I wouldn't trust any caps with paper or cardboard envelopes.? The last ones were probably made in the 1960s.
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, January 27th, 2025 at 5:08 PM, John K5MO via groups.io <johnk5mo@...> wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I got some of those yellow paper covered electrolytic at the "drake going out of business sale". I should see if they're leaky or not.
John
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 5:06?PM Steve Wedge, W1ES/4 via <w1es=
[email protected]> wrote:
Yep and the interesting thing is that the earlier TR-4 can cap doesn't fail like the newer one.
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, January 27th, 2025 at 3:53 PM, DavidC KD4E via <qrv=
[email protected]> wrote:
Talk about tunnel-vision!
He said TR-4 and it never even occurred to me to even look
closely
at the faceplate.
We were standing in a non climate-controlled space while talking,
and it was cold.
'And that's my story, and I'm sticking to it ..."
Now, I have to learn what the difference is between the TR-4 and
the TR-4C.
Thanks!
On 1/27/25 14:43, Steve Wedge, W1ES/4
via wrote:
Exactly,
which means that any kid or critter could touch dangerous
voltages.
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, January 27th, 2025 at
12:32 PM, VE7PS via
<ve7ps@...>
wrote:
And the AC-3 did
not have a top cover
like the AC-4.
PS
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at
9:28?AM Steve Wedge, W1ES/4 via <w1es=
[email protected]>
wrote:
The
circuit board for the rebuild kit mounts on top of the
chassis. You can also do a 1 for 1 replacement of the
capacitors with cans, which is more expensive but
preserves the original layout. If you put the new caps
underneath, you can leave the originals, unconnected, on
top. It is more difficult to mount caps underneath but
it is certainly doable and I had done several that way.
What you save on the new board, you more than make up
with time spent. Everyone's equation of time vs cost is
different...
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a
banana.
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, January 27th, 2025 at 12:22 PM, DavidC
KD4E via <qrv=
[email protected]>
wrote:
I don't understand the 'cage' thing.
There a solid metal plate over the bottom of this
PS.
Thanks
On 1/27/25 11:52, Evan via wrote:
As a side note, some prefer the
AC-3 over the AC-4 due to the "open air" sort of
cooling while the AC-4 has a small number of
"hot air exhaust slots". I have no personal
experience with the AC-3 so I am not aware of
reliability versus the AC-4.
On Monday, January 27, 2025 at 11:47:12
AM EST, Steve Wedge, W1ES/4 via
<w1es@...>
wrote:
I would simply go ahead and re-cap
this supply. Paper bodied electrolytic
capacitors are prone to dry out.
If you want to wait, replace just
the bias supply¡¯s capacitor, as if you
lose your bias supply, your finals, at
best, will be stressed beyond their
ratings, shortening the life of the
tubes.
The rebuild kit for the AC-3 costs
more than the one for the AC-4 because
it needs a ¡°cage¡± over the board to
prevent contact with dangerous
voltages. It is well worth it, though.
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit
flies like a banana.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:54, DavidC
KD4E via
<
qrv@...>
wrote:
I accepted a
trade offer of a TR-4 for my
troublesome TR-3.
Opened things up and have a few
questions for those in the know ...
Images here:
The power supply has some sort of
filmy deposit on top - I'm thinking
it's residue from tobacco.
1. I'm real shy about putting moisture
on the tops of the paper
electrolytics
but would WD-40 or a citrus-based
cleaner using a q-tip be safest for
the
chassis?
2. Do the caps appear to be original?
(The rig works but I'd rather update
things, if the caps are ancient, prior
to setting it up on my operating
desk.)
3. Does the serial number reveal
anything useful, please?
Thanks,
David KD4E