Dave Many thanks for quick answer. (As usual ...) It works, but no 60m in the stats. Another question : Should it be possible to have a 60m column in DxView ? It should be great. Many thanks 73 de F5PHW Phil envoyé : 2 mai 2025 à 09:26
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
de : Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...>
à : [email protected]
objet : Re: [DXLab] Statistics
+ AA6YQ comments below We are on the air with TM56REF. We are few operators using differents software for logging. Each evening, they send me their adif logs. I merge them into a general log with all operators's log. I would like to know if there is a way to have statistics with DxLabs ? How many QSO per bands, per modes ... ?
+ Click the "QSL Stats" button along the bottom of the Main window's "Check Progress" tab. The first two columns of the resulting report analyze your logged QSOs by band and mode with absolute counts and percentages, e.g.
+ The remaining the columns in this report analyze QSLing performance via Club Log, eQSL, LoTW, and QRZ.
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
+ AA6YQ comments below
We are on the air with TM56REF.
We are few operators using differents software for logging.
Each evening, they send me their adif logs. I merge them into a general log with all operators's log.
I would like to know if there is a way to have statistics with DxLabs ?
How many QSO per bands, per modes ... ?
+ Click the "QSL Stats" button along the bottom of the Main window's "Check Progress" tab. The first two columns of the resulting report analyze your logged QSOs by band and mode with absolute counts and percentages, e.g.
+ The remaining the columns in this report analyze QSLing performance via Club Log, eQSL, LoTW, and QRZ.
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Hello DxLabs's users
We are on the air with TM56REF. We are few operators using differents software for logging. Each evening, they send me their adif logs. I merge them into a general log with all operators's log. I would like to know if there is a way to have statistics with DxLabs ? How many QSO per bands, per modes ... ? Many thanks Best 73 de F5PHW Phil
|
Re: Frequency Dependent Device output to Serial Port
+ AA6YQ comments below
Its the antenna switch in my Palstar 1k-la RF Amp.
+ The user manual for that amp
?
+ is confusing, as it describes different External Data Connectors on page 10 and page 11.
?
+ I don't see any mention of an "antenna switch".
+ Likely, you can enable the amp to follow your transceiver's frequency by using Commander's Secondary CAT Port configured to use the Kenwood protocol. I'm basing this on the "RS-232 Band Control (Kenwood) pinout" table shown on page 10 of the user manual.
https://www.dxlabsuite.com/dxlabwiki/ControlDeviceViaSecondaryCATPort
+ I once asked the owner of Palstar for documentation describing his automatic tuner's control protocol so that I could extend Commander to support it, and was told to pound sand. Not my favorite company...
? ? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
Unsubscribing worked for me.
?
Jim N7US
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
On Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2025 19:22
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] Responding to Emailed QSLs
?
The only emailed QSLs I receive are from qslworld.com .
If I scroll to the bottom of an email message bearing one of these QSLs, the next-to-last line contains an "unsubscribe here" link.
Has anyone who has unsubscribed subsequently received another QSL from qslworld.com ?
? ? ? 73,
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
The only emailed QSLs I receive are from qslworld.com .
?
If I scroll to the bottom of an email message bearing one of these QSLs, the next-to-last line contains an "unsubscribe here" link.
Has anyone who has unsubscribed subsequently received another QSL from qslworld.com ?
? ? ? 73,
?
? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
?
?
?
?
|
Re: Frequency Dependent Device output to Serial Port
Its the antenna switch in my Palstar 1k-la RF Amp.
|
Greetings to all!
The number of Spot Database Entries as shown in configuration spot database tab, does it count unique callsigns of spots or not?
+ The "Size Control" panel on that tab displays the number of Entries in your Spot Database. Since there can be multiple Spot Database Entries with the same callsign - because a station has been active on different bands, or in different modes, or at different times of the day - the answer to your questions is "not".
+ To better understand how the Spot Database works, review the first paragraph of
Is there a way to prune DB by keeping a specific amount of unique callsigns?
+ No. Why would that be useful?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
On 5/1/2025 11:05 AM, dl8le wrote: If you take out your email information in qrz.com it should be very likely that you will not receive any electronic qsl. This should work in addition to clicking on the unsubscribe links. This is a VERY bad idea. Several times a year I use qrz.com to get email addresses to alert hams who are having some kind of on-the-air problem when on-the-air contact is not possible. It's one of things that hams have traditionally done for each other. 73, Jim K9YC
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
Tnx to you and all the buro sorters. Your tireless efforts are much appreciated.
73 Ron K3LUE
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
On 2025-05-01 6:07 PM, TOM-KQ5S via groups.io wrote: Do you know a way to set the bmp image to a certain size and
location on the QSL card? The only thing I know abut designing cards is contained in the DXKeeper Help file and the DXLab WiKi - particularly: <> You could use Paint (or other image manipulation program) to overlay a transparent white box in your background image where DXKeeper will print the confirmation and QSO details. Similarly, careful choice of type face, size, weight and color all contribute to legibility. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-05-01 6:07 PM, TOM-KQ5S via groups.io wrote: This is good info Joe. ?Do you know?a way to set the bmp image?to a certain size and location on the QSL card? ?If I use this method to reply to e-mail QSL cards then more than likely I will only have one contact with them. ?This leaves a lot of white space on the card. ?I would like to put an image below the QSO information. ?Currently. the image fills the entire card which makes reading the card difficult.
Thanks,
Tom-KQ5S
On May 1, 2025, at 15:52, Joe Subich, W4TV via groups.io <lists@...> wrote:
Of course, *ALL OF THIS* is moot. ?DXKeeper already allows one to
create and respond to e-mailed QSLs.
All that one needs to do is design a QSL card in QSL Config -> Cards. Set the Printer to "Microsoft Print to PDF" and set the size to "North
America 4x6". ?Place the QSOs for which QSLs are to be sent in the
QSL Queue. ?The "cards" can be "printed" and saved individually and
the resulting (pdf) file(s) attached to the e-mail reply.
One can select QSOs for e-mail QSLing in mass by tagging each QSO
intended to electronic QSL by setting QSL Sent Via = E, then filtering
the log page display with QSL_Sent_Via = 'E' (and any other limit like
Station_Callsign = 'XX1ZZZ') before clicking "Add Needed" or "Add
Requested".
Card definition for use with "Microsoft Print to PDF":
Page Layout:
????1 card (right feed)
Card Dimensions:
????Width: ?6 ???Side borders 0.5
????Height: 4 ???Top border ??0.375
If the recipient wants to print a 3.5" x 5.5" hard copy instead of
a 4" x 6" "card" it is only necessary to scale the PDF to 85% when
printing.
Note: Using DXKeeper's *EXISTING* Print Card capability also allows
QSO Specific QSL Messages.
73,
??... Joe, W4TV
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
This is good info Joe. ?Do you know?a way to set the bmp image?to a certain size and location on the QSL card? ?If I use this method to reply to e-mail QSL cards then more than likely I will only have one contact with them. ?This leaves a lot of white space on the card. ?I would like to put an image below the QSO information. ?Currently. the image fills the entire card which makes reading the card difficult.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On May 1, 2025, at 15:52, Joe Subich, W4TV via groups.io <lists@...> wrote:
Of course, *ALL OF THIS* is moot. ?DXKeeper already allows one to
create and respond to e-mailed QSLs.
All that one needs to do is design a QSL card in QSL Config -> Cards. Set the Printer to "Microsoft Print to PDF" and set the size to "North
America 4x6". ?Place the QSOs for which QSLs are to be sent in the
QSL Queue. ?The "cards" can be "printed" and saved individually and
the resulting (pdf) file(s) attached to the e-mail reply.
One can select QSOs for e-mail QSLing in mass by tagging each QSO
intended to electronic QSL by setting QSL Sent Via = E, then filtering
the log page display with QSL_Sent_Via = 'E' (and any other limit like
Station_Callsign = 'XX1ZZZ') before clicking "Add Needed" or "Add
Requested".
Card definition for use with "Microsoft Print to PDF":
Page Layout:
????1 card (right feed)
Card Dimensions:
????Width: ?6 ???Side borders 0.5
????Height: 4 ???Top border ??0.375
If the recipient wants to print a 3.5" x 5.5" hard copy instead of
a 4" x 6" "card" it is only necessary to scale the PDF to 85% when
printing.
Note: Using DXKeeper's *EXISTING* Print Card capability also allows
QSO Specific QSL Messages.
73,
??... Joe, W4TV
|
Hi all,
Until recently, I was getting 5 or more electronic QSL's from numerous sources, until I took my email address out of QRZ and put it in my bio with an (at) instead of the @ sign.
I did try unsubscribing from two sites, but that did not stop emailed QSL's from arriving here. I also noticed that all were already confirmed via LoTW, so I really did not see the point of this spam. If they were from folk that do not use LoTW, I would have responded (via email) to suggest that if they want a card, then use the bureau, as an electronic card is not valid for anything.
From what I can see, these electronic cards are simply an ADIF dump to one of these services, and not personalised at all, which is pointless.
I therefore totally agree with Joe on this.
73 de Phil GU0SUP
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV Sent: 30 April 2025 22:59 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [DXLab] Electronic QSL On 2025-04-30 5:44 PM, Chuck, WS1L via groups.io wrote: My feelings are that although these e-cards are not valid for any
awards, they are still "the final courtesy" being sent by the other
operator. I do not view unsolicited commercial e-mail (yes, these e-mail QSL operations are commercial) as a courtesy. It is an invasion of my privacy just like any other unsolicited commercial e-mail (SPAM). so I would be in favor of a quick way to reply to those that I do
receive. I am strongly opposed to anything that would encourage this liddish behavior. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-04-30 5:44 PM, Chuck, WS1L via groups.io wrote: My feelings are that although these e-cards are not valid for any awards,
they are still "the final courtesy" being sent by the other operator. I
have started to get a few, so I would be in favor of a quick way to reply
to those that I do receive.
73 de Chuck, WS1L
chandlerusm@...
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:01?PM Dave AA6YQ via groups.io <aa6yq=
[email protected]> wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
I have also gotten many of these. Some are nice cards, other's very
generic with a "typewriter" font that's hard to read. I should just dump
them but I have been answering since old habits die hard. I also send to
eQSL, LOTW and CLublog automatically when the QSO is terminated.
I made up a card with Paint Shop Pro (any paint/art program will work)
with everything, address, grid square, county etc but the QSO info. When I
get a card, I look in DXK for the particular entry and highlight it and
copy to clipboard in the popup. This goes to wordpad which I copy and in
Paint Shop Pro, add it to the card I made which now has the needed info
added in text. Save it and send it off.
Odd that when I copy to clipboard, I do not get all the info...i.e. the
signal report is missing although it is in the log entry and was
highlighted and maybe copied. No big deal...I just add the sig report. Is
there a limit to what can be copied to the clipboard in DXK?
+ Rather than generate a QSL card image populated with QSO information and
place it in the Windows Clipboard, perhaps a new "Generate text QSL"
right-mouse menu command could be an augmented version of the current "Copy
to Windows Clipboard" command that include signal reports and the "QSL
Message" item (if logged). This could be generated in multi-line format,
e.g.
Callsign: ZS8W
Frequency: 14.087
Mode: FT8
Date: 2025-04-28
Time: 07:58:45Z
Notes: Tnx QSL!
73 de AA6YQ
+ and quickly pasted into a return email message.
+Comments, suggestions, better ideas?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
Of course, *ALL OF THIS* is moot. DXKeeper already allows one to
create and respond to e-mailed QSLs.
All that one needs to do is design a QSL card in QSL Config -> Cards. Set the Printer to "Microsoft Print to PDF" and set the size to "North
America 4x6". Place the QSOs for which QSLs are to be sent in the
QSL Queue. The "cards" can be "printed" and saved individually and
the resulting (pdf) file(s) attached to the e-mail reply.
One can select QSOs for e-mail QSLing in mass by tagging each QSO
intended to electronic QSL by setting QSL Sent Via = E, then filtering
the log page display with QSL_Sent_Via = 'E' (and any other limit like
Station_Callsign = 'XX1ZZZ') before clicking "Add Needed" or "Add
Requested".
Card definition for use with "Microsoft Print to PDF":
Page Layout:
1 card (right feed)
Card Dimensions:
Width: 6 Side borders 0.5
Height: 4 Top border 0.375
If the recipient wants to print a 3.5" x 5.5" hard copy instead of
a 4" x 6" "card" it is only necessary to scale the PDF to 85% when
printing.
Note: Using DXKeeper's *EXISTING* Print Card capability also allows
QSO Specific QSL Messages.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
Joe,? I think you have the best solution.? I have been printing the email "telegram" and then hitting delete.? Better not to respond in any way.? My QRZ page is clear about?what I will and won't accept for confirmation.? I won't remove my email address because it is legitimately useful for my purposes but to answer any of these emails is just inviting trouble.? I have not yet determined if any of these match actual QSOs so from now, I'm not going to bother printing them for future research.? I hope everyone will come to a solution to this issue.? I continue to use LOTW, Buro cards, and direct cards.? With cost of mailing going up even Buro and direct is getting too burdensome.? If ARRL would accept other sources as confirmation I'd consider them.
73,
Guy K4CNF
On 2025-05-01 3:37 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
> There's always the DELETE key; or one could set up filters to move
> emails from designated sources to SPAM .
The damage is done before the delete key can be used.? Lacking a
"bounce" a commercial e-mail generator can assume the address is,
at least, valid.? Filters require reviewing anything in "SPAM" to
confirm the filter is not triggering falsely on valid e-mail and
that opens one to hidden payloads.
Unsolicited commercial e-mail is, arguably, an illegal invasion
of one's privacy and everything should be done to discourage such
activity.? If one really wants a confirmation they can mail a
physical card or use LotW ... or, forbid, send a personal e-mail.
73,
? ? ... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-05-01 3:37 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
> Joe, W4TV wrote, in part:
>
> Perhaps ARRL should provide legitimate bureau staff access to the
> member directory (with e-mail) ...
>
> That would be great, Joe. Unfortunately not everyone belongs to ARRL (and
> more are leaving...I wonder why!),
> and its highly unlikely ARRL would provide such a service to us sorters.
> ARRL has indicated its funding for the
> incoming buro is living on borrowed time.
>
> There's always the DELETE key; or one could set up filters to move emails
> from designated sources to SPAM .
>
> 73
> ---
> Ted? ?WA3AER
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 3:28?PM Joe Subich, W4TV via <lists=
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2025-05-01 3:17 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
>>
>>>? From where I sit, if you want cards from the buro, you need to
>>> provide an email address where QRZ.com provides the field for you to
>>> enter it.
>> Perhaps ARRL should provide legitimate bureau staff access to the
>> member directory (with e-mail) rather than require amateurs to
>> expose themselves to additional unsolicited commercial (spam)
>> e-mail in order to receive cards from the bureau.
>>
>> In any case, e-mail should not be necessary if users keep envelopes
>> (with current address) on file with the bureau.? We certainly did
>> not have access to e-mail 40 years ago when I was a letter manager
>> with the 8th area bureau.? In the worst case a post card to the
>> station's Callbook address was sufficient.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>>? ? ? ... Joe, W4TV
>>
>> On 2025-05-01 3:17 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
>>> I see a lot of entries w/o bio.
>>> There have been lots of suggestions here about handling the
>>> electronic/email QSLs. Each has it's merit, and it's an individual choice
>>> on how to handle them.
>>>? ?From where I sit, if you want cards from the buro, you need to provide
>> an
>>> email address where QRZ.com provides the field for you to enter it.
>>>
>>> 73
>>> ---
>>> Ted? ?WA3AER
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 1, 2025, 15:03 Earl Needham via <kd5xb=
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What if one would remove the email address and then put it close to the
>>>> top of the bio?? Would that stop the email cards and still allow bureau
>>>> workers to get the info?
>>>>
>>>> Earl / KD5XB
>>>>
>>>> Sent from Proton Mail Android
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> On 5/1/25 12:28 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Juergen wrote, in part:
>>>> looks as if they all use the email-information given in (for
>>>> sender and receiver of the card). If you take out your email
>> information in
>>>> qrz. <>
>>>>
>>>> As a buro card sorter who relies on QRZ.com, I hope this advice is not
>>>> taken to heart. We rely on QRZ to get email addresses to communicate
>> with
>>>> buro account holders! When there's no email address, the alternative is
>> to
>>>> waste postage and envelopes to try to contact buro users. That gets to
>> be a
>>>> big expense after a while.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> ---
>>>> Ted? ?WA3AER
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ---
>>>> Ted? ?WA3AER
>>>>
>>>>
|
Greetings to all!
The number of??Spot Database Entries??as shown in configuration spot database tab, does it count?unique callsigns of spots or not?
Is there a way to prune DB by keeping a specific amount of unique callsigns?
?
TKS!
73 de SV1CDN, Dennis!
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
On 2025-05-01 3:37 PM, Ted Bauer via groups.io wrote: There's always the DELETE key; or one could set up filters to move
emails from designated sources to SPAM . The damage is done before the delete key can be used. Lacking a "bounce" a commercial e-mail generator can assume the address is, at least, valid. Filters require reviewing anything in "SPAM" to confirm the filter is not triggering falsely on valid e-mail and that opens one to hidden payloads. Unsolicited commercial e-mail is, arguably, an illegal invasion of one's privacy and everything should be done to discourage such activity. If one really wants a confirmation they can mail a physical card or use LotW ... or, forbid, send a personal e-mail. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-05-01 3:37 PM, Ted Bauer via groups.io wrote: Joe, W4TV wrote, in part:
Perhaps ARRL should provide legitimate bureau staff access to the
member directory (with e-mail) ...
That would be great, Joe. Unfortunately not everyone belongs to ARRL (and
more are leaving...I wonder why!),
and its highly unlikely ARRL would provide such a service to us sorters.
ARRL has indicated its funding for the
incoming buro is living on borrowed time.
There's always the DELETE key; or one could set up filters to move emails
from designated sources to SPAM .
73
---
Ted WA3AER
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 3:28?PM Joe Subich, W4TV via groups.io <lists=
[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-01 3:17 PM, Ted Bauer via groups.io wrote:
From where I sit, if you want cards from the buro, you need to
provide an email address where QRZ.com provides the field for you to
enter it. Perhaps ARRL should provide legitimate bureau staff access to the
member directory (with e-mail) rather than require amateurs to
expose themselves to additional unsolicited commercial (spam)
e-mail in order to receive cards from the bureau.
In any case, e-mail should not be necessary if users keep envelopes
(with current address) on file with the bureau. We certainly did
not have access to e-mail 40 years ago when I was a letter manager
with the 8th area bureau. In the worst case a post card to the
station's Callbook address was sufficient.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-05-01 3:17 PM, Ted Bauer via groups.io wrote:
I see a lot of entries w/o bio.
There have been lots of suggestions here about handling the
electronic/email QSLs. Each has it's merit, and it's an individual choice
on how to handle them.
From where I sit, if you want cards from the buro, you need to provide an
email address where QRZ.com provides the field for you to enter it.
73
---
Ted WA3AER
On Thu, May 1, 2025, 15:03 Earl Needham via groups.io <kd5xb=
[email protected]> wrote:
What if one would remove the email address and then put it close to the
top of the bio? Would that stop the email cards and still allow bureau
workers to get the info?
Earl / KD5XB
Sent from Proton Mail Android
-------- Original Message --------
On 5/1/25 12:28 PM, Ted Bauer via groups.io wrote:
Juergen wrote, in part:
looks as if they all use the email-information given in qrz.com (for
sender and receiver of the card). If you take out your email information in
qrz. <>
As a buro card sorter who relies on QRZ.com, I hope this advice is not
taken to heart. We rely on QRZ to get email addresses to communicate
with
buro account holders! When there's no email address, the alternative is
to
waste postage and envelopes to try to contact buro users. That gets to
be a
big expense after a while.
73
---
Ted WA3AER
--
---
Ted WA3AER
|
Re: Responding to Emailed QSLs
Joe, W4TV wrote, in part:
Perhaps ARRL should provide legitimate bureau staff access to the
member directory (with e-mail)?...
That would be great, Joe. Unfortunately not everyone belongs to ARRL (and more are leaving...I wonder why!), and its highly unlikely ARRL would provide such a service to us sorters. ARRL has indicated its funding for the? incoming buro is living on borrowed time.
There's always the DELETE key; or one could set up filters to move emails from designated sources to SPAM .
73?
On 2025-05-01 3:17 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
> From where I sit, if you want cards from the buro, you need to
> provide an email address where QRZ.com provides the field for you to
> enter it.
Perhaps ARRL should provide legitimate bureau staff access to the
member directory (with e-mail) rather than require amateurs to
expose themselves to additional unsolicited commercial (spam)
e-mail in order to receive cards from the bureau.
In any case, e-mail should not be necessary if users keep envelopes
(with current address) on file with the bureau.? We certainly did
not have access to e-mail 40 years ago when I was a letter manager
with the 8th area bureau.? In the worst case a post card to the
station's Callbook address was sufficient.
73,
? ? ... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-05-01 3:17 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
> I see a lot of entries w/o bio.
> There have been lots of suggestions here about handling the
> electronic/email QSLs. Each has it's merit, and it's an individual choice
> on how to handle them.
>? From where I sit, if you want cards from the buro, you need to provide an
> email address where QRZ.com provides the field for you to enter it.
>
> 73
> ---
> Ted? ?WA3AER
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2025, 15:03 Earl Needham via <kd5xb=
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> What if one would remove the email address and then put it close to the
>> top of the bio?? Would that stop the email cards and still allow bureau
>> workers to get the info?
>>
>> Earl / KD5XB
>>
>> Sent from Proton Mail Android
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> On 5/1/25 12:28 PM, Ted Bauer via wrote:
>>
>> Juergen wrote, in part:
>> looks as if they all use the email-information given in (for
>> sender and receiver of the card). If you take out your email information in
>> qrz. <>
>>
>> As a buro card sorter who relies on QRZ.com, I hope this advice is not
>> taken to heart. We rely on QRZ to get email addresses to communicate with
>> buro account holders! When there's no email address, the alternative is to
>> waste postage and envelopes to try to contact buro users. That gets to be a
>> big expense after a while.
>>
>> 73
>> ---
>> Ted? ?WA3AER
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Ted? ?WA3AER
>>
>>
--
---
Ted? ?WA3AER
|
Re: DXCCC Challenge: Worked vs Confirmed
Thanks for the idea Jamie,
I did try that and it only identified the remaining two entities
I need, P5 and YK.
Dave's link he sent is what I needed.? I'm trying to confirm the
DXCC Challenge qso's
I appreciate the help.
Rich - N5ZC
On 5/1/2025 1:31 PM, Jamie WW3S wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
correct, and wasnt that the original question, how can I
determine the 137 thats worked but not confirmed??
------ Original Message ------
Date 5/1/2025 12:34:53 PM
Subject Re: [DXLab] DXCCC Challenge: Worked vs Confirmed
+ AA6YQ comments below
Run the realtime award tracker, and only check
worked….
+ The DXCC tab of DXKeeper's "Realtime Award Tracking"
window can be used to identify DXCC entities that are Worked
but not confirmed.?
? ? ? 73,
? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: DXCCC Challenge: Worked vs Confirmed
Thank you Dave,
Rich - N5ZC
On 5/1/2025 11:31 AM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
+ AA6YQ comments below
I have 2453 confirmed dxcc challenge qso's and 2590
worked. A delta of 137.
What report can I run to identify the 137 qso's so I can
attempt to get them confirmed. There may be more than 137
qso's as I probably have qso's with multiple stations for the
same dxcc/band. This would be a good thing as it would give me
multiple chances to confirm the dxcc/band.
+ Use DXKeeper's Need filter, as described here:
? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
Jim N7US
Ron T
Phil Cooper
Dionisis “Dennis” Drakopoulos - SV1CDN