Re: RFI Continues on WinWarbler
+ AA6YQ comments below
There is only 1 WinWarbler until and unless I transmit on 20 Meters with > 300 W or so of output. With the TS590-SG or any other basic transceiver I have ever used I do not and never have had any RFI of any kind that I could detect.
+ As I explained the last time you brought this up, Gil, there is no practical way to determine exactly why WinWarbler fails when your RFI exceeds a certain value. Clearly your PC is malfunctioning in that situation - violating the prerequisites for running any DXLab application: a working PC. WinWarbler may not be the only application that fails in that situation; it may be the only application whose failure in that situation is obvious. Consider WinWarbler to be the canary in your coal mine. 73, ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: RFI Continues on WinWarbler
There is only 1 WinWarbler until and unless I transmit on 20 Meters with > 300 W or so of output. With the TS590-SG or any other basic transceiver I have ever used I do not and never have had any RFI of any kind that I could detect. ? ? Outlook LT Gil W0MN Hierro Candente Batir de Repente 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb ? ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Gerry R via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] RFI Continues on WinWarbler? I agree with Joe about coax chokes and getting the ladderline outside the house. I am wondering why there are TWO Winwarbler programs running at the same time? ? On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:54?AM Joe Subich, W4TV via <lists=[email protected]> wrote:
Even if you go to a rooftop vertical (e.g. R-6000 or similar),
install a high quality common mode choke ("line isolator")
right at the antenna.? The commercial antennas do not have
sufficient built-in choking, particularly for "pathological"
(odd multiples of 1/4 wave) lengths of feedline.? ?I needed
a line isolator where my feedline enters the shack (and will
build a better one for the antenna when I next do maintenance).
Depending on the space available and feedline length, you may
want to consider a G5RV or ZS6BKW antenna.? With them you can
terminate the ladder line outside the shack with a *high quality*
common mode choke/line isolator and bring coax back to the rig.
In either case, I would recommend K9YC's "Choke Cookbook" for
common mode choke/line isolator designs:
? ? <>
Table 3, on page 8 gives several designs for multi-band, two
toriod chokes.? The "160-20" design would be ideal for a
G5RV/ZS6BKW (used on 80-20 or 80-17) and the "30-10" would be
a great add-on choke for a vertical like the R-6000.
73,
? ? ... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-03-04 10:37 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via wrote:
> I have done the required calculations and meet the requirements. Nevertheless I tend to agree that it is the direct exposure you refer to. Come nicer weather I may switch to a different antenna that does not need ladder line. Padhans a rooftop vertical while tis 85 year old can still do it.? ?
>
>? ?
>
> Outlook LT Gil W0MN
>
> Hierro Candente Batir de Repente
>
> 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb
>
>? ?
>
>? ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV via
> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 8:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DXLab] RFI Continues on WinWarbler
>
>? ?
>
>? ?
>
> If your problem is not uncontrolled common mode RFI, it is direct RF Exposure.? If direct RF Exposure is causing your problems, you are probably in violation of part 97.13 (c).? Have you performed the calculations required to assure compliance with the regulations referenced in 97.13(c)?
>
>? ?
>
> 73,
>
>? ?
>
>? ? ? ... Joe, W4TV
>
>? ?
>
> On 2025-03-04 8:44 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via wrote:
>
>> I put on toroids on all things that enter the PC.
>
>>
>
>> I have followed many thigs to try to get good ground system .
>
>>
>
>> I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAM BUT WINWARBLER IS USELESS ON
>
>> 20m AT > 300? Watts.
>
>>
>
>> Antenna is fed with ladder line and? 12 feet of the line is indoors so
>
>> I assume this is RFI. I have no? problems on even higher frequencies
>
>> with Coax Fed Dipole.
>
>>
>
>> I do find it strange that ONLY WinWarbler FAILS. I END UP WITH 2
>
>> COPIES RUNNING. If I terminate? ALL with Launcher it terminates? only
>
>> one? of them (ALL OTHER APPS DO END) and forces a Restart of? PC to fix.
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>> It looks I need a different antenna system that does not require the
>
>> ladder line? feed. I can run WinWarbler with? no problem on other
>
>> bands and o 20 M into dummy load.
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>> What does anyone think? Am I? stuck. I guess I could try returning to
>
>> my Older W10 Machine? that had NONE of this? trouble, even before
>
>> spending 100 for Toroids. The Toroids did help a lot since more than
>
>> WinWarbler was failing before? installing? them.
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>> Outlook LT Gil W0MN
>
>>
>
>> Hierro Candente Batir de Repente
>
>>
>
>> 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb
>
>>
>
-- W0MN EN34rb 44.08226 N 92.51265 W
Hierro candente, batir de repente
HP Laptop
|
Re: RFI Continues on WinWarbler
I agree with Joe about coax chokes and getting the ladderline outside the house.
I am wondering why there are TWO Winwarbler programs running at the same time?
Gerry, WA9GON
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:54?AM Joe Subich, W4TV via <lists= [email protected]> wrote:
Even if you go to a rooftop vertical (e.g. R-6000 or similar),
install a high quality common mode choke ("line isolator")
right at the antenna.? The commercial antennas do not have
sufficient built-in choking, particularly for "pathological"
(odd multiples of 1/4 wave) lengths of feedline.? ?I needed
a line isolator where my feedline enters the shack (and will
build a better one for the antenna when I next do maintenance).
Depending on the space available and feedline length, you may
want to consider a G5RV or ZS6BKW antenna.? With them you can
terminate the ladder line outside the shack with a *high quality*
common mode choke/line isolator and bring coax back to the rig.
In either case, I would recommend K9YC's "Choke Cookbook" for
common mode choke/line isolator designs:
? ? <>
Table 3, on page 8 gives several designs for multi-band, two
toriod chokes.? The "160-20" design would be ideal for a
G5RV/ZS6BKW (used on 80-20 or 80-17) and the "30-10" would be
a great add-on choke for a vertical like the R-6000.
73,
? ? ... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-03-04 10:37 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via wrote:
> I have done the required calculations and meet the requirements. Nevertheless I tend to agree that it is the direct exposure you refer to. Come nicer weather I may switch to a different antenna that does not need ladder line. Padhans a rooftop vertical while tis 85 year old can still do it.? ?
>
>? ?
>
> Outlook LT Gil W0MN
>
> Hierro Candente Batir de Repente
>
> 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb
>
>? ?
>
>? ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV via
> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 8:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DXLab] RFI Continues on WinWarbler
>
>? ?
>
>? ?
>
> If your problem is not uncontrolled common mode RFI, it is direct RF Exposure.? If direct RF Exposure is causing your problems, you are probably in violation of part 97.13 (c).? Have you performed the calculations required to assure compliance with the regulations referenced in 97.13(c)?
>
>? ?
>
> 73,
>
>? ?
>
>? ? ? ... Joe, W4TV
>
>? ?
>
> On 2025-03-04 8:44 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via wrote:
>
>> I put on toroids on all things that enter the PC.
>
>>
>
>> I have followed many thigs to try to get good ground system .
>
>>
>
>> I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAM BUT WINWARBLER IS USELESS ON
>
>> 20m AT > 300? Watts.
>
>>
>
>> Antenna is fed with ladder line and? 12 feet of the line is indoors so
>
>> I assume this is RFI. I have no? problems on even higher frequencies
>
>> with Coax Fed Dipole.
>
>>
>
>> I do find it strange that ONLY WinWarbler FAILS. I END UP WITH 2
>
>> COPIES RUNNING. If I terminate? ALL with Launcher it terminates? only
>
>> one? of them (ALL OTHER APPS DO END) and forces a Restart of? PC to fix.
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>> It looks I need a different antenna system that does not require the
>
>> ladder line? feed. I can run WinWarbler with? no problem on other
>
>> bands and o 20 M into dummy load.
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>> What does anyone think? Am I? stuck. I guess I could try returning to
>
>> my Older W10 Machine? that had NONE of this? trouble, even before
>
>> spending 100 for Toroids. The Toroids did help a lot since more than
>
>> WinWarbler was failing before? installing? them.
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>>? ?
>
>>
>
>> Outlook LT Gil W0MN
>
>>
>
>> Hierro Candente Batir de Repente
>
>>
>
>> 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb
>
>>
>
|
Re: RFI Continues on WinWarbler
Even if you go to a rooftop vertical (e.g. R-6000 or similar),
install a high quality common mode choke ("line isolator")
right at the antenna. The commercial antennas do not have
sufficient built-in choking, particularly for "pathological"
(odd multiples of 1/4 wave) lengths of feedline. I needed
a line isolator where my feedline enters the shack (and will
build a better one for the antenna when I next do maintenance).
Depending on the space available and feedline length, you may
want to consider a G5RV or ZS6BKW antenna. With them you can
terminate the ladder line outside the shack with a *high quality*
common mode choke/line isolator and bring coax back to the rig.
In either case, I would recommend K9YC's "Choke Cookbook" for
common mode choke/line isolator designs:
<>
Table 3, on page 8 gives several designs for multi-band, two
toriod chokes. The "160-20" design would be ideal for a
G5RV/ZS6BKW (used on 80-20 or 80-17) and the "30-10" would be
a great add-on choke for a vertical like the R-6000.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2025-03-04 10:37 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via groups.io wrote: I have done the required calculations and meet the requirements. Nevertheless I tend to agree that it is the direct exposure you refer to. Come nicer weather I may switch to a different antenna that does not need ladder line. Padhans a rooftop vertical while tis 85 year old can still do it. ?
Outlook LT Gil W0MN
Hierro Candente Batir de Repente
44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] RFI Continues on WinWarbler
If your problem is not uncontrolled common mode RFI, it is direct RF Exposure. If direct RF Exposure is causing your problems, you are probably in violation of part 97.13 (c). Have you performed the calculations required to assure compliance with the regulations referenced in 97.13(c)?
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-03-04 8:44 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via groups.io wrote:
I put on toroids on all things that enter the PC. I have followed many thigs to try to get good ground system . I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAM BUT WINWARBLER IS USELESS ON 20m AT > 300 Watts. Antenna is fed with ladder line and 12 feet of the line is indoors so I assume this is RFI. I have no problems on even higher frequencies with Coax Fed Dipole. I do find it strange that ONLY WinWarbler FAILS. I END UP WITH 2 COPIES RUNNING. If I terminate ALL with Launcher it terminates only one of them (ALL OTHER APPS DO END) and forces a Restart of PC to fix. It looks I need a different antenna system that does not require the ladder line feed. I can run WinWarbler with no problem on other bands and o 20 M into dummy load. What does anyone think? Am I stuck. I guess I could try returning to my Older W10 Machine that had NONE of this trouble, even before spending 100 for Toroids. The Toroids did help a lot since more than WinWarbler was failing before installing them. Outlook LT Gil W0MN Hierro Candente Batir de Repente 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb
|
Re: RFI Continues on WinWarbler
I have done the required calculations and meet the requirements. Nevertheless I tend to agree that it is the direct exposure you refer to. Come nicer weather I may switch to a different antenna that does not need ladder line. Padhans a rooftop vertical while tis 85 year old can still do it.? ? ? Outlook LT Gil W0MN Hierro Candente Batir de Repente 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb ? ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] RFI Continues on WinWarbler ? ? If your problem is not uncontrolled common mode RFI, it is direct RF Exposure.? If direct RF Exposure is causing your problems, you are probably in violation of part 97.13 (c).? Have you performed the calculations required to assure compliance with the regulations referenced in 97.13(c)? ? 73, ? ??? ... Joe, W4TV ? On 2025-03-04 8:44 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via groups.io wrote: > I put on toroids on all things that enter the PC. > > I have followed many thigs to try to get good ground system . > > I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAM BUT WINWARBLER IS USELESS ON > 20m AT > 300? Watts. > > Antenna is fed with ladder line and? 12 feet of the line is indoors so > I assume this is RFI. I have no? problems on even higher frequencies > with Coax Fed Dipole. > > I do find it strange that ONLY WinWarbler FAILS. I END UP WITH 2 > COPIES RUNNING. If I terminate? ALL with Launcher it terminates? only > one? of them (ALL OTHER APPS DO END) and forces a Restart of? PC to fix. > >?? > > It looks I need a different antenna system that does not require the > ladder line? feed. I can run WinWarbler with? no problem on other > bands and o 20 M into dummy load. > >?? > > What does anyone think? Am I? stuck. I guess I could try returning to > my Older W10 Machine? that had NONE of this? trouble, even before > spending 100 for Toroids. The Toroids did help a lot since more than > WinWarbler was failing before? installing? them. > >?? > >?? > >?? > >?? > > Outlook LT Gil W0MN > > Hierro Candente Batir de Repente > > 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb > >?? ? ? ? ? ? ? -- W0MN EN34rb 44.08226 N 92.51265 W
Hierro candente, batir de repente
HP Laptop
|
ohhhhh, that would be a good one!? I'd vote for that too.? LOL
73, Don
VA7ZT
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 6:46?AM Ken Bandy, KJ9B via <ken.kj9b= [email protected]> wrote: I’m still waiting for the “enable coffee pot on rare DX” interface ? ? 73, Ken, KJ9B ? ? One more question....is there anything your software won't do?? :) ? # more AA6YQ comments below
? ? ? ? + If you make the Needed column visible in the Spot Database Display and can remember the abbreviations, you'll be able to immediately see why a Spot Database Entry is considered Needed without having to right-click and select "Display Award Progress for ...".
# If you forget an abbreviation, let the mouse cursor hover over the letter(s) in a Spot Database Entry's Needed field and a popup explanation will remind you.
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: RFI Continues on WinWarbler
If your problem is not uncontrolled common mode RFI, it is direct
RF Exposure. If direct RF Exposure is causing your problems, you
are probably in violation of part 97.13 (c). Have you performed
the calculations required to assure compliance with the regulations
referenced in 97.13(c)?
73,
... Joe, W4TV
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2025-03-04 8:44 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via groups.io wrote: I put on toroids on all things that enter the PC.
I have followed many thigs to try to get good ground system .
I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAM BUT WINWARBLER IS USELESS ON 20m
AT > 300 Watts.
Antenna is fed with ladder line and 12 feet of the line is indoors so I
assume this is RFI. I have no problems on even higher frequencies with Coax
Fed Dipole.
I do find it strange that ONLY WinWarbler FAILS. I END UP WITH 2 COPIES
RUNNING. If I terminate ALL with Launcher it terminates only one of them
(ALL OTHER APPS DO END) and forces a Restart of PC to fix.
It looks I need a different antenna system that does not require the ladder
line feed. I can run WinWarbler with no problem on other bands and o 20 M
into dummy load.
What does anyone think? Am I stuck. I guess I could try returning to my
Older W10 Machine that had NONE of this trouble, even before spending 100
for Toroids. The Toroids did help a lot since more than WinWarbler was
failing before installing them.
Outlook LT Gil W0MN
Hierro Candente Batir de Repente
44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb
|
I’m still waiting for the “enable coffee pot on rare DX” interface ? ? 73, Ken, KJ9B ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Don Carlgren via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 9:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] Band spread? One more question....is there anything your software won't do?? :) ? # more AA6YQ comments below
? ? ? ? + If you make the Needed column visible in the Spot Database Display and can remember the abbreviations, you'll be able to immediately see why a Spot Database Entry is considered Needed without having to right-click and select "Display Award Progress for ...".
# If you forget an abbreviation, let the mouse cursor hover over the letter(s) in a Spot Database Entry's Needed field and a popup explanation will remind you.
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
One more question....is there anything your software won't do?? :)
take care 73, Don VA7ZT
# more AA6YQ comments below
? ? ? ? + If you make the Needed column visible in the Spot Database Display and can remember the abbreviations, you'll be able to immediately see why a Spot Database Entry is considered Needed without having to right-click and select "Display Award Progress for ...".
# If you forget an abbreviation, let the mouse cursor hover over the letter(s) in a Spot Database Entry's Needed field and a popup explanation will remind you.
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
RFI Continues on WinWarbler
I put on toroids on all things that enter the PC. I have followed many thigs to try to get good ground system . I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAM BUT WINWARBLER IS USELESS ON 20m AT > 300 ?Watts. Antenna is fed with ladder line and? 12 feet of the line is indoors so I assume this is RFI. I have no? problems on even higher frequencies with Coax Fed Dipole. I do find it strange that ONLY WinWarbler FAILS. I END UP WITH 2 COPIES? RUNNING. If I terminate ?ALL with Launcher it terminates? only one? of them (ALL OTHER APPS DO END) and forces a Restart of? PC to fix. ? It looks I need a different antenna system that does not require the ladder line? feed. I can run WinWarbler with? no problem on other bands and o 20 M into dummy load. ? What does anyone think? Am I? stuck. I guess I could try returning to my Older W10 Machine? that had NONE of this? trouble, even before spending 100 for Toroids. The Toroids did help a lot since more than WinWarbler was failing before? installing ?them. ? ? ? ? Outlook LT Gil W0MN Hierro Candente Batir de Repente 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb ? ? -- W0MN EN34rb 44.08226 N 92.51265 W
Hierro candente, batir de repente
HP Laptop
|
Re: Wrong Band sort in DXKeeper's User-defined sorts
+ AA6YQ comments below
Use val(Band) to sort numerically instead of alpha.
The use of "val()" is not documented, AFAIK.
+ The 4th paragraph of
?
+ suggested using the ABS function, applying it to the DXCCID field as an example. I changed this to the more understandable VAL function, and added a sentence suggesting its use to numerically sort by band.
+ Thanks!
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: Wrong Band sort in DXKeeper's User-defined sorts
Joe, good tip! The val(Band) works fine.
Thank you
Lui
|
# more AA6YQ comments below
+ If you make the Needed column visible in the Spot Database Display and can remember the abbreviations, you'll be able to immediately see why a Spot Database Entry is considered Needed without having to right-click and select "Display Award Progress for ...".
# If you forget an abbreviation, let the mouse cursor hover over the letter(s) in a Spot Database Entry's Needed field and a popup explanation will remind you.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Awesome Dave!? Thanks so much for the tip.? I'll add that to the display.? That will be very handy.
73, Don VA7ZT
+ AA6YQ comments below
AHA!? OK, I think I have it.
I just had a great example.? 2 spots for VK9XU on 28.095.? One is black and one is red.? the black one is FT8 and the red one is RTTY When I check the award status the RTTY is red because it's a needed ZONE for RTTY on 10.
When I check the award status for the FT8 it shows as digital is confirmed on Zone 29.
So for WAZ purposes there is a difference between RTTY and all the other digital modes.
+ Exactly right.
This has been bugging me for ages.? Now I know why!? It never occured to me it was the WAZ status that was causing this.? I always assumed it was the DXCC status.
Thanks for the tip on the award status.? I didn't know I could pull that menu up.? Very cool.
+ There's a field in the Spot Database Display named Needed that uses single letter abbreviations to indicate why a SpotDatabase Entry is considered "needed":
+ If you make the Needed column visible in the Spot Database Display and can remember the abbreviations, you'll be able to immediately see why a Spot Database Entry is considered Needed without having to right-click and select "Display Award Progress for ...".
+ Your VK9XU RTTY Spot Database Entry has a Z in its Needed field.
? ? ? 73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
+ AA6YQ comments below
AHA! OK, I think I have it.
I just had a great example. 2 spots for VK9XU on 28.095. One is black and one is red. the black one is FT8 and the red one is RTTY When I check the award status the RTTY is red because it's a needed ZONE for RTTY on 10.
When I check the award status for the FT8 it shows as digital is confirmed on Zone 29.
So for WAZ purposes there is a difference between RTTY and all the other digital modes.
+ Exactly right.
This has been bugging me for ages. Now I know why! It never occured to me it was the WAZ status that was causing this. I always assumed it was the DXCC status.
Thanks for the tip on the award status. I didn't know I could pull that menu up. Very cool.
+ There's a field in the Spot Database Display named Needed that uses single letter abbreviations to indicate why a SpotDatabase Entry is considered "needed":
+ If you make the Needed column visible in the Spot Database Display and can remember the abbreviations, you'll be able to immediately see why a Spot Database Entry is considered Needed without having to right-click and select "Display Award Progress for ...".
+ Your VK9XU RTTY Spot Database Entry has a Z in its Needed field.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
AHA!? OK, I think I have it.
I just had a great example.? 2 spots for VK9XU on 28.095.? One is black and one is red.? the black one is FT8 and the red one is RTTY When I check the award status the RTTY is red because it's a needed ZONE for RTTY on 10. When I check the award status for the FT8 it shows as digital is confirmed on Zone 29.
So for WAZ purposes there is a difference between RTTY and all the other digital modes.
This has been bugging me for ages.? Now I know why!? It never occured to me it was the WAZ status that was causing this.? I always assumed it was the DXCC status.
Thanks for the tip on the award status.? I didn't know I could pull that menu up.? Very cool.
73, Don
VA7ZT
Hi Dave,
I realize that.? But it's being flagged red even though I've already worked it on one of the other digital modes.? This isn't happening in reverse.? I've seen spots for FT8 stations that I have worked on RTTY in the past but not on FT8 and they are not being flagged red so it must be detecting them as already worked.? However if a spot comes in as RTTY and I have worked it on FT8 it is still being flagged as red because it's RTTY.? I'm only seeing this with RTTY spots.
I'll do what you suggest and "check the award progress for" to see if that gives me a clue as to what's happening.? It's probably something I have turned on that is making it flag an RTTY spot as needed even if I've already worked it on one of the other digi modes.
Perhaps another example... I worked VK9XU on 20M FT8.? Any future spots for VK9XU on 20 that come through as FT8 or FT4 are black.? But if someone mistakenly spots VK9XU as an RTTY station it's showing up in red.
I'll let you know if the "Display award progress for..." reveals anything.
Thanks for the help 73, Don
VA7ZT
To answer Joe, I have SC Filter selected and nothing is in it.
I think what I wanted to try was unclear.? I'll try to describe it better.? It's not that I don't want to see the spots that come in as RTTY.? What I see happening is spots that come in as RTTY are treated differently than all other Digital mode spots.
+ That's not correct. For DXCC awards, RTTY is one of multiple digital modes that count towards DXCC Digi awards.
So frequently what happens is someone will spot a station as RTTY even though it was actually a FT8 QSO on say 14.074.? So in my case it will get flagged red because I haven't worked it on RTTY.
+ The next time you see a Spot Database Entry that is colored as "needed" and you don't understand why, you can obtain an explanation by right-clicking it and selecting "Display award progress for... " from the pop-up menu.
? ? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Hi Dave,
I realize that.? But it's being flagged red even though I've already worked it on one of the other digital modes.? This isn't happening in reverse.? I've seen spots for FT8 stations that I have worked on RTTY in the past but not on FT8 and they are not being flagged red so it must be detecting them as already worked.? However if a spot comes in as RTTY and I have worked it on FT8 it is still being flagged as red because it's RTTY.? I'm only seeing this with RTTY spots.
I'll do what you suggest and "check the award progress for" to see if that gives me a clue as to what's happening.? It's probably something I have turned on that is making it flag an RTTY spot as needed even if I've already worked it on one of the other digi modes.
Perhaps another example... I worked VK9XU on 20M FT8.? Any future spots for VK9XU on 20 that come through as FT8 or FT4 are black.? But if someone mistakenly spots VK9XU as an RTTY station it's showing up in red.
I'll let you know if the "Display award progress for..." reveals anything.
Thanks for the help 73, Don
VA7ZT
To answer Joe, I have SC Filter selected and nothing is in it.
I think what I wanted to try was unclear.? I'll try to describe it better.? It's not that I don't want to see the spots that come in as RTTY.? What I see happening is spots that come in as RTTY are treated differently than all other Digital mode spots.
+ That's not correct. For DXCC awards, RTTY is one of multiple digital modes that count towards DXCC Digi awards.
So frequently what happens is someone will spot a station as RTTY even though it was actually a FT8 QSO on say 14.074.? So in my case it will get flagged red because I haven't worked it on RTTY.
+ The next time you see a Spot Database Entry that is colored as "needed" and you don't understand why, you can obtain an explanation by right-clicking it and selecting "Display award progress for... " from the pop-up menu.
? ? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
To answer Joe, I have SC Filter selected and nothing is in it.
I think what I wanted to try was unclear. I'll try to describe it better. It's not that I don't want to see the spots that come in as RTTY. What I see happening is spots that come in as RTTY are treated differently than all other Digital mode spots.
+ That's not correct. For DXCC awards, RTTY is one of multiple digital modes that count towards DXCC Digi awards.
So frequently what happens is someone will spot a station as RTTY even though it was actually a FT8 QSO on say 14.074. So in my case it will get flagged red because I haven't worked it on RTTY.
+ The next time you see a Spot Database Entry that is colored as "needed" and you don't understand why, you can obtain an explanation by right-clicking it and selecting "Display award progress for... " from the pop-up menu.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Hi Dave & Joe,
To answer Joe, I have SC Filter selected and nothing is in it.
I think what I wanted to try was unclear.? I'll try to describe it better.? It's not that I don't want to see the spots that come in as RTTY.? What I see happening is spots that come in as RTTY are treated differently than all other Digital mode spots.? I'm not sure if this is by design or not.? So frequently what happens is someone will spot a station as RTTY even though it was actually a FT8 QSO on say 14.074.? So in my case it will get flagged red because I haven't worked it on RTTY.? I would still like to see the spot but not have it flagged red (new band/country) if I've already worked it on one of the other digital modes on that band.
Basically I guess I'm asking if all digital mode spots (RTTY, FT8, FT4, etc) could be treated as if they were one mode in the bandspread or spot collector since most digital awards now accept all of them under the same banner.? Perhaps this can be done with a prefilter or something?? ie, turn on a filter that treats all digial mode spots as one type so it won't get flagged red (new band/country) if it's been worked on any digital mode.
73, Don VA7ZT
Don,
Are you using a filter in Commander -> Config -> BandSpread -> Spot
Filter?? If so, which filter and what is in it?
I'd bet you have defined one that specifies Mode='RTTY' ... you will
want to change that to something that better reflects the modes you
are using.
73,
? ? ... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-03-03 8:08 PM, Don Carlgren via wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Currently my bandspread will highlight anything I need on RTTY.? I don't
> use RTTY anymore and primarily use FT8 as my digital mode.? Is there a way
> to get the bandspread to only highlight needed countries for digi instead?
> That way if I've worked a needed country on FT8 it would no longer be
> highlighted if it's spotted as RTTY which frequently happens with spots
> that are actually FT8 stations.
>
> Clear as mud?? :)
>
> Thanks
> 73, Don
> VA7ZT
>
> <>
>
> <>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
|
Perhaps the OP made a typo and meant FT8 rather than FT9?
JT65 and JT9 were popular JT modes when I became a ham 10 years ago.
73
Stan
KM4HQE
On 3/3/25 03:37, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
+ AA6YQ comments below
I am starting to hear a little bit about FT9
+ Where?
+ Neither Google nor Perplexity could find any reference to a
digital mode called FT9.
? ? 73,
? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
Gilbert Baron W0MN