Your reading comprehension sucks, Emily.? Go back and read my
original post.
On 2/17/21 5:00 PM, Emily Mae via
groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:41 PM, Emily Mae wrote:
It was a scientific report commissioned by the
Pentagon just as climate change research was commissioned by
the Pentagon.? Climate change research was not an altruistic
effort to save life on the planet but where to put military
bases.
That said, the polar ice caps are melting at an astounding
rate, much faster than predicted.? The human race is clearly
due for a correction.? ?
Most likely extinction.
Do you ever read the articles you post? Page 1 of the report
says the following:
The purpose of this report is to imagine the
unthinkable ¨C to push the boundaries of current research
on climate change so we may better understand the potential
implications on United States national security. We have
interviewed leading climate change scientists, conducted
additional research, and reviewed several iterations of
the scenario with these experts.
The scientists support this project, but caution that
the scenario depicted is extreme in two fundamental ways.
First, they suggest the occurrences we outline would most
likely happen in a few regions, rather than on globally.
Second, they say the magnitude of the event may be
considerably smaller. We have created a climate change
scenario that although not the most likely, is plausible, and
would challenge United States national security in ways that
should be considered immediately.?
Secondly, why do you say it was secret?? It was written in 2003
and approved for public release (see the form attached to Page
1).? It looks like it was commissioned by the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory Pasadena, CA, not the Pentagon.? Maybe you mean the
larger report?? This is just an Appendix.?
It contains nothing that would guide the location of military
bases and interestingly what was imagined for 2020 hasn't
occurred. Interesting though. These are the goals of the report:
This scenario poses new challenges for the United States, and
suggests several steps to be taken: ? Improve predictive climate
models to allow investigation of a wider range of scenarios and
to anticipate how and where changes could occur ? Assemble
comprehensive predictive models of the potential impacts of
abrupt climate change to improve projections of how climate
could influence food, water, and energy ? Create vulnerability
metrics to anticipate which countries are most vulnerable to
climate change and therefore, could contribute materially to an
increasingly disorderly and potentially violent world. Abrupt
Climate Change 2 ? Identify no-regrets strategies such as
enhancing capabilities for water management ? Rehearse adaptive
responses ? Explore local implications ? Explore geo-engineering
options that control the climate
?
--
Em