Peter,Enclosed is a schematic of my suggestion
below. That is an 8.2V Rohm Zener chosen for tempco to cancel
the negative tempco of two Vbe's. It is slightly too positive in
the result but quite "good enough." You willr just get much
flatter regulation with the Darlington pair and that can be had
in a single package.
Of course, depending on the Vcemax spec of
your cascode MOSFET, you might have only one cascode instead of
two..... That will not make a noticeable difference except to
breakdown.
rogerw
On 4/6/2022 8:32 AM, Roger Whatley via
groups.io wrote:
Peter,
I realize that circuit described below might
be "good enough," but realize that making that one BJT a
Darlington pair is a significant improvement to the
regulation. You can even get the Darlington in one transistor
package, of course, cheap.
As UnRegHV increases, the current in the BJT
necessarily increases in order to regulate the loop. For every
extra 0.1uA of extra base current required, the voltage drop
in the feedback resistors (66M + 66M + 1M) goes up
0.1uA*(66M+66M+1M) = 13.3V and thus regulation suffers. The
BJT current easliy goes from less than 10uA to over 200uA,
thus the base current might go up by a worst-case of as much
as 1uA, giving a 133V change in the output. So that is the
motivation for the Darlington.
(In case anyone wonders, why not an FET
instead of a BJT, that WAS the original circuit and it suffers
worse circuit errors.....)
The next big error is that as the BJT
current increases with UnRegHV increases, so does Vbe and Vz
increase. Those are the motivations for subsequent circuit
complications and resulting in the Penultimate Way-Improved
version..... it is overkill, I know, to the requirement, but
by simulating those improvements I gain insights as to just
what the remaining errors were. And it was fun!
My take is that your present circuit, but
with a Darlington Pair, will be "good enough" and if it were a
purpose-built Darlington in one three-lead package, no more
expensive or even board-space than a single BJT.
Of course, a single Zener voltage may be
chosen to match the negative tempco of two Vbe's. Again, no
extra expense or board space. (Off the top of my head, I am
thinking about 8V Zener for +4mV/degC?)
rogerw
On 4/4/2022 10:33 PM, peter via
groups.io wrote:
Roger:
?back to the circuit you posted in message #300
Simple cascode, with only 1 npn tr + 2 mosfets.
Since I found the 2SK3265, I removed the 2nd mosfet so its very
basic circuit.
66Meg, two 1 Meg, 100k+ 2.2M trimmer , 5.1V zener, 2SK3265,
2SC3311
Set trimmer for 900V, Vary input from 950~ 1150, output only
varied 5V or less.
Heated the circuit with a hair dryer, got it up from 25C to
about 60C, voltage rose may be 5 or 6 volts. Good enough for me!
Time to make it small enough to stuff inside my CDV-700 !
It on the LHS of the attached jpg, circuit in message #300 is on
the RHS
P
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
¦¬¦¯¦«¦¸¦ ¦«¦¡¦¢¦¥
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.
--
rogerw
On the Catclaw
¦¬¦¯¦«¦¸¦ ¦«¦¡¦¢¦¥
The PanDemic is over, but the DemPanic goes on.
MisDisMal is a dictator's tool of repression.