Re: D&H Heritage Unit
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý
Ray,
From what I understand, there were some component roads that had a heritage scheme designed, but not implemented. This was the case for the New Haven and likely the L&HR. When you look at the portions of those systems that actually were in service under
NS, it made sense. The only portion of the NH that NS operated was the very small segment from Campbell Hall to just outside of Maybrook...maybe 6 miles.? L&HR operated by NS was also extremely short, maybe 20 miles. They couldn't paint an engine for every
component road they had, and it makes sense that smaller roads weren't done.?
Jim Rowland
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Raymond Wetzel via Groups.Io <sevenspringss1@...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 11:51 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DandH-Railroad] D&H Heritage Unit ?
For that matter, the question remains as to why NS never painted up a heritage unit for the Lehigh & Hudson River Rwy,
which of course they took over from Warwick to Maybrook, cut back to the new Hudson Jct (between East Hall and Burnside), but I've never read nor heard anyone ever mention this. Ray -----Original Message----- From: Bill><> <madog@...> To: DandH io <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Jan 22, 2020 10:52 am Subject: [DandH-Railroad] D&H Heritage Unit Does anyone know why NS did not paint up a heritage unit since they took over the old A&S seems fitting?
?
Bill><>
?
2015? the old signal mast at 480, would also like to know why the rear headlight is on 6752?
?
|