开云体育

wrote: destroy ... anything Such as what Jesus is actually teaching. Hence we see people hiding from a discussion of what that actually is, and involving themselves with attempts to rewrite the Course

--- In Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "garyrrenard" <garyrrenard@y...> wrote: Gene actually has kind of a bet going there about how > long it will take him to get kicked out of the

I don't feel resentful about it, Stephen. Why would I? I choose not to get involved with debates about it, but that doesn't have anything to do with resenting it. I have a copy of the Urtext, but I

Thanks for the reminder Gary. I remember Ken saying many years ago that if we are too fearful to go to Jesus/HS we have our Brothers to gently remind us of who we really are. :-) :::::grinding my

For the first time in a long time I believe in the saying "ignorance is bliss." :-) I have no clue as to what this lady has been saying since she has been on this listserv, and I have decided to try

Stephen wrote: debate us for reasons of defensivness and being indignant about having the gall to state opinions that go against the grain, is to refuse to enter dialogue for all the wrong reasons.

A little piece of Sikh wisdom for you guys. Thought I might "enlighten" you to the fact that there are plenty of other people in the world who believe that the world (as it is seen in Illumination)

Very good post, Carrie. And for everyone who's reading this, Carrie is a Blue Book student - just like you guys. And she's not the only one who saw Gary and his wife's games. I'll even add that there

To: <Disappearance_of_the_Universe@...> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 7:10 PM Subject: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Re: Wishing you a mind at peace You've had a bad run, Gary, because

To: <Disappearance_of_the_Universe@...> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Re: Wishing you a mind at peace Nobody is "shoving" the Urtext

Carrie wrote: discussion on the ng and they mainly get ignored.<< Hello Carrie: I notice you have a few Course themes that you basically go over and over to prove some kind of point. Like "if a

Carrie wrote: who cares if a few people criticize it? Hi Carrie. It wasn't criticism of the book that was answered by us at the ng, it was the deliberate misrepresentation of what the book said as

Re: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Re: A + P used to meansomethingFrom: Gene Bogart To: Disappearance_of_the_Universe@... Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:22 PM Subject: Re:

Strange... I just came from "the newsgroup from hell" (and seems like calling it this, means you are aware of what it's like- so why are you surprised what you find there?) and looked down here,

To: <Disappearance_of_the_Universe@...> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Actually, Gene's being nice so far... Actually, Pat, the copyright

That is the ultimate goal, but I also need not skip steps ... if I see my myself getting upset, rankled ... I need to be aware of that for I am very good at rationalizing, minimizing my feelings about

Stephen wrote: judgemental claim? Just someone who's been watching you people in action for the last six months.

Okay, I did make a mistake . I meant to say "those of us who choose to answer at this time will serve to make the DU list stronger." I was really getting a lot out of sharing our experiences with the

Judy wrote: the universe - and this power can't be seen by the eyes of the body. I'll read this over when I have time and see if I have made sense. I have the feeling I did, though - coming from the

Elizabeth wrote: hypothetical smoke, and we'll relay some of J's teachings to you on how to escape it." Does this "it" refer to time and/or the universe? Hi Elizabeth. Yes, I believe it does. what