Before the book came out, one of the things I thought might
cause the most discussion was the smart-ass type style that is
sometimes evident. I mention in my Author's Note that Pursah told me
their style was designed to get me to pay attention. Also, readers
will note that *my* smart ass comments were usually a defense against
my painful shyness, which I didn't really start to get over until
this latest phase of my life with my ascended visitors and the Course.
It's been surprising to me that I really haven't received many
complaints about this particular subject. Even in exchanging e-mails
with priests (both Catholic and Episcopalian) and ministers, I don't
think I've heard one negative comment about the book's style. A
priest told me it's nothing compared to what he hears in confession!
In any case, A Course in Miracles says, "If you would be heard by
those who suffer, you must speak their language. If you would be a
savior, you must understand what needs to be escaped." (M64-65)
So maybe my visitors knew what they were doing. However, I'd be
happy to hear any comments, positive or negative, about what any of
you thought when you first noticed that this book didn't have the
same style as most of the other spiritual books, and whether or not
you found it helpful in communicating the message it was intended to.
Love and peace, Gary.
