Re: Attn does not interrupt
Oh, I can stop it! If PA1 doesn't work, /C U=ROOPS at the console gets the job done :-) Sometimes, PA1 interrupts (which is not my experience from MVS/XA and TSO/E in the 1990s). But I'm wondering
By
Rupert Reynolds
·
#1659
·
|
Re: Attn does not interrupt
<jb.reginato@...> wrote: It is very common to have the TSO prompt right after the first PA1. At the prompt an "END" command should finish the execution. HTH
By
Fernando M. Roxo da Motta
·
#1658
·
|
RES: [H390-MVS] Attn does not interrupt
Try PA1 twice De: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Em nome de Rupert Reynolds Enviada em: quarta-feira, 18 de novembro de 2020 07:08
By
Jo?o Reginato
·
#1657
·
|
RES: [H390-MVS] Attn does not interrupt
Try PA1 De: [email protected] <[email protected]> Em nome de Rupert Reynolds Enviada em: quarta-feira, 18 de novembro de 2020 07:08 Para: [email protected] Assunto: [H390-MVS] Attn does not
By
Jo?o Reginato
·
#1656
·
|
Attn does not interrupt
When I worked on MVS/XA via VTAM in the 1990s, Attn could interrupt any TSO program doing terminal I/O using Attn. PA1 produced a similar response from TSO, with the vertical bar on screen, except
By
Rupert Reynolds
·
#1655
·
|
Re: New tk4 release?
Hello Peter, Am 18.11.2020 um 02:42 schrieb pjfarley3 <pjfarley3@...>: That¡¯s why I wrote: ?or readily compiled for their particular platform¡°. :-) :wq! PoC
By
Patrik Schindler
·
#1654
·
|
Re: New tk4 release?
Thanks for the reply J¨¹rgen. I mostly agree with Patrik (who replied earlier) that a TK4 release with a stable SDL Hercules in it¡¯s current form MINUS the unstable TXF facility would still be very
By
pjfarley3
·
#1653
·
|
Re: [Marketing Mail] Re: [H390-MVS] Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Actually, You probably would do better to actually USE it ¨C As you spend time ¨C you learn various tricks ¨C Reading manuals or help files ¨C will get you started, but ¨C it is the DOING with
By
Jeff Bassett
·
#1652
·
|
Re: New tk4 release?
Hello J¨¹rgen, Am 17.11.2020 um 22:27 schrieb Juergen <winkelmann@...>: Sorry, but I disagree. I don¡¯t see why TK4- (in it¡¯s original meaning as Turn-Key MVS 3.8j) is supposed to be delayed
By
Patrik Schindler
·
#1651
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Thank you Rob, I have also used RPF.? As a matter of fact, the difference between the panels in REVIEW and RPF was what puzzled me to start with. All the best -- Marco Antoniotti Somewhere over the
By
Marco Antoniotti
·
#1650
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Thank you Greg for the explanation. Things do make more sense now. -- Marco Antoniotti Somewhere over the rainbow
By
Marco Antoniotti
·
#1649
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Thanks.? Understood. I presume that to figure out all the defaults in TSO, one has to do some... RTFM. -- Marco Antoniotti Somewhere over the rainbow
By
Marco Antoniotti
·
#1648
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Hi Jeremy Ok. Point taken :)? I should not complain too much about IBM, given that it payed my wife's salary for more than ten years :) What I meant is that somehow, it looks like at a certain point
By
Marco Antoniotti
·
#1647
·
|
Re: New tk4 release?
Hi All sorry for the delay with releasing TK4- Update 09. The major issue holding the release up is the current state of SDL Hyperion, which will be the engine running TK4- Update 09. Although the MVS
By
Juergen
·
#1646
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
On Micros, CP/M (and hence MS-DOS) got drive letters descending from VM. ¡°Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.¡± Attributed to author and cleric Charles Caleb Colton. -ahd- -- Drew
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#1645
·
|
Re: I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
Stone knives and bear skins. Over on VM/370, the original EXEC is based on the script processor for CTSS, RUNCOM.? That's wonderful historical trivia, not so wonderful when you're trying to get work
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#1644
·
|
Re: Newbie question about REVIEW/RPF etc
Hi Folks, I use in RPF a different approach. All the datasets (TSO libraries) and other datasets are treated the same. RPF does not use apostrophes in the data set names, so all data sets are fully
By
Rob Prins
·
#1643
·
|
Re: I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
Thanks. brexx/370 was my first thought already, although I was keeping an open mind about alternatives :-)
By
Rupert Reynolds
·
#1642
·
|
Re: I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
Hey Rupert, this is why we has created brexx/370. You can grab it from: https://github.com/mvslovers/brexx370 Mike Rupert Reynolds <rupertreynolds@...> schrieb am Di. 17. Nov. 2020 um 14:15: Von
By
Mike Gro?mann
·
#1641
·
|
I've just realised how 'stone age' CLIST is with MVS 3.8 :-)
I tried to write a CLIST that processes all DSNs for an HLQ. No &SYSINDEX(needle,haystack) No SYSCALL for an internal PROC I need to install Rexx, or port my compiler :-) Roops
By
Rupert Reynolds
·
#1640
·
|