¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: A + P used tomeansomething


Stephen
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Re: A + P used tomeansomething

> From: "ideaofgod" <gwsmith@...>
>
> --- In Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "Stephen"
> <cracker.jack@n...> wrote:
>
>> but this is so backwards, I just don't know where to begin...
>> The Course is overwhelmingly specific in it's teaching
>> that "there is no world"

>> Nope. ?It isn't. ?That's just a commonly held belief ?- and I can
>> understand why hearing otherwise is somewhat difficult to swallow.

> One big difficulty is that we don't even have a consensus on what we
> mean by "the world". People will argue that there is no world, and
> then grow angry if I ask what it is that isn't. What is "the world"?
> The idea of space and time? Some illusion? The reality behind the
> illusion? What??


Maybe this is the real crux of all this discussion; what is "the world" as you are referring to it, the one you say the Course tells us God made. ?Is it the earth, the planets, stars, galaxies... the universe of matter, energy, space, and time?
The short answer to that would have to be "yes" as:
?
"God created time so that man could use it creatively, and convince himself of his own ability to create.? Time is a teaching device, and a means to an end.? It will cease when it is no longer useful for facilitating learning." (ACIM Urtext)

"The acceptance of the Atonement by everyone is only a matter of time. In fact, both time AND matter were created for this purpose." (ACIM Urtext)
Is it the "new world", where we will receive new bodies (as the Bible promises), and will rule alongside Jesus in glory for a thousand years?
Not if taken too literally.? Try this instead and tell me what you think:
?
"All appeared new, and strange at first, inexpressibly rare and delightful and beatiful.? I was a little stranger, which at my entrance into the world was saluted and surrounded with innumerable joys.? My knowledge was Divine.? I knew by intuition those things which, since my Apostacy, I collected again by the highest reason.? My every ignorance was advantageous.? I seemed as one brought into the Estate of Innocence.? All things were spotless and pure and glorious: yea, and infinitely mine, and joyful and precious.? I knew not that there were any sins, or complaints or laws.? I dreamed not of poverties, contentions or vices.? All tears and quarrels were hidden from mine eyes.? Everything was at rest, free and immortal.? I knew nothing of sickness or death or rents or exaction, either for tribute or bread.? In the absence of these I was entertained like an Angel with the works of God in their splendour and glory, I saw all in the peace of Eden; Heaven and Earth did sing my Creator's praises, and could not make more melody to Adam than
to me.? All Time was Eternity, and a perpetual Sabbathy.? It is not strange, that an infant [Traherne is referring to being 'born again' or 'anew' in his writtings] should be heir of the whole World, and see those mysteries which the books of the learned never unfold?
?
??????? The corn was orient and immortal wheat, which never should be reaped, nor was ever sown.? I thought it had stood from everlasting to everlasting.? The dust and stones of the street were as precious as gold; the gates were at first the end of the world.? The green trees when I saw them first through one of the gates transported and ravished me, their sweetness and unusual beauty made my heart to leap, and almost mad with ecstasy, they were such strange and wonderful things.? The men!? O what venerable and reverend creatures did the aged seem!? Immortal Cherubims!
And young men glittering and sparkling Angels, and maids strange seraphic pieces of life and beauty!? Boys and girls tumbling in the street, and playing, were moving jewels.? I knew not that they were born or should die;? But all things abided eternally as they were in their proper places.? Eternity was manifest in the Light of the Day, and something infinite behind everything appeared: which talked with my expectation and moved my desire.? The city seemed to stand in Eden, or to be built in Heaven.? The streets were mine, the temple was mine, the people were mine, their clothes and gold and silver were mine, as much as their sparkling eyes, fair skins, and ruddy faces.? The skies were mine, ans so were the sun and moon and stars, and all the World was mine, and I the only spectator and enjoyer of it.? I knew no churlish proprieties, nor bounds, nor divisions: but all proprieties and divisions were mine: all treasures and the possessors of them.? So that with much ado I was corrupted, and made to learn the dirty devices of this world.? Which now I unlearn, and become, as it were, a little child again that I may enter into the Kingdom of God."? (Thomas Traherne - 'The Earthly Splendour')
Or is it the full Awareness of the Son as created by God, which seems to be what most Course students (at least, that I know) believe that the Course is referring to, metaphorically/symbolically, when there is any hint of a statement regarding "the real world" or "the world that God made"...
Good question, since in mysticism you are One with Creation/The Universe.? Consider Traherne's account carefully - and note the title: The Earthly Splendour.? No, Gene, mystics are not wrong.? You are right to say that the world as seen as outside of us, hellish and separate from us is an 'illusion' but that's all.
Perhaps this issue you have raised here is all just a matter of semantics; simply your definition of "the world". So please define, and maybe we can put this issue to rest.
?How can one define what escapes definition?? The short answer would be to say that "you" are the world, but even that will be contaminated by what you consider "the world" to be.? Try these sections from Nisargadatta's "I Am That" for a more full answer:
?
Q: Righteousness will set me free.
?
M: Righteousness will undoubtedly make you and your world a comfortable, even happy place. But what is the use? There is no reality in it. It cannot last.
?
Q: God will help.
?
M: To help you God must know your existence. But you and your world are dream states. In dream you may suffer agonies. None knows them, and none can help you.

~~~~~~~

Q: God runs the world, God will save it.

M: That's what you say! Did God come and tell you that the world is His creation and concern and not yours?

Q: Why should it be my sole concern?

M: Consider. The world in which you live, who else knows about it?

Q: You know. Everybody knows.

M: Did anybody come from outside of your world to tell you? Myself and everybody else appear and disappear in your world. We are all at your mercy.

Q: It cannot be so bad! I exist in your world as you exist in mine.

M: You have no evidence of my world. You are completely wrapped up in the world of your own making.

Q: My own feeling is that my spiritual development is not in my hands. Making one's own plans and carrying them out leads nowhere. I just run in circles round myself. When God considers the fruit to be ripe, He will pluck it and eat it. Whichever fruit seems green to Him will remain on the world's tree for another day.

M: You think God knows you? Even the world He does not know.

Q: Yours is a different God. Mine is different. Mine is merciful. He suffers along with us.

M: You pray to save one, while thousands die. And if all stop dying, there will be no space on earth

Q: I am not afraid of death. My concern is with sorrow and suffering. My God is a simple God and rather helpless. He has no power to compel us to be wise. He can only stand and wait.

M: If you and your God are both helpless, does it not imply that the world is accidental? And if it is, the only thing you can do is to go beyond it.

~~~~~~~

Q: Why do you deny being to the world?

M: I do not negate the world. I see it as appearing in consciousness, which is the totality of the known in the immensity of the unknown. What begins and ends is mere appearance. The world can be said to appear, but not to be. The appearance may last very long on some scale of time, and be very short on another, but ultimately it comes to the same. Whatever is time bound is momentary and has no reality.

Q: Surely, you see the actual world as it surrounds you. YOU seem to behave quite normally!

M: That is how it appears to you. What in your case occupies the entire field of consciousness, is a mere speck in mine. The world lasts, but for a moment. It is your memory that makes you think that the world continues. Myself, I don't live by memory. I see the world as it is, a momentary appearance in consciousness.

Q: In your consciousness?

M: All idea of 'me' and 'mine', even of 'I am' is in consciousness.

Q: Is then your 'absolute being' (paramakash) un¨Cconsciousness?

M: The idea of un¨Cconsciousness exists in consciousness only.

Q: Then; how do you know you are in the supreme state?

M: Because I am in it. It is the only natural state.

Q: Can you describe it?

M: Only by negation, as uncaused, independent, unrelated, undivided, uncomposed, unshakable, unquestionable, unreachable by effort. Every positive definition is from memory and, therefore, inapplicable. And yet my state is supremely actual and, therefore, possible, realizable, attainable.

Q: Are you not immersed timelessly in an abstraction?

M: Abstraction is mental and verbal and disappears in sleep, or swoon; it reappears in time; I am in my own state (swarupa)timelessly in the now. Past and future are in the mind only ¨C I am now.

Q: The world too is now.

M: Which world?

Q: The world around us.

M: It is your world you have in mind, not mine. What do you know of me, when even my talk with you is in your world only? You have no reason to believe that my world is identical with yours. My world is real, true, as it is perceived, while yours appears and disappears, according to the state of your mind. Your world is something alien, and you are afraid of it. My world is myself. I am at home.

Q: If you are the world, how can you be conscious of it? Is not the subject of consciousness different from its object?

M: Consciousness and the world appear and disappear together, hence they are two aspects of the same state.

Q: In sleep I am not, and the world continues.

M: How do you know?

Q: On waking up I come to know. My memory tells me.

M: Memory is in the mind. The mind continues in sleep.

Q: It is partly in abeyance.

M: But its world picture is not affected. As long as the mind is there, your body and your worid are there. Your world is mind¨Cmade, subjective, enclosed within the mind, fragmentary, temporary, personal, hanging on the thread of memory.

Q: So is yours?

M: Oh, no. I live in a world of realities, while yours is of imaginings. Your world is personal, private, unshareable, intimately your own, Nobody can enter it, see as you see, hear as you hear, feel your emotions and think your thoughts. In your world you are truly alone, enclosed in your ever¨Cchanging dream, which you take for life. My world is an open world, common to all, accessible to all. In my world there is community, insight, love, real quality; the individual is the total, the totality ¨C in the individual. All are one and the One is all.

Q: Is your world full of things and people as is mine?

M: No, it is full of myself.

Q: But do you see and hear as we do?

M: Yes, I appear to hear and see and talk and act, but to me it just happens, as to you digestion or perspiration happens. The body¨Cmind machine looks after it, but leaves me out of it. Just as you do not need to worry about growing hair, so I need not worry about words and actions. They just happen and leave me unconcerned, for in my world nothing ever goes wrong.

~~~~~~~

So you see, Gene, "the world" is ego because you are ego, forgiven because you are forgiven (real world), Heaven because you are in Heaven.

~

Stephen

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.