Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
how to limit visibility of archives?
oliviaj_catlady
In my new group here, I see that archives are "visible to anyone." I would like archives to be visible to subscribers only, as I see is the case in at least one other group I belong to. But I can't find the variable in "settings" for this. Where would I find this? Is this perhaps a feature that's available only to upgraded groups? Thanks for any info! Olivia_J |
(I'm clarifying my wording here as an opportunity to demonstrate a feature of groups.io not found in Yahoo Groups: the ability to edit a message that's already posted.)
Olivia, In my new group here, I see that archives are "visible to anyone." IOn the Settings page there's an item named "Privacy". This controls both whether the group is listed in the groups.io directory and whether access to the message archives are public or private (members only). There are two things I don't like about this control. First and foremost is that it is a one-way door: once the group's archives have been made private they cannot be made public again. I have that same complaint against Yahoo Groups, though I understand that many people think that it is a beneficial feature to protect members' privacy. The other is that it controls two different things (directory listing and archive visibility), forcing you to consider and choose between which combination of settings you want. I think combining unlike things together adds to complexity and confusion. Oh, yes, and while we're here: if you want your group to be found in web searches, best to have it listed in the directory. Even better to have the archives in public, but not if that goes against the nature of the group. -- Shal |
oliviaj catlady
Thanks, Shal. Darn. This is a deal-breaker. I absolutely must have the group listed in the directory, but I absolutely can't have the archives be public. DARN.? This would be so simple to change. Can you try to convince Mark?? I personally don't mind the one-way street with private groups staying private, because doing otherwise seems like a broken promise to people who joined when a group was private. But this other thing makes no sense, at least that I can see. I can't see any advantages of it and it seems like a trivial matter to change. Unless I'm missing something... Olivia_J On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote: Olivia, --
Olivia_J On the internet, nobody knows you're a cat |
oliviaj catlady
Shal, I just went there and found the three options. I'm trying to understand this better, because the word "private" seems to mean something different in yahoo from in . Here are the three options (I know you're aware of them, but I'm going to ask you questions to better understand them): 1. listed in directory, publicly viewable archives 2. listed in directory, private archives 3. not listed in directory, private archives. Isn't #2 exactly what I want - listed in directory, but private archives? It seems that "private archives" is not the same as "private group" in the yahoo sense. Here it just means that the old posts are not viewable by non-members. Is that correct? If that's correct, then I'm fine with that option. (In yahoo, a "private group" is a completely different thing.) Here, I just want a restricted group, that's listed in the directory, with private archives.? Olivia_J On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:28 PM, oliviaj catlady <oliviajcatlady@...> wrote:
--
Olivia_J On the internet, nobody knows you're a cat |
Olivia,
Darn. This is a deal-breaker. I absolutely must have the group listed inAs you've already discovered, that setting is available in the drop-list. I realize now that my description implied otherwise (that both must be public or neither). Sorry for the confusion. -- Shal |
Olivia,
1. listed in directory, publicly viewable archivesYes it is. I didn't mean to imply that setting isn't available. Yet now reading what I wrote I see I needed to be clearer. It seems that "private archives" is not the same as "private group" inCorrect. -- Shal |
oliviaj catlady
Big sigh of relief! Thanks, Shal! Olivia_J On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote: Olivia, --
Olivia_J On the internet, nobody knows you're a cat |
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 Shal Farley wrote:
Quoting Olivia:>>It seems that "private archives" is not the same as "private group" in the yahoo sense. Here it just means that the old posts are not viewable by non-members. Is that correct?<< Shal wrote:>>Correct.<< Sorry to be replying to a December post, but don't you mean ALL posts are not viewable by non-members? Not just old ones? Trying to sort this one out. Brenda |
Brenda,
Quoting Olivia:>>It seems that "private archives" is not the same asYou are correct. A better choice of words might have been "archived posts" or "the messages archive". -- Shal |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss