Mike Salfi wrote:
Running the 1057 for all or a substantial
portion of our trips just won't wash, unless we charged more in fares
(the coal consumption really is that much more).
I know the purists won't like this (admittedly I'm one), but if this is the
case I wonder if there should be some consideration to converting 1057 to an
oil burner. Running a diesel every weekend I'm sure will see their ridership
drop off substantially.
Does anyone know how long it will be before 136 is ready?
Rob
