¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
  1. FairfieldEstatesMailBoxes
  2. Messages
Single Messages Topics Expanded

Re: Last call for responses

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thank you Karen for your question.

I assume that you are referring to near the intersection of Fairfield and 3 Canyons.? That is potential site #1 referred to in previous emails. The Road District attorney, Nathan Williams, looked at the easement documents for both that site and #3 and concluded that legally we have a much better case for installing the mailboxes on the easement of site #3 than #1.? This is because the easement for site #1 is just the usual broad easement for "ingress/egress and utilities" and is not a specific agreement between the Road District and the property owner, the Palominas School District.? In contrast, the easement agreement for site #3 is specifically between the Road District and the previous landowner and gives the Road District much more latitude as what we can do in the easement.

Personally I see other advantages to site #3 over #1 such as it's much more spacious than what we would have at site #1.?

Ken


On 3/10/2021 6:46 PM, Karen McKnight wrote:

I was just wandering why the mailboxes couldn't be placed at the beginning of the street by the entrance, where there are no homes and traffic would be to a minimum ?

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:34 PM Ken Cameron via <rocks=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,

I'm sure you're getting really tired of getting emails from me, but I
would like to get as many responses as possible regarding the proposed
location of the mailboxes. Of the 17 homeowners on the email lists, so
far 12 have responded with a thumbs up and none with a thumbs down.? If
you haven't responded, please do so by midnight tonight.

Thanks,

Ken
Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.