开云体育

I ment the MN-4C, I don't know why I said the MN-2000C...... I've looked at the Murch tuners as well.

Hi Jim Managed to repair one of the spare PTO's all fitted back and seems to be? working ok. Not putting the front back as I am changing the bulbs to blue LED's. Then to the DR7 will check through

I was just thinking the same thing. I have a Murch sitting atop my MN2700. And a second homebrew knockoff awaiting cleanup. Spent less money than a night on the town for both combined. 73 -Jim NU0C

Billy: An MN-2000C?? Never heard of this one and I thought I knew of all the Drakes including the commercial marine reserve gear.? There is an MN-4C for sure (have one) which looks like an MN-7, but

I have 4 TR7As, one of them I purchased new and none of them have anything glued to the top of the PTO can. I also currently have 3 TR7s with serial numbers in the 9000s and none of them have any

Look for a Mutch UT-2000B (not the A). They go for short money and will load up the proverbial bedspring. 73, Dick, W1KSZ ________________________________ Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 9:16 AM To:

We have a huge hamfest coming up this next Saturday in Sevierville that I'm going to keep an eye out there and see what I can find. Thanks everyone.

Interesting. I don't recall having seen this. Fish paper maybe? 73 -Jim NU0C "Gary Follett" <xntrick1948@...> wrote:

I've been looking at the MN-2700 but like said, it doesn't really match, would love to find an MN-2000C which is an MN-2700 in the 4 line colors which are a little harder to find. I do actually have a

I agree ?with Peter. ?In fact, I use my MN-2000 for 40 meter operation but use my MN-2700 for all other ?bands due to ?the wide matching range. ?Once you find the sweet spot for each band,

Joe – W7RKN From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of VE7PS Subject: Re: [DRAKE-RADIO] MN2000 Billy: Indeed, the MN-2700 might be a better choice for 160m than trying

Did you check that there is an insulting strip loin top of the PTO mechanism? There is a very close fit between the bottom of the DR7 solder and the grounded metal below the DR7 just below the display

Billy: Indeed, the MN-2700 might be a better choice for 160m than trying to convert an MN-2000.? 160M coverage is already built into the 2700. It won't quite match your 4-line for sure.....but

Hi Billy I would think it near impossible to add 160 to the MN 2000. It looks like a high Q circuit and I read somewhere that it performs best when using antennas of near resonance and is tetchy on

It looks like you have an aftermarket LED board from DF4NW. Nice! However that suggests that someone botched the install and gave up on it. The display is strobed. One set of segment drivers drives

I seem to remember seeing a 160 mod a long time ago. Unfortunately, it involved drilling holes. At a minimum, it would involve adding inductance and fixed capacitors whilst using the bandswitch in the

Thanks Steve. Both digit one and two are missing the two segments I think.. You may be right about the soldering, it was a mess so I re did it . Will check again? and also look at the drivers. I am

Put up a 160 antenna and use tuner on 80-10 ! 73s Byron AC9PA

Has anyone ever modded an MN2000 to work on 160? That’s the only thing that has kept me from snatching one up to add to my C-line I have.

The second digit is missing two segments. It looks like a display or driver issue to me (assuming the etches and soldering are okay). I can’t remember if the display drivers are open collector or