Ray Henry
Jon
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The need for the small encoder is the product of trying to use the existing feedback packages with the Hardinge Lathe. This would only be a problem if you wanted to use the existing GE drive amps which require tach feedback. If you used newer servo amps that derive velocity from position you would not have this problem and could use any diameter encoder up to 3 inch. Yes, I believe that you might be able to fit a 1 inch diameter encoder in the feedback package where the resolver was. Three problems spring immediately to mind. Finding a drive gear for it's shaft, making an eccentric collar so that the gears can be adjusted, and being certain that the encoder's bearings can handle the the radial force required to drive it. The existing tach and resolver also have a small groove around them near the drive end that is used to mount them to the feedback package. This would not be an easy conversion and make the cost of the chip based resolver to pulse coder solution attractive -- or replace the drive amps as well as the feedback. Ray On Thursday 24 October 2002 06:16 am, you wrote:
Message: 17 |