Sorry for the slow response, Janine. I have been traveling! The biographies are written by a member of the cousin group who sends it to the project for review and posting. My co-admin and I just review the biographies for format and comment on any glaring inconsistencies or errors.
That being said, the owner of kit #188665 has not granted access to his kit to the project administrators, so I cannot take a look at his matches, but I can see that he matches kit #13589 to 66/67 markers by looking at the owner of that kit. The owner of kit #188665 has only taken a 67 marker test, so it cannot be explained by a more refined test, for instance Big Y testing, which would identify the Terminal SNP of the line.?
While the haplogroup for all (?) of the descendants of Job Daniel is I-M253, the haplogroup for kit# 188665 (I-L338) is in the same tree, meaning descended from I-M253, but is a much more recent mutation. The I-M253? mutation occurred about 28,000 years ago. There have been at least a dozen mutations between I-M253 and I-L338.
What immediately stands out to me, looking at the matches of kit#13589, is that he has a number of very close matches to numerous different surnames who are haplogroups I-M253 and I-L338. What I think is going on is that all of these men share a common ancestor who lived around 28,000 years ago but are not all closely related in a genealogically meaningful time frame. It may just be a coincidence that the owner of kit #188665 shares a surname with the the line of Job Daniel.
That is just my first thought from what I see, but I just got home and? have only been looking at these results for about 10 minutes. I need to take care of some things here, first, but I will take a closer look at all of the kits that I can see, tomorrow. I will also send a request to the owner of kit #188665 to grant me a bit more access, so that I can see what his results look like.
Best,
Kevin
Kevin Daniel