Ken,
I for one greatly appreciate your efforts to work the mail boxes. That being said I do believe we are having elections at our next meeting. As far as I can tell there has not been money spent by the board that would warrant this stance against them. I do believe the only money spent was not by the board. I also understand you want this done as soon as possible as do I, but I feel your approach may not be helping the situation. Are you trying to say we need to have an immediate election? Where are you going with this effort??
Matthew Paddock
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 20, 2021, at 08:54, Ken Cameron via groups.io <rocks@...> wrote:
?
First, I want to thank the board for their willingness to
serve, and Jim in particular for reviving the Road District. I¡¯m
perfectly
happy for this board to continue to serve.
But this is the situation. Jim and
Jimmy control the purse strings because they are the ones who sign
the checks.
However, this board has not been elected by the taxpayers, and
consequently this
board has no legal power to decide how the taxpayers¡¯ money should
be spent. Until
a legitimate board is elected by the taxpayers, all financial
decisions should
be made by a vote of the taxpayers and not by the board.
Does anyone disagree??
Should I discuss the legality of our situation with Kim
Lemons, Clerk of the Board?
Ken
