Re: Request for ISPF 2.2 Software
In that case good luck but suggest you
also look at Jay's website where he provides a step by step of
creating MVS rom scratch and after all it is only mil time used,
although some of yours :)
Vince
?On 10/01/2025 00:35, Dave Trainor - N8ZFM via groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thank you
Vince, Wally contacted me.?? I am aware of TK5 and its
awesome work, but my goal is to build my own system and
learn by doing that rather than get it pre-assembled, part
of the enjoyment is by learning each step along the way and
sure it’s a longer road but I find it rewarding.? RTFM is
always the best first (and second and third) step in
figuring stuff out before asking for help.
?
Thanks,
Dave – N8ZFM
?
Try going to :
Current version although there will be an update next month
all things willing and any changes made to any current
version will not be affected by any updates.
That said READ the supplied manuals :
TK5-Announcement-Letter.pdf
TK5-Introduction-and-User-Manual.pdf
There are other you should perruse as well.
Vincenf
On 09/01/2025 19:37, Dave Trainor - N8ZFM via groups.io
wrote:
I would like to obtain a copy for my
home usage, of Wally’s ISPF clone, I tried a direct e-mail
to Wally but possibly I have his address wrong, I have not
heard back so am trying here.
?
My reading of the archive of email here
indicates he would like to be the only one that
distributes the software and I wish to respect his
wishes.? Maybe this message will reach him, or someone
here can direct me to a better way to reach out. As quite
a few of us here are more advanced in the journey of life,
I hope he is doing well.
?
I am using a Jay Mosley designed MVS
3.8j system, because I enjoyed the learning of doing it
myself (well – with his expect guidance and instructions)
and then installing all of the applications, myself,
rather than using a pre-generated system like TK4 or 5,
which of course has all of this already.? Sense of
accomplishment and all – as well as educational.? And it
has been very educational. RPF and RFE from Rob is
excellent and I appreciate his contribution.
?
Thanks,
David Trainor – dave@...
Retired IT guy, now having fun
|
Re: Request for ISPF 2.2 Software
Thank you Vince, Wally contacted me.?? I am aware of TK5 and its awesome work, but my goal is to build my own system and learn by doing that rather than get it pre-assembled, part of the enjoyment is by learning
each step along the way and sure it’s a longer road but I find it rewarding.? RTFM is always the best first (and second and third) step in figuring stuff out before asking for help.
?
Thanks,
Dave – N8ZFM
?
Try going to :
Current version although there will be an update next month all things willing and any changes made to any current version will not be affected by any updates.
That said READ the supplied manuals :
TK5-Announcement-Letter.pdf
TK5-Introduction-and-User-Manual.pdf
There are other you should perruse as well.
Vincenf
On 09/01/2025 19:37, Dave Trainor - N8ZFM via groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would like to obtain a copy for my home usage, of Wally’s ISPF clone, I tried a direct e-mail to Wally but possibly I have his address wrong, I have not heard back so am trying here.
?
My reading of the archive of email here indicates he would like to be the only one that distributes the software and I wish to respect his wishes.? Maybe this message will reach him, or someone here can direct me to a better way to reach
out. As quite a few of us here are more advanced in the journey of life, I hope he is doing well.
?
I am using a Jay Mosley designed MVS 3.8j system, because I enjoyed the learning of doing it myself (well – with his expect guidance and instructions) and then installing all of the applications, myself, rather than using a pre-generated
system like TK4 or 5, which of course has all of this already.? Sense of accomplishment and all – as well as educational.? And it has been very educational. RPF and RFE from Rob is excellent and I appreciate his contribution.
?
Thanks,
David Trainor – dave@...
Retired IT guy, now having fun
|
Re: Request for ISPF 2.2 Software
Try going to :
Current version although there will be an update next month all
things willing and any changes made to any current version will
not be affected by any updates.
That said READ the supplied manuals :
TK5-Announcement-Letter.pdf
TK5-Introduction-and-User-Manual.pdf
There are other you should perruse as well.
Vincenf
On 09/01/2025 19:37, Dave Trainor - N8ZFM via groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would like to obtain a copy for my home
usage, of Wally’s ISPF clone, I tried a direct e-mail to
Wally but possibly I have his address wrong, I have not
heard back so am trying here.
?
My reading of the archive of email here
indicates he would like to be the only one that distributes
the software and I wish to respect his wishes.? Maybe this
message will reach him, or someone here can direct me to a
better way to reach out. As quite a few of us here are more
advanced in the journey of life, I hope he is doing well.
?
I am using a Jay Mosley designed MVS 3.8j
system, because I enjoyed the learning of doing it myself
(well – with his expect guidance and instructions) and then
installing all of the applications, myself, rather than
using a pre-generated system like TK4 or 5, which of course
has all of this already.? Sense of accomplishment and all –
as well as educational.? And it has been very educational.
RPF and RFE from Rob is excellent and I appreciate his
contribution.
?
Thanks,
David Trainor – dave@...
Retired IT guy, now having fun
_._,_._,_
|
Request for ISPF 2.2 Software
I would like to obtain a copy for my home usage, of Wally’s ISPF clone, I tried a direct e-mail to Wally but possibly I have his address wrong, I have not heard back so am trying here.
?
My reading of the archive of email here indicates he would like to be the only one that distributes the software and I wish to respect his wishes.? Maybe this message will reach him, or someone here can direct me to a better way to reach
out. As quite a few of us here are more advanced in the journey of life, I hope he is doing well.
?
I am using a Jay Mosley designed MVS 3.8j system, because I enjoyed the learning of doing it myself (well – with his expect guidance and instructions) and then installing all of the applications, myself, rather than using a pre-generated
system like TK4 or 5, which of course has all of this already.? Sense of accomplishment and all – as well as educational.? And it has been very educational. RPF and RFE from Rob is excellent and I appreciate his contribution.
?
Thanks,
David Trainor – dave@...
Retired IT guy, now having fun
_._,_._,_
|
In my case, the second OSA would connect to an entirely different network, on a different Ethernet switch.
How would that be configured?
Regards,
David
|
Jake (zpmain) wrote: Right now I am using the below statement to define one OSA
0400.3 OSA CHPID F0 iface 192.168.1.2 ipaddr 192.168.1.5 netmask 255.255.255.0
If i want second OSA devices defined then how do I code?
Can I just repeat this line with another IP address for
secondary OSA?
What the best way to get second osa device defined for the
hercules? Hi Jake! I'm not sure what you mean by "secondary OSA" (did you mean: "a second OSA?", or "another OSA?"), but yes, that's all you need to do. Just like any other device statement, such as a dasd device (where you repeat the statement but with a different device number and, of course, filename), for OSA, you simply repeat the statement, but with a different device number and, of course, ipaddr: 0404.3 OSA CHPID F0 iface 192.168.1.2 ipaddr 192.168.1.6 netmask 255.255.255.0 Notice the different device number (0404.3 instead of 0400.3) and ipaddr (192.168.1.6 instead of 192.168.1.5). The only caveat is that the iface option -- being which host adapter the emulation is to use -- must remain the same. On my own VM system for example (which works just fine), I have 3 OSA devices defined: 0600.3 OSA chpid F0 iface 192.168.0.107 ipaddr 192.168.0.73 netmask 255.255.0.0 0604.3 OSA chpid F0 iface 192.168.0.107 ipaddr 192.168.1.73 netmask 255.255.0.0 0608.3 OSA chpid F0 iface 192.168.0.107 ipaddr 192.168.2.73 netmask 255.255.0.0 It's that simple! I'm actually quite surprised that the question was even asked! Is there something about our documentation or something else somewhere that was maybe confusing you or causing you to think that maybe it was done differently, thereby compelling you to ask such a question? -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories mail: fish@...
|
Hello
Right now I am using the below statement to define one OSA devices?
0400.3 OSA CHPID F0 iface 192.168.1.2 ipaddr 192.168.1.5 netmask 255.255.255.0
If i want second OSA devices defined then how do I code ? Can I just repeat this line with another IP address for secondary OSA ?
What the best way to get second osa device defined for the hercules ?
Jake?
|
Re: TK4- complaints with IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 02:56 AM, Rob Prins wrote:
This is the official IBM supplied procedure.
?
Does it actually work? I ran the procedure as a regular job under HERC01 and IEBGENER returned RC=12, complaining that SYSUT1 did not have BLKSIZE/LRECL specified. As my SYS1.DUMP00 is (already?) empty, I can't tell for sure if SYS1.DUMP00 was emptied or not. :-/
?
Cheers,
?
Rene FERLAND, Montreal
?
|
Re: TK4- complaints with IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL
and for TK5 you have:
?
?RFEVIEW ?SYS1.PROCLIB(CLRDMP) - 1.00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?COLUMNS 1 72?
?Command ===> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Scroll ===> CSR?
?* **** TOP OF DATA
?====== ?-CAUTION- ?PROFILE NOW SET TO CAPS ON ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?====== ?-CAUTION- ?PROFILE NOW SET TO NUM ?ON ?STD ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?000001 //CLRDMP ? ?PROC ?DUMP=DUMP00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Y02006?
?000002 //DMP ? ? ? EXEC ?PGM=IEBGENER ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Y01980?
?000003 //SYSPRINT ?DD ? ?SYSOUT=A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?000004 //SYSUT2 ? ?DD ? ?DSN=SYS1.&DUMP,DISP=OLD ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Y02006?
?000005 //SYSUT1 ? ?DD ? ?DUMMY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?000006 //SYSIN ? ? DD ? ?DUMMY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Y02006?
?* *** BOTTOM OF DATA ***
?
?
Solution: copy this procedure to SYS1.PROCLIB in TK4-.
This is the official IBM supplied procedure.
?
Cheers,
Rob
|
Re: TK4- complaints with IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL
One other thing of note: An S522 ABEND is *exceedingly* uncommon for anything but a TSO session, where it's issued if the session has?been idle too long. Anywhere else, and it's almost certainly either an operator screwup, or less commonly, a programmer not realizing that he's doing something like trying to share a dataset that a long-running task like INTERCOMM?has allocated?as DISP=OLD.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 7:41?PM Mark A. Stevens via <marXtevens= [email protected]> wrote: On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 05:53 PM, Jay Maynard wrote:
Why's it trying to take an SVC dump on a 522? For that matter, what's NJE38 waiting on for 30 minutes that it takes a 522 in the first place? Got a dataset conflict or something?
Google AI says:
?
The S522 abend is not a typical job time exceeded error, it's a job wait time exceeded. That is to say, the time allocated to wait in an SVC wait state was exceeded.
?
So I looked to see what NJE38 might be waiting on, and apparently I had not uncommented the links between my two MVS systems. I'm guessing it timed out waiting for a device that was never there.
?
[xmas@mvs-01 local]$ cat 03
#
# TCPNJE
#?
#0091 tcpnje 2703 lnode=mvs1 rnode=mvs2 lport=31176 rport=31176 rhost=192.168.122.102
[xmas@mvs-01 local]$?
?
[xmas@mvs-02 local_conf]$ cat tcpnje?
#
# TCPNJE
#?
#0091 tcpnje 2703 lnode=mvsr2 rnode=mvs1 lport=31176 rport=31176 rhost=192.168.122.101
[xmas@mvs-02 local_conf]$?
?
So I'm going to shutdown the two systems, uncomment those, IPL, and then try to fix the dump jobs.
?
Thank you Jay!
?
?... Mark S.
?
|
Re: TK4- complaints with IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 05:41 PM, Mark A. Stevens wrote:
I seem to be having a "similar" problem, at least as far as SYS1.DUMP being full.
?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 09:40 AM, Rob Prins wrote:
For TK4- I get the following:
?
? ? - ? ? ? ? ? S CLRDMP,DUMP=DUMP00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP100 CLRDMP ? ON STCINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? STC ?778 ?IEF452I CLRDMP ? JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR ? ??
? ? - STC ?778 ?$HASP396 CLRDMP ? TERMINATED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP150 CLRDMP ? ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ? 8 LINES
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? IEE122I START COMMAND JCL ERROR ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP250 CLRDMP ? IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $HASP000 OK
?
So this is a TK4- vs. TK5 thing, for those of you just tuning in. For TK4- you have:
?
? ? ?RFEVIEW ?SYS2.PROCLIB(CLEARDMP) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? COLUMNS 1 72?
? ? ?COMMAND ===> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?SCROLL ===> CS
? ? ?* **** TOP OF DATA
? ? ?000001 //CLEARDMP PROC DD=00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ?000002 //EMPTY ? EXEC PGM=IEBGENER ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ?000003 //SYSPRINT DD ?DUMMY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ?000004 //SYSIN ? ?DD ?DUMMY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ?000005 //SYSUT1 ? DD ?DUMMY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ?000006 //SYSUT2 ? DD ?DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.DUMP&DD ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ?* *** BOTTOM OF DATA ***
?
and for TK5 you have:
?
?RFEVIEW ?SYS1.PROCLIB(CLRDMP) - 1.00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?COLUMNS 1 72?
?Command ===> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Scroll ===> CSR?
?* **** TOP OF DATA
?====== ?-CAUTION- ?PROFILE NOW SET TO CAPS ON ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?====== ?-CAUTION- ?PROFILE NOW SET TO NUM ?ON ?STD ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?000001 //CLRDMP ? ?PROC ?DUMP=DUMP00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Y02006?
?000002 //DMP ? ? ? EXEC ?PGM=IEBGENER ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Y01980?
?000003 //SYSPRINT ?DD ? ?SYSOUT=A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?000004 //SYSUT2 ? ?DD ? ?DSN=SYS1.&DUMP,DISP=OLD ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Y02006?
?000005 //SYSUT1 ? ?DD ? ?DUMMY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?000006 //SYSIN ? ? DD ? ?DUMMY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Y02006?
?* *** BOTTOM OF DATA ***
?
Running CLRDMP on TK4- fails because the job isn't there, I did look.
?
?... Mark S.
|
Re: TK4- complaints with IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 05:53 PM, Jay Maynard wrote:
Why's it trying to take an SVC dump on a 522? For that matter, what's NJE38 waiting on for 30 minutes that it takes a 522 in the first place? Got a dataset conflict or something?
Google AI says:
?
The S522 abend is not a typical job time exceeded error, it's a job wait time exceeded. That is to say, the time allocated to wait in an SVC wait state was exceeded.
?
So I looked to see what NJE38 might be waiting on, and apparently I had not uncommented the links between my two MVS systems. I'm guessing it timed out waiting for a device that was never there.
?
[xmas@mvs-01 local]$ cat 03
#
# TCPNJE
#?
#0091 tcpnje 2703 lnode=mvs1 rnode=mvs2 lport=31176 rport=31176 rhost=192.168.122.102
[xmas@mvs-01 local]$?
?
[xmas@mvs-02 local_conf]$ cat tcpnje?
#
# TCPNJE
#?
#0091 tcpnje 2703 lnode=mvsr2 rnode=mvs1 lport=31176 rport=31176 rhost=192.168.122.101
[xmas@mvs-02 local_conf]$?
?
So I'm going to shutdown the two systems, uncomment those, IPL, and then try to fix the dump jobs.
?
Thank you Jay!
?
?... Mark S.
?
|
Re: TK4- complaints with IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL
Why's it trying to take an SVC dump on a 522? For that matter, what's NJE38 waiting on for 30 minutes that it takes a 522 in the first place? Got a dataset conflict or something? Your dump datasets full condition is something?you need to take care of, and you need to look?at the CLRDUMP?and DUMPFULL?procs to see why they're taking JCL errors, but that's not your primary problem.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 5:41?PM Mark A. Stevens via <marXtevens= [email protected]> wrote: I seem to be having a "similar" problem, at least as far as SYS1.DUMP being full.
?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 09:40 AM, Rob Prins wrote:
For TK4- I get the following:
?
? ? - ? ? ? ? ? S CLRDMP,DUMP=DUMP00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP100 CLRDMP ? ON STCINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? STC ?778 ?IEF452I CLRDMP ? JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR ? ??
? ? - STC ?778 ?$HASP396 CLRDMP ? TERMINATED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP150 CLRDMP ? ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ? 8 LINES
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? IEE122I START COMMAND JCL ERROR ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP250 CLRDMP ? IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $HASP000 OK ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?
My log looks like the following. I've not done much of any work on this system other than to leave it up and running "idle" since I started recovering my KVMs from a server crash a while ago. I'm tired, so be kind. I think something happened to NJE38 and it finished filling SYS1.DUMP, so I probably need to go look at a dump to see what happened to NJE38? Trying Rob's suggestion and it not working means I need to go look at CLRDMP and see what is wrong with the JCL.
?
/16.22.48 ? ? ? ? ? LGN001I TSO logon in progress at VTAM terminal CUU0C0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.22.57 TSU ? 68 ?$HASP100 XMAS ? ? ON TSOINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.22.57 TSU ? 68 ?$HASP373 XMAS ? ? STARTED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.23.01 ? ? ? ? ? LGN001I TSO logon in progress at VTAM terminal CUU0C1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.23.11 TSU ? 69 ?$HASP100 HERC01 ? ON TSOINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.23.11 TSU ? 69 ?$HASP373 HERC01 ? STARTED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?NJE38 ? ? LMOD NJEINIT ? ABEND S522 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?PSW ? 00000000 00000000 ?ILC 00 ?INTC 0000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?DATA NEAR PSW ?00000000 ?040C0000 0002E19A 00000000 00000000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 0-3 ? 009BC7B0 ?88522000 ?00000000 ?009BE150 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 4-7 ? 00FE0898 ?009BC070 ?00000000 ?00000522 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 8-11 ?009BC7B0 ?00000000 ?00014058 ?009BC7B0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 12-15 400663F2 ?009BC920 ?500665B6 ?00038CA0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP100 DUMPFULL ON STCINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 *IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL AND NO SVC DUMPS CAN BE TAKEN ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?IEF452I DUMPFULL JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP396 DUMPFULL TERMINATED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP150 DUMPFULL ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ? 8 LINES ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP250 DUMPFULL IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?IEF450I NJE38 NJE38 - ABEND S522 U0000 - TIME=08.21.03 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?$HASP395 NJE38 ? ?ENDED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?$HASP150 NJE38 ? ?ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ?70 LINES ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?$HASP250 NJE38 ? ?IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP100 CLRDMP ? ON STCINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?IEF452I CLRDMP ? JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP396 CLRDMP ? TERMINATED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP150 CLRDMP ? ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ? 8 LINES ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/18.18.03 ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP250 CLRDMP ? IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?
?... Mark S.
|
Re: TK4- complaints with IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL
I seem to be having a "similar" problem, at least as far as SYS1.DUMP being full.
?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 09:40 AM, Rob Prins wrote:
For TK4- I get the following:
?
? ? - ? ? ? ? ? S CLRDMP,DUMP=DUMP00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP100 CLRDMP ? ON STCINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? STC ?778 ?IEF452I CLRDMP ? JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR ? ??
? ? - STC ?778 ?$HASP396 CLRDMP ? TERMINATED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP150 CLRDMP ? ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ? 8 LINES
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? IEE122I START COMMAND JCL ERROR ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ??
? ? ? STC ?778 ?$HASP250 CLRDMP ? IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $HASP000 OK ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?
My log looks like the following. I've not done much of any work on this system other than to leave it up and running "idle" since I started recovering my KVMs from a server crash a while ago. I'm tired, so be kind. I think something happened to NJE38 and it finished filling SYS1.DUMP, so I probably need to go look at a dump to see what happened to NJE38? Trying Rob's suggestion and it not working means I need to go look at CLRDMP and see what is wrong with the JCL.
?
/16.22.48 ? ? ? ? ? LGN001I TSO logon in progress at VTAM terminal CUU0C0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.22.57 TSU ? 68 ?$HASP100 XMAS ? ? ON TSOINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.22.57 TSU ? 68 ?$HASP373 XMAS ? ? STARTED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.23.01 ? ? ? ? ? LGN001I TSO logon in progress at VTAM terminal CUU0C1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.23.11 TSU ? 69 ?$HASP100 HERC01 ? ON TSOINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/16.23.11 TSU ? 69 ?$HASP373 HERC01 ? STARTED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?NJE38 ? ? LMOD NJEINIT ? ABEND S522 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?PSW ? 00000000 00000000 ?ILC 00 ?INTC 0000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?DATA NEAR PSW ?00000000 ?040C0000 0002E19A 00000000 00000000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 0-3 ? 009BC7B0 ?88522000 ?00000000 ?009BE150 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 4-7 ? 00FE0898 ?009BC070 ?00000000 ?00000522 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 8-11 ?009BC7B0 ?00000000 ?00014058 ?009BC7B0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?GR 12-15 400663F2 ?009BC920 ?500665B6 ?00038CA0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP100 DUMPFULL ON STCINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 *IEA994A ALL SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS ARE FULL AND NO SVC DUMPS CAN BE TAKEN ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?IEF452I DUMPFULL JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP396 DUMPFULL TERMINATED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP150 DUMPFULL ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ? 8 LINES ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?777 ?$HASP250 DUMPFULL IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?IEF450I NJE38 NJE38 - ABEND S522 U0000 - TIME=08.21.03 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?$HASP395 NJE38 ? ?ENDED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?$HASP150 NJE38 ? ?ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ?70 LINES ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/08.21.03 ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/08.21.03 STC ?775 ?$HASP250 NJE38 ? ?IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP100 CLRDMP ? ON STCINRDR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?IEF452I CLRDMP ? JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP396 CLRDMP ? TERMINATED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP150 CLRDMP ? ON PRINTER2 ? ? ? ? 8 LINES ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
/18.18.03 ? ? ? ? ? $HASP160 PRINTER2 INACTIVE - CLASS=Z ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
/18.18.03 STC ?778 ?$HASP250 CLRDMP ? IS PURGED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?
?... Mark S.
|
Re: QETH connectivity with z/OS 3.1 on Ubuntu
Hi Ian,
?
Looks like the connectivity is stable now, for the past two days. I shall let you know once I have any issue with all supporting messages.
?
Thank you.
Gaurav.
|
That is very good news. Looking forward to it.
Kind regards Dagfinn
Hi Greg,
?
I have installed 51.5.
This version will be a part of MVS-TK5 Update-4.
HI COBOL works fine.
?
Cheers,
Rob
|
Hi Greg,
?
I have installed 51.5.
This version will be a part of MVS-TK5 Update-4.
HI COBOL works fine.
?
Cheers,
Rob
|
Re: QETH connectivity with z/OS 3.1 on Ubuntu
> "... complaining that Inactive Data device."
?
What was complaining? z/OS? Hercules? Both? What was the message number and text of the complaint, or complaints? Have you referred to the message manual(s)?
|
QETH connectivity with z/OS 3.1 on Ubuntu
Hi,
I am using Hercules 4.8 Development branch on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and Guest OS is z/OS 3.1.
Following configuration works well, however OSA1500 interface gets disconnected in few hours complaining that Inactive Data device. I did implemented fix on MIH as recommended by .
?
Has anyone implemented OSA networking in z/OS 3.1 with Ubuntu, please help.
?
hercules.cnf
1500.3 QETH chpid F0 iface /dev/net/tun ipaddr 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 hwaddr 02-00-00-11-10-04 mtu 1500
?
K2.TCPPARMS(PROFILE) content:
?
IPCONFIG NOCHECKSUMOFFLOAD
INTERFACE OSA1500?
?DEFINE IPAQENET?
?IPADDR 192.168.100.2
?PORTNAME OSAFE?
?INBPERF DYNAMIC?
?PRIROUTER?
;?
PRIMARYINTERFACE OSA1500?
;
BEGINROUTES?
ROUTE 192.168.100.2 ?255.255.255.255 ? = OSA1500 MTU ? ?1492
ROUTE DEFAULT 192.168.100.1 ? ? ? OSA1500 MTU ? ?1492?
ENDROUTES?
;?
START OSA1500?
?
Defined port forwarding on host ubuntu linux with:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 23 -j DNAT --to 192.168.100.2:23
?
|
On 16/12/2024 9:28 pm, Rob Prins via groups.io wrote: Review 51.4 will be a part of MVS Turnkey 5 Update 4.
The release is delayed to February 2025. Hi Rob, Then you should be able to make that 51.5 at that time. :) Review 51.5 includes enhancements to the previously undocumented HI COBOL. Cheers, Greg
|
René Ferland
Rob Prins
Mark A. Stevens