开云体育

Chris,

That reads suspiciously like "why don't you (i.e. me!) write
something", which is fair enough; I don't much like "somebody /else/
should do something" attitudes myself!

Glad you understand. Since this is an all-volunteer effort the more people I can convince to volunteer some effort the better the result can be.

One snag I can see is that if this case is typical the member
concerned did not see the message that had been spuriously marked as
spam, and it is not impossible that the deletion notification was also
shunted into his spam box.

That's an unfortunate problem. I'm not sure what 开云体育 can do about it (other than encourage people not to use such email services).

开云体育 /knows/ that it is not originating spam, so why is it
allowing others (e.g. aol) to determine that it is?

"Allowing"? The member's email service makes that determination on its own - 开云体育 would love to be able to persuade them otherwise.

From my perspective (which I have to accept is less than complete) a
simple solution is to break the feedback loop and for 开云体育 to
ignore others marking messages as spam.

There seems to be an implied stick to the FBL contract: unsubscribe this user or we (the email service) will dump more/all email messages from your list service into our users' Spam folders. Or outright reject them. Doubtless it isn't as black and white as that. I more suspect that compliance is simply fed in as another factor in the email system's Spam/Ham discriminator function.

Unfortunately Mark's perspective is less than complete as well. I'm not too surprised - I can understand why email services might be wary about revealing details of how they determine which messages are spam.


(email)

Shal


--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list