开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

Re: discussion of DXView and DXKeeper with KB2VNB

Dave Bernstein
 

I like the simplifying aspect of this proposal -- it eliminates the ?
button to the left of the callsign. The Lookup button would do
everything. But it does mean that every "Lookup" will result in the
full DXKeeper window popping up. For those with smaller screens,
having to iconify it after every lookup may become tiresome.

I could create an configuration setting called "check for previous
QSOs on Lookup", which would let us have our cake and eat it too.

Comments?

Any reaction to the Start button change released last nite in 119?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@y..., "Richard B Drake" <rich@w...> wrote:
I have found that I run both DXView and
DXkeeper together all
of the
time. When I hear a DX station I type the call sign in
DXKeeper hit
enter
then look over to DXView to see where the station is.
Then I either
pass on
the QSO or try to make contact.
I use it that way also Dave. I assume you meant that you type the
callsign into the capture window and hit enter. I would still like
to see it do one more thing when you hit enter on a callsign in
the capture window and that is to automatically do a lookup for
previous QSO's with the station. I really like it when I call a
station and he immediately knows my name from a QSO we had last
year and I like to do the same. The present functionality where
you have to click on the question mark to get the lookup is too
slow. I like to see it immediately.

----
73, Rich - W3ZJ


Re: discussion of DXView and DXKeeper with KB2VNB

 

I have found that I run both DXView and
DXkeeper together all
of the
time. When I hear a DX station I type the call sign in
DXKeeper hit
enter
then look over to DXView to see where the station is.
Then I either
pass on
the QSO or try to make contact.
I use it that way also Dave. I assume you meant that you type the
callsign into the capture window and hit enter. I would still like
to see it do one more thing when you hit enter on a callsign in
the capture window and that is to automatically do a lookup for
previous QSO's with the station. I really like it when I call a
station and he immediately knows my name from a QSO we had last
year and I like to do the same. The present functionality where
you have to click on the question mark to get the lookup is too
slow. I like to see it immediately.

----
73, Rich - W3ZJ


discussion of DXView and DXKeeper with KB2VNB

Dave Bernstein
 

I have resized DXKeeper already as you had described but I was
running 600
x800 resolution. I have up 1024 x 768 It is a little better. The font
is
smaller but I fortunately have my eyesight. My thought on resizing
DXView
was to use a similar function that you have on the side and bottom of
the
log file in DXKeeper to view the list of QSO's that is too large for
the
window. I have found that I run both DXview and DXkeeper together all
of the
time. When I hear a DX station I type the call sign in DXKeeper hit
enter
then look over to DXView to see where the station is. Then I either
pass on
the QSO or try to make contact. Of course this may change as I do
more DXing
but for now this is the procedure I have gotten into without even
thinking
about it.

That's how I run DXView and DXKeeper as well. Have you tried the
new QSO
Capture window in DXKeeper? It lets you work the same way, but
consumes much
less screen space. The full DXKeeper window need only used when you
query
for previous QSOs with a station, or for general log maintenance
(QSLing,
etc). I can certainly give DXView a resizable border, but the result
would
be to "cut off" information -- there is nothing analogous to
DXKeeper's log
where I can simply show fewer log entries. Maybe there should be two
DXView
window sizes -- "full" (displaying all information as you see it now)
and
"reduced", showing a subset of the information in a smaller window.
What
would you see as the essential fields in the "reduced" window?

I have tried to print QSL cards and have come upon a problem which I
think
is with my printer. I have and HP 550C which is pretty old. When I
tried
printing 2 cards the end of the second card was cut off a little. I
tried
printing the same cards at work on an Epson 740 and had no problem. I
cannot
find a way to adjust the print area with the HP printer. Any
suggestions?

I use an HP 895CSE without difficulty, but am unfamiliar with the
550C.
All I can suggest is to manipulate the Printer Setup options in the
standard
Windows way.

On another subject... I have DSL at work and a cable modem at home. I
use
PCanywhwere to do a lot of file transfer and to check my home weather
station etc. I would love to be able to work my Icom IC-746 from my
laptop
at work. Have you heard of anything like this being done?

That's certainly feasible given the 746's extended CI-V command
set, and
there may well be software out there that supports this mode of
operation.
I'm not aware of any, but you might try posting your question on the
Icom
reflector, or doing some Internet searching with Alta Vista or Google.

By the way, Tom, there's now an email reflector for the DXlab suite
(DXKeeper, DXView, WinWarbler, etc.). I've copied the reflector on
this
message, as your comments and suggestions are quite relevant to the
evolution of these applications. If you care to join, you can do so
via
.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


-----Original Message-----
From: Bernstein, Dave [mailto:dhb@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:06 AM
To: me2u@...
Subject: RE: Just more stuff.


I have been playing around more with your software and I thought that
it
would be handy to be able to adjust the size of the window for DXview
and
DXkeeper. I think that I would like to be able to fit both windows in
my
monitor so I can view the information easier.

The only way to make the DXView window smaller would be to shift to
smaller fonts; I'm a little reluctant to do that given that I
occasionally
get feedback that the fonts are already too small!

The DXKeeper main window is already resizable in two ways: you can
specify which "panels" are visible (using the checkboxes on the Config
window), showing nothing but the basic QSO information if desired.
And you
can drag the window's lower right-hand corner to control the depth of
the
log display.

I'm not sure what version of DXKeeper you are running, but the
latest
development feature now includes an optional QSO Capture window, which
occupies much less screen space and allows you to capture the key QSO
information. Give it a try and let me know what you think.

What display resolution are you running?
Where do you get the postcard paper to print the QSL cards? I cant
seem to
find them locally.

I use 8.5" by 11.5" card stock, which is available in Staples,
OfficeMax,
or most stationary stores. Card stock is available in
different "weights" --
the heavier the weight, the stiffer the card. Your printer
documentation
should state the maximum weight it can handle.

I'm sure this is a lot of extra work but have you thought
about enhancing the software so that QSL cards can be customized with
pictures, different fonts etc?

Adding the ability to superimpose a bitmap graphic on the card
would be
easy, and is "on the list". Allowing the user to control font
selection,
font size, and font color is also not hard, though the addition of
significantly more "knobs" would require a "print preview" operation.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: PropView 1.0.2 settings not saved between sessions

Ron Eberson
 

No dave with the last update all are great no problem.
sorry to tell you not before.

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave Bernstein [mailto:dhb@...]
Verzonden: donderdag 5 april 2001 17:18
Aan: dxlab@...
Onderwerp: [dxlab] Re: PropView 1.0.2 settings not saved between
sessions


Ron, are you still having problems with PropView settings like Power
and TakeOff not being saved between sessions?

Is anyone else encountering this?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@y..., "Ron Eberson" <zx@c...> wrote:
YES HE WORKS DAVE thanks for it.

Is it posible to save some settings like power and wave angel of
antenna?
Also on the fig you can see not the top of the 7 from 17 meters.
Can we change the size of the window from Propview so that you can
see the
both DXView and Porpview on the screen compleet?

Thanks in advance and the time you take for all of us.


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave Bernstein [mailto:dhb@m...]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2001 7:23
Aan: dxlab@y...
Onderwerp: [dxlab] PropView 1.0.2 is available


This release corrects the runtime error occuring on systems with a
locale that doesn't use the period character as a decimal separator.

(Ron, this should correct the problem you are encountering with
1.0.1).

If you already have PropView 1.0.1 installed, you can upgrade by
downloading and running www.qsl.net/propview/PropView102Update.exe -
-
it will update your online help and install PropView102.exe, which
you can then run.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@y...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: PropView 1.0.2 settings not saved between sessions

Dave Bernstein
 

Ron, are you still having problems with PropView settings like Power
and TakeOff not being saved between sessions?

Is anyone else encountering this?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@y..., "Ron Eberson" <zx@c...> wrote:
YES HE WORKS DAVE thanks for it.

Is it posible to save some settings like power and wave angel of
antenna?
Also on the fig you can see not the top of the 7 from 17 meters.
Can we change the size of the window from Propview so that you can
see the
both DXView and Porpview on the screen compleet?

Thanks in advance and the time you take for all of us.


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave Bernstein [mailto:dhb@m...]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2001 7:23
Aan: dxlab@y...
Onderwerp: [dxlab] PropView 1.0.2 is available


This release corrects the runtime error occuring on systems with a
locale that doesn't use the period character as a decimal separator.

(Ron, this should correct the problem you are encountering with
1.0.1).

If you already have PropView 1.0.1 installed, you can upgrade by
downloading and running www.qsl.net/propview/PropView102Update.exe -
-
it will update your online help and install PropView102.exe, which
you can then run.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@y...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: PropView

Dave Bernstein
 

To get full interoperability between DXView and PropView, you should
be running DXView 1.2.6 -- sorry for not making this explicit.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@y..., "Richard B Drake" <rich@w...> wrote:
Robin,

PathView does access the prefix database in DXView. All you should
need to do is have both programs running and when you lookup a
prefix in DXView the resulting Lat/Lon information automatically
appears in PathView. If yours is not doing this then perhaps there
is some problem.

----
73, Rich - W3ZJ

-----Original Message-----
From: RTrebil640@a... [mailto:RTrebil640@a...]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:16 AM
To: dxlab@y...
Subject: [dxlab] PropView


Hi Dave,
Have just started using PropView and it seems to work
well at this
QTH. What would make it very quick to use would be the
ability to
use Country prefixes instead of Latitude and Longitude.
All of that
information must exist already in DXView...is there any
way in which
PropView could access that database?
Robin gw3zcf


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@y...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




Interesting observation with PathView

 

I just worked BX7AA on 21.016. I ran the propagation forecast for
him using the current solar flux of 228 (not too shabby) and it
showed that I should have propagation but it was between the 10%
and 50% MUF lines. I managed to work him but the interesting thing
was that the charts showed that propagation to him on that
frequency should improve over the next two hours and then begin to
drop off. Of course there is no guarantee that he would still be
there in two hours but the message to me was that if I had trouble
working him at this time I should keep trying because the
conditions should be improving. Nice job Dave, this is really
useful!

-----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
www.w3zj.com


Re: PropView

 

Robin,

PathView does access the prefix database in DXView. All you should
need to do is have both programs running and when you lookup a
prefix in DXView the resulting Lat/Lon information automatically
appears in PathView. If yours is not doing this then perhaps there
is some problem.

----
73, Rich - W3ZJ

-----Original Message-----
From: RTrebil640@... [mailto:RTrebil640@...]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:16 AM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] PropView


Hi Dave,
Have just started using PropView and it seems to work
well at this
QTH. What would make it very quick to use would be the
ability to
use Country prefixes instead of Latitude and Longitude.
All of that
information must exist already in DXView...is there any
way in which
PropView could access that database?
Robin gw3zcf


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




PropView

 

Hi Dave,
Have just started using PropView and it seems to work well at this
QTH. What would make it very quick to use would be the ability to
use Country prefixes instead of Latitude and Longitude. All of that
information must exist already in DXView...is there any way in which
PropView could access that database?
Robin gw3zcf


DXKeeper 1.1.9 is available

Dave, AA6YQ
 

This release

- adds an "Import from MMTTY" checkbox to the Import tab, which when
checked extracts transmit and receive sequence numbers from imported RST
sent and rcvd fields respectively

- adds a "Start" button to the QSO Capture window, which when activated
designates the QSO start time

When you click the Start button, it is replaced by a display of the QSO
start time. Clicking the Log or Clear buttons un-hides the Start button.
When the QSO Capture window's Callsign textbox has focus, striking the
"Insert" key is equivalent to clicking the Start button.

Clicking the Lookup button no longer designates the QSO start time.

If you've already installed DXKeeper 1.1.1 or later, you can upgrade to
version 1.1.9 by downloading and then running
-- your online help will
be updated by this process.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave, AA6YQ [mailto:dhb@...]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 1:31 AM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] DXLab 1.1.8 is available



This release

- corrects a defect that produced a crash if you tried to close
DXKeeper
while it was iconified

- in the QSO Capture window, clearing all fields leaves the text entry
cursor in the callsign field

If you've already installed DXKeeper 1.1.1 or later, you can upgrade to
version 1.1.8 by downloading and then running
www.qsl.net/dxkeeper/DXKeeper118Update.exe -- your online help will be
updated by this process.


73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: PropView

Dave, AA6YQ
 

When PropView starts, it initializes the Time field to the then current UTC
time. This won't change unless you change it -- either by double-clicking
(to set the current time), or by keying in a time. Clicking the "Predict"
button does not update the time to the current time, as that would preclude
times other than the current time.

Since time doesn't play a role in the computation -- its just used to
position the vertical time bar -- perhaps it would be more useful to
eliminate the "Time" text box (in the Conditions panel of the Parameters
tab) and instead make the vertical time bar in the Prediction display
"draggable". A prediction would initially position the vertical time bar to
the current time, but one could drag it around to serve as an index.
Double-clicking the vertical time bar would return it to the current time.

Note that a prediction could be for some day other than today, in which case
double-clicking the vertical time bar would be positioning it to "the
current time on that day".

Comments? Better ideas?

IonCAP does not consider geomagnetic conditions in its prediction
computation. I'm currently scanning the literature for the statistical
relationship between the K index and the dimensions of the auroral oval,
which would enable DXView to plot the oval and report the extent to which a
path experiences polar absorption. I know of at least one propagation
program that does this, and therefore assume that documentation of the
relationship exists. If anyone is has this information or a reference to it,
please send it my way.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B Drake [mailto:rich@...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 19:14 PM
To: Dxlab
Subject: [dxlab] PathView


Dave,

Now that the solar flare activity seems to have settled a bit,
PathView is providing some very nice and accurate information. I
think however that it is not always reading the clock. When I
first bring it up and do a prediction it shows the vertical time
bar in the correct location. However, it never seems to change as
I do more predictions at a later time unless I close and reopen it
again.

-----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
www.w3zj.com


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


PathView

 

Dave,

Now that the solar flare activity seems to have settled a bit,
PathView is providing some very nice and accurate information. I
think however that it is not always reading the clock. When I
first bring it up and do a prediction it shows the vertical time
bar in the correct location. However, it never seems to change as
I do more predictions at a later time unless I close and reopen it
again.

-----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
www.w3zj.com


Re: Callsign lookup

 

Dave,

As you probably know, some countries (the UK for example) still
require logging of both start and stop times. Here, we can do what
we want including nothing. But, QSLing dictates that we record
times as accurately as we can so that we can reasonably confirm a
contact. Thus, this is the reason for even being very concerned
about it. Most loggers record only one time and there has been a
big discussion lately on the OnLineQSL reflector as to whether to
record the start or the stop time. Interestingly, it splits about
50/50 among users and people have reasons that they consider
important for doing it one way or the other. DXKeeper is one of
the few loggers that records both the start and stop times so this
becomes an important feature of the program.

I think your idea of providing a separate button specifically for
noting start time is the best. No one will be confused about it
and it provides complete control over it. My suggestion would be
that it not be a required entry and if the user doesn't select it
you record the time of entry into the log (basically the end time
of the QSO) in both time fields. This will work out well for those
quick DX and contest contacts where start and stop times differ
only by a few seconds and also provides rag chewers with a way to
record both times on a long QSO when they want it.

----
73, Rich - W3ZJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Eberson [mailto:zx@...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:45 AM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Callsign lookup


A button so that we can make a choce in it than we can
use it also for
contests.
my opinion

Ron


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave, AA6YQ [mailto:dhb@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2001 7:39
Aan: dxlab@...
Onderwerp: RE: [dxlab] Callsign lookup


We can certainly change "?" from "check for previous
QSOs" to "check for
previous QSOs and lookup DXInfo but don't set the start
time". Seems a
little complicated to remember.

Or we could modify the "lookup" button to not set the
start time, perhaps
making start time the same as end time for all QSOs
logged throught the
capture window. Or should I add a "start QSO" button to
record the start
time?

Which would be more intuitive and/or convenient?

Is there a better idea?


73,

Dave, AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B Drake [mailto:rich@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 23:40 PM
To: Dxlab
Subject: [dxlab] Callsign lookup


Dave,

Entering a callsign in DXKeeper's capture window and
clicking on
the question mark next to it causes the callsign to
be placed into
the filter window and looked up. If the callsign exists in the
log, the information is also transferred to DXView which then
provides beam heading and progress information.
However, if the
callsign does not exist in the log, nothing goes to DXView. I
could click "lookup" to get the call into DXView but that does
other things including noting the start time and I
haven't started
a QSO yet.

-----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
www.w3zj.com


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.







To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




Re: PropView 1.0.2 is available

Dave, AA6YQ
 

By "save some settings", I assume you mean between PropView sessions. Power
and WaveAngle are saved between sessions -- I checked this on both US and
European configurations.

When you close PropView, is it terminating normally or are you seeing an
error message? Perhaps PropView is terminating abnormally before it saves
your modified settings.

The frequency display is dynamic -- when the range of frequencies is large,
the ham bands get scrunched together and the labels overlap, resulting in
the problem you noticed with the 7 in 17 meters. Perhaps there's a way to
miminize this by making the labels alternate positions -- I'll think about
it...

DXView's and PropView's windows are as compressed as I know how to make them
without sacrificing useability. The only way to make them smaller would be
to adopt a smaller font size, which I'm reluctant to implement given the
periodic comments I get about the fonts already being too small. The more
DXLab applications you run, the more screen space you need; I don't know how
to work around this without making the applications much harder to use; the
good news is that higher-resolution display systems (1024x768, 1280x1024,
1600x1200) have gotten a lot less expensive over the past few years.
Alternate suggestions would be appreciated.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Eberson [mailto:zx@...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:32 AM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] PropView 1.0.2 is available


YES HE WORKS DAVE thanks for it.

Is it posible to save some settings like power and wave angel of antenna?
Also on the fig you can see not the top of the 7 from 17 meters.
Can we change the size of the window from Propview so that you can see the
both DXView and Porpview on the screen compleet?

Thanks in advance and the time you take for all of us.


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave Bernstein [mailto:dhb@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2001 7:23
Aan: dxlab@...
Onderwerp: [dxlab] PropView 1.0.2 is available


This release corrects the runtime error occuring on systems with a
locale that doesn't use the period character as a decimal separator.

(Ron, this should correct the problem you are encountering with
1.0.1).

If you already have PropView 1.0.1 installed, you can upgrade by
downloading and running www.qsl.net/propview/PropView102Update.exe --
it will update your online help and install PropView102.exe, which
you can then run.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Click here for Business information


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: Callsign lookup

Ron Eberson
 

A button so that we can make a choce in it than we can use it also for
contests.
my opinion

Ron


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave, AA6YQ [mailto:dhb@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2001 7:39
Aan: dxlab@...
Onderwerp: RE: [dxlab] Callsign lookup


We can certainly change "?" from "check for previous QSOs" to "check for
previous QSOs and lookup DXInfo but don't set the start time". Seems a
little complicated to remember.

Or we could modify the "lookup" button to not set the start time, perhaps
making start time the same as end time for all QSOs logged throught the
capture window. Or should I add a "start QSO" button to record the start
time?

Which would be more intuitive and/or convenient?

Is there a better idea?


73,

Dave, AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B Drake [mailto:rich@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 23:40 PM
To: Dxlab
Subject: [dxlab] Callsign lookup


Dave,

Entering a callsign in DXKeeper's capture window and clicking on
the question mark next to it causes the callsign to be placed into
the filter window and looked up. If the callsign exists in the
log, the information is also transferred to DXView which then
provides beam heading and progress information. However, if the
callsign does not exist in the log, nothing goes to DXView. I
could click "lookup" to get the call into DXView but that does
other things including noting the start time and I haven't started
a QSO yet.

-----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
www.w3zj.com


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.







To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: Callsign lookup

Dave, AA6YQ
 

We can certainly change "?" from "check for previous QSOs" to "check for
previous QSOs and lookup DXInfo but don't set the start time". Seems a
little complicated to remember.

Or we could modify the "lookup" button to not set the start time, perhaps
making start time the same as end time for all QSOs logged throught the
capture window. Or should I add a "start QSO" button to record the start
time?

Which would be more intuitive and/or convenient?

Is there a better idea?


73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B Drake [mailto:rich@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 23:40 PM
To: Dxlab
Subject: [dxlab] Callsign lookup


Dave,

Entering a callsign in DXKeeper's capture window and clicking on
the question mark next to it causes the callsign to be placed into
the filter window and looked up. If the callsign exists in the
log, the information is also transferred to DXView which then
provides beam heading and progress information. However, if the
callsign does not exist in the log, nothing goes to DXView. I
could click "lookup" to get the call into DXView but that does
other things including noting the start time and I haven't started
a QSO yet.

-----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
www.w3zj.com


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: PropView 1.0.2 is available

Ron Eberson
 

YES HE WORKS DAVE thanks for it.

Is it posible to save some settings like power and wave angel of antenna?
Also on the fig you can see not the top of the 7 from 17 meters.
Can we change the size of the window from Propview so that you can see the
both DXView and Porpview on the screen compleet?

Thanks in advance and the time you take for all of us.


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave Bernstein [mailto:dhb@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2001 7:23
Aan: dxlab@...
Onderwerp: [dxlab] PropView 1.0.2 is available


This release corrects the runtime error occuring on systems with a
locale that doesn't use the period character as a decimal separator.

(Ron, this should correct the problem you are encountering with
1.0.1).

If you already have PropView 1.0.1 installed, you can upgrade by
downloading and running www.qsl.net/propview/PropView102Update.exe --
it will update your online help and install PropView102.exe, which
you can then run.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


PropView 1.0.2 is available

Dave Bernstein
 

This release corrects the runtime error occuring on systems with a
locale that doesn't use the period character as a decimal separator.

(Ron, this should correct the problem you are encountering with
1.0.1).

If you already have PropView 1.0.1 installed, you can upgrade by
downloading and running www.qsl.net/propview/PropView102Update.exe --
it will update your online help and install PropView102.exe, which
you can then run.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Callsign lookup

 

Dave,

Entering a callsign in DXKeeper's capture window and clicking on
the question mark next to it causes the callsign to be placed into
the filter window and looked up. If the callsign exists in the
log, the information is also transferred to DXView which then
provides beam heading and progress information. However, if the
callsign does not exist in the log, nothing goes to DXView. I
could click "lookup" to get the call into DXView but that does
other things including noting the start time and I haven't started
a QSO yet.

-----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
www.w3zj.com


Re: PropView 1.0.1

Dave Bernstein
 

Thanks, Ron. "98" and "Dutch version" was what I needed to know. I'll
get on it this evening.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



--- In dxlab@y..., "Ron Eberson" <zx@c...> wrote:
Dave he give's also in the window error 13
type mismatch is this a info for you?

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dave Bernstein [mailto:dhb@m...]
Verzonden: dinsdag 3 april 2001 20:54
Aan: dxlab@y...
Onderwerp: [dxlab] Re: PropView 1.0.1


Ron,

I tested this release on three different versions of windows: NT
4.0,
98SE, and Win2K. My guess is that you are running a European
version,
and that one of PropView's date or time routines is failing in this
environment and creating the runtime error.

Please tell me what version of Windows you are running, and which
European locale you have chosen. Hopefully I can replicate and then
repair the problem tonite.

PropView uses the same Help viewing mechanism as the other DXLab
applications -- in fact it uses the same code module. So I'm not
sure
why PropView is failing, but will look into it.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@y..., "Ron Eberson" <zx@c...> wrote:


Helo all.

I have install the 1.01 version of PropView.

I have the next problem.

1. When i click the Predict button the next mesagge
show: Error 13 Run
time error.
2. If i click the help button i have a screen for DOS and and
must put a
filename?????
3. I have also if i click the Config button the same error 13
4. I can not save my Antenna degrees and my output power.
5. The DXView give the long and lat super on DXProp.

Who can help me.

Ron


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
dxlab-unsubscribe@y...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to