开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

[C14] Re: CM 1400 GT


Angel
 

开云体育

In my opinion a C14 is no less stable atop a CI700 than a G11. I own then both and have not been able to tell any difference stability wise. Fit and finish, that's another story.
?
Angel
?

-----Original Message-----
From: cgentryz [mailto:cgentry339@...]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 7:10 PM
To: C14@...
Subject: [C14] Re: CM 1400 GT

--- In C14@y..., paulatkinson22@a... wrote:
> Yes,? don't get it.? The mount is the main reason.? ... You will be
>unhappy with the
>mount...

Well, not necessarily.? I am quite happy with my CI-700 with C14.?
Check out the CI-700 group before you decide.

Chip G.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
C14-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


 

Angel,

Tell us your opinion of fit and finish on the CI-700? ?I'd like to hear what you think.

Paul Atkinson


 

Angel,

Thanks for you input on both mounts. ?My earlier comments on the CM 1400 GT were not intended to bash the CI-700. ?However, I agree with you on many of the points you made. ?I feel having seen the CI in action that it isn't a great combination with the C14. ?It seemed way to flimsy, especially the tripod/leg issue. ?In fact, I used one prior to buying my C14 and that is why I made the decision to go with another mount. ?As such, I was indicating my view that in the long run they would probably be much more happy with at least a G11 or larger. ?In my opinion, the G11 is about the smallest mount I would consider. ?It is my humble opinion that Celestron mounts are seriously lacking. ?Look at the June 2002 issue of Astronomy and read the Celestron 9.25 review (if you haven't already). ?That review is perfect example of Celestron as a whole. ?GREAT optics on seriously inadequate mounts. ?Celestron is trying to keep cost down ?as much as possible. ?I can appreciate that fact. ?However, I think that it also hurts them in the long run. ?The C14 is their Cadillac. ?However, they are putting their Cadillac on cheap tires. ?

In a dream world, if money were no object, the AP900/1200 or the GM200, or many other larger mounts are probably the best choices for this optically superior instrument. ?

Paul Atkinson


Angel
 

开云体育

Paul,
?
It a matter of personal preference, but one must see them side by side to get a feel for what I'm talking about. Take for example the anodizing on my G11 looks new after almost 6 years. On the other hand the CI700,?purchased January 2001 and already?the finish is?much less lustrous than the G11 with less significantly less use. The counterweight bar on the CI700 is showing some minor rust spots. Not only fit and finish but little things like the encoder mounting and the clutch knobs which are way too SMALL, specially the dovetail plate clutches. Once in a while I tighten them too much and it makes it a pain at the end of the night to?remove the C14.
?
I can go on and on, as you have to "live" with both mounts to appreciate the G11. So you might ask, why did I keep both mount? Well, I sold the CI700 tripod and have it mounted on a Losmandy GM8 tripod which makes it a very heavy duty and portable alternative to my G11. I briefly owned a GM8 and sold the head just because of the ability of the CI700 to carry a larger payload. It handles my C9.25, AP155 for visual use without any fuzz.
?
Regards,
?
Angel
?
?
?

?-----Original Message-----
From: paulatkinson22@... [mailto:paulatkinson22@...]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:50 AM
To: C14@...
Subject: Re: [C14] Re: CM 1400 GT

Angel,

Tell us your opinion of fit and finish on the CI-700? ?I'd like to hear what you think.

Paul Atkinson
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
C14-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Angel
 

开云体育

Paul,
?
Could not agreed with you more. I will eventually move to a larger mount... someday!
?
Angel
?

-----Original Message-----
From: paulatkinson22@... [mailto:paulatkinson22@...]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:55 AM
To: C14@...
Subject: Re: [C14] Re: CM 1400 GT

Angel,

Thanks for you input on both mounts. ?My earlier comments on the CM 1400 GT were not intended to bash the CI-700. ?However, I agree with you on many of the points you made. ?I feel having seen the CI in action that it isn't a great combination with the C14. ?It seemed way to flimsy, especially the tripod/leg issue. ?In fact, I used one prior to buying my C14 and that is why I made the decision to go with another mount. ?As such, I was indicating my view that in the long run they would probably be much more happy with at least a G11 or larger. ?In my opinion, the G11 is about the smallest mount I would consider. ?It is my humble opinion that Celestron mounts are seriously lacking. ?Look at the June 2002 issue of Astronomy and read the Celestron 9.25 review (if you haven't already). ?That review is perfect example of Celestron as a whole. ?GREAT optics on seriously inadequate mounts. ?Celestron is trying to keep cost down ?as much as possible. ?I can appreciate that fact. ?However, I think that it also hurts them in the long run. ?The C14 is their Cadillac. ?However, they are putting their Cadillac on cheap tires. ?

In a dream world, if money were no object, the AP900/1200 or the GM200, or many other larger mounts are probably the best choices for this optically superior instrument. ?

Paul Atkinson

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
C14-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .