Stephen, I know several students of ACIM who learned on their own
independently without studying Ken Wapnick who came to the same
conclusion. If I were to read it independently, I would, too. I am
curious as to whether you have you come to your conclusions
independently or have you been influenced by someone else? I believe
that Jesus is most of the time talking in symbols that we can
understand where we are at now. At other times he is is stretching
us closer to the truth.
Love,
Linda
--- In Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "Stephen"
<cracker.jack@n...> wrote:
MessageFrom: Jim Dunn
No, Jim, this idea about Creation being *nothing but* an ego
illusion that has been most strongly propagated by Ken Wapnick and
FACIM is quite simply wrong. There's just no doubt about it at
all. The evidence that can be amassed against it (and *for* the
counter view) from ACIM itself as well as many other important and
related sources is of mammoth proportions.
~
Stephen
