¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: R4C power supply question


 

" I? never found tube life a problem with the elevated filament voltage. "

I have a vintage text around here somewhere focused specifically on tube (receiving) longevity studies? and among the variables they looked at, filament voltage was the primary driver of reduced usable life.

John



On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 2:04?PM Rob Sherwood <rob@...> wrote:

Hi Steve,

?

I used the Sartori ¡°sold tubes¡± in the 3rd mixer position for a while until he went out of production.? Then I designed my MIX-4 replacement.? There were two versions with different mixer components (40673 & later the SA602).?

?

Before I figured out how RFI hash was getting into the 3rd mixer I used a 1:1 120 volt shielded isolation transformer to keep the hash from getting to the receiver.

?

Rob, NC0B

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Wedge, W1ES/4 via
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2023 11:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DRAKE-RADIO] R4C power supply question

?

I definitely noticed the hash on the audio when I bought my first later-production R-4C and spent a fair amount of time trying to tame it.? The location of that third mixer and its design meant that very small differences in shield locations, variations in individual 6EJ7 tubes, etc., were critical to how well the 3rd mixer worked.? I was lucky in that doing the Sartori circuit tamed it enough that I could ignore whatever artefacts were still there.? The early R-4C, with the 6HS6 mixers, didn't have this issue at all.? I agree that the performance of that mixer really threw a wet blanket on the whole experience but I did keep that C Line for a few years and even did some contesting with it.? By that time, we were starting to hear the siren song of the Kenwood TS-930S and I made the switch in the late 80s.

?

I have since discovered that one can cherrypick 6EJ7's from a bunch of NOS tubes and get one that reduces the hash almost enough to not need to change any circuitry.

?

I still love the sharpness of the R-4C filters and have a C Line that works pretty well, stone-stock.

?

73,

?

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

?

Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.

?

Sent with secure email.

?

------- Original Message -------
On Wednesday, March 22nd, 2023 at 12:59 PM, Rob Sherwood <rob@...> wrote:


Hi Doug,

?

Please see comments inserted below.

?

Rob, NC0B

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Crompton WA3DSP
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 11:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DRAKE-RADIO] R4C power supply question

?

Rob,

Yes I completely rebuilt the supply adding a 7812 regulator board which are dirt cheap on Amazon and elsewhere. I also added an LM380 audio board. again, dirt cheap, and everything runs from regulated 12V. I use 3 diodes in series to lower the low voltage to the 7812 to about 14.5-15 volts and the 7812 loafs along.

?

Reply:? I never used your diode idea, and at least the way I used a copper strap from the 7812 to the chassis, 17 volts into the regulator was a non-issue.? I used the LM-383T which puts out more power than the LM-380, but 100mW produces plenty of audio with a typical high efficiency speaker. I also used the LM-383T in my SE-3 AM sync detector, but running on 18 volts instead of 12 volts.

My R4C never had the C201 as far as I remember although I ripped quite a bit off the power supply board. There is no heat there anymore. I do have some very low level hum that is coming from somewhere ahead of the volume pot. It is absolutely clean with the pot disconnected. It is very low level, but being a purist, I was looking for possible fixes.

?

Reply:? My engineer carefully specified how my LM-383T audio amp board had to have a single ground return. Otherwise there would be a ground-loop hum problem.? That is likely what you are observing.?

I wonder if others have measured filament voltage. I used several digital meters and they all agreed that the filaments were running at about 7.0-7.1 volts. This is with a 121 volt line. I figured I needed about .3 ohms to lower it so I wound about 6 feet of #30 enameled wire on a high value 2W resistor which dropped it about .5 volts or so.

Reply:? Yes the typical filament voltage is slightly higher than +10% above nominal 6.3 volts on most of the hundreds of R-4Cs that came through my shop.? I recently was dealing with an R-4C that took 5 minutes to warm up, and the filament voltage was 6.1 volts.? I never came up with a solution to the slow warmup.? I never found tube life a problem with the elevated filament voltage.?


I was also wondering when the LM380 first came out. The earliest data I can find is an app note dated 1972, so it had to be early in the R4C production, My R4C is SN 28387 which is very close to the end of production in 1976 or later so it certainly could have had a much better power supply and audio amp at that late date.? Think of the space that would have been saved as most of the powers supply and audio boards would have gone away, I guess by 1976 they were working on the TR7 design which used the newer chips.

?

Reply:? Drake is notorious for using big dropping resistors in products.? Look at the L-4B power supply and all the heat in those large resistors.? The TR-7 wasn¡¯t any better with all the heat in regulators sinked to the chassis near the PTO.? Also why put the 100 watt PA right by the PTO??? Why put the R-4C power transformer right behind the PTO?? The earlier Drake R-4, R-4A and R-4B receivers had the power transformer oriented 90 degrees from where it is in the R-4C.? In the R-4C case, the transformer magnetic field couples into the PTO slug-tuned inductor causing hum sidebands on the PTO output. If you operate the PTO outside the radio it has no line-related sidebands.? If you remove the R-4C power transformer, punch two new holes in the chassis, and remount the transformer 90 degrees from normal (as it is in earlier models), the line-related hum sidebands on the PTO signal are drastically lower.? Please see attached PDF from my 2012 Drake Dayton Forum presentation.

?

COMMENTS:? Consider the parts count in the TR-7 DR-7 board with all those TTL chips.? The parts count on that board, and likely many others, could have been drastically reduced, decreasing assembly time and cost.? The change in the R-4C from 6HS6 mixer tubes to 6EJ7s, and the subsequent circuit change for LO injection, was a terrible step backwards.? Any RFI noise on the AC line passed right into the grid of the 3rd mixer.? That didn¡¯t happen with the 6HS6 circuit.? Drake did well for decades in spite of design errors and the lack of production updates that would have saved money and made the products better. I wonder if the culture at Drake had been more proactive whether the TR-8 would? have had a chance in the market?? David Assaf W5XU is the TR-8 guru, but I don¡¯t know whether a schematic even exists for the TR-8.? Was it designed well?? I? have no idea. ?????

?

73, Rob, NC0B

Doug, WA3DSP

?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.