¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Iron Highway

"John Reay" <[email protected]
 

Doug,

I don't think CP is ever going to capture more than a tiny fraction of truck
trailer traffic passing through your community on Hwy 401. Here are some
reasons why it'll never happen.

1. The Belleville sub is single track and cannot accomodate enough additional
traffic to make any significant impact.
2. The Smith's Falls crew change is not conducive to truck competitive timings.
3. CN competition
4. Independent truckers
5. A lot of the truck traffic you see on the 401 is destined for intermediate
points, and cannot economically be serviced by rail.
6. A lot of truck traffic is over the road from Chicago. Unless it is already
on a flatcar leaving Chicago, it's not likely to be on the rails between
Toronto and Montreal.
7. A significant number of trucks on the 401 are actually drayage, to or from
the intermodal yards of both CN and CP.

CP's Iron Highway service seems primarily aimed at the fleet operator and is
sold on a reserved guaranteed slot basis. The trucking company pays whether or
not the service is used. Therefore the I.H. can theoretically be profitable
even with many empty spots on the train. As they have just announced a
significant expansion (longer trains rather than more trains), its performance
must be deemed satisfactory.

...John Reay, mailto:reay@...

From: Doug Hately <cprnut@...>

It is with a lot of dismay that I watch the I.H. daytime trains
running with a handful of trailers. The 401 in my area is an endless
stream of big trucks with their polluting and road damaging results.
The I.H. is full on weekends and this suggests the railway is unable to
match delivery times demanded by business today.
In the 60s, CP was moving 5000 trailers per week between Montreal
and Toronto. The potential must be H U G E for this type of traffic
today. Why can't the rails get it??? What do you think????

Doug Hately


1057

James E.Mack
 

A few days ago they had postings about CPR 1057 at the South Simcoe
Railway. In end of May 1972 I was at the John Street engine house of
the CP in Toronto. The 1057 was inside with the front off and flues
out. A John Clark had been doing work on her. Mr. Clark was the CP
engine house foreman. At that time I got a post card with a photo of
the 1057 on it. On the back "- Purchased in August 1960 by Regal
Stationery Co. Limited, Toronto."


Kinnear

Mark Liddell
 

Hi guys

Here is what I saw around Kinnear today...

1100 - 557 - StLH5649 CP5512 CP5580 Soo6000 48 cars
1855 - 521 - Soo6021 Soo6028 CP5505 ? cars
2115 - 558 - CP5623 CP5607 40 cars
2250 - 522 - Soo6054 CP5500 49 cars
*522 originally departed at 1910 and got about 3 carlengths past the
South Sdg Swt and the Soo6054 shut down, and they backed the train up to
clear the brick yard and waited a couple hours for a diesel maintainer
to look at it, 558 ran around them in the siding. The Soo6054 was
eventually started after the batteries were filled. The engine would not
start due to overheated batteries.

Mark
--
______________________________________________
Mark Liddell
Hamilton, Ontario

ICQ#3400633
mailto:mliddell@...
Website:
______________________________________________


FROM MY RECORDS-CP RAIL TRAINSPOTTING-PORT COQUITLAM(VANCOUVER AREA)B.C.-CIRCA-1985

Donald Scott <[email protected]
 

Continued From June 2, 1995
Going Back to Circa-1985
Port Coquitlam, B.C.
March 14, 1985
Eastend of yard: Yard engine GP-9 1579
Westend of Yard:
1352-GP-9's 8659-8661-8685 Transfer for Sapperton and New Westminster on
southwest line Westminster sub-division.
Runthrough from east coal-unit train to Pacific Coast Terminals Port
Moody on Vancouver line: SD40-2-SD40-2.
March 25, 1985-Newly outshopped GP-9 at east-end of diesel shop.
March 31, 1985
Westend yard engine: GP-9 8685
1900- Westend yard engine-GP-9 8684.
1902-Grain trainsfer to Vancouver- GP-38 3001-GP-9 8665-GP-38 3005
April 1, 1985
Eastend of yard-yard engine GP-9 1579
Business car #7
1125- Intermodal train from east to CP Mayfiar Intermodal Terminal on
southwest line: SD40-2's 6065-5570-6003.
In consist CP Ships Trans-Atlantic containers.
1125-westend yard engines- GP-9's 1589(new rebuild)1582, 8659.
April 5, 1985
Eastend yard engine-GP-9 1580
Westend of yard:
Potash transfer to Sapperton on southwest line(1415)GP-9's
8684-8669-8683 Total 95 cars and caboose.
July 19, 1985
Same location
Westend yard engines- SW1200RS 1207, GP-9 1589. Remarks unit 1207
belongs downtwon Vancouver.
To Be Continued.
Don Scott-Coquitlam, B.C.


Lakes District, Cartier Sub lineup for June 3rd.

Wayne Regaudie
 

I'm back in Sudbury for a day, then back east again.
I managed to get a lineup this morning.

For those who want it, here it is.
For those who don't, press delete. :)


- - - - - - - - - - -
Algoma District
Cartier Subdivision

General Train Status Report
Thursday June 03 1999


Westward:

CP 6035 435 Arrive Romford 08:50 to Cartier *1
CP 9119 401 Depart Romford 09:20 to Cartier
VIA 6215 185 Depart Sudbury 09:40 to Cartier
CP 5773 407 Depart Romford 10:45 to Cartier
POOL INCO-3 Depart Sudbury 12:30 to Levack
CP 8549 403 Depart Romford 12:45 to Cartier
CP 5933 481 Depart Coniston 13:30 to Cartier
CP 6007 431 Depart Coniston 13:45 to Cartier
CP 9006 471 Depart Coniston 14:30 to Cartier


Eastward:

RMS 5 Run light Depart Cartier 09:45 to Romford
CP 5969 486 Depart Cartier 11:15 to Coniston
CP 5822 482 Depart Cartier 11:45 to Coniston
?? ???? Extra Depart Sudbury 12:00 to Romford *2
POOL Falcon Depart Sudbury 12:00 to Mile 69.2 *3
POOL INCO-3 Depart Levack 14:30 to Sudbury
CP 5971 716 (Acid) Depart Sudbury 16:45


Broadcast complete at 09:52

*1 Train 435 had work at Romford and Sudbury.
*2 Power move to Toronto.
*3 Falconbridge Turn running early today to get loads for 716 out early.

End



Wayne
Mile 77


Mission railbridge incident

Steve Goodman
 

Canadian Pacific's Mission Bridge was badly
damaged when a barge collided,with it early
Wednesday Jun 2. A CPR maintence person at the
bridge Wed,afternoon says it will be out of
service for two weeks. There is considerable
damage to the cribbing in the upriver side and
apparently the
bridge is tilted at a 15 degree angle in the open
position with the up river side up in the air.
The bridge which crosses the Fraser River to
Abbotsford(formerly Matsqui) sees upwards of 25-30 trains a day,which
include CP Coal and Containers
trains,Via's Canadian and the Sumas local.
CN will run 1 CP train each 4 hours,crossing over
at Nepa one mile east of Basque.

Ken Storey,Cam,and Helmut


[railswest] Mission railbridge update!

Steve Goodman
 

From: Ken Storey <klstorey@...>
Reply-To: railswest@...
To: railswest@...
Subject: [railswest] Mission railbridge update!
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 16:17:53 -0700

From: Ken Storey <klstorey@...>

The word now is the Mission Bridge was badly damaged when a barge collided
with it early Wednesday Jun 2. A CPR maintence person at the bridge Wed
afternoon says it will be out of service for two weeks. There is
considerable damage to the cribbing in the upriver side and apparently the
bridge is tilted at a 15 degree angle in the open position with the up
river side up in the air. I guess coal and intermodal for Roberts Bank will
be running on CN and VIA will detour through New West, over the Fraser
River Bridge and through Thornton Yard. I'll give a furter report later as
I'm heading out to have a look.

Ken Storey


At 06:40 AM 6/2/99 -0700, you wrote:
From: "McFadyen" <camshawn@...>

The 6am news thismorning said that the CP railbridge in Mission is out of
service due to a collision with a barge overnight.

If it is closed for any length of time,how will trains for Roberts Bank
reroute??


------------------------------------------------------------------------
How has ONElist changed your life?

Share your story with us at
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(railswest)"The BC Railfan's best friend"


Conrail Breakup off to good start

"Rainer Auer" <[email protected]
 

This JOC story just to keep you up to date. In this case, a smooth
transition is significant and relevant to the CPR (StL&H/D&H) as significant
changes result in the East.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------

CONRAIL BREAKUP
Day one of merger: on track to success


NS, CSX employees express both relief and apprehension


BY RIP WATSON
Journal of Commerce Staff

Norfolk Southern Corp. and CSX Corp. steamed through an apparently
trouble-free first day of service to former customers of Conrail Inc. with a
sigh of relief and a whiff of employee apprehension.

Those twin messages emerged from interviews with more than a dozen NS and
CSX executives and employees in Jacksonville, Fla., and Altoona, Pa., during
Tuesday's "Day One," when the two carriers divided up Conrail and formally
began operations over their own expanded systems that move virtually all
Eastern railroad traffic.

"I'm cautiously optimistic," said Randy Coho, a member of the Transportation
Communications Union that represents clerical workers in Altoona. "Everybody
is assuming that wait and see attitude."

Dennis Appleman, local chairman of the International Association of
Machinists in Altoona, said most of his union's members "are concerned about
their jobs. We have 460 machinists on June 1, 1999. How many will there be a
year from now?"

"Employment is always a concern," said 23-year Conrail veteran Jerry Conrad,
a boilermaker in Altoona.

"We're grateful we have a chance here. We are all waiting to see what
happens."

NS is the fourth employer for some Altoona workers, following Conrail, Penn
Central and Pennsylvania Railroad.

'Just another merger'

Conrad also said, "For a lot of people here, this isn't anything new. We're
just going through another merger."

It was another day at the office for CSX's director of train operations,
Carl Caldwell, a 41-year industry veteran of 10 rail mergers.

"We've had an excellent day," Caldwell said. "It's one of the best days
we've had in a long time."

"Our people have been so apprehensive," said Don Menefee, a general chairman
of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers in Jacksonville.

He praised CSX President Pete Carpenter for helping smooth the transition.

"Many of these people are concerned for their jobs," said Federal Railroad
Administrator Jolene Molitoris, who visited Altoona and Jacksonville for a
first-hand look.

"They have been through several mergers," she said. "Their experience has
not always been good.

"It's incumbent on the unions, NS and FRA to assure that these people have
enough information in a timely way that the insecurity is taken away."

Prodded by Rep. Bud Shuster, R-Pa., NS promised to spend $67 million to
upgrade the Altoona facilities and move 178 jobs there.

"These commitments were only a down payment," Molitoris said. "Our
responsibility is assuring that those commitments are met."

Attracting business

Another commitment made by NS and CSX is to use their new assets to attract
new business.

"Railroads have to be strong for the 21st century," Molitoris said. "We care
a lot about market share at FRA. If the railroads can't gain market share,
things don't look too great."

Executives at both railroads tried to project a business-as-usual attitude.

"Everything seems to be running fine," said NS Chairman David Goode. "We
have a good beginning."

"We came out of this weekend in great style," said Michael Ward, CSX
executive vice president. "I've had a most wonderful day. Hopefully, this is
a harbinger of what will happen in the future."

The excitement showed through in others.

Ray Thigpen, CSX assistant vice president, was in Jacksonville, but he
really wanted to be on the first train running east from Chicago -- an
intermodal service loaded with parcel traffic.

Menefee injected some caution by discussing operations in Chicago, where the
railroad and the union battled over the procedures for qualifying current
CSX workers to run trains over former Conrail lines.

Chicago also was a focal point, because UTU General Chairman Carl Cochran
said CSX provided crews for several Norfolk Southern trains there because of
a temporary NS crew shortage.

'Great safety record'

Safety at NS, which has won the industry's top safety award for 10
consecutive years, also was a prominent topic.

Asked about differences between his old and new employers, Coho said
"Norfolk is more safety-conscious."

"NS has a great safety record," Appleman said. "They don't vary. If it's a
rule, it's a rule."

A recent NS bulletin to Conrail engineers underlined that view.

"An engineer will be subject to discipline when speeding results in an
accident and/or whenever the train is operated at an excessive speed," the
notice said.

"To repeat, engineers guilty of excessive speed will be subject to
dismissal," the bulletin said in closing.

Molitoris said, "That letter was in a very traditional railroad mode. You
can get the facts out about safety in a way that is not harsh. I believe NS
will revise it (the way safety messages are sent)."I
Rip Watson can be reached at
(410) 494-9959 or
rwatson@...


Weekly Performance Reports

"Rainer Auer" <[email protected]
 

Looks like the CPR has changed its methods for calculating "Train Speeds",
resulting in a dramatic increase, see
. Does anyone
have any info on the difference?
============
Rainer Auer
Morinville, AB
============


Re: TUG & BARGE HITS CPR's MISSION RAILWAY BRIDGE-DETOURS

 

Bridge out of commission at Mission... :-)

Patrick Lawson

On the radio news in Vancouver at 0700, said the CPR Mission, B.C.
bridge which was open for marine traffic for a tug-barge movement was
hit by the barge.


Re: RS10's / RS18's differences

Doug Hately
 

Paul Tatham wrote:

From: Paul Tatham <ptatham@...>

This subject came up on the CP Bruce Branches list and as it's a subject
re the CPR in general I am reposting it here...

It's also a subject I've often wondered about. Perhaps one of you has
the answer.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Owen Sound/Orangeville Sub Motive Power
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 20:29:01 -0400
From: Paul Tatham <ptatham@...>
Organization: University of Guelph
To: CP Bruce Branches Discussion List <CP_BRUCE@...>

Ron Bouwhuis wrote:

RS18's were common - but there again I'm not good at identifying
differences between RS10"s & 18's.
Without getting into issues of doors and louvres, I believe one of the easier > spotting differences involved the MultiMark: RS10 on the short hood; RS18 on > the long hood.
That painting difference was due to the RS10's being setup for long hood
forward - IIRC an RS10 was just an RS3 with full height hoods. The
same method could be used for the maroon and gray scheme - RS10's had
the gray "front" on the long hood end.

Sure made it easy spotting which was which though!

Anyone know why the RS10's and RS18's were configured this way? I note
that other original long hood forward locos such as the FM's H-24-66 and
H-16-44 were originally long hood forward but were soon converted to
short hood forward.

Scanning Rail Canada Vol 3 it looks like other than RS10's only the
RS2's and 3's (which having a shorter hood had better long hood forward
visibility) and the Baldwin DRS-4-4-1000 units remained long hood
forward into CP Rail days. (That is of course excluding the end cab
"switcher" type locos with no short hood - bit too little collision
protection there!)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Tatham Phone : 519-824-4120 x2836
Senior Systems Analyst Fax : 519-766-9744
University Systems &#92; UC4 E-Mail : ptatham@...
Computing & Communications Services Home : R.R. 2, Guelph, ON, N1H 6H8
University of Guelph : 519-837-1464
Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1 : "Mileage 44.8, Guelph Sub"

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Give back to your community through "Grow to Give."

Deadline is June 19. See homepage for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-P-R "Canadian Pacific Railway"
I'd say this discussion about long hood forward goes back to the steam
days. The front end of a steam engine provided plenty of crew
protection from a front end collision. It has been reported that the
engineer of a steam train would even open the throttle if an unavoidable
level crossing accident was about to take place.
The fear was that some part of the car or truck on the crossing
would go under the locomotive and derail it. By increasing speed the
vehicle might be knocked clear of the train.
Most early first generation road switchers ran long hood forward.
The improvement in visibility with the short hood forward too favour
over the loss of impact protection and many units were converted while
later orders on CP came short hood forward.
This preference was a long time coming on the N&W, who ordered
SD40s and SD45s with their long nose forward.
BTW I wonder if it is true that all first generation road switchers
on the CN (Canadian National) ran long hood forward?????

Doug Hately


Re: Steam at South Simcoe?

"Jeff Pinchbeck" <[email protected]
 


From: Ken Pebesma <kpebesma@...>

Not necessarily so. When my 3 year old wants to see a model train run, he
always asks for the steam engine.
Funny, my son does too.

My son also wants to go to the Galt yards to wait for the steam engines to
come by. They never do but at least he sees a diesel or 2 go by and he can
go home happy.

Jeff Pinchbeck

jpinchbeck@... ph. 519-622-3619
============================================================================
===============
Canadian Pacific SIG, vice Chair and Marketing director

Join the CP SIG list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------

Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: W E Miller [SMTP:traction@...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 10:56 PM
To: C-P-R@...
Subject: Re: [C-P-R] Steam at South Simcoe?

From: W E Miller <traction@...>

Steam vs diesel probably has a lot to do with what era one was born in.
Steam was king when I was young so I prefer the steam locomotive over
the diesel. Many times as a child laying in bed late at night, I'd hear
westbound double-headed steam powered freights thunder over the bridge
over the Grand River in Galt, smoke stacks barking as they made a run
for the hill up to Orr's Lake. To listen as they began to loose speed
on the grade then blow the whistle for Blenheim Road
crossing..............pinch me! What a beautiful
memory....................

Three SD40's..wahhh wahhh wah wahhh - goodbye.

P Lawson wrote:

From: plawson@... (P Lawson)

Okay, I'll be the contrarian regarding South Simcoe.
I'll take the diesel side too.

I'd rather watch/photograph a train going by, (steam or
diesel, freight
or
passenger) than ride on it. When I am riding in a passenger car it
doesn't
make much difference to me what the power is. Maybe if I was
riding in
the
cab eating cinders (or whatever steam fans do) I'd be more inspired by
the
steam experience. :-)
--

William E. Miller
________________________________________________________
&#92; Electric Lines in Southern Ontario
&#92;
________&#92;____________________________________________
/____G R A N D_____R_I_V_E_R_____R_A_I_L_W_A_Y_____&#92;
|[_] [_][_][_][_][_] [][][] [_]|
|| | 626 | | 626 | ||
o------------------------------======--------------o
/|-|(o)=x=(o) xxxxxx 0|___||___||-| (o)=x=(o)|-|&#92;
========================================================

------------------------------------------------------------------------
How has ONElist changed your life?

Share your story with us at
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-P-R "Canadian Pacific Railway"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you entered ONElist's "Grow to Give" program?

Deadline is June 19. Join now to win $5000 for your charity of choice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-P-R "Canadian Pacific Railway"


A FEW CPR TRAINSPOTTINGS-PORT COQUITLAM(VANCOUVER AREA)B.C.

Donald Scott <[email protected]
 

CPR Port Coquitlam, B.C. All at westend of yard.
May 26, 1999
1035-SD-40's 5411-5414 departing on westbound transfer to downtown
Vancouver-double-stack train, Trans-Pacific containers. Remarks: 5414
dual-flag scheme.
May 27, 1999
1105-Outbound transfer to Westminster sub-soutwest line to CP Mayfair
Intermodal terminal-all container cars unloaded:
GP-38's 3007-3012. Remarks: unit 3007 dual-flag scheme.
June 1, 1999
1040-Westend yard power: GP-9 1579-SW1200 1239(remote). Unit 1239
belongs downtown Vancouver.
Remarks: 1579 lettered CP Rail System-candy apple red.
1112-Runthrough potash unit train from east to southwest Westminster sub
enroute to Sapperton-"Canpotex" cars-good 100 cars. Units: GE AC4400
9651-GM SD-90 9129-GE AC4400 9567. Remarks: A number of "Canpotex" cars
on one end-Canadian and Australian flag and underneath flags "Partners
in Quality".
June 2, 1999
1035- GP-38's 3001-3009 Container transfer to CP Mayfair Intermodal
terminal on southwest line Westminster sub.
Remarks: Unit 3009 dual-flag scheme.
1035-Double-stack transfer ready to depart for downtown Vancouver: GE
AC4400 9559-SD-40 5402. Trans-Pacific containers.
Don Scott-Coquitlam, B.C.


RS10's / RS18's differences

Paul Tatham <[email protected]
 

This subject came up on the CP Bruce Branches list and as it's a subject
re the CPR in general I am reposting it here...

It's also a subject I've often wondered about. Perhaps one of you has
the answer.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Owen Sound/Orangeville Sub Motive Power
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 20:29:01 -0400
From: Paul Tatham <ptatham@...>
Organization: University of Guelph
To: CP Bruce Branches Discussion List <CP_BRUCE@...>

Ron Bouwhuis wrote:

RS18's were common - but there again I'm not good at identifying
differences between RS10"s & 18's.
Without getting into issues of doors and louvres, I believe one of the easier > spotting differences involved the MultiMark: RS10 on the short hood; RS18 on > the long hood.
That painting difference was due to the RS10's being setup for long hood
forward - IIRC an RS10 was just an RS3 with full height hoods. The
same method could be used for the maroon and gray scheme - RS10's had
the gray "front" on the long hood end.

Sure made it easy spotting which was which though!

Anyone know why the RS10's and RS18's were configured this way? I note
that other original long hood forward locos such as the FM's H-24-66 and
H-16-44 were originally long hood forward but were soon converted to
short hood forward.

Scanning Rail Canada Vol 3 it looks like other than RS10's only the
RS2's and 3's (which having a shorter hood had better long hood forward
visibility) and the Baldwin DRS-4-4-1000 units remained long hood
forward into CP Rail days. (That is of course excluding the end cab
"switcher" type locos with no short hood - bit too little collision
protection there!)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Tatham Phone : 519-824-4120 x2836
Senior Systems Analyst Fax : 519-766-9744
University Systems &#92; UC4 E-Mail : ptatham@...
Computing & Communications Services Home : R.R. 2, Guelph, ON, N1H 6H8
University of Guelph : 519-837-1464
Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1 : "Mileage 44.8, Guelph Sub"


Re: VIA leasors 1994-95

Bill Miller <[email protected]
 

Did the F40PH-2s actually go to Winnipeg?
Yes.


Does anyone in WPG have photos ?







----------------------------------------------------------
Bill Miller - CPR Editor CTC Board Railroads Illustrated
----------------------------------------------------------
ICQ# 9907692
The View From Galt Station
" << MOVED !!
Canadian Pacific Railway Diesel Locomotive Roster
"
----------------------------------------------------------


Re: VIA leasors 1994-95

Paul Bloxham
 

April 1995 _Branchline_ says that CP3041-VIA6449 powered the Moonlight to
Owen Sound on March 3/95.

PSB


Re: QUICK-URGENT!!!!!

Sean Graham-White
 

From: Bryce Lee <brycelee@...>

At 18:49 6/2/99 -0400, you wrote:
Hi everyone: 2240 tonight (June 2) arriving North Bay via Smith
Falls approx.. 0630 / 0830 on June 3. Got people hear that want to take
pictures. Can someone confirm this and provide more particulars?
thanks cheers Doug camerons@...
That first units was supposed to be ready last Thursday, oh well a few days
late, and its going by RL Ottawa Valley to North Bay...
It will be in the latest kindergarten paint scheme...
What are the Ontario Northland reporting marks?

Sean


Re: VIA leasors 1994-95

Manny Jacob
 

Hmmm can you provide more detail about this? Did this ACTUALLY happen, or was it
only talked about? Do photos exist someplace? Did the F40PH-2s actually go to
Winnipeg?

Thanks!

Manny

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Miller <bmiller@...>

About a year later (after all were retuned), two or three re-appeared and CP tried
to use them all over, Toronto to Winnipeg etc but it only lasted a week or three
and they didn't work out.


QUICK-URGENT!!!!!

camerons
 

Hi everyone:

heard a rumor that one of the ONR new SD 75i's will be leaving Montreal on CP train # 431 departing approx.. 2240 tonight (June 2) arriving North Bay via Smith Falls approx.. 0630 / 0830 on June 3.

Got people hear that want to take pictures.

Can someone confirm this and provide more particulars?

thanks

cheers

Doug
camerons@...


Re: Steam at South Simcoe?

Rob Sterne
 

Shari Boland wrote:

Being born and raised during the diesel era (and
affiliated with a museum that houses both steam and diesel representation), I
have to honestly say that steam holds much more appeal to me than does diesel.
Interesting to watch the reaction of people as they see the rolling stock we
house - it tends to be the steam locomotives that provoke the most positive
response.
Shari is right. When you walk into the ECRM you have to walk right past ex-CP,
RSD17, 8921 in order to get to ex-CN Hudson 5700. It's the NON railfans that ignore
8921 and go straight to 5700.

So....my question is; will SSR be running any steam at all this season??
You can ask them directly Shari. Their web site is .
There is an e-mail address on the site somewhere.

Rob