¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Cranks and buttons

Darrell
 

I don't know about the other manual mills, but retro fitting a Bridgeport
manual mill is not a cost effective plan. A good Bpt manual goes for around
$7000 add ball screws, motor mounts, motors, power supplies, driver cards
and a PC control and you have just spent $6000 to $8000 on the retro fit and
now your "new" machine is worth about $5000 - $6000. If you have room, just
get a BOSS control machine and add a new control all for less than $5000. If
you don't have room for both, sell the manual and take a vacation with the
$2000 profit.
Darrell

----- Original Message -----
From: <ptengin@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cranks and buttons


In a message dated 05/04/2000 1:36:04 PM Hawaiian Standard Time,
munro@... writes:

<< As for me, I am in the process of getting a CNC mill, but I was told in
no
uncertain terms that I should keep my manual mill as well, rather than do
a
retrofit, because I was going to need it.

David M. Munro
>>

I got both a manual and a cnc. There is most definitely a place for both
in
anybody's shop. If they got the money and space that is.

I ususally prep blanks, make fixtures and tools on my manual, the cnc
does
the production.

Peter
THRD, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you like to save big on your phone bill -- and keep on saving
more each month? Join beMANY! Our huge buying group gives you Long
Distance
rates which fall monthly, plus an extra $60 in FREE calls!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page:
FAQ:
bill,
List Manager


Re: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!

Darrell
 

I don't think he was using the Bridgeport drivers.
Darrell

----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Goldstein <timg@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very
long!


Interesting...

When I talked to Matt Shaver about his Bridgeport conversion he said he
was
able to get 60 ipm if I remember correctly. Makes you wonder why he
managed
3X the speed you are getting??

Tim
[Denver, CO]

----- Original Message -----
From: Darrell <dgehlsen@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very
long!


Tim,
I am running an AMD K6 II 400 and only require 2000 steps per inch. I am
running freqmod Feb 29 I believe. When I tried it on my Bridgeport,
movement
started getting ratty at 15 IPM and maxed out at 20 IPM. Looking at the
pulse train with a scope, pulse jitter (timing between steps) got worse
up
to 20 IPM and then smoothed out to near perfect at 30 IPM and then
started
going bad again. At 20 IPM the pulse train was varying by as much as
3/4s
of
the signal width. I talked to Fred Proctor and he agreed that timing in
EMC
was the problem.
Using micro stepping and small motors would probably let you move much
faster but with 1100 oz in motors and full stepping on the Bridgeport it
requires a clean signal. I am used to getting 120 IPM.
I have used the Microkinetics 8010 drivers with good success and I think
the
problems that users have been having on this group is directly related
to
the poor step signal timing.
Darrell


------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page:
FAQ:
bill,
List Manager


Re: Jog Pendant

 

the only machine I've seen that used a joystick to jog is the Omniturn
retrofit
package and that just used a digital stick in place of the usual 4 jog
buttons
it seems like a good idea at first but the stick turns out to be awkward to
use for jogging ,buttons and an encoder dial are much more natural (for me )
a better use for the j-stick port might be to use the joystick button inputs
for jogging
and wire the analog inputs to feed/speed override dials(in 10% increments)
that is IF you wanted to use the j-stick port at all ,you wont be editing
in another window while jogging so the normal keyboard commands
should be ok
my concern was Jon's point about E-stop being the only way to bail out
in the situation he described
on most of the machines I've worked on the 3 main pendant controls are
E-stop,feed hold and cycle start ,and are always grouped together in the
easiest to reach spot on the pendant
jog controls and override dials come next and the keypad and edit functions
usualy get pushed to the top-far side of the control

Brian

The problem with the PC game joysticks is they are extremely
non-linear, and drift wildly with temperature. they use a cheap
pot it the stick, and a timer chip and cheap capacitor and resistor
to measure the pot position. I can't allow a machine that can
exert over 1000 Lbs of linear force to be controlled by something
that unreliable.

Jon


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets
you see and manage all of your finances all in one place.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page:
FAQ:
bill,
List Manager


Re: Conversational Programming

Matt Shaver
 

From: Fred Smith <imserv@...>
Does anybody know how much of the $11,000 of an Accurite is paid in royalty
to Hurco for their conversational controller patent?

4,477,754 Roch , et al. October 16, 1984 Interactive machining system


html/search-bool.html&r=17&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=pall&s1=Hurco&OS=Hurco&RS=Hurc
o

I heard at one time they nearly bankrupt K&T when they won their
infringement lawsuit. Of course this could just be an Urban Myth.
I read this post and the patent it references right before I went to sleep. I
just now awoke in a cold sweat after having the strangest dream:

My wife and kids were trying to keep the cops busy at the front door. I was
in the bathroom desperately trying to flush a huge K&T CNC mill down the
toilet. I kept pushing on it, but it just wouldn't go and I could hear the
cops coming down the hall...

Matt


Re: Jog Pendant

Jon Elson
 

Brian Bartholomew wrote:

So, I'm planning on making a real pendant, with jog dials, override
controls, etc. that would be connected to the GUI directly, rather
than through the X interface. What had been holding me back was
deciding how to connect the pendant to the PC.
Sounds like work. Why not use one of those existing commercial PC
game joysticks with fifty zillion buttons on it?
The problem with the PC game joysticks is they are extremely
non-linear, and drift wildly with temperature. they use a cheap
pot it the stick, and a timer chip and cheap capacitor and resistor
to measure the pot position. I can't allow a machine that can
exert over 1000 Lbs of linear force to be controlled by something
that unreliable.

Jon


Re: CPNC

 

the CP program has been available at ftp://isdftp.cme.nist.gov/pub/emc/
for a couple of months as cp.zip

Brian

Ray Henry wrote:

A student at NIST recently worked out a system for CPNC that called up
Jon
E's programs on the screen, let the operator fill in the variables,
figured
the g-code and put the results into an xml delimited file. This xml
file
could then be saved and re-opened for editing. When the xml program
was
ready to run using EMC, the CP stripped out the g-code and sent it to
the
interpreter.
Hey, great! When will this be released, and how about the detials, so I
can convert the
rest of the programs that I have in the same manner? This sounds like
it will satisfy
a number of users. Then, people can ask for various additions, and
anyone who
figures out how to code it can add the new features.

Jon


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets
you see and manage all of your finances all in one place.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page:
FAQ:
bill,
List Manager


Re: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!

Jon Elson
 

Carlos Guillermo wrote:

Matt Shaver wrote:

AFAIK
OK, I figure out IMHO, FWIW, TIA, and a few others, but this one I do
not
get! Anyone know where to find an NG-addict's acronym dictionary?
As Far As I Know

There are some acronym dictionaries for the net, but I can't cite a
particular URL for one.

Jon


Re: CPNC

Jon Elson
 

Ron Ginger wrote:

Again, I sure wish I could get you in front of an AcuRite machine.
All
you do there is create geometry by filling in blanks, enter the tool
size, and run it. The screen shows the part, the offsets are all
figured
by the program, you dont even have the ability to clean up the code,
its
not needed, and its all on one machine so no transfer is needed.
Yup, I had the local dealer for AccuRite out to show me their system.
The CPNC was VERY impressive, I was very excited, until I heard
their price. At the time, they only had what they called 2 1/2D, that
means 2 axes with motors and one with a linear scale and manual
movement. All that for ONLY $13,000. And, I think, ballscrews
might have been EXTRA! I tried not to laugh as I ushered the guy
out.

I'm doing without, and not too unhappy. If somebody comes out
with an affordable way to add this feature, with or without graphics,
I'll gladly add it, but I'm not going to pay $13,000 for it.

Jon


Re: Names

Jon Elson
 

Dan Mauch wrote:

Had I been at Names and heard the crowd shout down Fred over the use
of
manual machining , I would have jumped up and told the hecklers to
sit down
and shut up. Fred is right!. There are countless times that I still
use
manual control of my milling machine for one off type parts and for
doing a
myraid of tasks like fly cutting, end milling a piece etc. Remember a
few
months ago there was quite a discussion on building a hand held
pendant for
manual control of a cnc machine for power feeding?
Yes, of course, I do this all the time, too! I sometimes machine with
the jog keys,
but that ties up one hand, so I often key in the G-code to make various
cuts.
I can key in a multiple command, and mill down an edge, pull away, and
then
quickly return to the begin point, all with one key press. That way,
the tool doesn't
dwell at the end waiting for me to enter the next command.

Jon


Jog Pendant

Brian Bartholomew
 

So, I'm planning on making a real pendant, with jog dials, override
controls, etc. that would be connected to the GUI directly, rather
than through the X interface. What had been holding me back was
deciding how to connect the pendant to the PC.
Sounds like work. Why not use one of those existing commercial PC
game joysticks with fifty zillion buttons on it?

Brian


Re: vector-cam?

 

Jim,

I have Vector CAD/CAM and am a very happy customer. It is easy to use,
amazing in what it can do (just love the pocket and skin functions), and
best of all the support from Fred at IMService is the best. If I had to come
up with a complaint it is that the program will not let you use long file
names.

I am just a home shop hacker, but sure do feel I would not want to do CNC
without Vector. I have no relationship to Vector except as a satisfied
customer.

Tim
[Denver, CO]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Fackert [mailto:jfackert@...]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:46 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] vector-cam?


Does anyone have any experience with Centriforce VECTORCad cad-cam
software? How's it work?
It was shown at the names show, looks pretty nice... integreated
parametric
cad and cam with g-code, etc. output for mills and lathes...

Jim Fackert


Re: Conversational Programming

Fred Smith
 

Does anybody know how much of the $11,000 of an Accurite is paid in royalty
to Hurco for their conversational controller patent?

4,477,754 Roch , et al. October 16, 1984 Interactive machining system


html/search-bool.html&r=17&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=pall&s1=Hurco&OS=Hurco&RS=Hurc
o

I heard at one time they nearly bankrupt K&T when they won their
infringement lawsuit. Of course this could just be an Urban Myth.


Best Regards,

Fred Smith
IMService

imserv@...
Phone: 248-486-3600 or 800-386-1670
Fax:248-486-3698


Re: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!

lawrence jackman
 

As far as I know
Larry

Carlos Guillermo wrote:

Matt Shaver wrote:

AFAIK


Re: Auto Cad Lt

James Cullins
 

Well all the responded I received so far have been very positive. We have
2000 just setting on the shelf. I'll get started .
Thanks to all for your input.
Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: George Potter <gpotter@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Auto Cad Lt


Jim,

AutoCAD LT is a first rate 2 D drafting program (limited 3D). I started
using AutoCAD (the real stuff) at version 2.17 (long time ago) ...... and
more recently (because of job changes) ended up using AutoCAD LT
(I'm up to LT 98).

Learning this is very worthwhile, as it is a powerfull drafting tool, and
it
is easy to migrate to full AutoCAD, should the opportunity occur.

If you have AutoCAD LT 97 or later, it comes with a "learning assistant"
CD that would really help learn it.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
George Potter

James Cullins wrote:

List
Has any one used Auto Cad Lt, if so what do you think of it.
I have access to it at work ,and was thinking about learning it.
Jim

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets
you see and manage all of your finances all in one place.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page:
FAQ:
bill,
List Manager

------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page:
FAQ:
bill,
List Manager


Re: vector-cam?

Dan Falck
 

On Thu, 04 May 2000, you wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with Centriforce VECTORCad cad-cam
software? How's it work?
It was shown at the names show, looks pretty nice... integreated parametric
cad and cam with g-code, etc. output for mills and lathes...

Jim Fackert
Jim,
I use Vector CAD/CAM and really like it. At first, it was hard for me to get
used to, since I have been using Autocad . But, after using Vector for a
while, I can get around in it very well. In fact, I use it more than Autocad
2000.

Vector has contour milling, pocket milling, true type font machining,
copy/cut/paste, dxf input, etc...

Fred Smith has been very good to work with. He is one of the reasons that I
continue to upgrade. Lately, I have been calling him and bugging him about
buying the next release that has surface machining.

Thanks,
Dan


Re: vector-cam?

Jon Anderson
 

Jim Fackert wrote:

Does anyone have any experience with Centriforce VECTORCad cad-cam
software? How's it work?
I'm just getting started with it. Been limping on a demo 14.0 version of
Bobcad for several years (cutting and pasting 11 lines at a time into
Notepad...).
Vector is different from Bobcad, and there appears to be as much or more
CAD oriented features as CAM. That does me little good as I'm ususally
working from geometry created from Cadkey files. I'm sure the CAD
features will come in handy sooner or later when I catch some booboo
while programming. If I stay with Cadkey another revision, I'll move on
to Acucarve eventually which runs from inside Cadkey. But for now, it
appears to be a great tool at a good price. And, I doubt you will find
better service/support than offered by Fred Smith, here on the list.

Jon


vector-cam?

Jim Fackert
 

Does anyone have any experience with Centriforce VECTORCad cad-cam
software? How's it work?
It was shown at the names show, looks pretty nice... integreated parametric
cad and cam with g-code, etc. output for mills and lathes...

Jim Fackert


Re: Subject: Manual Vs CNC Was Re: Names

Jon Anderson
 

Sometimes CNC can be the way to go for even a single hole.
Some years back in a sheetmetal shop I worked at, a custome rectangle
punch/die was ordered for a job. Needless to say, it showed up at the
very last minute, and the operator quickly discovered the index pin was
missing, along with the hole! The supervisor brought to me and asked if
there was any way in heck I could put a 1/4" dowel pin in the hardened
die. I hand ground a solid carbide spade drill, programmed a single
through hole with peck increments of .001. Gave it lots of coolant and
walked away. 15 minutes later, we had a perfect thru hole. I'd not have
wanted to stand there pecking a manual machine like that!

Jon


Re: Cranks and buttons

 

In a message dated 05/04/2000 1:36:04 PM Hawaiian Standard Time,
munro@... writes:

<< As for me, I am in the process of getting a CNC mill, but I was told in no
uncertain terms that I should keep my manual mill as well, rather than do a
retrofit, because I was going to need it.

David M. Munro
>>

I got both a manual and a cnc. There is most definitely a place for both in
anybody's shop. If they got the money and space that is.

I ususally prep blanks, make fixtures and tools on my manual, the cnc does
the production.

Peter
THRD, Inc.


Re: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!

 


Matt Shaver wrote:

AFAIK
OK, I figure out IMHO, FWIW, TIA, and a few others, but this one I do not
get! Anyone know where to find an NG-addict's acronym dictionary?

Carlos Guillermo
VERVE Engineering & Design
As Far As I Know, that's what it means.

Paul
--
Paul Amaranth | Rochester MI, USA
Aurora Group, Inc. | Systems & Software
paul@... | Unix / Windows / NT