开云体育

Hi! I knew I had missing something hehe. I can search for the COBOL way, but I'm not totally sure it will work with the compiler that is present on tk4 :-) (this one I know is very old because I

Hi David. AFAIK (I tried anyways) the implementation of SORT present in Tk5 (I guess in Tk4- too, along with the one referenced by Jay Moseley in his website... both with all that 60's 2311/2314 DASD

Hi: I'm probably missing something, but on SORT program under JCL you can use SUM FIELDS=NONE to remove duplicates. For instance SORT FIELDS=(1,10,CH,A) SUM FIELDS=NONE Will sort and delete any

Thank you for your points. Being a complete noob, after successfully using SORT for MVS directly, yesterday I got it working under COBOL (the only language I know a little and I play with) after

So I did run into a cosmetic issue with Sort/Merge. I wonder if it will be possible to expand the record count fields in this message: IER054I Records In??????? , Records Out As you can see,

Thank you. It didn't seem to make any difference. However, I didn't know that existed. And if I do preallocate the data set it works just fine. However, I wanted IEHMOVE to allocate the output

That was the secret sauce Mike...thank you! The job spanned the dataset across WORK1 and WORK3 and did it dynamically.

Try //SEQOUT DD UNIT=(WORK,6), since you only have that many. <dan@...> wrote:

Here's the actual job. If I change SEQOUT to UNIT=(3390,59) the JCL fails. //HERC01S JOB (MYNAME),'TEST SORT', // CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=X,MSGLEVEL=(1,1)

Hi Alejandro, My primary focus for refurbishing the OS/360 Sort/Merge program and releasing OS/360 Sort/Merge for MVS 3.8 was to remove any dependency on any specific DASD device. I achieved that

// UNIT=(3390,59), <dan@...> wrote: -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

You need to give it more space.? SYSUT10,sysut20 on other work volumes. regards; Rahim??? ??

Is it possible to have a (temporary) multi-volume dataset under MVS 3.8j? As an exercise, I have a job that creates 9.5 million random records and then passes the dataset to OS/360 Sort (using TK5

The problem is not the dasd volume, it's the tape.? You probably reformatted the tape into AWS format, but DFDSS does not understand the record formats you are trying to install to the disk. To copy

I believe you should be able to restore to the SAME or LARGER target – Since you indicate that you dumped from a M9 – you will need to restore to a M9 or larger – However, NOT to a smaller model

Hi, Unfortunately you've reached the end of my knowledge, but perhaps you need to specify 3390-9 in the hercules conf file ? I have a thought that using just 3390 defaults to a much smaller 3390-1, so

Hi Tom, thanks for your reply.? yes, the source dumped from a 3390-9. the backup procedure is as below: //BACKUP? ?PROC VSN=' ',LB=' ',VOLSER=' ' //STEP1? ? EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=0M //SYSPRINT

HI, is the data you are restoring from the same device type as you are restoring too ? Your target is a 3390, is the source dumped from a 3390 ? I think that DFSMSdss doesn't convert from one device

Hi Clem, this is a distant memory, so may not work add ,COPYAUTH to the command Update: Another colleague suggested defining your TO dataset identically before issuing the command, then COPYAUTH

Hi, I am trying to run a very simple IEHMOVE but I get a RAKF error in TK5.? The message is: IEH453I DATA SET SYS1.MACLIB NOT MOVED/COPIED BECAUSE?TO DATA SET PREVIOUSLY RACF DEFINED. The output