Re: MSFT vs FT4
|
Yes.? But logging into eqsl.cc shows that eQSL considers them a match and thereby? represents a confirmed QSO. Although somewhat questionable, I therefore propose DXKeeper considers MFSK without?submode? and FT4 as the same mode for eQSL confirmations. Bj?rn Den l?r 13 juni 2020 kl 21:57 skrev Bernd - KB7AK <bernd1peters@...>: He might be referring to the fact that some QSO's in eQSL come through as just MFSK, while the majority comes through as MFSK(FT4). If a QSO is logged as MFSK in eQSL it cannot be matched to a QSO that is logged as FT4 in DXKeeper, I usually have one of 2 each week.? |
Bj?rn SM7IUN