¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Fenbendazole


 

Rahel,

You are falling into the trap of thinking all omega-6s are bad!? They are crucial in the oxygen transport in the mitochondria--not omega-3. If you study Budwig's works, she is equally bullish on the omega-6, linoleic acid along with the omega-3, linolenic acid! In fact they both work synergistically. The bad omega-6s are the ones processed by the food industry to lengthen storage life. They are the ones that are hydrogenated by industry and they will NOT easily allow for oxygen transport once incorporated into the mitochondrial membrane.

I would like to also stress here that there is a very good reason why the inner membrane of the Mitochondria has very little of the triple bond Omega-3 Linolenic acid in it as compared to the double-bonded Omega-6 Linoleic acid. From reading much of Dr. Budwig's writings, she seemed to think the triple bond of Linolenic acid was even more important in oxygen uptake than the double-bonded Linoleic acid, though she knew both were extremely important. This is really quite wrong! If you study biology, you know that the Goldilocks Principle is very evident throughout. There are certain conditions that are most hospitable for life. Too much of something or too little of something will have disastrous effects on a healthy organism. This principle applies to the PUFAs as well. The more complex the bonds of the PUFAs, the more reactive they are to oxygen and the more likely they oxidize becoming rancid. The Omega-6 Linoleic acid with its two double-bonds has just enough attraction for oxygen where its electrons can latch onto oxygen in the mitochondria's inner-membrane and act as a reversible carrier. The omega-3, triple-bonded Linolenic acid would prove too reactive for this task as would even the higher 5 & 6 double-bonds seen in fish oil's EPA and DHA which is why we see neither in any substantial volumes in the mitochondria!? In commercial retail, fish oil and flax oil are a lot more likely to go rancid than the Omega-6 Linoleic acid oils. Same is true in the mitochondria. Just the right oxygen reactivity is all important with this task of carrying oxygen from outside the mitochondria membrane to the inner structure where it can produce ATP. If the Omega-3 Linolenic acid was the prime PUFA in the mitochondria, it would be more likely to suffer rancidity on contact with oxygen resulting in no reversible qualities which are so needed for oxygen uptake and diffusion. There would be irreversibly auto-oxidization when reversibility is a must.

Chem Phys Lipids. 2015 Apr;187:50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Cardiolipin linoleic acid content and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase activity are associated in rat skeletal muscle.

Abstract

Cardiolipin (CL) is an inner-mitochondrial membrane phospholipid that is important for optimal mitochondrial function. Specifically, Cardiolipin and the Cardiolipin's linoleic content are known to be positively associated with cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity. However, this association has not been examined in skeletal muscle. In this study, rats were fed high-fat diets with a naturally occurring gradient in linoleic acid:? coconut oil? 5.8%; flaxseed oil 13.2%; safflower oil 75.1%) in an attempt to alter both mitochondrial Cardiolipin linoleic composition and COX activity in rat mixed hind-limb muscle. In general, mitochondrial membrane lipid composition was fairly resistant to dietary treatments as only modest changes in fatty acid composition were detected in Cardiolipin and other major mitochondrial phospholipids. As a result of this resistance, Cardiolipin content was not different between the dietary groups. Consistent with the lack of changes in Cardiolipin content, mitochondrial activity was also not different between the dietary groups. However, correlational analysis using data obtained from rats across the dietary groups showed a significant relationship. suggesting that Cardiolipin content may positively influence mitochondrial activity thereby making this lipid molecule a potential factor related to mitochondrial health and function in skeletal muscle.

doug

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:14 AM Rod Holmgren via <s4sindus=[email protected]> wrote:

I don't want to paste the whole article, but here is an excerpt from the FAQ's on BP from HCN site



¡°There really is no good substitute for dairy products in the Budwig Diet. ... the flaxoil/cottage cheese mixture changes the two components into a different food which is easier to tolerate. (As one person reports: ¡®For many years I have been unable to tolerate dairy but have no problem with flaxoil/cottage cheese¡¯). I guess we should believe Dr. Budwig when she says that she has never had a patient who couldn't tolerate quark (cottage cheese) as part of her Oil-Protein Diet.¡±

I would suggest to bookmark the whole FAQ page there as it answers many of the questions asked here.

Best wishes, Rod in MN/USA

On Thursday, April 14, 2022, 10:22:20 AM CDT, donegoing2002@... via <donegoing2002=[email protected]> wrote:


I have a question for all. In a book by Dr. Greger, he says, " Researchers found that cow's milk stimulated the growth of human prostate cancer cells in each of fourteen separate experiments, producing an average increase in cancer growth rate of more than 30%. In contrast, almond milk suppressed the growth of cancer cells by more than 30%.? I'm wondering if there could be a better substance to use with the flaxseed oil other than cottage cheese or quark with the Budwig protocol that would be non-dairy??? ? ?On the use of Fenbendazole if it prevents the uptake of glucose into cancer cells, wouldn't it also prevent the uptake of glucose into healthy cells too, and cause weakness or fatigue? Thanks, Duane

On Wednesday, April 13, 2022, 10:21:00 PM MDT, Rahel Warshaw-Dadon <joy.forward@...> wrote:


Shalom,
There have been some interesting discussions, here, about??as an alternative treatment for cancer.

Here, on the Budwig Forum, I suggest that it is important to mention the possible connection between the Budwig Protocol and Treatment by??.???is a drug given to patients suffering from parasites.? This drug interferes with glucose transport into the cells.? Without glucose, the parasites die.? As we know, without glucose, cancer cells cannot survive.? Thus, taking??causes both parasites and cancer cells to die from lack of nutrition.??

Cancer cells have membranes that are rich in omega-6 oils, causing easy transport of glucose, and not allowing oxygen transport into the cell.? The result of following the Budwig Protocol is that cancer cells cannot reproduce because there is not enough omega-6 oil to build the cancer cell membrane.? Normal, healthy cells, that?burn oxygen, have membranes that are rich in omega-3.? That is the reason that the BP is based on flaxseed oil, in which the ratio of omega-6 oils to omega-3 oils is 1::4 (unlike corn oil, for example, in which the ration of omega-6 oils to omega-3 oils?is about 46::1).? Thus, a protocol based on?Fenbendazole might successfully reduce the cancer cell population, but would not offer the building blocks for continued health. Moreover, the die-off from rapidly?degraded cancer cells can be difficult for the body to process:? sometimes faster is not always better.

Here, we know that the BP will lead to health.??

I can imagine that?Fenbendazole might offer a quick fix.? I do not imagine that it will bring one to good health.? It is possible that a combination of these two protocols, a?Fenbendazole Protocol and prolonged use of the Budwig Protocol, might be an answer.

There is a Facebook group called "".? I find the group posts a bit difficult, because, I believe, the moderators are simply not knowledgeable?enough to guide the discussions.? Nevertheless, there is interesting information.? It is important to note that some of the members of that group have mentioned research papers about the possible dangers of high doses of?Fenbendazole, and of following instructions found on social media, rather than on a more serious forum, like this one.??

There is a lot about?Fenbendazole that is NOT yet known.
Be careful.

with good wishes,
Rahel
Jerusalem

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.