Doug Harrison
For the purposes of this discussion I will declare the length of the table
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
as X and the length of the gantry as Y. To make the single side drive work we must abandon the idea of a gantry as a beam and think of it as a truss (triangle). Think of it as a right triangle where the long leg is the Y axis and the short leg is the X axis. The short leg if the triangle is roughly 50% of the long leg. Thus, for a 60X120 table the distance between trucks that run the X axis rail is about 30-36 inches. As such, the in-plane force (neglecting acceleration) on the X axis trucks is about twice the tool load - not much. The principle advantage of this method lies in the rigidity of the truss. Bending is no longer an issue. Deflection in the XY plane is avoided without resorting to adding bulk. Les Watts' router base is built this way. It seems incredibly stiff though it is only 2X2 box tubing. The one sided approach allows you to invest your ballscrew budget in one good piece instead of two lesser units. The drive side rail should be beefier than the opposite rail. No problem. A disadvantage is that the drive side rail must be about three feet longer than the intended travel - still better than with a moving table though. One of our list members (was it Bob Campbell?) has built a few tables this way and was happy with the results. Doug ----- Original Message -----
From: dakota8833 <dakota8833@...>
|