开云体育

I'm not making a case against having high end separates or?debating sound quality - I completely believe that high-end separates will always perform better than a receiver., and if you have the space and the time to dedicate to enjoying it, and no urge for a simpler setup, then great!

Let me describe it this way. I have a hall closet completely?consumed by audio equipment. I need a? professional 6' rolling audio rack to stack and fit three amps?+?multiple shelves for a turntable, a CD player, a tuner, a receiver (needed for surround speakers), a modem, a router, TWO more whole home audio amps....WHEW!!?

So my thinking is a "higher-end" receiver would simplify things, gain me MUCH more space and add more technology/options to the system (wi-fi, faster HDMI, LAN connection) that vintage gear lacks. And storing all?those CD's is a PITA. A NAS with my music collection as uncompressed Flac files running via PLEX seems like a nice alternative. A new AV receiver with all kinds of connectivity (wiFi, LAN, etc.) plenty of power for the DQ-10's seems a good?approach. I feel like ease of use and increase in functionality outweighs a slight step-down in audio quality.

So I'd like to hear how people have integrated a NAS into their systems. BTW - I am keeping the DQ-10's, DQLP1 and subs.