Re: Q65C upload refused by Eqsl
So I have to upload the QSO mode = MFSK submode = Q65? Or mode = Q65 73, Aart PA3C
By
aart wedemeijer PA3C
·
#223032
·
|
Re: Q65C upload refused by Eqsl
+ AA6YQ comments below + The ADIF specification does not define Q65C as a valid mode or submode: http://adif.org.uk/ADIF_Current#Mode_Enumeration http://adif.org.uk/ADIF_Current#Submode_Enumeration
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#223031
·
|
Q65C upload refused by Eqsl
I tried to upload qso's with mode Q65C to Eqsl. But they were refused. Any tips, or is Eqsl not up to date with (not-so-new) new modes? Something with mode/submode but could not find in the wiki how
By
aart wedemeijer PA3C
·
#223030
·
|
Re: Commander - Disable interrogation doesn¡¯t ¡°stick¡±
+ AA6YQ comments below + Does the IC-705 have a dual CI-V bus interface?
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#223029
·
|
Re: Commander - Disable interrogation doesn¡¯t ¡°stick¡±
All I can say it that using the supplied Icom commands from the respective Radio¡¯s manuals is that it works, and it has for me for several years. And that the approach for PW1 collision isolation
By
Dave w6de
·
#223028
·
|
Re: Commander - Disable interrogation doesnt ¡°stick¡±
If that's the case, why don't you connect PG/TG to the MK II Aux CI-V output? The Aux CIV is isolated and emulates the Icom "Transceive" data with no collisions. Use MK II to the transceiver's CI-V
By
Joe Subich, W4TV
·
#223027
·
|
Re: Commander - Disable interrogation doesn¡¯t ¡°stick¡±
+ AA6YQ comments below + I suspect that you are correct, Dave, but I have asked Icom several times for a statement from Icom Japan confirming that Icom radios with two CI-V bus ports behave in this
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#223026
·
|
Re: Commander - Disable interrogation doesn¡¯t ¡°stick¡±
Your Icom 7610 can handle this problem for you. In Menu1 select ¡°Connectors¡±, in connectors select ¡°CI-V¡±, then in ¡°CI-V Port¡± select Unlink from [REMOTE]. While there in ¡°CI-V port¡±
By
Dave w6de
·
#223025
·
|
Re: Commander - Disable interrogation doesnt ¡°stick¡±
+ AA6YQ comments below + It's not a question of "hardening", it's a question of correcting an egregious defect caused by failing to fully implement the CI-V specification. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#223024
·
|
Re: Commander - Disable interrogation doesnt ¡°stick¡±
Hi Dave/Joe, apologies for the delayed response, fathers day/holiday got in the way. My comments #### below
By
bob-w9zv
·
#223023
·
|
Re: Pathfinder Hiccup
Not at all there was a change at my operating system, hint with TSQL.exef is now working also here, seems to be a timing problem before tnx 73 Alex, OE3JTB
By
Alex OE3JTB
·
#223022
·
|
Re: Economical way to control a Yaesu G-450ADC with DXView?
Probably not. The original G450A used an *AC* motor the G800DXA and G1000DXA are DC motors. There was a late G450ADC (with no change in markings) with a DC motor but most G450s that you will find are
By
Joe Subich, W4TV
·
#223021
·
|
Re: DXKeeper - abbreviated times
Thaks Dave, the corrected version cures this issue. 73 Dave G3YMC
By
Dave Sergeant G3YMC
·
#223020
·
|
Re: Economical way to control a Yaesu G-450ADC with DXView?
I just installed an easy rotor control module in mine and I have been very pleased. EASY-ROTOR-CONTROL vibroplex.com Bruce - K5WBM
By
Bruce - K5WBM
·
#223019
·
|
Re: Economical way to control a Yaesu G-450ADC with DXView?
Does anyone know if the G450A rotator will work with a G1000DXA or G800DXA control boxes? We have had good success connecting the Arduino based NV1Q controller to the DIN port on the G1000DXA and into
By
VE6KK
·
#223018
·
|
Re: E-Mail Alert Notification Issue
You need to set it up on the gmail side to allow it. https://support.google.com/a/answer/9003945?hl=en Mine sends messages to my call phone SMS gateway via gmail. 73 -Jim NU0C "J.A. Wolf via
By
Jim Shorney
·
#223017
·
|
Re: DXKeeper and LOTW
+ AA6YQ comment below + The new information in this update is that LoTW is working (but still not accessible). 73, Dave, AA6YQ
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#223016
·
|
Re: DXKeeper and LOTW
Thanks!! Thank you for your assistance in this matter, Chris Vince¡ªAJ8Q ________________________________ Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 8:21 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re:
By
Chris--AJ8Q
·
#223015
·
|
Re: DXKeeper and LOTW
Chris, Here's a link to the latest info from ARRL on the disruption. There is no information as to when LoTW will be available again. https://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-systems-service-disruption Robie
By
Robie - AJ4F
·
#223014
·
|
Re: E-Mail Alert Notification Issue
Jeff, You may want to check out HamAlert. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By
KA9JAC
·
#223013
·
|