:26:58 HHC00221I 0:0551 Tape file a01001.aws, type AWS: format type AWS Format tape file
12:26:58 HHC00224I 0:0551 Tape file a01001.aws, type AWS: display "
By
Rahim Azizarab
·
#4891
·
|
Re: Unzipping MVS .ZIP data sets
Hi Silvio,
Method 1.
In SYS2.JCLLIB you find the job MINIUNZP.
Method 2.
Go to RFE 3.4 or RPF 3.4 and select data set level TK5 and place a B (browse)
before the data set name. The data set will be
By
Rob Prins
·
#4890
·
|
Unzipping MVS .ZIP data sets
Dear all,
I'm trying to unzip some of the .ZIP files on the TK5 system but with no success. Does somebody have a working sample how this can be done successfully.
Many thanks in advance.
Silvio
By
Silvio Losa
·
#4889
·
|
Re: Tape mount UNIT not brought online
I before do v and after devinit when they system require a tape, so this
web https://mainframecorner.com/?p=1488 . Article
<rahimazizarab@...> escribió:
By
jose
·
#4888
·
|
Tape mount UNIT not brought online
I do devinit? 550 tape01.aws?? then? .v 550,online
The config file:
0550????? 3420????? tape01.aws??????????? #? tape
0551????? 3420?????
By
Rahim Azizarab
·
#4887
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
Since (until a month ago) my entire systems career was in Houston...
And the shop I ran into JES3 at was Rockwell Shuttle Operations
Corporation, a NASA/JSC contractor.
I always thought it was
By
Jay Maynard
·
#4886
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
Later releases work well with multiple CPUs in Hercules (n-1),
<slgarwood@...> wrote:
By
Mike Schwab
·
#4885
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
JES3 was a bit weird, but remember its heritage - West Coast ASP etc….originally 7094/7040-like system.
HASP was a Houston child, My first systems programmer job was in a HASP shop then I moved to a
By
Sterling Garwood
·
#4884
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
Yeah, I can see how you might be chary of testing the waters. MVS 3.8 was
kinda iffy for MP/AP support, especially early on, but in the 1982-1983
timeframe, it had gotten pretty solid, at least on the
By
Jay Maynard
·
#4883
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
I have always been suspicious of Hercules/Herculon in the area of multiprocessors. My rule of thumb is to run one cpu (the Gene Amdahl model). The whole interaction of MVS MP, Hercules support of MP,
By
Sterling Garwood
·
#4882
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
And designed for 2 processors. Next version was debugged for 3+ processors.
<mark.s.waterbury@...> wrote:
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away
By
Mike Schwab
·
#4881
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
I will note that MVS 3.8 was the first release of OS/VS2 to support an attached processor or multiprocessor configuration, if I recall correctly.
Also, given that MVS running on Hercules today is
By
Mark Waterbury
·
#4880
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
Hi Daniel,
The S/M Program runs in Problem Program mode (Key 8) and is not an Authorized Program as it does not use any system services that require Authorization. The Program strictly follows the
By
Tom Armstrong
·
#4879
·
|
Re: MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
Hi, Daniel,
You would have to SYSGEN MVS 3.8J for either an "AP" or "MP" configuration to get that to work.
You cannot just expect to throw additional CPUs at MVS 3.8J and expect it to work "out of
By
Mark Waterbury
·
#4878
·
|
MVS 3.8j (TK5) Crashes on Massive SORT
I've been playing with a SORT job to stress test my system.? It sorts 99,999,999 random 80 byte records.? The job works just fine if I am running with 1 CPU.? Run MVS with 2 CPUs and it typically
By
Daniel L. Srebnick
·
#4877
·
|
Re: SORT, REGION and MAIN
Hi Daniel,
For a successful sort the REGION size definitely has to be larger than the storage that the S/M Program is allocated by use of various S/M Program parameters. As to how much larger the
By
Tom Armstrong
·
#4876
·
|
Re: SORT, REGION and MAIN
Can run with REGION=6M possibly larger. End of step message shows how
much memory of 24, 31, 64 bit memory was actually used.
<dan@...> wrote:
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL
By
Mike Schwab
·
#4875
·
|