Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
1) So, in a Lionel the primary "flyback"
voltage should be about 15.5V peak. Then after a diode drop and
limited by the loading of the one-shot pulse detector on the
-15V line. This -15V is regulated in the primary when the 900+
shunt regulator pulls energy in the secondary (and which energy
is sucked from the primary....), ergo regulation on both ends of
the transformer.
And in the similar ENi it is Zener regulated
in the primary to 15.5V, ergo regulated in the secondary too,
without a secondary shunt regulator.
2) I think I asked the earlier question
without much clarity in my own mind..... Let me re-phrase:
In a Lionel with the secondary shunt
regulation in place, what is the secondary winding peak voltage?
1350V?
In an ENi with the primary shunt regulation in
place, what is the (unloaded, as is) secondary winding peak
voltage? also 1350V, perhaps?
If 1350V is the right number, that suggests to
me a windings ratio of 1350/15.5 = 87.? Off the top of my head,
I think I was using ratio=77 2+ years ago..... which would be
1200V peak secondary.
I might go do some sims later with that.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 3:44 PM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Yes I have measured totally unregulated rectified , and
no that's not it. 1350 is where I pre regulate the
made-from-CDV-700-transformer bias supplies for use in and
with shop made testing equipment. Without that, it is much
higher, too much in fact, probably the main cause of
internal arcing/failure of them in the CDV-700's. Nothing
on that PCB can withstand 2kV+
This is why when doing a HV rectifier upgrade, replace
Corotron (if present, ENi has none) or add the Zener stack
FIRST, check it for working, THEN replace the diode.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley"
<rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
1) have you ever measured an
unregulated HV output , after rectification but
without Shunt Regulator loading, of a Vic/Lionel/ENi
with a 1G meter?
?Is that the 1300V figure you used
earlier?
2) The Vic 6/6A manual on page 4
says this will be about 1100V, but that is likely
not open-circuit but rather loaded in-circuit.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:55 PM, Geo
Dowell wrote:
That tracks with bench measurements gentlemen,
I'm seeing full rated V at 1000 M Ohms load and 1
kV DC, but not at 10,000 M Ohms.
Now on to the next measurement which requires
an electrostatic Voltmeter.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:33:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Ah! Excellent! Down to 1uA
with 10uA being comfortably on the curve,
and that is a 1/2Watt Zener which is the
most common kind I see.
I notice the Zener (or
Avalanche) voltage increases linearly up to
about 1mA, then increases at a higher rate,
no doubt due to extrinsic series resistance
in the bulk material of the chip. I wonder
why they spec operation in the tables at
5mA?
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:25
PM, peter via groups.io wrote:
Roger et al:
?figure 1 in the attached Rohm spec sheet
show? current vs voltage for their various
zeners.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
I live not to far from Lake Buchanan in Central Texas where Barringer Hill lies inundated since 1937. Cool story to read, quite a history. That Badu family also was connected with some other radioactive mine interest in the area.
I also have a small specimen of gadolinite from Barringer Hill which I acquired in Llano, about 5 years ago. It is very mildly hot, registering about 300cpm on either a Ludlum 14C with a 44-7 probe, or a Lionel CD V7006b when held in very close proximity with the beta window open.
rogerw
-- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
|
peter <epkoncept@...> added folder /Components/Zeners
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Yes I have measured totally unregulated rectified , and no that's not it. 1350 is where I pre regulate the made-from-CDV-700-transformer bias supplies for use in and with shop made testing equipment. Without that, it is much higher, too much in fact, probably the main cause of internal arcing/failure of them in the CDV-700's. Nothing on that PCB can withstand 2kV+
This is why when doing a HV rectifier upgrade, replace Corotron (if present, ENi has none) or add the Zener stack FIRST, check it for working, THEN replace the diode. Geo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:12:31 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
1) have you ever measured an unregulated HV
output , after rectification but without Shunt Regulator
loading, of a Vic/Lionel/ENi with a 1G meter?
?Is that the 1300V figure you used earlier?
2) The Vic 6/6A manual on page 4 says this
will be about 1100V, but that is likely not open-circuit but
rather loaded in-circuit.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:55 PM, Geo Dowell wrote:
That tracks with bench measurements gentlemen, I'm seeing
full rated V at 1000 M Ohms load and 1 kV DC, but not at
10,000 M Ohms.
Now on to the next measurement which requires an
electrostatic Voltmeter.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley"
<rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:33:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting
site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Ah! Excellent! Down to 1uA with 10uA
being comfortably on the curve, and that is a 1/2Watt
Zener which is the most common kind I see.
I notice the Zener (or Avalanche)
voltage increases linearly up to about 1mA, then
increases at a higher rate, no doubt due to extrinsic
series resistance in the bulk material of the chip. I
wonder why they spec operation in the tables at 5mA?
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:25 PM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger et al:
?figure 1 in the attached Rohm spec sheet show? current vs
voltage for their various zeners.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
1) have you ever measured an unregulated HV
output , after rectification but without Shunt Regulator
loading, of a Vic/Lionel/ENi with a 1G meter?
?Is that the 1300V figure you used earlier?
2) The Vic 6/6A manual on page 4 says this
will be about 1100V, but that is likely not open-circuit but
rather loaded in-circuit.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:55 PM, Geo Dowell wrote:
That tracks with bench measurements gentlemen, I'm seeing
full rated V at 1000 M Ohms load and 1 kV DC, but not at
10,000 M Ohms.
Now on to the next measurement which requires an
electrostatic Voltmeter.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley"
<rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:33:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting
site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Ah! Excellent! Down to 1uA with 10uA
being comfortably on the curve, and that is a 1/2Watt
Zener which is the most common kind I see.
I notice the Zener (or Avalanche)
voltage increases linearly up to about 1mA, then
increases at a higher rate, no doubt due to extrinsic
series resistance in the bulk material of the chip. I
wonder why they spec operation in the tables at 5mA?
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:25 PM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger et al:
?figure 1 in the attached Rohm spec sheet show? current vs
voltage for their various zeners.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
That tracks with bench measurements gentlemen, I'm seeing full rated V at 1000 M Ohms load and 1 kV DC, but not at 10,000 M Ohms.
Now on to the next measurement which requires an electrostatic Voltmeter.
Geo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:33:36 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Ah! Excellent! Down to 1uA with 10uA being
comfortably on the curve, and that is a 1/2Watt Zener which is
the most common kind I see.
I notice the Zener (or Avalanche) voltage
increases linearly up to about 1mA, then increases at a higher
rate, no doubt due to extrinsic series resistance in the bulk
material of the chip. I wonder why they spec operation in the
tables at 5mA?
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:25 PM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger et al:
?figure 1 in the attached Rohm spec sheet show? current vs voltage
for their various zeners.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Peter, how about starting a Zener folder in FILES so we can find this again, and add to it.
Geo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "peter via groups.io" <epkoncept@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:25:08 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Roger et al: ?figure 1 in the attached Rohm spec sheet show? current vs voltage for their various zeners.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Ah! Excellent! Down to 1uA with 10uA being
comfortably on the curve, and that is a 1/2Watt Zener which is
the most common kind I see.
I notice the Zener (or Avalanche) voltage
increases linearly up to about 1mA, then increases at a higher
rate, no doubt due to extrinsic series resistance in the bulk
material of the chip. I wonder why they spec operation in the
tables at 5mA?
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:25 PM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger et al:
?figure 1 in the attached Rohm spec sheet show? current vs voltage
for their various zeners.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Roger et al: ?figure 1 in the attached Rohm spec sheet show? current vs voltage for their various zeners.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
The winding ratio is the square root of the
ratio of the inductances, so the secondary (measured with the
two primary's open circuit) is probably in the several Henry
region.......
I did come up with numbers I used in
simulations, but with the Zener String Shunt Regulator at the
output it was no so critical what UnRegHV was
open-circuited........
I have never seen specs anywhere either.
Parenthetically, I do recall seeing inductance
specs on the Vic transformer used in the GM pulse detect One
Shot (which use to be called a Blocking Oscillator). Or was it
just coil resistances I saw???? Don't recall....
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 2:13 PM, Geo Dowell wrote:
"
Have you ever seen a spec on
the windings ratio(s) of the HV transformer for
Vic/Lionel/Eni? (OR the inductances, from which the ratios
can be calculated?) I tried (over 2yr ago) to measure the
inductances.... worked fine on the primary's but my
instrument was not stable on the secondary....)
rogerw"
No but they
go from 3V to 900V in one step, and those secondary
wires are very thin indeed. Never bothered to measure
the inductances but?could if it was needed. Had to
measure the resistance of the secondary for an overseas
friend yesterday, 3730 Ohms from memory. Maybe I can get
him to mike the diameter, he did take it apart to try to
find the break. Or maybe some member here has a dead one
to check wire gauge? That info would be good to have
because it's sure to come up again. Those CDV-700
transformers are getting really scarce, as they age out.
Geo
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley"
<rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:01:48 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting
site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
1) Yes, I think so, but 10uA makes me
much more comfortable. At 1uA I would expect it is low
in the knee. At 10uA I would suspect it is high in the
knee. That is all I know about that: suspicions based on
simulations.
2) No spec I have ever seen. You would
prefer the smallest (1/8 or 1/4Watt) Zener wattage? in
order to be the smallest junction area so that current
density is as high as possible.
3) yes, and that is why I was excited
by that 2uA OpAmp. Essentially to duplicate the internal
LM431 configuration but with very low current demand.
But every attempt I have made to use it in simulation
has oscillated. Too much phase lag thru the feedback?
loop. I tried to frequency compensate to no avail. I
also tried a similar higher gain-bandwith and 20uA
version. No dice. If I kept going up in current
consumption I assume I would find a sufficient phase
margin for the loop, but that idea is on indefinite
hold.
I like the Good Enough circuit just
fine. What Peter showed this morning......
I also think I would like to pursue
that same regulation idea, but in the LV primary, as you
have suggested.
Have you ever seen a spec on the
windings ratio(s) of the HV transformer for
Vic/Lionel/Eni? (OR the inductances, from which the
ratios can be calculated?) I tried (over 2yr ago) to
measure the inductances.... worked fine on the primary's
but my instrument was not stable on the secondary....)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 1:29 PM, Geo Dowell
wrote:
Let's? skip that for now.?
Will a single series Zener, say 100V, operate if
the supply is limited to 1 uA by the load resistance?
Is there a spec for that?
We were talking about the LM431 the other day and
you both correctly pointed out it needs 1 mA to
operate, but what does a Zener need to operate,
current wise, assuming there is more than adequate V
present to break it over?
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 12:02:38 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Geo,
With UnRegHV = 1300V and
dropping resistor = 1.8Meg,
No load, 910.00V
Rload = 1G, 909.99V
Rload = 100Meg, 909.86V,
Rload = 10Meg, 909.01V.
If one were to measure on the
other side of the 3.3Meg resistor going up the
cable to the GM tube, a very different result
would ensue. 1G would be very handy! But, if ne
knows the numbers, one can calculate from the
loaded measurement what the infinite input
impedance
scope would
have seen
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:41 AM,
Roger Whatley via groups.io wrote:
good question. I will hazard
a MindSim answer, then will do the simulation.
As long? as the loading of
the Zener String regulated node does not
approach to close to the current flowing into
the Zener, it will not drop the voltage too
much.
(900+V/1G) << (1300V-
900+V)/1.8Meg? , or,
0.9uA << 222uA
So, the Zener String sees a
very negligible change in current with a 1G
loading at the anode of the string, since
222uA-0.9uA ~ 221uA is hardly any change. Even
if you loaded it down to only 10uA in the
Zener string you would not see a lot of
change, as it depends on the regulation curve.
(By gosh! you just told me
how I can measure the regulation curve over
voltage with a fixed HV supply! Wallah!)
So, continuing Stream of
Thought..... the more interesting case is not
UnRegHV = 1300V but what if only 1000v? Then,
0.9uA <<
(1000V-900V)/1.8Meg? ,or,
0.9uA << 55.5uA
Still lots of room to load
it and leave 10uA or more for the Zener
String.
I actually think (I think, I
am not sure) that the typical HV Generator is
going to be current limited by the time it
gets to maybe 20uA at some UnRegHV voltage
well below the OpenCircuit voltage....... in
that case:
0.9uA << 20uA (or
whatever the current-limited number is. When I
designed the Lionel and Vic HV Generators for
lower power consumption, I shot for a 10uA
output current.)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:05 AM,
Geo Dowell wrote:
I don't know, never saw that listed
either.
Meantime do this simple sim for me.
+1300V DC to cathode of a Zener ( can be
via? 1.8M Ohm res. or direct in this case
only). Any Zener. On the other side of the
Zener, a 1000 M Ohm load to ground(-).
What V does the infinite impedance scope
probe show at the junction of anode and 1G
load?
I am not good with simulators, but
physically do this on the workbench every
day.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022
10:46:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question
and an interesting site for those that
modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
Ok, I got a bit
curious...... If a Zener String of
900+V can change +/-40V over -25degC
to +75degC, what did the original
Corotrons do?
IE, a Victoreen GV3A
Corotron?
It turns out that
this Vic catalog does not give a spec
on the basic GV3A used, but does give
temp info on the "High Temperature"
version:
?
page 15

So, you can see an
original 900V High Temp Corotron only
varied 16V from -65degC to
150degC...... pretty impressive I
think.
We are replacing
these things with Zener Strings with
relatively high positive tempco......
I think the ultimate
economic answer is to regulate in the
primary circuit, just as you
suggested, and as ENi did, and depend
on the fixed transformer secondary
ratio to get the regulated HV, and to
temperature compensate the primary
along with an adjustable trim
capability.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022
9:58 AM, Roger Whatley via groups.io
wrote:
1) yes, could be
multiple junctions.
2) You have an
exray machine?
3) We used to
"de-pot" plastic packaged IC chips
with acid to expose the die in the
package, to examine under a
microscope, photograph, etc. trace
circuits that way....... might be
hard to do with an axial lead
diode.... I don't know.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022
9:49 AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
I've always assumed the
multiple junction idea, because in
practice the higher voltage
rectifier diodes get longer and
longer. Ones for a 100kV stack are
a good 6 inches long each. Don't
know, just guessing. Will have to
X-Ray one, but when it's out of
the X-Ray machine how to do that?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7,
2022 9:43:53 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB]
Question and an interesting site
for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Well, the
answer to your first
question is: I am not sure,
but I think it is probably
just very lightly doped
silicon pn junction. The
light doping (and perhaps
playing around with the
doping profile - Its just
fizzicks, ya' know!) gives
higher reverse breakdown
voltage. And the lighter
doping also gives a higher
bulk resistivity such that
the extrinsic series
resistance is higher than a
LV diode, so higher forward
drop at least is due to
higher series resistance.
This is a
"no-cost" contract. It is
going to take an infinity of
diodes!
rogerw
On
4/7/2022 9:32 AM, Geo Dowell
wrote:
Question Roger, are HV
(like 8kV) low current
diodes a stack of normal
PN junctions inside? or
are they a single special
PN junction? What I do
measure is higher and
higher Fwd V drop as the V
(sub) max rating
increases.
By the way, if you only
need that many PN
junctions to achieve
thermal cancelling, try
switching to Schottkey
diodes. That will double
or tripple the parts
count. This is a
"cost-plus-contract",
right?
Geo
From: "Roger
Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,
April 7, 2022 9:06:12 AM
Subject: Re:
[CDV700CLUB] Question and
an interesting site for
those that modify CDV700s
and more.
Geo,
Sure,
enclosed, but I have
already modified the
Zener String with a
temperature
compensation scheme
that will be
somewhat familiar to
the discerning eye.
I am NOT suggesting
this circuit for a
build, merely
playing around with
ideas!
So,
if I measure the
voltage of the top
of that Zener String
alone, it is a
nominal 788V at
25degC, and 821V at
75degC, and 754V
at-25degC. That is a
+67V change over
100degC or about
+0.67V/degC tempco.
(parenthetically,
the original full
Zener String was
about +/-40V.)? If I
compensate that with
the negative tempco
of a Vbe which is
about -2.2mv/degC,
I
need 0.67V/2.2mV =
304 Vbes...... whew!
That's a lot of
diodes!
Instead
the BJT circuit is
multiplying the sum
of Q1&Q3 Vbe by
129 = 258Vbe's. All
I can say about the
difference from
calculated is that
the actual tempco of
the bjt's is in the
model somewhere and
differs from my
Mindsim
approximation. And
btw, the pnp BJT Q2
is a local feedback
trick that is
"fortifying"
Q1...... without Q2
you get weak knee,
with Q2 you get a
sharp knee. Q2 and
R3 can be removed
and the circuit
still functions but
regulation suffers.
Anyway,
the second enclosure
shows the regulation
performance over
temperature. When I
expand the scale I
can see the
regulated voltage at
906V nominal 25degC,
908V at 75degC, and
905V at -25degC.
So,
for one thing, this
whole exercise begs
a question: Who lets
their GM Counter get
THAT hot or cold? I
think that is a
philosophical
question.... If a GM
Counter fell in the
forest, in the
winter up north, and
there was not a
woman there to turn
it on, does it
really matter? Does
it even exist???
rogerw
On
4/7/2022 3:36 AM, Geo
Dowell wrote:
Roger, show
schematic of sim?
Geo
From: "Roger
Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
April 6, 2022
9:28:41 PM
Subject: Re:
[CDV700CLUB]
Question and an
interesting site
for those that
modify CDV700s and
more.
Well I just
simulated
something I
had not yet
thought to
do...... I
simulated a
Zener string.
Yeah, it
worked......
ha!
Largest Zener
I could find
in the model
library was
36V so I
strung enough
of those to
make about
890V nominal
with a 3.3Meg
dropper
resistor. Its
regulation is
very flat only
rose about 3V
from 1000V to
1200V input.
That as good
as my
Penultimate
Way-Good
Cascode Shunt
Regulator can
do, and far
less complex.
But guess
what? over
temperature it
sucks big
wind! +/-40V
from -25 to 25
to 75degC! The
Penultimate
only varies
about +/-3V
over that temp
range
(overkill).
But the Good
Enough Cascode
Shunt
Regulator,
with its
temperature
compensation
scheme, only
varies less
tha +/-5V.
Regulation
varies less
than 10V from
the knee to
950 to 1200V
On 4/6/2022
10:53 AM,
Roger Whatley
via groups.io
wrote:
Peter,
Minor
change, I
noticed after
I posted the
note below
that I had not
specified the
second BJT in
the
Darlington.
The enclosed
schematic is
corrected and
now the
simulation
predicts about
dead-nuts on
for the tempco
of the output.
Other than
that, same
comments as
below. I think
this is the
best "good
enough"
cascoded shunt
regulator.
rogerw
On
4/6/2022 10:40
AM, Roger
Whatley via
groups.io
wrote:
Peter,Enclosed
is a schematic
of my
suggestion
below. That is
an 8.2V Rohm
Zener chosen
for tempco to
cancel the
negative
tempco of two
Vbe's. It is
slightly too
positive in
the result but
quite "good
enough." You
willr just get
much flatter
regulation
with the
Darlington
pair and that
can be had in
a single
package.
Of course,
depending on
the Vcemax
spec of your
cascode
MOSFET, you
might have
only one
cascode
instead of
two..... That
will not make
a noticeable
difference
except to
breakdown.
rogerw
On
4/6/2022 8:32
AM, Roger
Whatley via
groups.io
wrote:
Peter,
I realize
that circuit
described
below might be
"good enough,"
but realize
that making
that one BJT a
Darlington
pair is a
significant
improvement to
the
regulation.
You can even
get the
Darlington in
one transistor
package, of
course, cheap.
As UnRegHV
increases, the
current in the
BJT
necessarily
increases in
order to
regulate the
loop. For
every extra
0.1uA of extra
base current
required, the
voltage drop
in the
feedback
resistors (66M
+ 66M + 1M)
goes up
0.1uA*(66M+66M+1M)
= 13.3V and
thus
regulation
suffers. The
BJT current
easliy goes
from less than
10uA to over
200uA, thus
the base
current might
go up by a
worst-case of
as much as
1uA, giving a
133V change in
the output. So
that is the
motivation for
the
Darlington.
(In case
anyone
wonders, why
not an FET
instead of a
BJT, that WAS
the original
circuit and it
suffers worse
circuit
errors.....)
The next
big error is
that as the
BJT current
increases with
UnRegHV
increases, so
does Vbe and
Vz increase.
Those are the
motivations
for subsequent
circuit
complications
and resulting
in the
Penultimate
Way-Improved
version.....
it is
overkill, I
know, to the
requirement,
but by
simulating
those
improvements I
gain insights
as to just
what the
remaining
errors were.
And it was
fun!
My take is
that your
present
circuit, but
with a
Darlington
Pair, will be
"good enough"
and if it were
a
purpose-built
Darlington in
one three-lead
package, no
more expensive
or even
board-space
than a single
BJT.
Of course,
a single Zener
voltage may be
chosen to
match the
negative
tempco of two
Vbe's. Again,
no extra
expense or
board space.
(Off the top
of my head, I
am thinking
about 8V Zener
for
+4mV/degC?)
rogerw
On
4/4/2022 10:33
PM, peter via
groups.io
wrote:
Roger:
?back to the
circuit you
posted in
message #300
Simple
cascode, with
only 1 npn tr
+ 2 mosfets.
Since I found
the 2SK3265, I
removed the
2nd mosfet so
its very basic
circuit.
66Meg, two 1
Meg, 100k+
2.2M trimmer ,
5.1V zener,
2SK3265,
2SC3311
Set trimmer
for 900V, Vary
input from
950~ 1150,
output only
varied 5V or
less.
Heated the
circuit with a
hair dryer,
got it up from
25C to about
60C, voltage
rose may be 5
or 6 volts.
Good enough
for me!
Time to make
it small
enough to
stuff inside
my CDV-700 !
It on the LHS
of the
attached jpg,
circuit in
message #300
is on the RHS
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
" Have you ever seen a spec on the windings ratio(s) of the HV transformer for Vic/Lionel/Eni? (OR the inductances, from which the ratios can be calculated?) I tried (over 2yr ago) to measure the inductances.... worked fine on the primary's but my instrument was not stable on the secondary....)
rogerw"
No but they go from 3V to 900V in one step, and those secondary wires are very thin indeed. Never bothered to measure the inductances but?could if it was needed. Had to measure the resistance of the secondary for an overseas friend yesterday, 3730 Ohms from memory. Maybe I can get him to mike the diameter, he did take it apart to try to find the break. Or maybe some member here has a dead one to check wire gauge? That info would be good to have because it's sure to come up again. Those CDV-700 transformers are getting really scarce, as they age out.
Geo
Geo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:01:48 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
1) Yes, I think so, but 10uA makes me much
more comfortable. At 1uA I would expect it is low in the knee.
At 10uA I would suspect it is high in the knee. That is all I
know about that: suspicions based on simulations.
2) No spec I have ever seen. You would prefer
the smallest (1/8 or 1/4Watt) Zener wattage? in order to be the
smallest junction area so that current density is as high as
possible.
3) yes, and that is why I was excited by that
2uA OpAmp. Essentially to duplicate the internal LM431
configuration but with very low current demand. But every
attempt I have made to use it in simulation has oscillated. Too
much phase lag thru the feedback? loop. I tried to frequency
compensate to no avail. I also tried a similar higher
gain-bandwith and 20uA version. No dice. If I kept going up in
current consumption I assume I would find a sufficient phase
margin for the loop, but that idea is on indefinite hold.
I like the Good Enough circuit just fine. What
Peter showed this morning......
I also think I would like to pursue that same
regulation idea, but in the LV primary, as you have suggested.
Have you ever seen a spec on the windings
ratio(s) of the HV transformer for Vic/Lionel/Eni? (OR the
inductances, from which the ratios can be calculated?) I tried
(over 2yr ago) to measure the inductances.... worked fine on the
primary's but my instrument was not stable on the secondary....)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 1:29 PM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Let's? skip that for now.?
Will a single series Zener, say 100V, operate if the supply
is limited to 1 uA by the load resistance?
Is there a spec for that?
We were talking about the LM431 the other day and you both
correctly pointed out it needs 1 mA to operate, but what does
a Zener need to operate, current wise, assuming there is more
than adequate V present to break it over?
From: "Roger Whatley"
<rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 12:02:38 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting
site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
With UnRegHV = 1300V and dropping
resistor = 1.8Meg,
No load, 910.00V
Rload = 1G, 909.99V
Rload = 100Meg, 909.86V,
Rload = 10Meg, 909.01V.
If one were to measure on the other
side of the 3.3Meg resistor going up the cable to the GM
tube, a very different result would ensue. 1G would be
very handy! But, if ne knows the numbers, one can
calculate from the loaded measurement what the infinite
input impedance
scope would have
seen
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:41 AM, Roger
Whatley via groups.io wrote:
good question. I will hazard a
MindSim answer, then will do the simulation.
As long? as the loading of the Zener
String regulated node does not approach to close to
the current flowing into the Zener, it will not drop
the voltage too much.
(900+V/1G) << (1300V-
900+V)/1.8Meg? , or,
0.9uA << 222uA
So, the Zener String sees a very
negligible change in current with a 1G loading at the
anode of the string, since 222uA-0.9uA ~ 221uA is
hardly any change. Even if you loaded it down to only
10uA in the Zener string you would not see a lot of
change, as it depends on the regulation curve.
(By gosh! you just told me how I can
measure the regulation curve over voltage with a fixed
HV supply! Wallah!)
So, continuing Stream of
Thought..... the more interesting case is not UnRegHV
= 1300V but what if only 1000v? Then,
0.9uA << (1000V-900V)/1.8Meg?
,or,
0.9uA << 55.5uA
Still lots of room to load it and
leave 10uA or more for the Zener String.
I actually think (I think, I am not
sure) that the typical HV Generator is going to be
current limited by the time it gets to maybe 20uA at
some UnRegHV voltage well below the OpenCircuit
voltage....... in that case:
0.9uA << 20uA (or whatever the
current-limited number is. When I designed the Lionel
and Vic HV Generators for lower power consumption, I
shot for a 10uA output current.)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:05 AM, Geo
Dowell wrote:
I don't know, never saw that listed either.
Meantime do this simple sim for me.
+1300V DC to cathode of a Zener ( can be via?
1.8M Ohm res. or direct in this case only). Any
Zener. On the other side of the Zener, a 1000 M Ohm
load to ground(-).
What V does the infinite impedance scope probe
show at the junction of anode and 1G load?
I am not good with simulators, but physically do
this on the workbench every day.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 10:46:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Geo,
Ok, I got a bit
curious...... If a Zener String of 900+V can
change +/-40V over -25degC to +75degC, what
did the original Corotrons do?
IE, a Victoreen GV3A
Corotron?
It turns out that this Vic
catalog does not give a spec on the basic GV3A
used, but does give temp info on the "High
Temperature" version:
?
page 15

So, you can see an original
900V High Temp Corotron only varied 16V from
-65degC to 150degC...... pretty impressive I
think.
We are replacing these
things with Zener Strings with relatively high
positive tempco......
I think the ultimate
economic answer is to regulate in the primary
circuit, just as you suggested, and as ENi
did, and depend on the fixed transformer
secondary ratio to get the regulated HV, and
to temperature compensate the primary along
with an adjustable trim capability.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:58 AM,
Roger Whatley via groups.io wrote:
1) yes, could be multiple
junctions.
2) You have an exray
machine?
3) We used to "de-pot"
plastic packaged IC chips with acid to
expose the die in the package, to examine
under a microscope, photograph, etc. trace
circuits that way....... might be hard to do
with an axial lead diode.... I don't know.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:49
AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
I've always assumed the multiple
junction idea, because in practice the
higher voltage rectifier diodes get longer
and longer. Ones for a 100kV stack are a
good 6 inches long each. Don't know, just
guessing. Will have to X-Ray one, but when
it's out of the X-Ray machine how to do
that?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022
9:43:53 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question
and an interesting site for those that
modify CDV700s and more.
Well, the answer
to your first question is: I am not
sure, but I think it is probably
just very lightly doped silicon pn
junction. The light doping (and
perhaps playing around with the
doping profile - Its just fizzicks,
ya' know!) gives higher reverse
breakdown voltage. And the lighter
doping also gives a higher bulk
resistivity such that the extrinsic
series resistance is higher than a
LV diode, so higher forward drop at
least is due to higher series
resistance.
This is a
"no-cost" contract. It is going to
take an infinity of diodes!
rogerw
On 4/7/2022
9:32 AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Question Roger, are HV (like
8kV) low current diodes a stack of
normal PN junctions inside? or are
they a single special PN junction?
What I do measure is higher and
higher Fwd V drop as the V (sub)
max rating increases.
By the way, if you only need
that many PN junctions to achieve
thermal cancelling, try switching
to Schottkey diodes. That will
double or tripple the parts count.
This is a "cost-plus-contract",
right?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7,
2022 9:06:12 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB]
Question and an interesting site
for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Geo,
Sure,
enclosed, but I have already
modified the Zener String
with a temperature
compensation scheme that
will be somewhat familiar to
the discerning eye. I am NOT
suggesting this circuit for
a build, merely playing
around with ideas!
So, if I
measure the voltage of the
top of that Zener String
alone, it is a nominal 788V
at 25degC, and 821V at
75degC, and 754V at-25degC.
That is a +67V change over
100degC or about +0.67V/degC
tempco. (parenthetically,
the original full Zener
String was about +/-40V.)?
If I compensate that with
the negative tempco of a Vbe
which is about -2.2mv/degC,
I need
0.67V/2.2mV = 304 Vbes......
whew! That's a lot of
diodes!
Instead
the BJT circuit is
multiplying the sum of
Q1&Q3 Vbe by 129 =
258Vbe's. All I can say
about the difference from
calculated is that the
actual tempco of the bjt's
is in the model somewhere
and differs from my Mindsim
approximation. And btw, the
pnp BJT Q2 is a local
feedback trick that is
"fortifying" Q1......
without Q2 you get weak
knee, with Q2 you get a
sharp knee. Q2 and R3 can be
removed and the circuit
still functions but
regulation suffers.
Anyway,
the second enclosure shows
the regulation performance
over temperature. When I
expand the scale I can see
the regulated voltage at
906V nominal 25degC, 908V at
75degC, and 905V at -25degC.
So, for
one thing, this whole
exercise begs a question:
Who lets their GM Counter
get THAT hot or cold? I
think that is a
philosophical question....
If a GM Counter fell in the
forest, in the winter up
north, and there was not a
woman there to turn it on,
does it really matter? Does
it even exist???
rogerw
On
4/7/2022 3:36 AM, Geo Dowell
wrote:
Roger, show schematic
of sim?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6,
2022 9:28:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB]
Question and an
interesting site for those
that modify CDV700s and
more.
Well I just simulated
something I had not
yet thought to
do...... I simulated a
Zener string.
Yeah, it worked......
ha!
Largest Zener I could
find in the model
library was 36V so I
strung enough of those
to make about 890V
nominal with a 3.3Meg
dropper resistor. Its
regulation is very
flat only rose about
3V from 1000V to 1200V
input. That as good as
my Penultimate
Way-Good Cascode Shunt
Regulator can do, and
far less complex.
But guess what? over
temperature it sucks
big wind! +/-40V from
-25 to 25 to 75degC!
The Penultimate only
varies about +/-3V
over that temp range
(overkill).
But the Good Enough
Cascode Shunt
Regulator, with its
temperature
compensation scheme,
only varies less tha
+/-5V. Regulation
varies less than 10V
from the knee to 950
to 1200V
On 4/6/2022 10:53
AM, Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
Minor change, I
noticed after I
posted the note
below that I had not
specified the second
BJT in the
Darlington. The
enclosed schematic
is corrected and now
the simulation
predicts about
dead-nuts on for the
tempco of the
output. Other than
that, same comments
as below. I think
this is the best
"good enough"
cascoded shunt
regulator.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 10:40
AM, Roger Whatley
via groups.io wrote:
Peter,Enclosed is
a schematic of my
suggestion below.
That is an 8.2V
Rohm Zener chosen
for tempco to
cancel the
negative tempco of
two Vbe's. It is
slightly too
positive in the
result but quite
"good enough." You
willr just get
much flatter
regulation with
the Darlington
pair and that can
be had in a single
package.
Of course,
depending on the
Vcemax spec of
your cascode
MOSFET, you might
have only one
cascode instead of
two..... That will
not make a
noticeable
difference except
to breakdown.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022
8:32 AM, Roger
Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
I realize that
circuit
described below
might be "good
enough," but
realize that
making that one
BJT a Darlington
pair is a
significant
improvement to
the regulation.
You can even get
the Darlington
in one
transistor
package, of
course, cheap.
As UnRegHV
increases, the
current in the
BJT necessarily
increases in
order to
regulate the
loop. For every
extra 0.1uA of
extra base
current
required, the
voltage drop in
the feedback
resistors (66M +
66M + 1M) goes
up
0.1uA*(66M+66M+1M)
= 13.3V and thus
regulation
suffers. The BJT
current easliy
goes from less
than 10uA to
over 200uA, thus
the base current
might go up by a
worst-case of as
much as 1uA,
giving a 133V
change in the
output. So that
is the
motivation for
the Darlington.
(In case anyone
wonders, why not
an FET instead
of a BJT, that
WAS the original
circuit and it
suffers worse
circuit
errors.....)
The next big
error is that as
the BJT current
increases with
UnRegHV
increases, so
does Vbe and Vz
increase. Those
are the
motivations for
subsequent
circuit
complications
and resulting in
the Penultimate
Way-Improved
version..... it
is overkill, I
know, to the
requirement, but
by simulating
those
improvements I
gain insights as
to just what the
remaining errors
were. And it was
fun!
My take is that
your present
circuit, but
with a
Darlington Pair,
will be "good
enough" and if
it were a
purpose-built
Darlington in
one three-lead
package, no more
expensive or
even board-space
than a single
BJT.
Of course, a
single Zener
voltage may be
chosen to match
the negative
tempco of two
Vbe's. Again, no
extra expense or
board space.
(Off the top of
my head, I am
thinking about
8V Zener for
+4mV/degC?)
rogerw
On 4/4/2022
10:33 PM, peter
via groups.io
wrote:
Roger:
?back to the
circuit you
posted in
message #300
Simple cascode,
with only 1 npn
tr + 2 mosfets.
Since I found
the 2SK3265, I
removed the 2nd
mosfet so its
very basic
circuit.
66Meg, two 1
Meg, 100k+ 2.2M
trimmer , 5.1V
zener, 2SK3265,
2SC3311
Set trimmer for
900V, Vary input
from 950~ 1150,
output only
varied 5V or
less.
Heated the
circuit with a
hair dryer, got
it up from 25C
to about 60C,
voltage rose may
be 5 or 6 volts.
Good enough for
me!
Time to make it
small enough to
stuff inside my
CDV-700 !
It on the LHS of
the attached
jpg, circuit in
message #300 is
on the RHS
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
1) Yes, I think so, but 10uA makes me much
more comfortable. At 1uA I would expect it is low in the knee.
At 10uA I would suspect it is high in the knee. That is all I
know about that: suspicions based on simulations.
2) No spec I have ever seen. You would prefer
the smallest (1/8 or 1/4Watt) Zener wattage? in order to be the
smallest junction area so that current density is as high as
possible.
3) yes, and that is why I was excited by that
2uA OpAmp. Essentially to duplicate the internal LM431
configuration but with very low current demand. But every
attempt I have made to use it in simulation has oscillated. Too
much phase lag thru the feedback? loop. I tried to frequency
compensate to no avail. I also tried a similar higher
gain-bandwith and 20uA version. No dice. If I kept going up in
current consumption I assume I would find a sufficient phase
margin for the loop, but that idea is on indefinite hold.
I like the Good Enough circuit just fine. What
Peter showed this morning......
I also think I would like to pursue that same
regulation idea, but in the LV primary, as you have suggested.
Have you ever seen a spec on the windings
ratio(s) of the HV transformer for Vic/Lionel/Eni? (OR the
inductances, from which the ratios can be calculated?) I tried
(over 2yr ago) to measure the inductances.... worked fine on the
primary's but my instrument was not stable on the secondary....)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 1:29 PM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Let's? skip that for now.?
Will a single series Zener, say 100V, operate if the supply
is limited to 1 uA by the load resistance?
Is there a spec for that?
We were talking about the LM431 the other day and you both
correctly pointed out it needs 1 mA to operate, but what does
a Zener need to operate, current wise, assuming there is more
than adequate V present to break it over?
From: "Roger Whatley"
<rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 12:02:38 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting
site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
With UnRegHV = 1300V and dropping
resistor = 1.8Meg,
No load, 910.00V
Rload = 1G, 909.99V
Rload = 100Meg, 909.86V,
Rload = 10Meg, 909.01V.
If one were to measure on the other
side of the 3.3Meg resistor going up the cable to the GM
tube, a very different result would ensue. 1G would be
very handy! But, if ne knows the numbers, one can
calculate from the loaded measurement what the infinite
input impedance
scope would have
seen
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:41 AM, Roger
Whatley via groups.io wrote:
good question. I will hazard a
MindSim answer, then will do the simulation.
As long? as the loading of the Zener
String regulated node does not approach to close to
the current flowing into the Zener, it will not drop
the voltage too much.
(900+V/1G) << (1300V-
900+V)/1.8Meg? , or,
0.9uA << 222uA
So, the Zener String sees a very
negligible change in current with a 1G loading at the
anode of the string, since 222uA-0.9uA ~ 221uA is
hardly any change. Even if you loaded it down to only
10uA in the Zener string you would not see a lot of
change, as it depends on the regulation curve.
(By gosh! you just told me how I can
measure the regulation curve over voltage with a fixed
HV supply! Wallah!)
So, continuing Stream of
Thought..... the more interesting case is not UnRegHV
= 1300V but what if only 1000v? Then,
0.9uA << (1000V-900V)/1.8Meg?
,or,
0.9uA << 55.5uA
Still lots of room to load it and
leave 10uA or more for the Zener String.
I actually think (I think, I am not
sure) that the typical HV Generator is going to be
current limited by the time it gets to maybe 20uA at
some UnRegHV voltage well below the OpenCircuit
voltage....... in that case:
0.9uA << 20uA (or whatever the
current-limited number is. When I designed the Lionel
and Vic HV Generators for lower power consumption, I
shot for a 10uA output current.)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:05 AM, Geo
Dowell wrote:
I don't know, never saw that listed either.
Meantime do this simple sim for me.
+1300V DC to cathode of a Zener ( can be via?
1.8M Ohm res. or direct in this case only). Any
Zener. On the other side of the Zener, a 1000 M Ohm
load to ground(-).
What V does the infinite impedance scope probe
show at the junction of anode and 1G load?
I am not good with simulators, but physically do
this on the workbench every day.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 10:46:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Geo,
Ok, I got a bit
curious...... If a Zener String of 900+V can
change +/-40V over -25degC to +75degC, what
did the original Corotrons do?
IE, a Victoreen GV3A
Corotron?
It turns out that this Vic
catalog does not give a spec on the basic GV3A
used, but does give temp info on the "High
Temperature" version:
?
page 15

So, you can see an original
900V High Temp Corotron only varied 16V from
-65degC to 150degC...... pretty impressive I
think.
We are replacing these
things with Zener Strings with relatively high
positive tempco......
I think the ultimate
economic answer is to regulate in the primary
circuit, just as you suggested, and as ENi
did, and depend on the fixed transformer
secondary ratio to get the regulated HV, and
to temperature compensate the primary along
with an adjustable trim capability.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:58 AM,
Roger Whatley via groups.io wrote:
1) yes, could be multiple
junctions.
2) You have an exray
machine?
3) We used to "de-pot"
plastic packaged IC chips with acid to
expose the die in the package, to examine
under a microscope, photograph, etc. trace
circuits that way....... might be hard to do
with an axial lead diode.... I don't know.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:49
AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
I've always assumed the multiple
junction idea, because in practice the
higher voltage rectifier diodes get longer
and longer. Ones for a 100kV stack are a
good 6 inches long each. Don't know, just
guessing. Will have to X-Ray one, but when
it's out of the X-Ray machine how to do
that?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022
9:43:53 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question
and an interesting site for those that
modify CDV700s and more.
Well, the answer
to your first question is: I am not
sure, but I think it is probably
just very lightly doped silicon pn
junction. The light doping (and
perhaps playing around with the
doping profile - Its just fizzicks,
ya' know!) gives higher reverse
breakdown voltage. And the lighter
doping also gives a higher bulk
resistivity such that the extrinsic
series resistance is higher than a
LV diode, so higher forward drop at
least is due to higher series
resistance.
This is a
"no-cost" contract. It is going to
take an infinity of diodes!
rogerw
On 4/7/2022
9:32 AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Question Roger, are HV (like
8kV) low current diodes a stack of
normal PN junctions inside? or are
they a single special PN junction?
What I do measure is higher and
higher Fwd V drop as the V (sub)
max rating increases.
By the way, if you only need
that many PN junctions to achieve
thermal cancelling, try switching
to Schottkey diodes. That will
double or tripple the parts count.
This is a "cost-plus-contract",
right?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7,
2022 9:06:12 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB]
Question and an interesting site
for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Geo,
Sure,
enclosed, but I have already
modified the Zener String
with a temperature
compensation scheme that
will be somewhat familiar to
the discerning eye. I am NOT
suggesting this circuit for
a build, merely playing
around with ideas!
So, if I
measure the voltage of the
top of that Zener String
alone, it is a nominal 788V
at 25degC, and 821V at
75degC, and 754V at-25degC.
That is a +67V change over
100degC or about +0.67V/degC
tempco. (parenthetically,
the original full Zener
String was about +/-40V.)?
If I compensate that with
the negative tempco of a Vbe
which is about -2.2mv/degC,
I need
0.67V/2.2mV = 304 Vbes......
whew! That's a lot of
diodes!
Instead
the BJT circuit is
multiplying the sum of
Q1&Q3 Vbe by 129 =
258Vbe's. All I can say
about the difference from
calculated is that the
actual tempco of the bjt's
is in the model somewhere
and differs from my Mindsim
approximation. And btw, the
pnp BJT Q2 is a local
feedback trick that is
"fortifying" Q1......
without Q2 you get weak
knee, with Q2 you get a
sharp knee. Q2 and R3 can be
removed and the circuit
still functions but
regulation suffers.
Anyway,
the second enclosure shows
the regulation performance
over temperature. When I
expand the scale I can see
the regulated voltage at
906V nominal 25degC, 908V at
75degC, and 905V at -25degC.
So, for
one thing, this whole
exercise begs a question:
Who lets their GM Counter
get THAT hot or cold? I
think that is a
philosophical question....
If a GM Counter fell in the
forest, in the winter up
north, and there was not a
woman there to turn it on,
does it really matter? Does
it even exist???
rogerw
On
4/7/2022 3:36 AM, Geo Dowell
wrote:
Roger, show schematic
of sim?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6,
2022 9:28:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB]
Question and an
interesting site for those
that modify CDV700s and
more.
Well I just simulated
something I had not
yet thought to
do...... I simulated a
Zener string.
Yeah, it worked......
ha!
Largest Zener I could
find in the model
library was 36V so I
strung enough of those
to make about 890V
nominal with a 3.3Meg
dropper resistor. Its
regulation is very
flat only rose about
3V from 1000V to 1200V
input. That as good as
my Penultimate
Way-Good Cascode Shunt
Regulator can do, and
far less complex.
But guess what? over
temperature it sucks
big wind! +/-40V from
-25 to 25 to 75degC!
The Penultimate only
varies about +/-3V
over that temp range
(overkill).
But the Good Enough
Cascode Shunt
Regulator, with its
temperature
compensation scheme,
only varies less tha
+/-5V. Regulation
varies less than 10V
from the knee to 950
to 1200V
On 4/6/2022 10:53
AM, Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
Minor change, I
noticed after I
posted the note
below that I had not
specified the second
BJT in the
Darlington. The
enclosed schematic
is corrected and now
the simulation
predicts about
dead-nuts on for the
tempco of the
output. Other than
that, same comments
as below. I think
this is the best
"good enough"
cascoded shunt
regulator.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 10:40
AM, Roger Whatley
via groups.io wrote:
Peter,Enclosed is
a schematic of my
suggestion below.
That is an 8.2V
Rohm Zener chosen
for tempco to
cancel the
negative tempco of
two Vbe's. It is
slightly too
positive in the
result but quite
"good enough." You
willr just get
much flatter
regulation with
the Darlington
pair and that can
be had in a single
package.
Of course,
depending on the
Vcemax spec of
your cascode
MOSFET, you might
have only one
cascode instead of
two..... That will
not make a
noticeable
difference except
to breakdown.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022
8:32 AM, Roger
Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
I realize that
circuit
described below
might be "good
enough," but
realize that
making that one
BJT a Darlington
pair is a
significant
improvement to
the regulation.
You can even get
the Darlington
in one
transistor
package, of
course, cheap.
As UnRegHV
increases, the
current in the
BJT necessarily
increases in
order to
regulate the
loop. For every
extra 0.1uA of
extra base
current
required, the
voltage drop in
the feedback
resistors (66M +
66M + 1M) goes
up
0.1uA*(66M+66M+1M)
= 13.3V and thus
regulation
suffers. The BJT
current easliy
goes from less
than 10uA to
over 200uA, thus
the base current
might go up by a
worst-case of as
much as 1uA,
giving a 133V
change in the
output. So that
is the
motivation for
the Darlington.
(In case anyone
wonders, why not
an FET instead
of a BJT, that
WAS the original
circuit and it
suffers worse
circuit
errors.....)
The next big
error is that as
the BJT current
increases with
UnRegHV
increases, so
does Vbe and Vz
increase. Those
are the
motivations for
subsequent
circuit
complications
and resulting in
the Penultimate
Way-Improved
version..... it
is overkill, I
know, to the
requirement, but
by simulating
those
improvements I
gain insights as
to just what the
remaining errors
were. And it was
fun!
My take is that
your present
circuit, but
with a
Darlington Pair,
will be "good
enough" and if
it were a
purpose-built
Darlington in
one three-lead
package, no more
expensive or
even board-space
than a single
BJT.
Of course, a
single Zener
voltage may be
chosen to match
the negative
tempco of two
Vbe's. Again, no
extra expense or
board space.
(Off the top of
my head, I am
thinking about
8V Zener for
+4mV/degC?)
rogerw
On 4/4/2022
10:33 PM, peter
via groups.io
wrote:
Roger:
?back to the
circuit you
posted in
message #300
Simple cascode,
with only 1 npn
tr + 2 mosfets.
Since I found
the 2SK3265, I
removed the 2nd
mosfet so its
very basic
circuit.
66Meg, two 1
Meg, 100k+ 2.2M
trimmer , 5.1V
zener, 2SK3265,
2SC3311
Set trimmer for
900V, Vary input
from 950~ 1150,
output only
varied 5V or
less.
Heated the
circuit with a
hair dryer, got
it up from 25C
to about 60C,
voltage rose may
be 5 or 6 volts.
Good enough for
me!
Time to make it
small enough to
stuff inside my
CDV-700 !
It on the LHS of
the attached
jpg, circuit in
message #300 is
on the RHS
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
" ??I worked as an X-ray repair tech at my last job.? Medical and Veterinary X-ray at first, then the Medical side split off.? Mostly field portable stuff.? We had a really cool X-ray dosimeter tool that could be configured for different measurement units.? I may have some info on it still in my archives.? It would record the kVp, mAs, and dose from an exposure. "
Clay does "Victoreen NERO" ring any bells?
Geo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "freshndaire" <fanman@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 1:06:23 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
A bit off my original topic here.? I have a large area diode detector in the collection, nothing to hook it to.? They are commercially available.? I haven't gotten around to doing anything with it unfortunately.? I can't get? to it at the moment.? I'll may post a picture later.? I didn't post my cleaned up Eltronics PR-13 pics because my phone camera has lost the menu to change resolution for some odd reason. I probably disabled too many "sharing features".
? I worked as an X-ray repair tech at my last job.? Medical and Veterinary X-ray at first, then the Medical side split off.? Mostly field portable stuff.? We had a really cool X-ray dosimeter tool that could be configured for different measurement units.? I may have some info on it still in my archives.? It would record the kVp, mAs, and dose from an exposure.? We used it to check the output of the X-ray generators.? The image detectors were basically the reverse of an LCD monitor.? I have some that are delaminating and have image quality issues due to the light not coupling well in the delaminated areas.? it is all at the edges so they are actually still usable.? The took in light in rows and columns.? There was a scintillating sheet married to the detector to capture the light from the exposure.? Getting a good image is somewhat software intensive.? Fun stuff, I loved the technology.? They were just getting into ultrasound when I quit.? I always wore a recording dosimeter and used protective gear.? The dose from a digital image is small, but I sometimes took hundreds of test shots in a day!? Seldom had any recorded dose at the end of the month.
? X-ray generators will tickle a Survey meter, even the portable ones I worked with.? I couldn't get a long enough pulse to for a reading to settle out, but you can get a definite upscale reading.? If I live long enough I will someday hook up a scope and see what I can capture.with a survey meter in a beam path.? The Ion chamber is quick to respond, the metering circuits not so much.? Could be fun.? If I knew another local enthusiast I would have had some motivation to do more with the hobby.? The world is becoming a very lonely place.
? I am glad I shared the info on the Corotron replacement with this topic.? I had been sitting on that planning to do what you guys are doing, but I would have struggled without simulating the circuits.? great work.? I wanted to get it out there in case I get hit by a truck or something.? You guys are doing interesting work, I was always just planning to do a Corotron replacement with low cost and parts count to keep it cheap and simple to build.? You have branched out a bit from that!? There is a Corotron catalog on the logwell site.
? I have been bogged down by my excesses.? I have a large collection of parts from HP and Ericsson surplus and have hit the point where I have so many parts? I can't find what I need and it is easier to buy them.? Stupidly overwhelmed at this point.? I literally have thousands of FETs, some just one, some on reels of 3000!? I have a list of most of what I have, but had not looked up specs on all of them.? Been doing the research and linking FET data sheets to my spreadsheet of parts.? But since I suck at making decisions I now have too many choices to pick from, none are what I thought was going to make the circuit simple.? And I just realized that if I move the parts data all the links will be broken.? Bummer when it comes time to share the list.
Time for a lunch break.
Clay
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
" ??I have been bogged down by my excesses.? I have a large collection of parts from HP and Ericsson surplus and have hit the point where I have so many parts? I can't find what I need and it is easier to buy them.? Stupidly overwhelmed at this point.? I literally have thousands of FETs, some just one, some on reels of 3000!? I have a list of most of what I have, but had not looked up specs on all of them.? Been doing the research and linking FET data sheets to my spreadsheet of parts.? But since I suck at making decisions I now have too many choices to pick from, none are what I thought was going to make the circuit simple.? And I just realized that if I move the parts data all the links will be broken.? Bummer when it comes time to share the list.Time for a lunch break.Clay"
What you said!
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... laughing so hard I'm choking on my own spit!
Time for a 3 martini break? ?errrrrrrr..........I mean lunch break, here too.
Geo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 1:20:27 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Clay,
Regarding the "stupidly overwhelmed' comment,
"I resemble that remark!"
Thank you for your kind appreciation. Peter's
latest circuit, posted today, looks very good to me, a balance
of cost/complexity and performance. And it can be configured
either as a Shunt oe Series Pass Regulator with or without the
extra transistor (which can be a HV BJT or HV MosFet).
I was very impressed to find this morning how
well a Vic Corotron might regulate, especially over Temperature.
And I guess that was a point in the very beginning of this
thread!
Our simple Zener Strings are not so hot
performance after all!
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 1:06 PM, freshndaire wrote:
? A bit off my original topic here.? I have a large area diode
detector in the collection, nothing to hook it to.? They are
commercially available.? I haven't gotten around to doing anything
with it unfortunately.? I can't get? to it at the moment.? I'll
may post a picture later.? I didn't post my cleaned up Eltronics
PR-13 pics because my phone camera has lost the menu to change
resolution for some odd reason. I probably disabled too many
"sharing features".
? I worked as an X-ray repair tech at my last job.? Medical and
Veterinary X-ray at first, then the Medical side split off.?
Mostly field portable stuff.? We had a really cool X-ray dosimeter
tool that could be configured for different measurement units.? I
may have some info on it still in my archives.? It would record
the kVp, mAs, and dose from an exposure.? We used it to check the
output of the X-ray generators.? The image detectors were
basically the reverse of an LCD monitor.? I have some that are
delaminating and have image quality issues due to the light not
coupling well in the delaminated areas.? it is all at the edges so
they are actually still usable.? The took in light in rows and
columns.? There was a scintillating sheet married to the detector
to capture the light from the exposure.? Getting a good image is
somewhat software intensive.? Fun stuff, I loved the technology.?
They were just getting into ultrasound when I quit.? I always wore
a recording dosimeter and used protective gear.? The dose from a
digital image is small, but I sometimes took hundreds of test
shots in a day!? Seldom had any recorded dose at the end of the
month.
? X-ray generators will tickle a Survey meter, even the portable
ones I worked with.? I couldn't get a long enough pulse to for a
reading to settle out, but you can get a definite upscale
reading.? If I live long enough I will someday hook up a scope and
see what I can capture.with a survey meter in a beam path.? The
Ion chamber is quick to respond, the metering circuits not so
much.? Could be fun.? If I knew another local enthusiast I would
have had some motivation to do more with the hobby.? The world is
becoming a very lonely place.
? I am glad I shared the info on the Corotron replacement with
this topic.? I had been sitting on that planning to do what you
guys are doing, but I would have struggled without simulating the
circuits.? great work.? I wanted to get it out there in case I get
hit by a truck or something.? You guys are doing interesting work,
I was always just planning to do a Corotron replacement with low
cost and parts count to keep it cheap and simple to build.? You
have branched out a bit from that!? There is a Corotron catalog on
the logwell site.
? I have been bogged down by my excesses.? I have a large
collection of parts from HP and Ericsson surplus and have hit the
point where I have so many parts? I can't find what I need and it
is easier to buy them.? Stupidly overwhelmed at this point.? I
literally have thousands of FETs, some just one, some on reels of
3000!? I have a list of most of what I have, but had not looked up
specs on all of them.? Been doing the research and linking FET
data sheets to my spreadsheet of parts.? But since I suck at
making decisions I now have too many choices to pick from, none
are what I thought was going to make the circuit simple.? And I
just realized that if I move the parts data all the links will be
broken.? Bummer when it comes time to share the list.
Time for a lunch break.
Clay
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Let's? skip that for now.?
Will a single series Zener, say 100V, operate if the supply is limited to 1 uA by the load resistance?
Is there a spec for that?
We were talking about the LM431 the other day and you both correctly pointed out it needs 1 mA to operate, but what does a Zener need to operate, current wise, assuming there is more than adequate V present to break it over?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 12:02:38 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
With UnRegHV = 1300V and dropping resistor =
1.8Meg,
No load, 910.00V
Rload = 1G, 909.99V
Rload = 100Meg, 909.86V,
Rload = 10Meg, 909.01V.
If one were to measure on the other side of
the 3.3Meg resistor going up the cable to the GM tube, a very
different result would ensue. 1G would be very handy! But, if ne
knows the numbers, one can calculate from the loaded measurement
what the infinite input impedance
scope would have seen
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:41 AM, Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
good question. I will hazard a MindSim
answer, then will do the simulation.
As long? as the loading of the Zener String
regulated node does not approach to close to the current
flowing into the Zener, it will not drop the voltage too much.
(900+V/1G) << (1300V- 900+V)/1.8Meg? ,
or,
0.9uA << 222uA
So, the Zener String sees a very negligible
change in current with a 1G loading at the anode of the
string, since 222uA-0.9uA ~ 221uA is hardly any change. Even
if you loaded it down to only 10uA in the Zener string you
would not see a lot of change, as it depends on the regulation
curve.
(By gosh! you just told me how I can measure
the regulation curve over voltage with a fixed HV supply!
Wallah!)
So, continuing Stream of Thought..... the
more interesting case is not UnRegHV = 1300V but what if only
1000v? Then,
0.9uA << (1000V-900V)/1.8Meg? ,or,
0.9uA << 55.5uA
Still lots of room to load it and leave 10uA
or more for the Zener String.
I actually think (I think, I am not sure)
that the typical HV Generator is going to be current limited
by the time it gets to maybe 20uA at some UnRegHV voltage well
below the OpenCircuit voltage....... in that case:
0.9uA << 20uA (or whatever the
current-limited number is. When I designed the Lionel and Vic
HV Generators for lower power consumption, I shot for a 10uA
output current.)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:05 AM, Geo Dowell
wrote:
I don't know, never saw that listed either.
Meantime do this simple sim for me.
+1300V DC to cathode of a Zener ( can be via? 1.8M Ohm
res. or direct in this case only). Any Zener. On the other
side of the Zener, a 1000 M Ohm load to ground(-).
What V does the infinite impedance scope probe show at
the junction of anode and 1G load?
I am not good with simulators, but physically do this on
the workbench every day.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 10:46:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
Ok, I got a bit curious...... If a
Zener String of 900+V can change +/-40V over -25degC
to +75degC, what did the original Corotrons do?
IE, a Victoreen GV3A Corotron?
It turns out that this Vic catalog
does not give a spec on the basic GV3A used, but does
give temp info on the "High Temperature" version:
?
page 15

So, you can see an original 900V
High Temp Corotron only varied 16V from -65degC to
150degC...... pretty impressive I think.
We are replacing these things with
Zener Strings with relatively high positive
tempco......
I think the ultimate economic answer
is to regulate in the primary circuit, just as you
suggested, and as ENi did, and depend on the fixed
transformer secondary ratio to get the regulated HV,
and to temperature compensate the primary along with
an adjustable trim capability.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:58 AM, Roger
Whatley via groups.io wrote:
1) yes, could be multiple
junctions.
2) You have an exray machine?
3) We used to "de-pot" plastic
packaged IC chips with acid to expose the die in the
package, to examine under a microscope, photograph,
etc. trace circuits that way....... might be hard to
do with an axial lead diode.... I don't know.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:49 AM, Geo
Dowell wrote:
I've always assumed the multiple junction idea,
because in practice the higher voltage rectifier
diodes get longer and longer. Ones for a 100kV
stack are a good 6 inches long each. Don't know,
just guessing. Will have to X-Ray one, but when
it's out of the X-Ray machine how to do that?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 9:43:53 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Well, the answer to your
first question is: I am not sure, but I
think it is probably just very lightly doped
silicon pn junction. The light doping (and
perhaps playing around with the doping
profile - Its just fizzicks, ya' know!)
gives higher reverse breakdown voltage. And
the lighter doping also gives a higher bulk
resistivity such that the extrinsic series
resistance is higher than a LV diode, so
higher forward drop at least is due to
higher series resistance.
This is a "no-cost"
contract. It is going to take an infinity of
diodes!
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:32
AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Question Roger, are HV (like 8kV) low
current diodes a stack of normal PN
junctions inside? or are they a single
special PN junction? What I do measure is
higher and higher Fwd V drop as the V
(sub) max rating increases.
By the way, if you only need that many
PN junctions to achieve thermal
cancelling, try switching to Schottkey
diodes. That will double or tripple the
parts count. This is a
"cost-plus-contract", right?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022
9:06:12 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question
and an interesting site for those that
modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
Sure, enclosed,
but I have already modified the
Zener String with a temperature
compensation scheme that will be
somewhat familiar to the discerning
eye. I am NOT suggesting this
circuit for a build, merely playing
around with ideas!
So, if I measure
the voltage of the top of that Zener
String alone, it is a nominal 788V
at 25degC, and 821V at 75degC, and
754V at-25degC. That is a +67V
change over 100degC or about
+0.67V/degC tempco.
(parenthetically, the original full
Zener String was about +/-40V.)? If
I compensate that with the negative
tempco of a Vbe which is about
-2.2mv/degC,
I need 0.67V/2.2mV
= 304 Vbes...... whew! That's a lot
of diodes!
Instead the BJT
circuit is multiplying the sum of
Q1&Q3 Vbe by 129 = 258Vbe's. All
I can say about the difference from
calculated is that the actual tempco
of the bjt's is in the model
somewhere and differs from my
Mindsim approximation. And btw, the
pnp BJT Q2 is a local feedback trick
that is "fortifying" Q1......
without Q2 you get weak knee, with
Q2 you get a sharp knee. Q2 and R3
can be removed and the circuit still
functions but regulation suffers.
Anyway, the second
enclosure shows the regulation
performance over temperature. When I
expand the scale I can see the
regulated voltage at 906V nominal
25degC, 908V at 75degC, and 905V at
-25degC.
So, for one thing,
this whole exercise begs a question:
Who lets their GM Counter get THAT
hot or cold? I think that is a
philosophical question.... If a GM
Counter fell in the forest, in the
winter up north, and there was not a
woman there to turn it on, does it
really matter? Does it even exist???
rogerw
On 4/7/2022
3:36 AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Roger, show schematic of sim?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022
9:28:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question
and an interesting site for those
that modify CDV700s and more.
Well I just simulated
something I had not yet
thought to do...... I
simulated a Zener string.
Yeah, it worked...... ha!
Largest Zener I could find in
the model library was 36V so I
strung enough of those to make
about 890V nominal with a
3.3Meg dropper resistor. Its
regulation is very flat only
rose about 3V from 1000V to
1200V input. That as good as
my Penultimate Way-Good
Cascode Shunt Regulator can
do, and far less complex.
But guess what? over
temperature it sucks big wind!
+/-40V from -25 to 25 to
75degC! The Penultimate only
varies about +/-3V over that
temp range (overkill).
But the Good Enough Cascode
Shunt Regulator, with its
temperature compensation
scheme, only varies less tha
+/-5V. Regulation varies less
than 10V from the knee to 950
to 1200V
On 4/6/2022 10:53 AM, Roger
Whatley via groups.io wrote:
Peter,
Minor change, I noticed
after I posted the note
below that I had not
specified the second BJT in
the Darlington. The enclosed
schematic is corrected and
now the simulation predicts
about dead-nuts on for the
tempco of the output. Other
than that, same comments as
below. I think this is the
best "good enough" cascoded
shunt regulator.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 10:40 AM,
Roger Whatley via groups.io
wrote:
Peter,Enclosed is a
schematic of my suggestion
below. That is an 8.2V
Rohm Zener chosen for
tempco to cancel the
negative tempco of two
Vbe's. It is slightly too
positive in the result but
quite "good enough." You
willr just get much
flatter regulation with
the Darlington pair and
that can be had in a
single package.
Of course, depending on
the Vcemax spec of your
cascode MOSFET, you might
have only one cascode
instead of two..... That
will not make a noticeable
difference except to
breakdown.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 8:32 AM,
Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
I realize that circuit
described below might be
"good enough," but
realize that making that
one BJT a Darlington
pair is a significant
improvement to the
regulation. You can even
get the Darlington in
one transistor package,
of course, cheap.
As UnRegHV increases,
the current in the BJT
necessarily increases in
order to regulate the
loop. For every extra
0.1uA of extra base
current required, the
voltage drop in the
feedback resistors (66M
+ 66M + 1M) goes up
0.1uA*(66M+66M+1M) =
13.3V and thus
regulation suffers. The
BJT current easliy goes
from less than 10uA to
over 200uA, thus the
base current might go up
by a worst-case of as
much as 1uA, giving a
133V change in the
output. So that is the
motivation for the
Darlington.
(In case anyone
wonders, why not an FET
instead of a BJT, that
WAS the original circuit
and it suffers worse
circuit errors.....)
The next big error is
that as the BJT current
increases with UnRegHV
increases, so does Vbe
and Vz increase. Those
are the motivations for
subsequent circuit
complications and
resulting in the
Penultimate Way-Improved
version..... it is
overkill, I know, to the
requirement, but by
simulating those
improvements I gain
insights as to just what
the remaining errors
were. And it was fun!
My take is that your
present circuit, but
with a Darlington Pair,
will be "good enough"
and if it were a
purpose-built Darlington
in one three-lead
package, no more
expensive or even
board-space than a
single BJT.
Of course, a single
Zener voltage may be
chosen to match the
negative tempco of two
Vbe's. Again, no extra
expense or board space.
(Off the top of my head,
I am thinking about 8V
Zener for +4mV/degC?)
rogerw
On 4/4/2022 10:33 PM,
peter via groups.io
wrote:
Roger:
?back to the circuit you
posted in message #300
Simple cascode, with
only 1 npn tr + 2
mosfets.
Since I found the
2SK3265, I removed the
2nd mosfet so its very
basic circuit.
66Meg, two 1 Meg, 100k+
2.2M trimmer , 5.1V
zener, 2SK3265, 2SC3311
Set trimmer for 900V,
Vary input from 950~
1150, output only varied
5V or less.
Heated the circuit with
a hair dryer, got it up
from 25C to about 60C,
voltage rose may be 5 or
6 volts. Good enough for
me!
Time to make it small
enough to stuff inside
my CDV-700 !
It on the LHS of the
attached jpg, circuit in
message #300 is on the
RHS
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 12:02:38 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
With UnRegHV = 1300V and dropping resistor =
1.8Meg,
No load, 910.00V
Rload = 1G, 909.99V
Rload = 100Meg, 909.86V,
Rload = 10Meg, 909.01V.
If one were to measure on the other side of
the 3.3Meg resistor going up the cable to the GM tube, a very
different result would ensue. 1G would be very handy! But, if ne
knows the numbers, one can calculate from the loaded measurement
what the infinite input impedance
scope would have seen
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:41 AM, Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
good question. I will hazard a MindSim
answer, then will do the simulation.
As long? as the loading of the Zener String
regulated node does not approach to close to the current
flowing into the Zener, it will not drop the voltage too much.
(900+V/1G) << (1300V- 900+V)/1.8Meg? ,
or,
0.9uA << 222uA
So, the Zener String sees a very negligible
change in current with a 1G loading at the anode of the
string, since 222uA-0.9uA ~ 221uA is hardly any change. Even
if you loaded it down to only 10uA in the Zener string you
would not see a lot of change, as it depends on the regulation
curve.
(By gosh! you just told me how I can measure
the regulation curve over voltage with a fixed HV supply!
Wallah!)
So, continuing Stream of Thought..... the
more interesting case is not UnRegHV = 1300V but what if only
1000v? Then,
0.9uA << (1000V-900V)/1.8Meg? ,or,
0.9uA << 55.5uA
Still lots of room to load it and leave 10uA
or more for the Zener String.
I actually think (I think, I am not sure)
that the typical HV Generator is going to be current limited
by the time it gets to maybe 20uA at some UnRegHV voltage well
below the OpenCircuit voltage....... in that case:
0.9uA << 20uA (or whatever the
current-limited number is. When I designed the Lionel and Vic
HV Generators for lower power consumption, I shot for a 10uA
output current.)
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:05 AM, Geo Dowell
wrote:
I don't know, never saw that listed either.
Meantime do this simple sim for me.
+1300V DC to cathode of a Zener ( can be via? 1.8M Ohm
res. or direct in this case only). Any Zener. On the other
side of the Zener, a 1000 M Ohm load to ground(-).
What V does the infinite impedance scope probe show at
the junction of anode and 1G load?
I am not good with simulators, but physically do this on
the workbench every day.
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 10:46:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
Ok, I got a bit curious...... If a
Zener String of 900+V can change +/-40V over -25degC
to +75degC, what did the original Corotrons do?
IE, a Victoreen GV3A Corotron?
It turns out that this Vic catalog
does not give a spec on the basic GV3A used, but does
give temp info on the "High Temperature" version:
?
page 15

So, you can see an original 900V
High Temp Corotron only varied 16V from -65degC to
150degC...... pretty impressive I think.
We are replacing these things with
Zener Strings with relatively high positive
tempco......
I think the ultimate economic answer
is to regulate in the primary circuit, just as you
suggested, and as ENi did, and depend on the fixed
transformer secondary ratio to get the regulated HV,
and to temperature compensate the primary along with
an adjustable trim capability.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:58 AM, Roger
Whatley via groups.io wrote:
1) yes, could be multiple
junctions.
2) You have an exray machine?
3) We used to "de-pot" plastic
packaged IC chips with acid to expose the die in the
package, to examine under a microscope, photograph,
etc. trace circuits that way....... might be hard to
do with an axial lead diode.... I don't know.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:49 AM, Geo
Dowell wrote:
I've always assumed the multiple junction idea,
because in practice the higher voltage rectifier
diodes get longer and longer. Ones for a 100kV
stack are a good 6 inches long each. Don't know,
just guessing. Will have to X-Ray one, but when
it's out of the X-Ray machine how to do that?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 9:43:53 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an
interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and
more.
Well, the answer to your
first question is: I am not sure, but I
think it is probably just very lightly doped
silicon pn junction. The light doping (and
perhaps playing around with the doping
profile - Its just fizzicks, ya' know!)
gives higher reverse breakdown voltage. And
the lighter doping also gives a higher bulk
resistivity such that the extrinsic series
resistance is higher than a LV diode, so
higher forward drop at least is due to
higher series resistance.
This is a "no-cost"
contract. It is going to take an infinity of
diodes!
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 9:32
AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Question Roger, are HV (like 8kV) low
current diodes a stack of normal PN
junctions inside? or are they a single
special PN junction? What I do measure is
higher and higher Fwd V drop as the V
(sub) max rating increases.
By the way, if you only need that many
PN junctions to achieve thermal
cancelling, try switching to Schottkey
diodes. That will double or tripple the
parts count. This is a
"cost-plus-contract", right?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022
9:06:12 AM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question
and an interesting site for those that
modify CDV700s and more.
Geo,
Sure, enclosed,
but I have already modified the
Zener String with a temperature
compensation scheme that will be
somewhat familiar to the discerning
eye. I am NOT suggesting this
circuit for a build, merely playing
around with ideas!
So, if I measure
the voltage of the top of that Zener
String alone, it is a nominal 788V
at 25degC, and 821V at 75degC, and
754V at-25degC. That is a +67V
change over 100degC or about
+0.67V/degC tempco.
(parenthetically, the original full
Zener String was about +/-40V.)? If
I compensate that with the negative
tempco of a Vbe which is about
-2.2mv/degC,
I need 0.67V/2.2mV
= 304 Vbes...... whew! That's a lot
of diodes!
Instead the BJT
circuit is multiplying the sum of
Q1&Q3 Vbe by 129 = 258Vbe's. All
I can say about the difference from
calculated is that the actual tempco
of the bjt's is in the model
somewhere and differs from my
Mindsim approximation. And btw, the
pnp BJT Q2 is a local feedback trick
that is "fortifying" Q1......
without Q2 you get weak knee, with
Q2 you get a sharp knee. Q2 and R3
can be removed and the circuit still
functions but regulation suffers.
Anyway, the second
enclosure shows the regulation
performance over temperature. When I
expand the scale I can see the
regulated voltage at 906V nominal
25degC, 908V at 75degC, and 905V at
-25degC.
So, for one thing,
this whole exercise begs a question:
Who lets their GM Counter get THAT
hot or cold? I think that is a
philosophical question.... If a GM
Counter fell in the forest, in the
winter up north, and there was not a
woman there to turn it on, does it
really matter? Does it even exist???
rogerw
On 4/7/2022
3:36 AM, Geo Dowell wrote:
Roger, show schematic of sim?
Geo
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...>
To: "CDV700CLUB" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022
9:28:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question
and an interesting site for those
that modify CDV700s and more.
Well I just simulated
something I had not yet
thought to do...... I
simulated a Zener string.
Yeah, it worked...... ha!
Largest Zener I could find in
the model library was 36V so I
strung enough of those to make
about 890V nominal with a
3.3Meg dropper resistor. Its
regulation is very flat only
rose about 3V from 1000V to
1200V input. That as good as
my Penultimate Way-Good
Cascode Shunt Regulator can
do, and far less complex.
But guess what? over
temperature it sucks big wind!
+/-40V from -25 to 25 to
75degC! The Penultimate only
varies about +/-3V over that
temp range (overkill).
But the Good Enough Cascode
Shunt Regulator, with its
temperature compensation
scheme, only varies less tha
+/-5V. Regulation varies less
than 10V from the knee to 950
to 1200V
On 4/6/2022 10:53 AM, Roger
Whatley via groups.io wrote:
Peter,
Minor change, I noticed
after I posted the note
below that I had not
specified the second BJT in
the Darlington. The enclosed
schematic is corrected and
now the simulation predicts
about dead-nuts on for the
tempco of the output. Other
than that, same comments as
below. I think this is the
best "good enough" cascoded
shunt regulator.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 10:40 AM,
Roger Whatley via groups.io
wrote:
Peter,Enclosed is a
schematic of my suggestion
below. That is an 8.2V
Rohm Zener chosen for
tempco to cancel the
negative tempco of two
Vbe's. It is slightly too
positive in the result but
quite "good enough." You
willr just get much
flatter regulation with
the Darlington pair and
that can be had in a
single package.
Of course, depending on
the Vcemax spec of your
cascode MOSFET, you might
have only one cascode
instead of two..... That
will not make a noticeable
difference except to
breakdown.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 8:32 AM,
Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
I realize that circuit
described below might be
"good enough," but
realize that making that
one BJT a Darlington
pair is a significant
improvement to the
regulation. You can even
get the Darlington in
one transistor package,
of course, cheap.
As UnRegHV increases,
the current in the BJT
necessarily increases in
order to regulate the
loop. For every extra
0.1uA of extra base
current required, the
voltage drop in the
feedback resistors (66M
+ 66M + 1M) goes up
0.1uA*(66M+66M+1M) =
13.3V and thus
regulation suffers. The
BJT current easliy goes
from less than 10uA to
over 200uA, thus the
base current might go up
by a worst-case of as
much as 1uA, giving a
133V change in the
output. So that is the
motivation for the
Darlington.
(In case anyone
wonders, why not an FET
instead of a BJT, that
WAS the original circuit
and it suffers worse
circuit errors.....)
The next big error is
that as the BJT current
increases with UnRegHV
increases, so does Vbe
and Vz increase. Those
are the motivations for
subsequent circuit
complications and
resulting in the
Penultimate Way-Improved
version..... it is
overkill, I know, to the
requirement, but by
simulating those
improvements I gain
insights as to just what
the remaining errors
were. And it was fun!
My take is that your
present circuit, but
with a Darlington Pair,
will be "good enough"
and if it were a
purpose-built Darlington
in one three-lead
package, no more
expensive or even
board-space than a
single BJT.
Of course, a single
Zener voltage may be
chosen to match the
negative tempco of two
Vbe's. Again, no extra
expense or board space.
(Off the top of my head,
I am thinking about 8V
Zener for +4mV/degC?)
rogerw
On 4/4/2022 10:33 PM,
peter via groups.io
wrote:
Roger:
?back to the circuit you
posted in message #300
Simple cascode, with
only 1 npn tr + 2
mosfets.
Since I found the
2SK3265, I removed the
2nd mosfet so its very
basic circuit.
66Meg, two 1 Meg, 100k+
2.2M trimmer , 5.1V
zener, 2SK3265, 2SC3311
Set trimmer for 900V,
Vary input from 950~
1150, output only varied
5V or less.
Heated the circuit with
a hair dryer, got it up
from 25C to about 60C,
voltage rose may be 5 or
6 volts. Good enough for
me!
Time to make it small
enough to stuff inside
my CDV-700 !
It on the LHS of the
attached jpg, circuit in
message #300 is on the
RHS
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Clay,
Regarding the "stupidly overwhelmed' comment,
"I resemble that remark!"
Thank you for your kind appreciation. Peter's
latest circuit, posted today, looks very good to me, a balance
of cost/complexity and performance. And it can be configured
either as a Shunt oe Series Pass Regulator with or without the
extra transistor (which can be a HV BJT or HV MosFet).
I was very impressed to find this morning how
well a Vic Corotron might regulate, especially over Temperature.
And I guess that was a point in the very beginning of this
thread!
Our simple Zener Strings are not so hot
performance after all!
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 1:06 PM, freshndaire wrote:
? A bit off my original topic here.? I have a large area diode
detector in the collection, nothing to hook it to.? They are
commercially available.? I haven't gotten around to doing anything
with it unfortunately.? I can't get? to it at the moment.? I'll
may post a picture later.? I didn't post my cleaned up Eltronics
PR-13 pics because my phone camera has lost the menu to change
resolution for some odd reason. I probably disabled too many
"sharing features".
? I worked as an X-ray repair tech at my last job.? Medical and
Veterinary X-ray at first, then the Medical side split off.?
Mostly field portable stuff.? We had a really cool X-ray dosimeter
tool that could be configured for different measurement units.? I
may have some info on it still in my archives.? It would record
the kVp, mAs, and dose from an exposure.? We used it to check the
output of the X-ray generators.? The image detectors were
basically the reverse of an LCD monitor.? I have some that are
delaminating and have image quality issues due to the light not
coupling well in the delaminated areas.? it is all at the edges so
they are actually still usable.? The took in light in rows and
columns.? There was a scintillating sheet married to the detector
to capture the light from the exposure.? Getting a good image is
somewhat software intensive.? Fun stuff, I loved the technology.?
They were just getting into ultrasound when I quit.? I always wore
a recording dosimeter and used protective gear.? The dose from a
digital image is small, but I sometimes took hundreds of test
shots in a day!? Seldom had any recorded dose at the end of the
month.
? X-ray generators will tickle a Survey meter, even the portable
ones I worked with.? I couldn't get a long enough pulse to for a
reading to settle out, but you can get a definite upscale
reading.? If I live long enough I will someday hook up a scope and
see what I can capture.with a survey meter in a beam path.? The
Ion chamber is quick to respond, the metering circuits not so
much.? Could be fun.? If I knew another local enthusiast I would
have had some motivation to do more with the hobby.? The world is
becoming a very lonely place.
? I am glad I shared the info on the Corotron replacement with
this topic.? I had been sitting on that planning to do what you
guys are doing, but I would have struggled without simulating the
circuits.? great work.? I wanted to get it out there in case I get
hit by a truck or something.? You guys are doing interesting work,
I was always just planning to do a Corotron replacement with low
cost and parts count to keep it cheap and simple to build.? You
have branched out a bit from that!? There is a Corotron catalog on
the logwell site.
? I have been bogged down by my excesses.? I have a large
collection of parts from HP and Ericsson surplus and have hit the
point where I have so many parts? I can't find what I need and it
is easier to buy them.? Stupidly overwhelmed at this point.? I
literally have thousands of FETs, some just one, some on reels of
3000!? I have a list of most of what I have, but had not looked up
specs on all of them.? Been doing the research and linking FET
data sheets to my spreadsheet of parts.? But since I suck at
making decisions I now have too many choices to pick from, none
are what I thought was going to make the circuit simple.? And I
just realized that if I move the parts data all the links will be
broken.? Bummer when it comes time to share the list.
Time for a lunch break.
Clay
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
? A bit off my original topic here.? I have a large area diode detector in the collection, nothing to hook it to.? They are commercially available.? I haven't gotten around to doing anything with it unfortunately.? I can't get? to it at the moment.? I'll may post a picture later.? I didn't post my cleaned up Eltronics PR-13 pics because my phone camera has lost the menu to change resolution for some odd reason. I probably disabled too many "sharing features".
? I worked as an X-ray repair tech at my last job.? Medical and Veterinary X-ray at first, then the Medical side split off.? Mostly field portable stuff.? We had a really cool X-ray dosimeter tool that could be configured for different measurement units.? I may have some info on it still in my archives.? It would record the kVp, mAs, and dose from an exposure.? We used it to check the output of the X-ray generators.? The image detectors were basically the reverse of an LCD monitor.? I have some that are delaminating and have image quality issues due to the light not coupling well in the delaminated areas.? it is all at the edges so they are actually still usable.? The took in light in rows and columns.? There was a scintillating sheet married to the detector to capture the light from the exposure.? Getting a good image is somewhat software intensive.? Fun stuff, I loved the technology.? They were just getting into ultrasound when I quit.? I always wore a recording dosimeter and used protective gear.? The dose from a digital image is small, but I sometimes took hundreds of test shots in a day!? Seldom had any recorded dose at the end of the month.
? X-ray generators will tickle a Survey meter, even the portable ones I worked with.? I couldn't get a long enough pulse to for a reading to settle out, but you can get a definite upscale reading.? If I live long enough I will someday hook up a scope and see what I can capture.with a survey meter in a beam path.? The Ion chamber is quick to respond, the metering circuits not so much.? Could be fun.? If I knew another local enthusiast I would have had some motivation to do more with the hobby.? The world is becoming a very lonely place.
? I am glad I shared the info on the Corotron replacement with this topic.? I had been sitting on that planning to do what you guys are doing, but I would have struggled without simulating the circuits.? great work.? I wanted to get it out there in case I get hit by a truck or something.? You guys are doing interesting work, I was always just planning to do a Corotron replacement with low cost and parts count to keep it cheap and simple to build.? You have branched out a bit from that!? There is a Corotron catalog on the logwell site.
? I have been bogged down by my excesses.? I have a large collection of parts from HP and Ericsson surplus and have hit the point where I have so many parts? I can't find what I need and it is easier to buy them.? Stupidly overwhelmed at this point.? I literally have thousands of FETs, some just one, some on reels of 3000!? I have a list of most of what I have, but had not looked up specs on all of them.? Been doing the research and linking FET data sheets to my spreadsheet of parts.? But since I suck at making decisions I now have too many choices to pick from, none are what I thought was going to make the circuit simple.? And I just realized that if I move the parts data all the links will be broken.? Bummer when it comes time to share the list.
Time for a lunch break.
Clay
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
I guess if I had finished reading your note,
you already said that!
Sorry!
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 12:06 PM, Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
looks very good. Q2 may easily need to be HV
though.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:45 AM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger and Geo:
?tried a simple series regulator
R6 is a dummy load of 100M( manually swept it down to 10k and
seems to work)
Q2 is a cheapo 2n3904 and so are Q1 and Q3?
choice of Q2 depends on how much voltage needs to be dropped.?
If only 30V needs to be removed, ok.?
If 200V needs to be removed, need to pick a higher voltage tr
for Q2
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|
Re: Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
looks very good. Q2 may easily need to be HV
though.
rogerw
On 4/7/2022 11:45 AM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger and Geo:
?tried a simple series regulator
R6 is a dummy load of 100M( manually swept it down to 10k and
seems to work)
Q2 is a cheapo 2n3904 and so are Q1 and Q3?
choice of Q2 depends on how much voltage needs to be dropped.?
If only 30V needs to be removed, ok.?
If 200V needs to be removed, need to pick a higher voltage tr for
Q2
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
收旬托次早 托式弛戎
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|