Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Open Source Sorftware is in Crisis
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýhttps://spectrum.ieee.org/open-source-crisis ? When he was leading the WSJT-X development team, now SK Bill G4WJS complained on several occasions that the hostile forks of WSJT-X were costing his team significant time and energy. That's why there's no supported interoperation between DXLab and "hostile forks" of WSJT-X. |
A "hostile fork" is any branch that fails to follow the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the limitations of the original developer and which is not merged back into the primary development map. <> In other words, any branch of a software development that stands in opposition to the original/authorized line of development. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-01-20 5:31 AM, Salvatore Besso via groups.io wrote:
hello, |
After this post, I uninstalled WSJT-X "Improved" and went back to WSJT-X.? I find that I can hardly operate it!? I have some learning to do -- but perhaps I've done the right thing. Happy New Year, Dave.? Thanks for all your hard work and especially your willingness to answer questions and in general help others. Vy 7 3 Earl / KD5XB DM84 e e
Sent with secure email.
On Sunday, January 19th, 2025 at 3:28 PM, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýWSJT-X Improved is not a hostile fork. ?It is written by Uwe DG2YCB who is also on the development team for WSJT-X.On Jan 20, 2025, at 10:34 AM, Earl Needham via <kd5xb@...> wrote: After this post, I uninstalled WSJT-X "Improved" and went back to WSJT-X.? I find that I can hardly operate it!? I have some learning to do -- but perhaps I've done the right thing. Happy New Year, Dave.? Thanks for all your hard work and especially your willingness to answer questions and in general help others. Vy 7 3 Earl / KD5XB DM84 e e
Sent with secure email.
On Sunday, January 19th, 2025 at 3:28 PM, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:
|
Well cool then!? I'll go back. I guess I should stick to stuff I know -- if I can ever find out what that is... Thanks, Earl / KD5XB e e
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, January 20th, 2025 at 9:49 AM, Bruce - K5WBM via groups.io <bruce.mclain@...> wrote: WSJT-X Improved is not a hostile fork. ?It is written by Uwe DG2YCB who is also on the development team for WSJT-X. |
On 2025-01-20 11:34 AM, Earl Needham via groups.io wrote:
After this post, I uninstalled WSJT-X "Improved" and went back to WSJT-X. I find that I can hardly operate it!WSJTX Improved (a.k.a wsjtx-devel) is hardly a "hostile fork". The developer of WSJTX Improved is a member of the primary WSJTX development team and wsjtx-devel is his "test bed" for items that may be merged into the main development branch in a future release. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-01-20 11:34 AM, Earl Needham via groups.io wrote: After this post, I uninstalled WSJT-X "Improved" and went back to WSJT-X. I find that I can hardly operate it! I have some learning to do -- but perhaps I've done the right thing. |
I guess I am confused.? How does something that someone?else is working on, cost them time and energy? Thanks 73On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 2:28?PM Dave AA6YQ via <aa6yq=[email protected]> wrote:
|
+ AA6YQ comments belo-w
+ At minimum,
1. protocol compatibility 2. issues raised by users not understanding which "variant" they are running
3. questions from 3rd party developers like me ? ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ |