¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: MSFT vs FT4


 

Just to avoid any misunderstanding, I agree that eQSL's?current practice is questionable.?

If you are able to convince eQSL to change that is of course the best solution.?

I did not even consider that. Perhaps I just think too much of them.?

Bj?rn SM7IUN

Den s?n 14 juni 2020 kl 02:03 skrev Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...>:

+ AA6YQ comments below

But logging into eqsl.cc shows that eQSL considers them a match and thereby represents a confirmed QSO.

Although somewhat questionable, I therefore propose DXKeeper considers MFSK without submode and FT4 as the same mode for eQSL confirmations.

+ That would be propagating a defect in eQSL to DXKeeper. No thanks.

+ I will alert Dave N5UP of eQSL.cc.

? ? ? ? 73,

? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ






Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.