Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Changing out L5 & L7 in UBitX for Spur Fix
Guy WB7SZI
just desoldered L5&7 to get ready for the placement of the SMD inductors.?
From the image I can see where to solder the inductors to where the toroids were but can¡¯t see where to solder the other ends. It looks like the traces below L5 & L7 were exposed to solder the other side. Is this right? thanks Guy WB7SZI? |
Your question made me go back and look at the picture.? L5 looks correct, as it is in the circuit as was the original (L5 and C215 in series with the filter).? L7 is directly connected to T4, removing C211 from the circuit.? Not sure if that is intentional, so good question!
Hopefully someone can answer your question, I do not know for sure.? Based on the values, I would assume that it is for DC blocking that may not be needed on both sides of the filter. Evan AC9TU |
Note that Raj, who came up with this fix, has reported that these should be shielded surface mount parts.
? ??/g/BITX20/message/60946 The thread is worth reading. Ashhar recommends a T low pass filter of 0.3uH-47pF-0.3uH to knock out the 90mhz 2'd harmonic of the 45mhz IF amp before it hits the mixer at D1,D2: ? ??/g/BITX20/message/61645 This kills the spur going out over the air at 2*45mhz-(45mhz+DialFreq) = 45mhz-DialFreq, only needed for 15m, 12m and 10m SSB transmissions. He uses a T30-6 torroids to create those 0.3uH inductors, might be better off with Raj's shielded surface mount inductors? And also recommends a 12mhz trap, I assume we have a 12mhz spur going out over the air otherwise: ? ??/g/BITX20/topic/28049653 Since clk2 is always above 45mhz, perhaps a 30mhz high pass filter would be easier to reproduce here. Jerry |
Try follow the pattern used by RAJ. ?It works. On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 10:25 PM Michael Mitchell <mitchellmichaelh@...> wrote:
|
Yes, they (C215 and C211) are still installed, however look close at C211 in the picture? The left side of the cap was connected to L7.? It is now not connected to anything.? That is not the case for C215, it is still in series with the filter.
The question was not if it worked or not, I am taking the feedback from ubitx.net that it does.? My prior email was more a question for my understanding rather than clarification on how to do it. 73 Evan AC9TU |
Jerry,
I have been following all of the threads you have listed above.? Note that the low pass filter by Ashhar is the newest.? I have read that Raj has agreed that either the LCL filter OR his replacement of L5 and L7 do reduce the spurs.? The solution from Ashhar is more complex, in that there are bias resistors that need to be replaced as well. Ashhar stated in the 61645 thread that the "relays as supplied now" do not need to be replaced.? It is not clear if that means that there are new parts being installed in the current shipping product, or if the originals are OK from v4 boards.? I have been looking for someone to receive a v5 board in the hopes that all of the corrections needed are on that board and we can lay to rest the correct solution to use to solve the spurs and harmonics. In the meantime I am off the air until I do something.? That may be wait for the QSX from QRPGuys if it becomes available before a v5 board from HF Signals. 73 Evan AC9TU |
Evan
As I recall, the worst spurs are above 14 MHz. I would not let this keep you off the air, and if you use an antenna tuner it may provide some reduction.? of course it makes sense to remedy the spurs and harmonics. Those in our group build have as built measurements and parts to make the fix. Curt |
We've got a bunch of different spurs.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
For example, the 12mhz spur due to clk0 crosstalk into clk2 is not going to be cured by swapping out L5,L7. Also, I would not expect that swapping out L5,L7 would clean up a 45mhz-DialFreq spur due to a second harmonic at Q20,21,22.? My best guess had been that L5,L7 prevent energy from the power amp from finding a path back into the 45mhz IF amp and taking another trip through the D1,D2 mixer creating all sorts of unexpected spurs. Perhaps Raj's L5,L7 mod reduces magnetic field coupling from toroids in the PA? Can be problematic to have a 10W amp operating unshielded in the same box with the low level signals going through the IF amps. In post 61645, Farhan states:? "With the relays that are now used for ubitx,? the harmonics at 3.5, 7 and 10 are in under -45 dbc. we don't need the axicom relays." In post 62307, he says: "The boards continued to ship with the same relays as some have also reported no difference with the new relay.? On the other hand, a new board layout with spur fix, allions suggested lpf layout and an lm386 af amp is in the mail. I will prototype it as soon as it arrives and share the results" My reading is that the v4 uBitx now ships the same as it always has.? ?There have been many many reports here of trouble with harmonics on v4 boards, though perhaps not at the frequencies Farhan was testing at (not 14mhz and up?), and perhaps with toroids oriented a bit differently or something.? So I'd take that "don't need the axicom relays" with a very large grain of salt.? The good news is that post 62307 also suggests that v5 is being actively worked on to reduce spurs and harmonics. > I have read that Raj has agreed that either the LCL filter OR his replacement of L5 and L7 do reduce the spurs. I think Raj said his extra 45mhz crystal filter was as good as some of the other fixes, not so sure he has recently claimed the L5,L7 fix to be a cure-all. Would be good if Raj and/or Farhan could give us an update on the current thinking of all these various spur fixes. My take: The extra 45mhz crystal filter might well take care of most of these spurs, though hard to obtain those 45mhz filters, and hard to verify that the center freq of the new one matches the one at Y1.? If adding a 45mhz crystal filter,? I'd want to sweep the IF to verify all is well. Farhan's LPF filter for the 90mhz harmonic takes care of the 45mhz-DialFreq spur, but won't touch all the lower frequency stuff we get from coupling between PA and IF. The L5,L7 fix would take care of that coupling, but not the 45mhz-DialFreq spur. The 12mhz trap fixes a spur that none of the above address. I don't have a way to easily measure harmonics and spurs? But I'd guess the best path for most is: ? replace kt1, kt2, kt3 with the axicom relays (or add a set of outboard low pass filters) ? do Raj's mod of replacing L5,L7 with shielded 1210 surface mount inductors (other SM inductors did not work) ? do Farhan's LPF mod to knock out that 90mhz harmonic of 45mhz going into D1,D2 ? somehow knock down the 12mhz spur due to clk0-to-clk2 crosstalk, perhaps using Farhan's 12mhz trap This stuff is not trivial to get right. Would be good to arrive at and easy and simple recipe to clean up the v3 and v4 rigs. In many cases the spurs and harmonics may not meet regs, but if operating at 5 or 10 watts are not too big an issue.? Operating the uBitx with a 100W amp could indeed be a big issue, and may attract unwanted attention. Jerry On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Evan Hand wrote: I have been following all of the threads you have listed above.? Note that the low pass filter by Ashhar is the newest.? I have read that Raj has agreed that either the LCL filter OR his replacement of L5 and L7 do reduce the spurs.? The solution from Ashhar is more complex, in that there are bias resistors that need to be replaced as well. |
Evan,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The caps are only DC blocking and do not have an effect on the filter. I mounted the coils where convenient. I scraped off the green pcb coating and soldered. You can also mount them exactly in the place of the old coils but you will need a lead extension at one end for the SMD coil. This prevents the harmonics from getting back into the BiDi amp and causing spurs. Its behaviour is identical to Farhans. Both clean up the higher bands. For lower bands change THREE relays to AXICOM. Raj At 25-12-18, you wrote:
Yes, they (C215 and C211) are still installed, however look close at C211 in the picture The left side of the cap was connected to L7. It is now not connected to anything. That is not the case for C215, it is still in series with the filter. |
I hope you ordered the right ones like in the pic!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
They are shielded and have a resistance of 2 ohms. TDK-EPCOS type is what I used and also some marked S+M ! Raj At 25-12-18, you wrote:
Raj, |
How big are the spurs at 12Mhz? Transmitting on 20m I could barely see that on my Softrock receiver (which grounds on TX) and a lot less than the fundamental, seems, I would say at least - 50db. The spur exists but seems to me quite low. Has anyone measured it against the fundamental with a reliable spectrum analyzer? Il 25/dic/2018 13:04, "Evan Hand" <elhandjr@...> ha scritto: I ordered the kit from the link on spectral purity:? |
Mark McNabb
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 02:02 AM, Raj vu2zap wrote:
Evan,Hi, I can't find a source for any DC that needs to be blocked at this point? As to replacing the toroids with shielded SMD inductors, it seems that this is only needed due to the nearness of L7 to T4?? On my board, as delivered, the two are actually touching.? Wouldn't spacing them better acheive the same results? 73, Mark. |
The problem is L5 is picking up harmonics from the output filters,
recirculating them through BiDi
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
and making things worse. L7 changed to keep symmetry on both sides of the 45MHz filter. Raj At 27-01-19, you wrote: On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 02:02 AM, Raj vu2zap wrote: |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss