Gentlepersons involved,
It is sad that an event created by a person (a moderator or owner), using an unusual and unintended way, modifying with authorisation or not (the account email) of a 'member' has created their own issue with which they disagree vehemently.
I see no reason for BUA using these groups to be 'manage their account for them' as that is in itself a form of privacy breach [ie you don't own the people/ members, not their personal information] - yet have total control over that entity. Exceptional circumstances, yes a backdoor required, but not otherwise.
Creating a solution may be easy- however creating the problem was even easier- an unintended use of private accounts.
Should the feature be anonymised as requested/ demanded, then other problems will likely occur.
It is perfectly appropriate for 'traceable' assets to be shown when such changes are made.
Would you accept this as 'the norm' for any society, business or other venture, beyond 'admins' with license to modify?
Respectfully,
davew
