Roger, show schematic of sim?
Geo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "Roger Whatley" <rogwhat53@...> To: "CDV700CLUB" < [email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 9:28:41 PM Subject: Re: [CDV700CLUB] Question and an interesting site for those that modify CDV700s and more.
Well I just simulated something I had not yet
thought to do...... I simulated a Zener string.
Yeah, it worked...... ha!
Largest Zener I could find in the model
library was 36V so I strung enough of those to make about 890V
nominal with a 3.3Meg dropper resistor. Its regulation is very
flat only rose about 3V from 1000V to 1200V input. That as good
as my Penultimate Way-Good Cascode Shunt Regulator can do, and
far less complex.
But guess what? over temperature it sucks big
wind! +/-40V from -25 to 25 to 75degC! The Penultimate only
varies about +/-3V over that temp range (overkill).
But the Good Enough Cascode Shunt Regulator,
with its temperature compensation scheme, only varies less tha
+/-5V. Regulation varies less than 10V from the knee to 950 to
1200V
On 4/6/2022 10:53 AM, Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
Minor change, I noticed after I posted the
note below that I had not specified the second BJT in the
Darlington. The enclosed schematic is corrected and now the
simulation predicts about dead-nuts on for the tempco of the
output. Other than that, same comments as below. I think this
is the best "good enough" cascoded shunt regulator.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 10:40 AM, Roger Whatley
via groups.io wrote:
Peter,Enclosed is a schematic of my
suggestion below. That is an 8.2V Rohm Zener chosen for
tempco to cancel the negative tempco of two Vbe's. It is
slightly too positive in the result but quite "good enough."
You willr just get much flatter regulation with the
Darlington pair and that can be had in a single package.
Of course, depending on the Vcemax spec of
your cascode MOSFET, you might have only one cascode instead
of two..... That will not make a noticeable difference
except to breakdown.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 8:32 AM, Roger Whatley
via groups.io wrote:
Peter,
I realize that circuit described below
might be "good enough," but realize that making that one
BJT a Darlington pair is a significant improvement to the
regulation. You can even get the Darlington in one
transistor package, of course, cheap.
As UnRegHV increases, the current in the
BJT necessarily increases in order to regulate the loop.
For every extra 0.1uA of extra base current required, the
voltage drop in the feedback resistors (66M + 66M + 1M)
goes up 0.1uA*(66M+66M+1M) = 13.3V and thus regulation
suffers. The BJT current easliy goes from less than 10uA
to over 200uA, thus the base current might go up by a
worst-case of as much as 1uA, giving a 133V change in the
output. So that is the motivation for the Darlington.
(In case anyone wonders, why not an FET
instead of a BJT, that WAS the original circuit and it
suffers worse circuit errors.....)
The next big error is that as the BJT
current increases with UnRegHV increases, so does Vbe and
Vz increase. Those are the motivations for subsequent
circuit complications and resulting in the Penultimate
Way-Improved version..... it is overkill, I know, to the
requirement, but by simulating those improvements I gain
insights as to just what the remaining errors were. And it
was fun!
My take is that your present circuit,
but with a Darlington Pair, will be "good enough" and if
it were a purpose-built Darlington in one three-lead
package, no more expensive or even board-space than a
single BJT.
Of course, a single Zener voltage may be
chosen to match the negative tempco of two Vbe's. Again,
no extra expense or board space. (Off the top of my head,
I am thinking about 8V Zener for +4mV/degC?)
rogerw
On 4/4/2022 10:33 PM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger:
?back to the circuit you posted in message #300
Simple cascode, with only 1 npn tr + 2 mosfets.
Since I found the 2SK3265, I removed the 2nd mosfet so its
very basic circuit.
66Meg, two 1 Meg, 100k+ 2.2M trimmer , 5.1V zener, 2SK3265,
2SC3311
Set trimmer for 900V, Vary input from 950~ 1150, output only
varied 5V or less.
Heated the circuit with a hair dryer, got it up from 25C to
about 60C, voltage rose may be 5 or 6 volts. Good enough for
me!
Time to make it small enough to stuff inside my CDV-700 !
It on the LHS of the attached jpg, circuit in message #300
is on the RHS
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
¦¬¦¯¦«¦¸¦ ¦«¦¡¦¢¦¥
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
¦¬¦¯¦«¦¸¦ ¦«¦¡¦¢¦¥
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
¦¬¦¯¦«¦¸¦ ¦«¦¡¦¢¦¥
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
¦¬¦¯¦«¦¸¦ ¦«¦¡¦¢¦¥
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
|