Re: Request assistance with FT-857D set up
On 01/02/2021 09:24 am, CT2GLA wrote:
Hello Stu.
Please allow me to clarify some aspects that are
not correct and may cause several problems.?
The negative should always be fused... Always.??
Correct. And don't use the vehicle chassis
etc for the negative -- you want a "clean" low resistance
connection from the power to radio.? (unless your car has a
postive earth.? I don't think there are many of those still
around)
Both cables should have a fuse as near as
possible of the radio. NO !? Both power
wires should go straight to the battery (or power supply at
home)? Especially In a vehicle, the fuse should be as near
to the battery as possible so that any short in the
wiring between battery and radio will be protected and you
will not have a melt-down in the cable.? Most mobile radios
you buy will normally have only ONE fuse in the positive
lead as supplied.
In case of a short inside of the radio that
"close" the? circuit by the negative the unit will be
protected by the fuse, and not as an direct cable without
protection.? Not sure I understand this
one.? A short (or high current problem inside the radio)
will go through your thick (red power cable and blow the
fuse at the battery
Both cables should have a direct connection from
the battery to the radio and we should avoid picking it from
split sources.? Correct -- avoid sharing the
same power wires with anything else
We always should have the radio off when we
start the car to avoid drop of voltage and spike of currents.
"good practice" correct and that's usually
the case, but I probably do it occasionally and never had a
problem.
Also the problem of the miss connection of
positive and negative is because of the fact that the radio
does not have a protection against inverse polarity neither
increase of voltage. Once again, probably
correct,? but I wouldn't guarantee that I've never done it
in the 10 years I've had it.? The on/off circuitry probably
shields the rest of the radio if you make a mistake (but
don't rely on that !
There is a small mod that adds a diod and a
zenner to solve this problem, you can even install it outside
of the radio, in a parallel connection from the white plug.? I've not heard of this on the 857, but back in
my early days this was often done when we used "ex-buiness"
surplus radios re-tuned to the ham bands, which were usually
not reverse supply protected.? But you had to use a very low
forward resistance diode or you lost over a volt in power to
the radio.? Remember that your diode, (and zener) have to be
rated at least 20 Amps on full power FM.?
Another note on fuses -- I've noticed several
cases when people have lost voltage displayed on the screen, or
even had intermittent complete loss of power.? This is often
caused by a fuse or fuse-holder that is corroded slightly.?
first thing to do is to clean or change the fuse.? Ifr that
doesn't work check the fuse holder.
Stu
If you need some further details please let me
know.?
73
Rui
A segunda, 1/02/2021,
08:28, Stu Nutt < stunutt@...>
escreveu:
First of all, I think you mis-typed the radio model
below -- I don't think Yaesu ever made an "837" ?
I've been using an 857 for about 10 years
(with various antennas), but not had the Radiowave
that you mentioned.
Overall. the radio is pretty indestructible as long
as you take a few fairly normal radio precautions.
- ?Don't get the positive and negative power
connections the wrong way round? !? The radio is
fused, but if the fuse in the positive (red) wire
doesn't blow, I believe there is an internal
fuse soldered into the rig which could be a
nightmare to replace.
- If you decide to use it mobile, don't rely
on the antenna ground for the negative connection,
and don't fuse the negative (black) battery
connection as in certain fault situations the
current from the car electrics could be routed
through the radio -- the starter motor can draw over
100 amps!
- Antenna -- As I said, I have no experience of the
Pathfinder MKI antenna, but it is an end-fed
antenna, which normally would have a high impedance
on all frequencies except when its length is a
half-wave (or multiple of).? Radiowave will have a
system included for matching it to other ham bands.?
There are a number of ways of doing thus and I don't
know which one they use.? However, I have seen
reports that it does not work so well on the
80m (called 75m in USA I believe) and 160m bands.?
In the case of the 857, it is protected from antenna
mis-match (which can destroy the transmitter output
stage) by automatically reducing the transmitter
power and protecting it.? However, the 857
specification says that it can be operated at up to
1.5 to 1 SWR, but I've found that mine seems to drop
the output from about 1.25 to 1.
An SWR meter is always a thing to have with
transmitters, and you can buy one for a few tens of
dollars.? Having an SWR meter in the? transmitter
output will allow you to see a fault that occurs in
the antenna or feeder cable, and save you from
calling away for a contact because the fault has
caused your radio to drop power and nobody can hear
you.? If you find that the SWR isn't good enough on
the lower bands (and the antenna and feeder seem to
be okay) you'll need to buy an "antenna tuner",
rated for 100 watts or more, to "match" the antenna
system to your radio.
?Good luck with your experience on the ham bands and
with the 857.? If you ever hear a signal coming from
G3OCR in England, please give me a shout and let me
know how you are doing ?
Regards,? Stu
On 01/02/2021 02:18 am, Adoni Poledicha via
wrote:
Greetings to all,
I got my hands on a FT-357D and I am very concern
with making sure I properly get it power up, and
running without damaging it in the process.
Although I am a licensed ham radio operator, my
experiences are limited to military type radios from
HF and up... and have had a long break from the
career and operations.
This FT-357D is completely new to me, and
considering how great of a radio it is, and
irreplaceable, considering it is no longer
manufactured and difficult to obtain parts, it is
critical that I get the process spot on into setting
it up and correctly powering it up.
I have in mind of setting it up as a desk top
radio and have obtain a Yaesu DC Power supply model
FP-1023, and a LDG YT-100 tuner.
For an antenna, I obtained a Pathfinder MKI power
500w SSB 100w CW by RadioWavz.
Anyone with experience that can assist me in the
process of my efforts to getting this rig up on the
air, will be greatly appreciated by me.
If there are any resources someplace else for me
to look into, that would be of help to.?
Thank you,?
Look forward to your feedback.
All the best,
Adoni
KG5WHC
Sent from mobile device
?
Perhaps we 8X7 owners should order a
new chip, we may just exhaust the world's
supply!!
John
VE7KKQ
This is very hand to know.
Thanks for telling us.?
Hey
group,
Thought I'd share my experience fixing
my 857. (Probably 15 years old, always
used inside)
In the past year or so whenever I
turned on the 857 it would not come
back to the way I powered it down.
Typically I would have it in Memory
mode (not VFO) and scanning VHF/UHF
programmed channels.
When I power it on it would almost
always come up to a VFO random
frequency and be scanning up or down
the freq.
About every 10-20 times on power up it
would come up with the display
contrast dark, with big digits and
when I switched to Memory mode and
tried to transmit I would get a TX
ERROR.
In this mode I always had to reflash
the program from Chirp.
I watched a few youtube videos and
found that likely it was the EEPROM
memory chip had gone bad.
So I ordered one off digikey. The part
is Q1066 on the schematic and it is a
24LC128T-I/SN
Pay attention to the package size I/SN
NOT I/SM
It was an easy swap if you are ok with
SMT
Reloaded the program from Chirp and it
has not failed since.
cheers
Dwight
|
Re: Request assistance with FT-857D set up
Hello Stu.
Please allow me to clarify some aspects that are not correct and may cause several problems.?
The negative should always be fused... Always.?
Both cables should have a fuse as near as possible of the radio.?
In case of a short inside of the radio that "close" the? circuit by the negative the unit will be protected by the fuse, and not as an direct cable without protection.?
Both cables should have a direct connection from the battery to the radio and we should avoid picking it from split sources.?
We always should have the radio off when we start the car to avoid drop of voltage and spike of currents.?
Also the problem of the miss connection of positive and negative is because of the fact that the radio does not have a protection against inverse polarity neither increase of voltage.?
There is a small mod that adds a diod and a zenner to solve this problem, you can even install it outside of the radio, in a parallel connection from the white plug.?
If you need some further details please let me know.?
73
Rui A segunda, 1/02/2021, 08:28, Stu Nutt < stunutt@...> escreveu:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
First of all, I think you mis-typed the radio model below -- I
don't think Yaesu ever made an "837" ?
I've been using an 857 for about 10 years (with various
antennas), but not had the Radiowave that you mentioned.
Overall. the radio is pretty indestructible as long as you take a
few fairly normal radio precautions.
- ?Don't get the positive and negative power connections the
wrong way round? !? The radio is fused, but if the fuse in the
positive (red) wire doesn't blow, I believe there is an internal
fuse soldered into the rig which could be a nightmare to
replace.
- If you decide to use it mobile, don't rely on the
antenna ground for the negative connection, and don't fuse the
negative (black) battery connection as in certain fault
situations the current from the car electrics could be routed
through the radio -- the starter motor can draw over 100 amps!
- Antenna -- As I said, I have no experience of the Pathfinder
MKI antenna, but it is an end-fed antenna, which normally would
have a high impedance on all frequencies except when its length
is a half-wave (or multiple of).? Radiowave will have a system
included for matching it to other ham bands.? There are a number
of ways of doing thus and I don't know which one they use.? However,
I have seen reports that it does not work so well on the
80m (called 75m in USA I believe) and 160m bands.? In the case
of the 857, it is protected from antenna mis-match (which can
destroy the transmitter output stage) by automatically reducing
the transmitter power and protecting it.? However, the 857
specification says that it can be operated at up to 1.5 to 1
SWR, but I've found that mine seems to drop the output from
about 1.25 to 1.
An SWR meter is always a thing to have with transmitters, and
you can buy one for a few tens of dollars.? Having an SWR meter
in the? transmitter output will allow you to see a fault that
occurs in the antenna or feeder cable, and save you from calling
away for a contact because the fault has caused your radio to
drop power and nobody can hear you.? If you find that the SWR
isn't good enough on the lower bands (and the antenna and feeder
seem to be okay) you'll need to buy an "antenna tuner", rated
for 100 watts or more, to "match" the antenna system to your
radio.
?Good luck with your experience on the ham bands and with the
857.? If you ever hear a signal coming from G3OCR in England,
please give me a shout and let me know how you are doing ?
Regards,? Stu
On 01/02/2021 02:18 am, Adoni Poledicha
via wrote:
Greetings to all,
I got my hands on a FT-357D and I am very concern with making
sure I properly get it power up, and running without damaging it
in the process.
Although I am a licensed ham radio operator, my experiences
are limited to military type radios from HF and up... and have
had a long break from the career and operations.
This FT-357D is completely new to me, and considering how
great of a radio it is, and irreplaceable, considering it is no
longer manufactured and difficult to obtain parts, it is
critical that I get the process spot on into setting it up and
correctly powering it up.
I have in mind of setting it up as a desk top radio and have
obtain a Yaesu DC Power supply model FP-1023, and a LDG YT-100
tuner.
For an antenna, I obtained a Pathfinder MKI power 500w SSB
100w CW by RadioWavz.
Anyone with experience that can assist me in the process of
my efforts to getting this rig up on the air, will be greatly
appreciated by me.
If there are any resources someplace else for me to look
into, that would be of help to.?
Thank you,?
Look forward to your feedback.
All the best,
Adoni
KG5WHC
Sent from mobile device
?
Perhaps we 8X7 owners should order a new chip, we
may just exhaust the world's supply!!
John
VE7KKQ
This is very hand to know. Thanks for
telling us.?
Hey group,
Thought I'd share my experience fixing my 857.
(Probably 15 years old, always used inside)
In the past year or so whenever I turned on the
857 it would not come back to the way I powered it
down.
Typically I would have it in Memory mode (not VFO)
and scanning VHF/UHF programmed channels.
When I power it on it would almost always come up
to a VFO random frequency and be scanning up or
down the freq.
About every 10-20 times on power up it would come
up with the display contrast dark, with big digits
and when I switched to Memory mode and tried to
transmit I would get a TX ERROR.
In this mode I always had to reflash the program
from Chirp.
I watched a few youtube videos and found that
likely it was the EEPROM memory chip had gone bad.
So I ordered one off digikey. The part is Q1066 on
the schematic and it is a 24LC128T-I/SN
Pay attention to the package size I/SN NOT
I/SM
It was an easy swap if you are ok with SMT
Reloaded the program from Chirp and it has not
failed since.
cheers
Dwight
|
Re: Request assistance with FT-857D set up
First of all, I think you mis-typed the radio model below -- I
don't think Yaesu ever made an "837" ?
I've been using an 857 for about 10 years (with various
antennas), but not had the Radiowave that you mentioned.
Overall. the radio is pretty indestructible as long as you take a
few fairly normal radio precautions.
- ?Don't get the positive and negative power connections the
wrong way round? !? The radio is fused, but if the fuse in the
positive (red) wire doesn't blow, I believe there is an internal
fuse soldered into the rig which could be a nightmare to
replace.
- If you decide to use it mobile, don't rely on the
antenna ground for the negative connection, and don't fuse the
negative (black) battery connection as in certain fault
situations the current from the car electrics could be routed
through the radio -- the starter motor can draw over 100 amps!
- Antenna -- As I said, I have no experience of the Pathfinder
MKI antenna, but it is an end-fed antenna, which normally would
have a high impedance on all frequencies except when its length
is a half-wave (or multiple of).? Radiowave will have a system
included for matching it to other ham bands.? There are a number
of ways of doing thus and I don't know which one they use.? However,
I have seen reports that it does not work so well on the
80m (called 75m in USA I believe) and 160m bands.? In the case
of the 857, it is protected from antenna mis-match (which can
destroy the transmitter output stage) by automatically reducing
the transmitter power and protecting it.? However, the 857
specification says that it can be operated at up to 1.5 to 1
SWR, but I've found that mine seems to drop the output from
about 1.25 to 1.
An SWR meter is always a thing to have with transmitters, and
you can buy one for a few tens of dollars.? Having an SWR meter
in the? transmitter output will allow you to see a fault that
occurs in the antenna or feeder cable, and save you from calling
away for a contact because the fault has caused your radio to
drop power and nobody can hear you.? If you find that the SWR
isn't good enough on the lower bands (and the antenna and feeder
seem to be okay) you'll need to buy an "antenna tuner", rated
for 100 watts or more, to "match" the antenna system to your
radio.
?Good luck with your experience on the ham bands and with the
857.? If you ever hear a signal coming from G3OCR in England,
please give me a shout and let me know how you are doing ?
Regards,? Stu
On 01/02/2021 02:18 am, Adoni Poledicha
via groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Greetings to all,
I got my hands on a FT-357D and I am very concern with making
sure I properly get it power up, and running without damaging it
in the process.
Although I am a licensed ham radio operator, my experiences
are limited to military type radios from HF and up... and have
had a long break from the career and operations.
This FT-357D is completely new to me, and considering how
great of a radio it is, and irreplaceable, considering it is no
longer manufactured and difficult to obtain parts, it is
critical that I get the process spot on into setting it up and
correctly powering it up.
I have in mind of setting it up as a desk top radio and have
obtain a Yaesu DC Power supply model FP-1023, and a LDG YT-100
tuner.
For an antenna, I obtained a Pathfinder MKI power 500w SSB
100w CW by RadioWavz.
Anyone with experience that can assist me in the process of
my efforts to getting this rig up on the air, will be greatly
appreciated by me.
If there are any resources someplace else for me to look
into, that would be of help to.?
Thank you,?
Look forward to your feedback.
All the best,
Adoni
KG5WHC
Sent from mobile device
?
Perhaps we 8X7 owners should order a new chip, we
may just exhaust the world's supply!!
John
VE7KKQ
This is very hand to know. Thanks for
telling us.?
Hey group,
Thought I'd share my experience fixing my 857.
(Probably 15 years old, always used inside)
In the past year or so whenever I turned on the
857 it would not come back to the way I powered it
down.
Typically I would have it in Memory mode (not VFO)
and scanning VHF/UHF programmed channels.
When I power it on it would almost always come up
to a VFO random frequency and be scanning up or
down the freq.
About every 10-20 times on power up it would come
up with the display contrast dark, with big digits
and when I switched to Memory mode and tried to
transmit I would get a TX ERROR.
In this mode I always had to reflash the program
from Chirp.
I watched a few youtube videos and found that
likely it was the EEPROM memory chip had gone bad.
So I ordered one off digikey. The part is Q1066 on
the schematic and it is a 24LC128T-I/SN
Pay attention to the package size I/SN NOT
I/SM
It was an easy swap if you are ok with SMT
Reloaded the program from Chirp and it has not
failed since.
cheers
Dwight
|
Nice recovery Tony.
I'm surprised with all the chatter about the 857 and 897, thought all the points and questions were long time put to bed, new blood I guess, good to see the younger crowd getting interested.
Stay safe Tony, perhaps when I get my station set up we can have a chat.
John VE7KKQ Campbell River
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 7:44 PM Tony VA7TF, VE7ACF < 20junk20@...> wrote: Ok, ? I¡¯ll clear up my first submission. ? If I recall, the first FT-857¡¯s, the DSP module was an option, but within a year or 2, it was included in the FT-857¡¯s as standard sales. ? I bought my ¡°857¡± in 2003 already in production a few years in, with the DSP module included and no longer as an option, it had become standard in the ¡°857¡± and at that time, without the 60 meter channels in the memory location (60m not available yet in Canada or USA). ? Later, the ¡°D¡± model came out with the DSP included, and then 60 meter channels in the memory location. ? I still have the original 2003 shipping box without the ¡°D¡± on it as FT-857. But my later 2017 ¡°D¡± model does have the ¡°D¡± included in the model number on the box as FT-857D. But on both radios, production of 14 years apart, both only have FT-857 on them, no ¡°D¡± in the later model year. Weird huh? ? And yes, there was a Japanese version of lower power ? I should have made myself a little clearer. lol ? ? --------------- Regards, ? Tony VA7TF ? ? Sorry Tony, you are not quite correct, not an option, the difference is the 857 came on to the market first, followed a year or two later by the 857D, once the "D" version was available, the non-D version was no longer produced. You are correct however about the difference between the two. Another thing that reared its head in the USA was that the 857 version aimed at the Japanese market managed to make its way into the US market, it had a maximum power out of 25Watts, this unit was marketed to the Japanese Novice hams as they had/have a power cap of 25 Watts. ? On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:09 AM Tony VA7TF, VE7ACF <20junk20@...> wrote: ? ? The ¡°D¡± model comes with the DSP module as a standard feature. The non ¡°D¡± was an option in the early sales stage. Also, the ¡°D¡± model comes with the 60 meter ¡°channels¡± in the memory location. ? Same ?TX power levels on all bands. ? ? --------------- Regards, ? Tony VA7TF ? ? as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of the 857D and has all the same features. ? David Lang ? On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote: ? > Hello, > I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in > a new box. > So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version > has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference... > Waiting for help, > Pirx ? ? ? ? ? --
+++++++++++++++
Tony VA7TF? VE7ACF
-- +++++++++++++++ Tony VA7TF? VE7ACF
|
Request assistance with FT-857D set up
Greetings to all,
I got my hands on a FT-357D and I am very concern with making sure I properly get it power up, and running without damaging it in the process.
Although I am a licensed ham radio operator, my experiences are limited to military type radios from HF and up... and have had a long break from the career and operations.
This FT-357D is completely new to me, and considering how great of a radio it is, and irreplaceable, considering it is no longer manufactured and difficult to obtain parts, it is critical that I get the process spot on into setting it up and correctly powering it up.
I have in mind of setting it up as a desk top radio and have obtain a Yaesu DC Power supply model FP-1023, and a LDG YT-100 tuner.
For an antenna, I obtained a Pathfinder MKI power 500w SSB 100w CW by RadioWavz.
Anyone with experience that can assist me in the process of my efforts to getting this rig up on the air, will be greatly appreciated by me.
If there are any resources someplace else for me to look into, that would be of help to.?
Thank you,?
Look forward to your feedback. All the best, Adoni KG5WHC
Sent from mobile device
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jan 31, 2021, at 7:25 PM, John <ve3kkqve3kkq@...> wrote:
? Perhaps we 8X7 owners should order a new chip, we may just exhaust the world's supply!!
John VE7KKQ
This is very hand to know. Thanks for telling us.?
Hey group, Thought I'd share my experience fixing my 857. (Probably 15 years old, always used inside) In the past year or so whenever I turned on the 857 it would not come back to the way I powered it down. Typically I would have it in Memory mode (not VFO) and scanning VHF/UHF programmed channels. When I power it on it would almost always come up to a VFO random frequency and be scanning up or down the freq. About every 10-20 times on power up it would come up with the display contrast dark, with big digits and when I switched to Memory mode and tried to transmit I would get a TX ERROR. In this mode I always had to reflash the program from Chirp.
I watched a few youtube videos and found that likely it was the EEPROM memory chip had gone bad. So I ordered one off digikey. The part is Q1066 on the schematic and it is a 24LC128T-I/SN Pay attention to the package size I/SN NOT I/SM It was an easy swap if you are ok with SMT
Reloaded the program from Chirp and it has not failed since.
cheers Dwight
|
What are you using as a Faraday container for your 857?
73, Sam-W5KF
|
Ok, ? I¡¯ll clear up my first submission. ? If I recall, the first FT-857¡¯s, the DSP module was an option, but within a year or 2, it was included in the FT-857¡¯s as standard sales. ? I bought my ¡°857¡± in 2003 already in production a few years in, with the DSP module included and no longer as an option, it had become standard in the ¡°857¡± and at that time, without the 60 meter channels in the memory location (60m not available yet in Canada or USA). ? Later, the ¡°D¡± model came out with the DSP included, and then 60 meter channels in the memory location. ? I still have the original 2003 shipping box without the ¡°D¡± on it as FT-857. But my later 2017 ¡°D¡± model does have the ¡°D¡± included in the model number on the box as FT-857D. But on both radios, production of 14 years apart, both only have FT-857 on them, no ¡°D¡± in the later model year. Weird huh? ? And yes, there was a Japanese version of lower power ? I should have made myself a little clearer. lol ? ? --------------- Regards, ? Tony VA7TF ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: JohnSent: January 31, 2021 2:54 PM To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [FT-857] 857 vs 857D ? Sorry Tony, you are not quite correct, not an option, the difference is the 857 came on to the market first, followed a year or two later by the 857D, once the "D" version was available, the non-D version was no longer produced. You are correct however about the difference between the two. Another thing that reared its head in the USA was that the 857 version aimed at the Japanese market managed to make its way into the US market, it had a maximum power out of 25Watts, this unit was marketed to the Japanese Novice hams as they had/have a power cap of 25 Watts. ? On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:09 AM Tony VA7TF, VE7ACF <20junk20@...> wrote: ? ? The ¡°D¡± model comes with the DSP module as a standard feature. The non ¡°D¡± was an option in the early sales stage. Also, the ¡°D¡± model comes with the 60 meter ¡°channels¡± in the memory location. ? Same ?TX power levels on all bands. ? ? --------------- Regards, ? Tony VA7TF ? ? as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of the 857D and has all the same features. ? David Lang ? On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote: ? > Hello, > I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in > a new box. > So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version > has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference... > Waiting for help, > Pirx ? ? ? ? ? --
+++++++++++++++
Tony VA7TF? VE7ACF
-- +++++++++++++++ Tony VA7TF? VE7ACF
|
Re: 857 boots up in weird mode FIXED!
Perhaps we 8X7 owners should order a new chip, we may just exhaust the world's supply!!
John VE7KKQ
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
This is very hand to know. Thanks for telling us.?
Hey group, Thought I'd share my experience fixing my 857. (Probably 15 years old, always used inside) In the past year or so whenever I turned on the 857 it would not come back to the way I powered it down. Typically I would have it in Memory mode (not VFO) and scanning VHF/UHF programmed channels. When I power it on it would almost always come up to a VFO random frequency and be scanning up or down the freq. About every 10-20 times on power up it would come up with the display contrast dark, with big digits and when I switched to Memory mode and tried to transmit I would get a TX ERROR. In this mode I always had to reflash the program from Chirp.
I watched a few youtube videos and found that likely it was the EEPROM memory chip had gone bad. So I ordered one off digikey. The part is Q1066 on the schematic and it is a 24LC128T-I/SN Pay attention to the package size I/SN NOT I/SM It was an easy swap if you are ok with SMT
Reloaded the program from Chirp and it has not failed since.
cheers Dwight
|
Re: 857 boots up in weird mode FIXED!
This is very hand to know. Thanks for telling us.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hey group, Thought I'd share my experience fixing my 857. (Probably 15 years old, always used inside) In the past year or so whenever I turned on the 857 it would not come back to the way I powered it down. Typically I would have it in Memory mode (not VFO) and scanning VHF/UHF programmed channels. When I power it on it would almost always come up to a VFO random frequency and be scanning up or down the freq. About every 10-20 times on power up it would come up with the display contrast dark, with big digits and when I switched to Memory mode and tried to transmit I would get a TX ERROR. In this mode I always had to reflash the program from Chirp.
I watched a few youtube videos and found that likely it was the EEPROM memory chip had gone bad. So I ordered one off digikey. The part is Q1066 on the schematic and it is a 24LC128T-I/SN Pay attention to the package size I/SN NOT I/SM It was an easy swap if you are ok with SMT
Reloaded the program from Chirp and it has not failed since.
cheers Dwight
|
Sorry Tony, you are not quite correct, not an option, the difference is the 857 came on to the market first, followed a year or two later by the 857D, once the "D" version was available, the non-D version was no longer produced. You are correct however about the difference between the two.
Another thing that reared its head in the USA was that the 857 version aimed at the Japanese market managed to make its way into the US market, it had a maximum power out of 25Watts, this unit was marketed to the Japanese Novice hams as they had/have a power cap of 25 Watts.
John VE7KKQ
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:09 AM Tony VA7TF, VE7ACF < 20junk20@...> wrote: ? ? The ¡°D¡± model comes with the DSP module as a standard feature. The non ¡°D¡± was an option in the early sales stage. Also, the ¡°D¡± model comes with the 60 meter ¡°channels¡± in the memory location. ? Same ?TX power levels on all bands. ? ? --------------- Regards, ? Tony VA7TF ? ? as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of the 857D and has all the same features. ? David Lang ? On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote: ? > Hello, > I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in > a new box. > So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version > has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference... > Waiting for help, > Pirx ? ? ? ? ? --
+++++++++++++++
Tony VA7TF? VE7ACF
|
The only difference between the 857 and 897 other than the casing is the 897 has the ability to house a battery for portable ops, circuitry between the two is identical save for the battery circuitry. Same electronic specs, same menu structure, same accessories, same max and min power outputs. The 897 power output drops when fitted with the internal battery, the infamous "brown wire" is used to sense battery power which decreases the maximum power out for both rigs (857 & 897).
In fact, this may add confusion, the 897 and 857 circuitry are the high power version of the 817 except for some differences, the finals for the 817 are the drivers in the 857 and 897.
John VE7KKQ 817 and 857 owner
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 9:57 AM david lang < david@...> wrote: as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of
the 857D and has all the same features.
David Lang
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote:
> Hello,
> I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in
> a new box.
> So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version
> has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference...
> Waiting for help,
> Pirx
|
I got my FT-857 mid 2000. The only places it hasn't been operated is maritime mobile (which will not happen) and portable, which I intend to take care of this summer. I have the IR 2.4KHz filter and have considered the TXCO module and may still install one as I may try FT8 from a picnic table. My unit was mostly mobile with the ATAS-120 which I ditched the included whip for a Larson Kool Rod VHF whip, I lost UHF but that is of no interest to me.I have never had any issues from the rig (touch wood) mostly OP problems, the manual soon sorts that out. I think the FT-101 series may have lasted longer than the FT-857. If a new ham is looking to get one of these rigs, do not modify it in any way and if you want the MARS mod done, get someone knowledgeable to assist you. Other than the filter, I have not touched the inside of my 857, I've no need to, it has provided many hours of enjoyment and as long as I can press the buttons, it will stay with me, also in the shack are an 817 and a FTdx3K. The 857 is a decent all-round rig, marginal for contesting, great for rag chewing and not too bad at DX'ing. It is my longest owned radio ever.
John VE7KKQ
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 8:00 AM Philip Salley < pcsalley@...> wrote: The FT-857 series is an amazing rig on a saga proportioned marathon run. It may have been in production longer than any amateur radio transceiver in history, and still going.? Believe it was first introduced about 2001.? I recall a QST review in Nov 2003 of the new "D" model.? One of the distinctions of the non-D model was the ability to do the MARS/CAP modification by the "hidden" menu.? That changed with the "D" model.? My personal FT-857D was among the earliest of the "Ds," has performed flawlessly for over 16 years both mobile (for many years) and in base station with not a single hitch.? Today the panel display has one single pixel wide vatical streak - that's all.? ?It has been MARS modified, added TCXO, YF-122S, YF-122C filters, and replaced the power cord connector with PowerPole.? Brown wire disabled.? Amazing receiver for its time, and operated full break-in CW like a champ.??It joined me in retirement, now resides in a faraday container tucked away just in case.? I take it out every few months for a wake up, and leave on power supply for a day or so then back to storage.? ?Don't mobile anymore, and base station is now an FT-991.? Phil / K4PO
|
857 boots up in weird mode FIXED!
Hey group, Thought I'd share my experience fixing my 857. (Probably 15 years old, always used inside) In the past year or so whenever I turned on the 857 it would not come back to the way I powered it down. Typically I would have it in Memory mode (not VFO) and scanning VHF/UHF programmed channels. When I power it on it would almost always come up to a VFO random frequency and be scanning up or down the freq. About every 10-20 times on power up it would come up with the display contrast dark, with big digits and when I switched to Memory mode and tried to transmit I would get a TX ERROR. In this mode I always had to reflash the program from Chirp.
I watched a few youtube videos and found that likely it was the EEPROM memory chip had gone bad. So I ordered one off digikey. The part is Q1066 on the schematic and it is a 24LC128T-I/SN Pay attention to the package size I/SN NOT I/SM It was an easy swap if you are ok with SMT
Reloaded the program from Chirp and it has not failed since.
cheers Dwight
|
Thanks for your help! Pirx
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
There was an FT-897D.? The FT-897D?is the same as the mobile/portable FT-857D, but has the TCXO-9 high stability oscillator installed.? The TCXO-9 oscillator was an option for the original FT-897.? The TCXO-9 was not included in either the FT-857 or FT-857D, but is available as an optional plug in board.
73, Larry
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:57 AM david lang < david@...> wrote: as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of
the 857D and has all the same features.
David Lang
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote:
> Hello,
> I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in
> a new box.
> So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version
> has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference...
> Waiting for help,
> Pirx
|
Re: MH-59 add tick when transmitting audio
Tnx Tony for the link. I'll investigate further here.
Les: I already did this by using a separate power supply and shutting down all other equipment. I have all my equipment connected to 230V and 12V power supplies. the system here is not directly connected to the house mains as I use an isolation transformer and a dedicated radio ground. The additional clamp on ferrite didn't have any effect unfortunately.
Getting complex now....
|
Did this install of a Yaesu FT-857D on a 2005 Jeep Rubicon Unlimited (long-wheelbase TJ) a ways back. Thought I¡¯d share in case anybody needs some ideas for a project.
I mounted the display/controls/mic on upper the windshield panel. The main unit is in the center console where the subwoofer used to be. The antenna is a Yaesu ATAS-100 on a Teraflex taillight bracket.
Ignition noise through the antenna was initially excessive on the received audio - well-known issue for this vehicle. Had to strap several body panels and several points in the exhaust together to quiet it down to bearable. I have a choke for the coax but have not installed yet.
Antenna tunes up with very low SWR anywhere between 7-30MHz and the full 6m band. SWR on 2m is not quite as good but usable. 70cm is not usable due to high SWR. Not a priority so haven't sorted it out yet but we are pushing the frequency for PL-259/SO-239 connectors.
  
|
There was an FT-897D.? The FT-897D?is the same as the mobile/portable FT-857D, but has the TCXO-9 high stability oscillator installed.? The TCXO-9 oscillator was an option for the original FT-897.? The TCXO-9 was not included in either the FT-857 or FT-857D, but is available as an optional plug in board.
73, Larry
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:57 AM david lang < david@...> wrote: as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of
the 857D and has all the same features.
David Lang
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote:
> Hello,
> I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in
> a new box.
> So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version
> has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference...
> Waiting for help,
> Pirx
|
? ? The ¡°D¡± model comes with the DSP module as a standard feature. The non ¡°D¡± was an option in the early sales stage. Also, the ¡°D¡± model comes with the 60 meter ¡°channels¡± in the memory location. ? Same ?TX power levels on all bands. ? ? --------------- Regards, ? Tony VA7TF ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: david langSent: January 31, 2021 9:57 AM To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [FT-857] 857 vs 857D ? as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of the 857D and has all the same features. ? David Lang ? On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote: ? > Hello, > I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in > a new box. > So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version > has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference... > Waiting for help, > Pirx ? ? ? ? ? -- +++++++++++++++ Tony VA7TF? VE7ACF
|
as I understand it, there is no 897D, the plain 897 is a lower power version of the 857D and has all the same features.
David Lang
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Peter wrote: Hello, I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in a new box. So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference... Waiting for help, Pirx
|
Hello, I do not have a FT-857 but as I understand my FT-897 is the same machine in a new box. So my question is: Do I have FT-897 or FT-897D? I was told the D version has no "D" letter on its face so it is not easy to see the difference...
Waiting for help, Pirx
|