¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: [C14] Re: CM 1400 GT


Angel
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Paul,
?
Could not agreed with you more. I will eventually move to a larger mount... someday!
?
Angel
?

-----Original Message-----
From: paulatkinson22@... [mailto:paulatkinson22@...]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:55 AM
To: C14@...
Subject: Re: [C14] Re: CM 1400 GT

Angel,

Thanks for you input on both mounts. ?My earlier comments on the CM 1400 GT were not intended to bash the CI-700. ?However, I agree with you on many of the points you made. ?I feel having seen the CI in action that it isn't a great combination with the C14. ?It seemed way to flimsy, especially the tripod/leg issue. ?In fact, I used one prior to buying my C14 and that is why I made the decision to go with another mount. ?As such, I was indicating my view that in the long run they would probably be much more happy with at least a G11 or larger. ?In my opinion, the G11 is about the smallest mount I would consider. ?It is my humble opinion that Celestron mounts are seriously lacking. ?Look at the June 2002 issue of Astronomy and read the Celestron 9.25 review (if you haven't already). ?That review is perfect example of Celestron as a whole. ?GREAT optics on seriously inadequate mounts. ?Celestron is trying to keep cost down ?as much as possible. ?I can appreciate that fact. ?However, I think that it also hurts them in the long run. ?The C14 is their Cadillac. ?However, they are putting their Cadillac on cheap tires. ?

In a dream world, if money were no object, the AP900/1200 or the GM200, or many other larger mounts are probably the best choices for this optically superior instrument. ?

Paul Atkinson

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
C14-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.