Re: New tk4 release?
Hi All sorry for the delay with releasing TK4- Update 09. The major issue holding the release up is the current state of SDL Hyperion, which will be the engine running TK4- Update 09. Although the MVS
By
Juergen
·
#1646
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
On Micros, CP/M (and hence MS-DOS) got drive letters descending from VM. ¡°Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.¡± Attributed to author and cleric Charles Caleb Colton. -ahd- -- Drew
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#1645
·
|
Re: I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
Stone knives and bear skins. Over on VM/370, the original EXEC is based on the script processor for CTSS, RUNCOM.? That's wonderful historical trivia, not so wonderful when you're trying to get work
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#1644
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Hi Folks, I use in RPF a different approach. All the datasets (TSO libraries) and other datasets are treated the same. RPF does not use apostrophes in the data set names, so all data sets are fully
By
Rob Prins
·
#1643
·
|
Re: I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
Thanks. brexx/370 was my first thought already, although I was keeping an open mind about alternatives :-)
By
Rupert Reynolds
·
#1642
·
|
Re: I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
Hey Rupert, this is why we has created brexx/370. You can grab it from: https://github.com/mvslovers/brexx370 Mike Rupert Reynolds <rupertreynolds@...> schrieb am Di. 17. Nov. 2020 um 14:15: Von
By
Mike Gro?mann
·
#1641
·
|
I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
I tried to write a CLIST that processes all DSNs for an HLQ. No &SYSINDEX(needle,haystack) No SYSCALL for an internal PROC I need to install Rexx, or port my compiler :-) Roops
By
Rupert Reynolds
·
#1640
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
So on most (but by no means all) systems, a TSO user's data sets have names that have the user ID as the high-level qualifier.? Also conventionally, this means that some sort of user (meaning
By
Greg Price
·
#1639
·
|
Re: Hercules Optimization and Tuning
Dave wrote: * For home use any more than 2 cores adds no extra to performance. Hercules will use one for CPU emulation and one for IO and other processing. * Generally, Hercules can emulate one less
By
Mark L. Gaubatz
·
#1638
·
|
Re: Hercules Optimization and Tuning
Fish wrote: [...] And make sure you have PLENTY of RAM on your host too! (So you can give as much as your guest needs for best performance.(*)) (*) Which ultimately depends on your guest's workload
By
Fish Fish
·
#1637
·
|
Re: Hercules Optimization and Tuning
Dave Wade wrote: That's only true for uniprocessor guest operating systems (i.e. guest operating systems that only support one CPU). For any multiprocessor guest operator system however (such as
By
Fish Fish
·
#1636
·
|
Re: Hercules Optimization and Tuning
Hi, For home use any more than 2 cores adds no extra to performance. Hercules will use one for CPU emulation and one for IO and other processing. Generally, Hercules can emulate one less Mainframe CPU
By
Dave Wade
·
#1635
·
|
Re: Hercules Optimization and Tuning
Usually one user job is going to be limited to one CPU. Running one batch job is going to max out one CPU with another CPU handling I/O and a third handling some MVS / Hercules / base overhead.
By
Mike Schwab
·
#1634
·
|
Hercules Optimization and Tuning
Hi I am newbie in Mainframe and Hercules and Hyperion. When i run something in guest my host shows approximately 20% of CPU usage or hard usage. I want to tune and optimize Hercules with parameters of
By
ehsdav@...
·
#1633
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
IBM created the format for using the system based on their design BUT they were one of the first in creating a commercial computer system from scratch starting with the 1401 and for science based the
By
Vince Coen
·
#1632
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
That's a bit harsh. They also "made up" the hardware and the whole OS and the restrictions on file names too. And /surely/ they designed SPF with this naming approach because their own programmers, or
By
Jeremy Nicoll
·
#1631
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
It does make sense, because IBM's security products can allow you to change or create datasets with certain HLQs (High Level Qualifier, the first part of a dataset name) such as your userid. And TSO
By
Rupert Reynolds
·
#1630
·
|
Re: New tk4 release?
Hello, same here! tk4- update 09 would be a great gift for xmas. I would gladly volunteer to be a tester if you need any.. -don Sent from my iPad Air 2
By
Don.isenstadt
·
#1629
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Thank you all for the explanations. So it boils down to "IBM made it up" :)? when it mapped these notions of "department", "project", "tool" ("type") to the 44 characters of DSNAMEs.? Is that right?
By
Marco Antoniotti
·
#1628
·
|
Re: New tk4 release?
Hello, also to J¨¹rgen, Am 15.11.2020 um 20:36 schrieb pjfarley3 <pjfarley3@...>: Moreover, does J¨¹rgen need some help? Testers? :wq! PoC
By
Patrik Schindler
·
#1627
·
|