¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

AMP-4

Joseph K7CBR
 

Mr. Rob... Can you please remind me what the low frequency attenuation was for your AMP-4? Thanks!

Joseph

On Wednesday, January 1, 2025 at 12:59:27 PM EST, Rob Sherwood via groups.io <rob@...> wrote:


My AMP-4 feedback loop was designed for about a 3 dB roll-off at 3 kHz.? Personal choice.? Rob, NC0B
> On Jan 1, 2025, at 10:10?AM, Jim Shorney via groups.io <jimNU0C@...> wrote:
>
> ?


Re: Speaker?

Joseph K7CBR
 

Spot on... As I stated in my group posting, the original driver is old, and a less efficient speaker can be had when using more power. My MS-4 was treated to a hardwood ply escutcheon to mount the speaker, I used some open cell foam at the back to dampen it some, treated the enclosure with dynamat... I do whatever I need to to make this stuff how I want it to be. I don't have one shred of worry or thought in trying to keep it original at all. Its 2025, advances in technology allow us to do things Drake would not have been able to. When I did all this about 7-8 years ago, I tested the factory Jensen and the new driver side by side. Sweeping from 50 to 10K cycles... I confirmed beyond any doubt the old speaker was terrible.

On Wednesday, January 1, 2025 at 12:42:16 PM EST, kg9hfrank@... via groups.io <kg9hfrank@...> wrote:


All the talk about the audio amplifier on an R-4C intrigues me to ask the question, ¡°What are you doing about the speaker?¡± ?
With a 50 year old speaker in some cases, what are you replacing it with, without doing any mechanical work?¡±
??
? ? ?Frank Krozel
? ? ? ? ? ?KG9H
Life Member, ARRL
? ? (630) 924-1600
kg9hfrank@...


Re: Speaker?

 

Frank,

I am running the audio out of my R4C into a CLEAR SPEECH noise filter, then....from the noise filter into a Kenwood SP-940 speaker with 3 filters in it.

Absolute Nirvana sound...Can pick up weak DX that doesn't move the meter.

?The Drake R4C out hears my Icom 7300, but quite a bit......

Bill N1WL
?

William Losefsky?

?????????



On Wednesday, January 1, 2025 at 12:42:15 PM EST, kg9hfrank@... via groups.io <kg9hfrank@...> wrote:


All the talk about the audio amplifier on an R-4C intrigues me to ask the question, ¡°What are you doing about the speaker?¡± ?
With a 50 year old speaker in some cases, what are you replacing it with, without doing any mechanical work?¡±
??
? ? ?Frank Krozel
? ? ? ? ? ?KG9H
Life Member, ARRL
? ? (630) 924-1600
kg9hfrank@...


Re: TR7 next problem

 

Jim I just hooked my older counter and it is reading 152 MHZ plus it minus. Now which one is right? Maybe this one where the voltage is so high. Maybe I should put a ground on RFC505 and see what happens?

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 1:58?PM Jim Harris <radiove1rb@...> wrote:
Jim maybe this will help. I touched up several solder joints although they didn¡¯t look good but not cracked. I switched the input to the counter and it is reading 17 to 18 mhz
as the frequency is jumping around so is not locked. I wonder if that is a clue??

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 12:52?PM Jim Harris via <radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:
Good ideas Jim and I will get at doing that today. It is windy and raining here quite hard. A good job inside hi hi. I will let you know how it goes. Many thanks for the suggestions?and help.

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 12:24?PM Jim Shorney via <jimNU0C=[email protected]> wrote:

At this point I am suspicious of that 1.3 MHz reading. That may be a spurious reading. It seems to me that the VCO should not be able to run there. What is the level of the signal? The frequency determining components are L502 and the varactor diodes. Resist the temptation to try to adjust L502. As a long time tech told me back in the dim past, when you have a failure "it is never the alignment".

At this point I think I would inspect the solder connections in the high VCO circuit under magnification and good lighting. You could have a failed joint or via. Check the voltages on the three JFETs. C156 or C517 could be suspect. You have a working low VCO to compare voltage and resistance readings to.

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 07:41:18 -0400
"Jim Harris via " <radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes Gary I did the ground on RFC505? when looking at the frequency on
> the counter and it does drop a lot. So I guess you are saying the High
> VCO is oscillating at 1.3 MHz . If that is the case there must be
> something wrong on that board unless the info it gets is wrong. Hope
> this helps.

--

73

-Jim
NU0C






Re: TR7 next problem

 

Forget that idea as I turned the TR7 off and that frequency did not go away. Guess next it to try and measure voltages on both VCO¡¯s and see if that will show the bad part etc.?

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 1:58?PM Jim Harris <radiove1rb@...> wrote:
Jim maybe this will help. I touched up several solder joints although they didn¡¯t look good but not cracked. I switched the input to the counter and it is reading 17 to 18 mhz
as the frequency is jumping around so is not locked. I wonder if that is a clue??

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 12:52?PM Jim Harris via <radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:
Good ideas Jim and I will get at doing that today. It is windy and raining here quite hard. A good job inside hi hi. I will let you know how it goes. Many thanks for the suggestions?and help.

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 12:24?PM Jim Shorney via <jimNU0C=[email protected]> wrote:

At this point I am suspicious of that 1.3 MHz reading. That may be a spurious reading. It seems to me that the VCO should not be able to run there. What is the level of the signal? The frequency determining components are L502 and the varactor diodes. Resist the temptation to try to adjust L502. As a long time tech told me back in the dim past, when you have a failure "it is never the alignment".

At this point I think I would inspect the solder connections in the high VCO circuit under magnification and good lighting. You could have a failed joint or via. Check the voltages on the three JFETs. C156 or C517 could be suspect. You have a working low VCO to compare voltage and resistance readings to.

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 07:41:18 -0400
"Jim Harris via " <radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes Gary I did the ground on RFC505? when looking at the frequency on
> the counter and it does drop a lot. So I guess you are saying the High
> VCO is oscillating at 1.3 MHz . If that is the case there must be
> something wrong on that board unless the info it gets is wrong. Hope
> this helps.

--

73

-Jim
NU0C






Re: VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

 

My AMP-4 feedback loop was designed for about a 3 dB roll-off at 3 kHz. Personal choice. Rob, NC0B

On Jan 1, 2025, at 10:10?AM, Jim Shorney via groups.io <jimNU0C@...> wrote:

?
Yeah, that works. The TDA chips are rock stable and practically bulletproof when implemented properly. I have one of the Velleman TDA2002 modules that I acquired some years back for my R4C, I just have not got a round tuit yet. One thing that I did do was to alter the capacitance in the feedback network to roll the audio off around 4KHz.

On Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:53 -0800
"Gary WB6OGD via groups.io" <winbladgary@...> wrote:

It's a waste of time and money to design an AF amp for the Drake.
I used a (now) 75cent complete TDA2030 module from china.

Like this one:
--

73

-Jim
NU0C





Re: TR7 next problem

 

Jim maybe this will help. I touched up several solder joints although they didn¡¯t look good but not cracked. I switched the input to the counter and it is reading 17 to 18 mhz
as the frequency is jumping around so is not locked. I wonder if that is a clue??

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 12:52?PM Jim Harris via <radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:
Good ideas Jim and I will get at doing that today. It is windy and raining here quite hard. A good job inside hi hi. I will let you know how it goes. Many thanks for the suggestions?and help.

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 12:24?PM Jim Shorney via <jimNU0C=[email protected]> wrote:

At this point I am suspicious of that 1.3 MHz reading. That may be a spurious reading. It seems to me that the VCO should not be able to run there. What is the level of the signal? The frequency determining components are L502 and the varactor diodes. Resist the temptation to try to adjust L502. As a long time tech told me back in the dim past, when you have a failure "it is never the alignment".

At this point I think I would inspect the solder connections in the high VCO circuit under magnification and good lighting. You could have a failed joint or via. Check the voltages on the three JFETs. C156 or C517 could be suspect. You have a working low VCO to compare voltage and resistance readings to.

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 07:41:18 -0400
"Jim Harris via " <radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes Gary I did the ground on RFC505? when looking at the frequency on
> the counter and it does drop a lot. So I guess you are saying the High
> VCO is oscillating at 1.3 MHz . If that is the case there must be
> something wrong on that board unless the info it gets is wrong. Hope
> this helps.

--

73

-Jim
NU0C






Re: Speaker?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

All the talk about the audio amplifier on an R-4C intrigues me to ask the question, ¡°What are you doing about the speaker?¡± ?
With a 50 year old speaker in some cases, what are you replacing it with, without doing any mechanical work?¡±
??
? ? ?Frank Krozel
? ? ? ? ? ?KG9H
Life Member, ARRL
? ? (630) 924-1600
kg9hfrank@...


Re: AF AMP VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

Joseph K7CBR
 

Gary!!! Bravo! I too used a device like that for mine( TDA7377)... I removed the original jensen speaker, used a lower efficiency driver, yet one with better listening specs. My MS-4 has been modified into a more practical speaker enclosure also. I tossed the cardboard speaker escutcheon and made a proper one out of hardwood ply. Lots of other things to make the box have more decent response also... Those TDA modules are great! I get about 10-11 watts from mine. 2.5 watts does not cut it when guys are now hell bent on 2.8kHz bandwidth or more. Doing all this and using one of Franks 2.8 filters was very liberating. I thought about using in bridged mode, yet 10-11 watts is flat enough.

On Wednesday, January 1, 2025 at 11:33:55 AM EST, Gary WB6OGD via groups.io <winbladgary@...> wrote:


It's a waste of time and money to design an AF amp for the Drake.
I used a (now) 75cent complete TDA2030 module from china.
?
Like this one:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/314750105717?_skw=TDa2030+amplifier+module&itmmeta=01JGHB55413WV2745A8XBJYQBN&hash=item4948917875:g:upwAAOSwiFZky38Y&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA8HoV3kP08IDx%2BKZ9MfhVJKl9LzhQlEV7hr7qISFGACsJ4nRv905MP85TlwPdXY5R6c3VMsAxJIQKAv5Wui8d0Yi5pi9YIYuzUCSjP5ml2suXZumYP9VjoXxEuLgFUi%2FbDTCLNL%2Bfzq1996uV4tf62yNmyWpQMXYoXUZz8Vv9amSvPAB9B%2B0dDCc1DrezcMlCO9tR6%2FQCZNyVOKUH0VaPBtchCvaYlnLrPBcthdKwTS0tsusftmUTkrWDt3q1FPcmtYKvA7qfjd%2FramvBIYhkHsdzm2t9cFMXaqQoBKG16X7Bgfc83okBCT8p2OAuM1pXVw%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR57SlKuEZQ
?
See my Folder in the Files section:
? ? "Drake R4A or R4B solid state AF Amp"
?
73,
Gary
WB6OGD
?


Re: VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

 

I've seen that board on Osh Park. I like the purple one. :D

On Wed, 01 Jan 2025 09:02:55 -0800
"Paul Christensen via groups.io" <w9ac@...> wrote:

The image below shows a discrete class AB amp layout meant specifically for the Drake R4 series

--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

 

Yeah, that works. The TDA chips are rock stable and practically bulletproof when implemented properly. I have one of the Velleman TDA2002 modules that I acquired some years back for my R4C, I just have not got a round tuit yet. One thing that I did do was to alter the capacitance in the feedback network to roll the audio off around 4KHz.

On Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:53 -0800
"Gary WB6OGD via groups.io" <winbladgary@...> wrote:

It's a waste of time and money to design an AF amp for the Drake.
I used a (now) 75cent complete TDA2030 module from china.

Like this one:
--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

 

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 08:33 AM, Gary WB6OGD wrote:
It's a waste of time and money to design an AF amp for the Drake.
I used a (now) 75cent complete TDA2030 module from china.
?
The TDA series and LM380 are fine although I wanted lower noise with no detectable hiss at any setting of the AF control when using studio-grade headphones.?
?
The image below shows a discrete class AB amp layout meant specifically for the Drake R4 series.? It has on-board V regulation, PS decoupling, and two isolated analog ground planes that meet together at the at the V reg ground pin.? Loudspeaker current can't modulate the ground reference of the high-gain, low-noise front-end stage.?
?
The high-gain stage uses low-noise Toshiba transistors. The output cap is 4500 uF.? An additional regulated output can feed the PTO.? ? Sure, it's only communications-grade audio but anyone wishing to listen at my QTH, you're welcome to stop by and hear the difference.
?
Paul, W9AC
?
?
?


Re: TR7 next problem

 

Good ideas Jim and I will get at doing that today. It is windy and raining here quite hard. A good job inside hi hi. I will let you know how it goes. Many thanks for the suggestions?and help.

Jim VE1RB

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 12:24?PM Jim Shorney via <jimNU0C=[email protected]> wrote:

At this point I am suspicious of that 1.3 MHz reading. That may be a spurious reading. It seems to me that the VCO should not be able to run there. What is the level of the signal? The frequency determining components are L502 and the varactor diodes. Resist the temptation to try to adjust L502. As a long time tech told me back in the dim past, when you have a failure "it is never the alignment".

At this point I think I would inspect the solder connections in the high VCO circuit under magnification and good lighting. You could have a failed joint or via. Check the voltages on the three JFETs. C156 or C517 could be suspect. You have a working low VCO to compare voltage and resistance readings to.

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 07:41:18 -0400
"Jim Harris via " <radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes Gary I did the ground on RFC505? when looking at the frequency on
> the counter and it does drop a lot. So I guess you are saying the High
> VCO is oscillating at 1.3 MHz . If that is the case there must be
> something wrong on that board unless the info it gets is wrong. Hope
> this helps.

--

73

-Jim
NU0C






Re: VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

 

It's a waste of time and money to design an AF amp for the Drake.
I used a (now) 75cent complete TDA2030 module from china.
?
Like this one:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/314750105717?_skw=TDa2030+amplifier+module&itmmeta=01JGHB55413WV2745A8XBJYQBN&hash=item4948917875:g:upwAAOSwiFZky38Y&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA8HoV3kP08IDx%2BKZ9MfhVJKl9LzhQlEV7hr7qISFGACsJ4nRv905MP85TlwPdXY5R6c3VMsAxJIQKAv5Wui8d0Yi5pi9YIYuzUCSjP5ml2suXZumYP9VjoXxEuLgFUi%2FbDTCLNL%2Bfzq1996uV4tf62yNmyWpQMXYoXUZz8Vv9amSvPAB9B%2B0dDCc1DrezcMlCO9tR6%2FQCZNyVOKUH0VaPBtchCvaYlnLrPBcthdKwTS0tsusftmUTkrWDt3q1FPcmtYKvA7qfjd%2FramvBIYhkHsdzm2t9cFMXaqQoBKG16X7Bgfc83okBCT8p2OAuM1pXVw%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR57SlKuEZQ
?
See my Folder in the Files section:
? ? "Drake R4A or R4B solid state AF Amp"
?
73,
Gary
WB6OGD
?


Re: TR7 next problem

 

At this point I am suspicious of that 1.3 MHz reading. That may be a spurious reading. It seems to me that the VCO should not be able to run there. What is the level of the signal? The frequency determining components are L502 and the varactor diodes. Resist the temptation to try to adjust L502. As a long time tech told me back in the dim past, when you have a failure "it is never the alignment".

At this point I think I would inspect the solder connections in the high VCO circuit under magnification and good lighting. You could have a failed joint or via. Check the voltages on the three JFETs. C156 or C517 could be suspect. You have a working low VCO to compare voltage and resistance readings to.

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 07:41:18 -0400
"Jim Harris via groups.io" <radiove1rb@...> wrote:

Yes Gary I did the ground on RFC505? when looking at the frequency on
the counter and it does drop a lot. So I guess you are saying the High
VCO is oscillating at 1.3 MHz . If that is the case there must be
something wrong on that board unless the info it gets is wrong. Hope
this helps.
--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

 

FWIW the TR7 uses an LM380. It works pretty well.

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 10:45:24 -0500
"Mike Bryce via groups.io" <prosolar@...> wrote:

FYI¡­ I designed an audio amp board for the R4C that used a LM380. Worked great and had plenty of humph to drive the MS4 speaker to room filling volume

--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Rob,

There¡¯s always the possibility of starting over, making the changes to the artwork as necessary to use newer parts and or different parts with different footprints.

I have time to do a few¡­ provided I have the physical dimensions for the board and of course schematics.

FYI¡­ I designed an audio amp board for the R4C that used a LM380. Worked great and had plenty of humph to drive the MS4 speaker to room filling volume



Mike, WB8VGE
SunLight Energy Systems
The Heathkit Shop
.com/
J e e p
o|||||||o?

On Dec 31, 2024, at 5:02 PM, Rob Sherwood via <rob@...> wrote:

Hi Glenn,
?
In 2022 there was an attempt to have Harbach Electronics offer the boards and a parts kit.? My old Gerber files were not readable by most current PCB programs.? A ham in Germany was able to get my old Gerber files converted to current formats.? By the time that problem was solved Harbach had lost interest.? I just sent an email to Dieter asking if he could locate the updated Gerber files and send them to me.? If this can be accomplished I would be happy to turn them over to anyone who was interested in running another batch of boards.? Call me if you want to chat.
?
Rob, NC0B
303-995-2749 cell
?
?
From:?[email protected]?[mailto:[email protected]]?On Behalf Of?Glenn W2BX via?
Sent:?Tuesday, December 31, 2024 11:24 AM
To:?[email protected]
Subject:?Re: [DRAKE-RADIO] VE3EFJ third mixer mod for the R4C
?


Re: Drake mods

 

Using a doubler off the fil line has been done before.? ?We used a doubler (FWD) and used the 5.0 vac fil on the drake L4B fil xfmr sec winding....to obtain? 12.74 vdc (after V drop from? both diodes).? ?That was used to operate the primary? side of an opto isolator. Sec output side of the same opto was used to key a mess of sped up vac relays. IE: the opto was used for a soft key setup.? That was a cheap and easy way to obtain 12.74 vdc.? The opto required anything from 9-18 vdc ( nominal was 15 vdc).?

On paper, it should work with a 6.3 vac fil......= 16.41vdc (including V drop from both diodes)? and your proposed LM380.? ?( LM380 requires? 10-22 vdc).? Suitable filtering may just require the? 2 x caps in the doubler.? Perhaps bigger value caps.? An extra? filter on the output would also work, like a simple C-R-C? added on....... provided the v drop across the R? was not too great.? ?A? C-L-C? also works good.?


Re: TR7 next problem

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yes Gary I did the ground on RFC505? when looking at the frequency on the counter and it does drop a lot. So I guess you are saying the High VCO is oscillating at 1.3 MHz . If that is the case there must be something wrong on that board unless the info it gets is wrong. Hope this helps.

73, Jim VE1RB

On 2024-12-31 18:06, Gary Follett via groups.io wrote:

I don¡¯t know how it can read 1.3 MHz if not oscillating¡­

Yes, the lo band VCO should change frequency if you pill RFC502 to ground, pulling the varactor drive from ~21 volts to zero volts.

Gary

W0DVN

On Dec 31, 2024, at 3:12?PM, Jim Harris via groups.io <radiove1rb@...> wrote:

Do you mean on the low VCO will drop as I don¡¯t think the high VCO is oscillating as it reads 1.3 mhz and dies not change when I put a ground on RFC 505. Also those voltages on the test pint do not change when the I change from the low VCO to the high one. I will test again.?

Jim VE1RB

On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 3:33?PM Gary Follett via??<xntrick1948=[email protected]> wrote:
Those voltages will inly read correctly if the PLL loop is closed. Do you have enough extenders to put the radio into operating condition?

The way you have it operating, the output at the test point is simply ramping up to the maximum that can be produced by U504 in an open loop condition.

However, the high band VCO should also go high in frequency with ~21 volts on RFC505.

I assume that, if you short RFC502 (lo band VCO) to ground, the frequency you read drops from the 65 MHz quite a lot.

Gary

W0DVN?


On Dec 31, 2024, at 11:54?AM, Jim Harris via??<radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Gary, I did the ground on RFC505 and no change except that the voltage goes very low of course going through a 100K resistor. The frequency counter shows 1.3 MHz on the output of the VCO when it is on 10 or 15 meters. When I switch to 14 MHz it pops up to 65 MHz but it is not connect to the translator board just plugged into my extenders.? I did a voltage check at the test point off of CR515, CR516, CR517, and CR518 and here is what I got, Way off.

1.5 MHZ 21.24 VDC Looks like it should be 3 volts. the photocopy is heard to read.

14.0 MHz 21.20 VDC Looks like it should be maybe 15 volts

21.0 MHZ 21.17 VDC and looks like it should be 6 Volts

29.5 MHZ 21.15 VDC and looks like it should be 14.5 volts

Maybe I am way off Gary but hope that maybe that helps. Almost looks like something it shorted? I don't know where to go next so any help appreciated. Thanks.

73, Jim VE1RB


On 2024-12-30 13:42, Gary Follett via??wrote:
That is WAY too high!!

The maximum that should be seen at this point is ~15 volts, the high end of 10 meters. 20 volts here would push the VCO to its maximum frequency, if it is running at all.?

Is there any RF signal coming out of the VCO? You may have answered this previously but I seem to have forgotten the answer. If there IS RF, here, what is its frequency?

Something is telling the PLL phase detector to put out a voltage thinking that the frequency is too low, which is why the voltage on RFC505 is so high.

Can you short RFC505 cold end to ground? This SHOULD make the VCO, if it is operating, go to the low end of its range in frequency. This point is fed via a 100K resistor from U504B so this will not hurt anything.

Gary

W0DVN

PS: Not taking into account C516 and C517, I had previously stated that voltage across the tuning diodes depended one the voltage at Q504 Drain. This was an error on my part. Those two capacitors isolate the DC on the tuning diodes from the Drain of the oscillator FET.

Cn you short?
On Dec 30, 2024, at 5:39?AM, Jim Harris via??<radiove1rb@...>?wrote:

Gary I just checked that voltage again with the band switch on 10 meters and the DC voltage at that RFC505 is 20.52 DC. Hope that helps.

Jim VE1RB

On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 8:37?PM Gary Follett via??<xntrick1948=[email protected]> wrote:
What is the voltage on RFC 505?

Gary

W0DVN

On Dec 29, 2024, at 6:24?PM, Jim Harris via??<radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

Worked on the VCO board today and founds that the 5 volt regulator is working just fine 5.02 VDC. So am thinking about it trying to decide what I check next. Might make a chart of voltages on the transistors from the working one and compare to the non working section.

73, Jim Ve1RB

On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:08?PM Gary Follett via??<xntrick1948=[email protected]> wrote:
The power supply that is the subject of this issue is the 7805 regulator on the VCO board. That is the one that denies power to just the one VCO (high bands, in this case) when it fails.

Regards,

Gary

W0DVN

On Dec 28, 2024, at 8:28?PM, Tony N5DIM <tony@...> wrote:

The WB4HFN website has a section with great information related to that power supply board. I just used it to resurrect a TR7 that was DOA. Good luck. 73 Tony N5DIM?

On Dec 28, 2024, at 5:52?PM, Gary Follett via??<xntrick1948=[email protected]> wrote:

?Sounds like you are on the right track. Don¡¯t ocelot the electrolytic capacitors on that supply as well.

Gary

W0DVN

On Dec 28, 2024, at 6:12?PM, Jim Harris via??<radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

Gary, I found a few minutes to work on the TR7 and discovered that the high VCO is not working at all. It does have the 10 vdc supply switch?on it but I don't know if that reulagor?is working or not. I will check it out but have to work on getting the metal shield off. I Hope that is the problem but I will work on it maybe tomorrow. Thanks for all your help.

73, Jim VE1RB

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 9:06?PM Gary Follett via??<xntrick1948=[email protected]> wrote:
It is worth asking, did the failure of your VCO board (displaying 51.950) occur on its own? That is to ask, did the radio work properly and then just fail or has it, as long as you have had it, always operated with this fault??

If it once worked for you and then failed, then it would make sense to see what gets disconnected if those pins are not in line ?and look for a way that same thing could happen without the pin alignment problem.

The pin alignment fix is pretty easy though, if the board alignment is the cause. It just SOUNDS difficult.

That whole DR7 was always a source of issues due to its complexity and difficulty of installation. I don¡¯t know how a DR7 could even endure the stresses of removal and reinsertion more than once!

Gary?

W0DVN

On Dec 27, 2024, at 6:25?PM, Jim Harris via??<radiove1rb=[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks Tom. I printed that off but hope that is not the problem.

73, Jim VE1RB

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 8:05?PM Tom Evans via??<Tom.AG9X=[email protected]> wrote:
In 2010 there was a thread regarding the Drake TR-7 display showing 51950.0 on the old retired Drakelist.

The thread is archived at?

Please click the link so the owner knows that we find the archive useful.

Hope this helps.
Tom, AG9X


================?
Below are the posts from Brian Koontz WA3ITE, Jim Shorney NU0C and Garey Barrell K4OAH (SK)?
(just in case Drake TR-7 DR-7 problems outlive the??site)


Re: [Drakelist] Almost there: TR-7 display issues -- FIXED!

Brian Koontz Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:36:54 -0700

Well, the TR-7 from hell is now a fully operational TR-7 from hell!

In preparation for some signal tracing, I decided to extend the DR-7
board using the extenders I have.? To do this, you have to unmount the
two voltage regulators mounted to the chassis, and jumper the
connector farthest to the right. ?(I didn't bother connecting the
up/down band buttons.) ?Lo and behold, the display worked!?

Some further investigation revealed that the chassis has warped over
the years, so the two 3-prong connectors on the VCO board were no
longer in a horizontal line.? So I was determined to make sure the
board was fully seated on all the connectors.

To do this, I had to drop the front panel.? Not a major chore, just
one knob to remove (the band knob) and 6 side screws. With that now
out of the way, it was an easy job to determine if all the pins were
where they belonged.? The only snag was that the front panel, when
canted downwards, angles the PTO can upwards.? So you have to hold the
front panel perpendicular and steady with slight downward pressure to
fully seat the board.? Once all the pins were visually confirmed to be
seated, I remounted the front panel, reattached the regulators and all
the connectors, and fired the rig up.? Everything now seems to work!

It turns out the original DR-7 board was indeed defective as well
(possibly because it had been seated incorrectly).? And a visual
confirmation from topside indicates the chassis is, indeed, warped:
The screw hole is misaligned with the mounting hole in the board.?

So, for archival purposes in case anyone else decides to search for
this problem: ?If the display if fixed on "51950", one possible cause
is that one or more DR-7 pins, possibly the VCO pins, are not
correctly seated.? The best solution is to drop the front panel and
confirm visually that the pins are fully seated.

Now it's time to get on the air!

??--Brian/WA3ITE


=================?

Jim Shorney Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:17:58 -0700

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:40:52 -0500, Brian Koontz wrote:

>Well, the TR-7 from hell is now a fully operational TR-7 from hell!
>
>Now it's time to get on the air!

Congratulations, Brian! You have been assimilated into the collective.
Resistance is futile.

73

-Jim



=================
?
Garey Barrell?k4oah@...?via?
Sat, Jul 31, 2010, 8:34?AM
to drakelist


Brian Koontz wrote:
> Some further investigation revealed that the chassis has warped over
> the years, so the two 3-prong connectors on the VCO board were no
> longer in a horizontal line.? So I was determined to make sure the
> board was fully seated on all the connectors.
>
>
>
> So, for archival purposes in case anyone else decides to search for
> this problem: ?If the display is fixed on "51950", one possible cause
> is that one or more DR-7 pins, possibly the VCO pins, are not
> correctly seated.? The best solution is to drop the front panel and
> confirm visually that the pins are fully seated.
>

Brian -

Congratulations!! ? It's always nice when one 'comes together'.

Just as an aside, someone suggested earlier (and correctly) that the
"51950" problem may indicate a loss of the 500 kHz reference signal.?
You might find it interesting that the left-most three pin connector on
the VCO board is the 500 kHz reference signal!

Those pins on the bottom of the DR-7 are ALWAYS a problem, ya' just
can't see 'em!!

Your 'trials' have been an interesting 'trip' for others, thanks for
documenting it for us all.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line& ?TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
<>

=================
?
Search terms to make this post easier to find:? Drake TR-7 TR7 DR-7 DR7 display frozen locked stuck ? 51950?? 51,950?? 51 950?? 5195? 51950.0 ? 51,950.0 ? 51 950 0



???


















Re: MS-4 Accretion

 

Right now, just a power supply. I am considering letting go of my A Line (late s/n, the transmitter is essentially an T-4XB) and my L7 (has a Harbach board, graphite tubes and I reworked the power supply chassis to use all PEM fasteners).



Steve Wedge, W1ES

Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Tuesday, December 31st, 2024 at 6:02 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io <buttercup11421@...> wrote:

Hi Steve,


On 12/31/24 16:57, Steve Wedge, W1ES/4 via groups.io wrote:

Let me know, as I am going to unleash a fairly good assortment of stuff onto the online auction site that shall remain unnamed...

Oh. What are you looking to part ways with?

73

Stan
KM4HQE