¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: CI-V bus collusion


 

Very true. Let's hope ICOM learned their lesson with the PW-2.

Bj?rn SM7IUN

Den s?n 1 mars 2020 kl 17:50 skrev Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...>:

+ AA6YQ comments below

In a Danish ham radio newsletter I saw a brutal but supposedly effective
fix for the PW-1 "issue". It may have some serious limitations since I
have not seen it spread.

A reversed diode between the CI-V line and the tranceivers's PTT output.

Providing the PTT line is either high impedance or a voltage higher than
that of the CI-V, it will do nothing while receiving but pull the CI-V line to
ground when transmitting. Effectively preventing the PW-1 to be mislead
into changing band while transmitting.

+ That wouldn't prevent a collision while receiving to change the PW-1 frequency just before it is instructed to transmit.

? ? ? 73,

? ? ? ? ? ? Dave




Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.