Thanks Jim,
We're getting close to being on the
same page. But where are the the financial records that are
available for everyone to see? You are absolutely right, squeakily
wheels can be a huge annoyance!
I think it's very clear that everyone
in Fairfield Estates would prefer having cluster mailboxes as
opposed to going to the post office. That's a major point. I can
not imagine how the Road District was ever established since it
has been such a ordeal just to find a site for mailboxes. But the
Road District is a major asset to our community and property
value.? Let's all work together it improve the Fairfield Estates.?
Best wishes,
Ken
On 4/15/2021 9:19 PM, Jim Ruby wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ken, the financial records are available for everyone to see.
The Board sets the budget, the county approves it, and issues a
check book, that they refer to as warrants, that require two
signatures, and they keep the records. We have never written
more than 5 checks maybe 6 in the past several years. Paying for
things like property taxes, mail box rent, and liability
insurance.?
Our problem with the county in obtaining monthly
statements has been their attempt to automate the system and
having us go on line to view them. I liked it better when they
just mailed it!
We have more work to do in regards to the county
and how they do collections, that will be a topic for the budget
meeting for FY 21/22.
Do not pay the attorney it has already been arranged and he
should have the check by now. I did see the letter he had
drafted to the school board at your request. That prompted me
to comment that we shouldn¡¯t pay the attorney for ?things we
can do ourselves!
In some cases the squeaky wheel does get the grease, in
other cases, it¡¯s an annoyance and you just get a new wheel.?
Thank you for your support to stay on as president, but
truthfully I really don¡¯t want the job. I only stayed on this
past year because I was asked to due so, because of my
longevity and experience. I made it my mission to protect the
District from the first President continually committing us to
projects that had nothing to do with Fairfield Roads. He was
such an analytical type, and spent our money like it was his
own.?
I¡¯m glad you have the VDO agreement in writing, I can¡¯t
wait to read it as check the signatures. I guess it¡¯s a good
thing you discovered it, other wise we would never have the
opportunity to fulfill the obligation.
?A 30x50 area for mailboxes in my estimation may not be
realistic but that too will be a topic at the next meeting. ?I
still believe the PSB will be respective to us using a small
area considering ?our district is so small and only grown by
two houses in the past 5 or more years.?
Working together is a must, we all have an investment
in this goal. You attract more flys with honey than salt.
We need to sell this in order to make it happen. Jimmy
made a good solid contact.... now let him work on
achieving the goal....Please?
Jim
On Apr 15, 2021, at 6:42 PM, Ken
Cameron via groups.io <rocks@...>
wrote:
?
Jim,
Thank you for your comments. I
understand that as President, you want to withhold
comments on many of my emails. And I understand
that I do send a lot of emails, but frankly,
sometimes a wheel needs to be squeaky to get any
action.
Below I address your specific
questions and comment that are in quotes.
¡°During the last meeting, it
was decided that site #1 (the best site) would be
investigated until it had been determined it was
unusable.¡±?
I don¡¯t recall a decision at
the meeting that site #1 was the best site. Nor
did Jimmy mention that decision in his email a
week after the meeting when he listed the two
reasons that he and you thought site #1 was the
best option.
¡°We just received a statement
from the attorney for $200 for just talking to you
the first time. I expect we will receive another
bill for the letter of intent you requested him
write to the Ellers and School Board without first
discussing this with the board.¡±
I don¡¯t recall requesting him
to write the letter. I was certainly in favor of
him doing it and he may have written them in
anticipation that they would be sent. But I don¡¯t
want to quibble. I will contact his office
tomorrow and pay the bill myself.
¡°In regards to your meeting
with the VDO?President Lynn¡¡. Again, I ask, did
you see any such agreement in writing?¡±
Yes and a copy is attached. See
page 4, third bullet point. ??
¡°Why may I ask are you so
focused with whether there is or is not an
easement bordering the school property for
Site#1?¡±
As I¡¯ve said ad nauseam, there
are big differences in what rights we have in an
easement (some rights) as opposed to private
property beyond the easement (no rights.) I was
focused on the easement because Jimmy said our
request was to install the mailboxes in the
easement that doesn¡¯t exist. Our request should be
clear that the boxes need to be installed on the
private property, not on the easement.
¡°Do we have the exact
dimensions or requirements signed off by the
Postmaster?¡±
I¡¯ve never seen a requirement
for exact dimensions for parking, and just from
looking at cluster mailbox installations, I doubt
there are any. Obviously, the site must be large
enough to be safe. I think the site should be
large enough to make U-turns on to the road, and
parking space for two or three cars. My guess is
about 30¡¯x50¡¯, but the Board and all interested
residents should decide.
¡°When he is able to survey our
District for the 4th time, rest assured that he
will have all the current legal documents to go
on. I am curious as to why you?feel the need to
speak to him personally, and would like to know
your intentions prior to his arrival, especially
if it concerns the district.¡±
We don¡¯t need to have the
district survey for the 4th time! Maybe
that¡¯s what causing the delay. I only want to
speak to him personally because they may have maps
that show the location of the property line. Then
we won¡¯t need them to come out at all and save
some money. My questions are extremely simple.
Where is the property line in two small areas?
¡°Your personal timeline doesn't
matter as much as doing the right thing concerning
the District does.¡±
I completely agree, but taking
more than eight months from last September to
simply site the mailboxes?does seems unnecessarily
long too me.
In closing, Jim, I think you
have the personality for a great President, and I
greatly appreciate your reviving the Road
District. I do believe that we need financial
transparently, and I haven¡¯t seen that since
September when I joined the Board. I would like to
see a financial report, have an outside audit of
the books, and know how my tax dollars are going
to be spent. Those are pretty normal expectations
for an organization like this. If that information
is available at the last meeting of the year, then
I would like the privilege of nominating you for
President again, I¡¯ll vote for you with both
hands, and I¡¯ll buy you a bottle or two of your
favorite drink. You will deserve it! Let¡¯s work
together.
Best wishes,
Ken
On 4/15/2021 2:12 PM, Jim
Ruby wrote:
Ken,
We are
a?board with members. We were formed to
represent the will of the property owners in
regards to the "Roads".? During the last
meeting, it was decided that site #1 (the
best site) would be investigated until it
had been determined it was unusable. I do
not understand why you consider this site a
"long shot", ?and I respectfully disagree!?
it appears to me that you are following your
own agenda.? ?I will openly admit that I am
troubled by some of your?actions.? We just
received a statement from the attorney for
$200 for just talking to you the first time.
I expect we will receive another bill for
the letter of intent you requested him write
to the Ellers and School Board without first
discussing this with the board. FYI, I sent
an email to the attorney instructing that
any requests of any kind regarding legal
matters will come from the Board,?not any
single individual.??
In
regards to your meeting with the
VDO?President Lynn, I had a meeting with
Ross Miller, the former President of
FRMID?and discussed the agreement with VDO
that you mentioned in a previous email, that
we possibly overlooked. Since we were both
present during the paving of Fairfield,
neither of us were aware of any such
agreement to pave the unused chained off
exit from Palisades. Again I ask, did you
see any such agreement in writing??
?Hopefully you did not commit the district
to fulfill such a request without discussing
and presenting facts to the board.
Why
may I ask are you so focused with whether
there is or is not an easement bordering the
school property for Site#1?? We have never
approached the school board and asked them
to consider allowing us to place mail boxes
on a small portion of their property prior
to now. If we obtain permission, and I have
confidence that we will, we do not need to
pursue?any other actions. In my experience
the school board will need to see drawings
showing exact dimensions of the area we are
requesting to use. Do we have the exact
dimensions or requirements signed off by the
Postmaster??
On a
personal note, I feel the need to remind you
that this is Cochise County, Arizona and we
are currently in the middle of an inflated
economy. Everyone that has anything to do
with home services, home improvement,
construction or land development etc. (which
includes our surveyor) are extremely busy.
There are shortages on products and
materials as well as prices escalating at
unimaginal rates. ?
I
spoke to the?surveyor yesterday, he
apologized and said he will do the best he
can considering his current?backlog of work.
He is unable to predict just when he will be
able to get out to Fairfield but hopes it
might be within the next two weeks. When he
is able to survey our District for the 4th
time, rest assured that he will have all the
current legal documents to go on. I am
curious as to why you?feel the need to speak
to him personally, and would like to know
your intentions prior to his arrival,
especially if it concerns the district.
In
closing, I want to make it known that I
personally have not chimed in on your
continuous emails for a reason.? As the
Board President, I would like to remain
politically correct and feel it's better
that I say nothing than to add my personal
input which might be considered rather
negative.
Your
personal timeline doesn't matter as much as
doing the right thing concerning the
District does.?
It is
apparent?that you disagree with the way the
district is being managed, then I suggest
you plan to?attend the last meeting of the
year and elect a new board.?
I¡¯ve been working on
finding a site for the mailboxes since
the Board Meeting last September.?
On September 17, 2020, I sent the
Chair of the 3 Canyons Master Design
Committee a ¡°heads-up¡± email about our
plans to install mailboxes. There was
little progress in the fall because I
was waiting for a Board meeting to be
called to discuss the mailboxes. The
meeting in March was the first since
September.
I must admit that I¡¯m
a little frustrated with the slow pace
of progress, especially the past few
months. Frankly, I feel it has been me,
who has wanted to explore all the
potential sites simultaneously, against
the Road District that focused solely on
site #1 east, which I¡¯ve always thought
was a very long shot.
Why is the Road
District so set on site #1 east? This is
what Jimmy said in his email of March
21.
¡°We think #1 is the
best option for these reasons.
1. The mailboxes would be located on the
east side of the road which is
convenient.?
2. The pull out is on private property.
If we lose access to the pull out, where
will we park?¡±?
That¡¯s it. Why have
the other potential sites, #3 west and
#1 west, been ignored?
As I¡¯ve said numerous
times, I have no favorite site. I just
want to have mailboxes. At least three
factors need to be considered in
evaluating potential sites: legality,
spaciousness, and convenience, with
legality by far the most important. ?Legality
involves contacting the property owners
and spaciousness involves knowing the
location of the property line.
They surveyors were
originally scheduled to come out in
early February, but they haven¡¯t been
here yet. They haven¡¯t been given the
priority that they deserve. We don¡¯t
need much information. Only the location
of the property line at site #1 west and
site #3 west.
I request
authorization from Jim to contact the
surveyors ASAP and to meet with them
when they are here.
We also need to
contact the property owners of site #3
west.?
I request
authorization from Jim to contact the
property owners of site #3 west. I
believe that he has their contact
information.
Unfortunately, we¡¯re
not going to make my goal of having
mailboxes installed before Sharon and I
leave for the summer at the end of May.
(I didn¡¯t expect it to take eight months
just to find a site along Fairfield
Cir!) Nevertheless, I will continue
putting my best effort into the project,
and hopefully someone will take over
when we leave.
Ken
<2011-01-20 Deed (VDO to Fairfield).pdf>
|