Hi all
It has been mentioned on this group a number of times in this discussion group so I am posting details here.?
I have now made available the QRP Labs 10W HF Linear PA kit, providing 26dB of gain with +/-1dB gain flatness from 2-30MHz, 10W output all the way up to 10m band from 12V supply. This amplifier uses two BS170 in push-pull as the driver and two IRF510 in push-pull as the final stage. This kit shows that two IRF510 MOSFETs can produce excellent results in a high performance yet low cost ($26) linear amplifier kit.?
See for details.?
I am not suggesting that this amplifier will solve all problems and without wishing to be offensive, the "garbage in, garbage out" rule always applies - in particular, if you feed it a signal containing spurs, harmonics, or other problems... then you will get the same thing at the other end, just amplified 26dB. It also still applies that all stages leading up to the final amplifier must have flat gain. If the pre-drivers cannot provide a big enough signal then you won't get full power output.?
But, it could be useful or interesting, in the BITX context, to look at the details of this amplifier kit and see the short lead lengths, symmetric PCB and extensively "stitched" groundplanes.?
I am very grateful to Allison KB1GMX for very valuable advice during the design and development of this amplifier, beta-testing prototypes, measurements and moral support.
73 Hans G0UPL
|
Congrats for the amplifier. Surely interesting for TX homebrewing at a reasonable cost. Is there any evidence that it would improve the PA of the uBitx?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Il 09/ott/2018 14:38, "Hans Summers" < hans.summers@...> ha scritto: Hi all
It has been mentioned on this group a number of times in this discussion group so I am posting details here.?
I have now made available the QRP Labs 10W HF Linear PA kit, providing 26dB of gain with +/-1dB gain flatness from 2-30MHz, 10W output all the way up to 10m band from 12V supply. This amplifier uses two BS170 in push-pull as the driver and two IRF510 in push-pull as the final stage. This kit shows that two IRF510 MOSFETs can produce excellent results in a high performance yet low cost ($26) linear amplifier kit.?
See for details.?
I am not suggesting that this amplifier will solve all problems and without wishing to be offensive, the "garbage in, garbage out" rule always applies - in particular, if you feed it a signal containing spurs, harmonics, or other problems... then you will get the same thing at the other end, just amplified 26dB. It also still applies that all stages leading up to the final amplifier must have flat gain. If the pre-drivers cannot provide a big enough signal then you won't get full power output.?
But, it could be useful or interesting, in the BITX context, to look at the details of this amplifier kit and see the short lead lengths, symmetric PCB and extensively "stitched" groundplanes.?
I am very grateful to Allison KB1GMX for very valuable advice during the design and development of this amplifier, beta-testing prototypes, measurements and moral support.
73 Hans G0UPL
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi all
It has been mentioned on this group a number of times in this discussion group so I am posting details here.?
- I have now made available the QRP Labs 10W HF Linear PA kit, providing 26dB of gain with +/-1dB gain flatness from 2-30MHz, 10W output all the way up to 10m band from ?supply. This amplifier uses two BS170 in push-pull as the driver and two IRF510 in push-pull as the final stage. This kit shows that two IRF510 MOSFETs can produce excellent results in a high performance yet low cost ($26) linear amplifier kit.?
See for details.?
I am not suggesting that this amplifier will solve all problems and without wishing to be offensive, the "garbage in, garbage out" rule always applies - in particular, if you feed it a signal containing spurs, harmonics, or other problems... then you will get the same thing at the other end, just amplified 26dB. It also still applies that all stages leading up to the final amplifier must have flat gain. If the pre-drivers cannot provide a big enough signal then you won't get full power output.?
But, it could be useful or interesting, in the BITX context, to look at the details of this amplifier kit and see the short lead lengths, symmetric PCB and extensively "stitched" groundplanes.?
I am very grateful to Allison KB1GMX for very valuable advice during the design and development of this amplifier, beta-testing prototypes, measurements and moral support.
73 Hans G0UPL
|
> Congrats for the amplifier. Surely interesting for TX homebrewing? > at a reasonable cost. Is there any evidence that it would improve? > the PA of the uBitx?
Evidence, no. I don't have a uBITX and the Linear kit has only just become available this afternoon.?
Theoretically: yes, it would improve the PA on the uBITX - a lot of care was spent on the board layout, keeping traces symmetric and leads as short as possible (look at the 1mm or so between the IRF510 body and the PCB, for example!). It has very flat gain from 2-30MHz and can even produce 10W on 4m band (70MHz) though gain is 8dB down by then... during testing this amplifier could not be made to exhibit any instability (oscillation). It also has a much larger heatsink than the stock uBITX amp, and the heatsink is grounded which also prevents feedback.?
BUT - the problems of the uBITX are not all in the driver and final PA stages. Earlier stages are overdriven and don't have flat gain with frequency. Spurs are generated but not filtered. Simply replacing the final two stages of uBITX only fixes some of the problems, not all.?
So yes, this amp would improve the PA... but at the end of the day it can only amplify what you give it: if what you give it is already unclean, it won't fix that.?
73 Hans G0UPL
|
Hans,
I just ordered one of Your 10 W PA kits and quickly read over the
assembly instruction.
Concerning the UBITX: the PA delivers 26 dB of gain, so for 10 W
output the input power for the PA is +40 dBm - 26 dB = +14 dBm
This power can be easily achieved with only one MMIC e.g. one of
the GALI amps--- or a discrete verions (BS170)?
As You also offer LPF kits, the problems of the uBITX can be
obsolete, but requires extra space for these extra boards.
One thing I m missing are the information about the P1dB pointz (
40 dBm)? and IMD performance.?
Henning Weddig
DK5LV
Am 09.10.2018 um 16:38 schrieb Hans
Summers:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
> Congrats for the amplifier. Surely
interesting for TX homebrewing?
> at a reasonable cost. Is there any evidence
that it would improve?
> the PA of the uBitx?
Evidence, no. I don't have a uBITX and the Linear kit has
only just become available this afternoon.?
Theoretically: yes, it would improve the PA on the uBITX -
a lot of care was spent on the board layout, keeping traces
symmetric and leads as short as possible (look at the 1mm or
so between the IRF510 body and the PCB, for example!). It has
very flat gain from 2-30MHz and can even produce 10W on 4m
band (70MHz) though gain is 8dB down by then... during testing
this amplifier could not be made to exhibit any instability
(oscillation). It also has a much larger heatsink than the
stock uBITX amp, and the heatsink is grounded which also
prevents feedback.?
BUT - the problems of the uBITX are not all in the driver
and final PA stages. Earlier stages are overdriven and don't
have flat gain with frequency. Spurs are generated but not
filtered. Simply replacing the final two stages of uBITX only
fixes some of the problems, not all.?
So yes, this amp would improve the PA... but at the end of
the day it can only amplify what you give it: if what you give
it is already unclean, it won't fix that.?
73 Hans G0UPL
|
I have just seen it on your website. Really nice. How much gain does it have if we exclude the first stage?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Il 09/ott/2018 16:39, "Hans Summers" < hans.summers@...> ha scritto: > Congrats for the amplifier. Surely interesting for TX homebrewing? > at a reasonable cost. Is there any evidence that it would improve? > the PA of the uBitx?
Evidence, no. I don't have a uBITX and the Linear kit has only just become available this afternoon.?
Theoretically: yes, it would improve the PA on the uBITX - a lot of care was spent on the board layout, keeping traces symmetric and leads as short as possible (look at the 1mm or so between the IRF510 body and the PCB, for example!). It has very flat gain from 2-30MHz and can even produce 10W on 4m band (70MHz) though gain is 8dB down by then... during testing this amplifier could not be made to exhibit any instability (oscillation). It also has a much larger heatsink than the stock uBITX amp, and the heatsink is grounded which also prevents feedback.?
BUT - the problems of the uBITX are not all in the driver and final PA stages. Earlier stages are overdriven and don't have flat gain with frequency. Spurs are generated but not filtered. Simply replacing the final two stages of uBITX only fixes some of the problems, not all.?
So yes, this amp would improve the PA... but at the end of the day it can only amplify what you give it: if what you give it is already unclean, it won't fix that.?
73 Hans G0UPL
|
Been meaning to buy some of the QRP Labs filters. So just purchased the Linear kit along with the filters. This will let me experiment with lowering the drive through the whole uBITX TX chain, most likely by greatly reducing the audio level, and see if and what improvements are made.
Most likely I'll mount the amp and filters in a stand alone box with an Arduino that will measure the TX frequency and automatically select the correct filter.
I'll include a small dummy load for the TX power to go until the correct filter is selected. Because the description of the amp claims the amp will survive large mismatches, I'll probably use something significantly higher than 50 ohms for the spurious output safety dummy load.
Tom, wb6b
|
This kit won¡¯t make the spur and bandpass problems of the uBITx go away.? Period.? Those problems occur in the early stages of the uBITx.? To the contrary it has the opportunity to make them worse since the gain of the amp is flat from 3-20 MHz? It may, however be a nice replacement for the final two stages in the uBITx if you want to maintain a fairly flat gain in those two stages.? That¡¯s all. ? MRM ? ? -- ¡_. _._
|
Remember this commandment MadRadioModder: 'if you want even performance 3-30mhz you need to design that predriver section to be flat'
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Il 09/ott/2018 17:56, "MadRadioModder" < madradiomodder@...> ha scritto:
>
> This kit won¡¯t make the spur and bandpass problems of the uBITx go away.? Period.? Those problems occur in the early stages of the uBITx.? To the contrary it has the opportunity to make them worse since the gain of the amp is flat from 3-20 MHz? It may, however be a nice replacement for the final two stages in the uBITx if you want to maintain a fairly flat gain in those two stages.? That¡¯s all.
>
> ?
>
> MRM
>
> ?
>
> ?
>
>
> --
>
> ¡_. _._
|
Best get after the rest of the radio then first. ? ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of iz oos Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 11:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] QSX 10W HF Linear PA kit ? Remember this commandment MadRadioModder: 'if you want even performance 3-30mhz you need to design that predriver section to be flat' Il 09/ott/2018 17:56, "MadRadioModder" <madradiomodder@...> ha scritto: > > This kit won¡¯t make the spur and bandpass problems of the uBITx go away.? Period.? Those problems occur in the early stages of the uBITx.? To the contrary it has the opportunity to make them worse since the gain of the amp is flat from 3-20 MHz? It may, however be a nice replacement for the final two stages in the uBITx if you want to maintain a fairly flat gain in those two stages.? That¡¯s all. > > ? > > MRM > > ? > > ? > > > -- > > ¡_. _._ -- ¡_. _._
|
Interesting that you used ferrite type #61 for the T201/T202 interstage coupling ...Helge Granberg (as far as I can research) always used type #61 for his designs ..From what I've cobbled together, the #61's work where the #43 stuff does not Jim
On Tuesday, October 9, 2018, 5:38:15 AM PDT, Hans Summers <hans.summers@...> wrote:
Hi all
It has been mentioned on this group a number of times in this discussion group so I am posting details here.?
I have now made available the QRP Labs 10W HF Linear PA kit, providing 26dB of gain with +/-1dB gain flatness from 2-30MHz, 10W output all the way up to 10m band from 12V supply. This amplifier uses two BS170 in push-pull as the driver and two IRF510 in push-pull as the final stage. This kit shows that two IRF510 MOSFETs can produce excellent results in a high performance yet low cost ($26) linear amplifier kit.?
See for details.?
I am not suggesting that this amplifier will solve all problems and without wishing to be offensive, the "garbage in, garbage out" rule always applies - in particular, if you feed it a signal containing spurs, harmonics, or other problems... then you will get the same thing at the other end, just amplified 26dB. It also still applies that all stages leading up to the final amplifier must have flat gain. If the pre-drivers cannot provide a big enough signal then you won't get full power output.?
But, it could be useful or interesting, in the BITX context, to look at the details of this amplifier kit and see the short lead lengths, symmetric PCB and extensively "stitched" groundplanes.?
I am very grateful to Allison KB1GMX for very valuable advice during the design and development of this amplifier, beta-testing prototypes, measurements and moral support.
73 Hans G0UPL
|
First off, the uBitx as is does pretty well on 80/40/20 meters. Power drops off on the stock uBitx as we go up to 15 and 10 meters. There's 6 months worth of discussion in this forum about how best to? get power up to where it should be on those high bands. Tough to do, most attempts failed when modifying the existing uBitx power amp. Grafting the QSX amp into the uBitx could mostly solve that. Could also solve issues of power amp energy coupling back into the IF amps, especially if the power amp is off in it's own box.
But the current signal levels in the IF amps and mixers create trouble with spurs on those upper bands.? Not too much point in going to the QSX power amp unless we clean that stuff up first.? And while we're at it, improve IMD and carrier leakage in those IF amps and mixers as well. ? If we assume we increase local oscillator CLK2 into the first mixer at D1,D2 up to 7dBm, then the maximum signal into it from the 45mhz IF during transmit should be at least 10dB down from that, or about -3dBm.? The mixer probably has a loss of around 6dB, and the 30mhz LPF might lose another dB.? So if we replace everything from Q90 on out to the IRF510's with a new power amp, that new amp will see a max of -10dBm, or 0.1mW going in. This new QSX amp has 26 dB of gain for 10W out (where 10W out is +40dBm), so needs 40dBm-26db = 14dBm going into the QSX amp (as Henning has said). We need at least an additional 24 dB of gain to go from -10 dBm out of the 30mhz LPF to +14dBm into the QSX amp.? That could easily be done with two MMIC stages, and there are many such MMIC's capable of delivering 14dBm of power to the QSX amp.
Some extra gain in those two MMIC's would be good so we?can keep the signal through the mixers even lower, and have some headroom for an adjustment such as RV1 of the uBitx.
Mouser 630-ADA-4743-TR1G
If you plan to bring the power up to 20W by boosting the supply voltage into the QSX amp, then you will need another 3dB of power going in, so 14dBm+3dB=17dBm into the QSX amp. And at 20W, you would want heavier transmit LPF's than the ones provided on the uBitx.
Also, it may be a good idea to have a 3dB attenuator between the MMIC's and the QSX amp to keep it stable.
It will be interesting to see how clean we can make the uBitx as an exciter. May need better transistors in the 45mhz stage, certainly want less gain on the two transmit side IF amps.? Want 7dBm of drive from the local oscillators. Perhaps the transformers in the mixers are not ideal, especially at 45mhz. Raj has made considerable progress in sorting this some of this out. ? I've got a QSX amp on order.? Looking forward to playing with it. But the uBitx has other issues to fix before we make use of the QSX amp to increase power out on those upper bands.
Jerry, KE7ER
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 07:54 AM, Henning Weddig wrote:
Hans,
I just ordered one of Your 10 W PA kits and quickly read over the assembly instruction.
Concerning the UBITX: the PA delivers 26 dB of gain, so for 10 W output the input power for the PA is +40 dBm - 26 dB = +14 dBm This power can be easily achieved with only one MMIC e.g. one of the GALI amps--- or a discrete verions (BS170)?
As You also offer LPF kits, the problems of the uBITX can be obsolete, but requires extra space for these extra boards.
One thing I m missing are the information about the P1dB pointz ( 40 dBm)? and IMD performance.?
Henning Weddig
DK5LV
|
Hmm, thought I had edited out the reference to the ADA4743 MMIC. It has appropriate power out and gain and price, but unfortunately is now obsolete. And the WYSIWYG browser based editor on groups.io is unfortunately not quite WYSIWYG.
Jerry, KE7ER
|
Jerry,
I agree that we need more than one MMIC for the TX gain stages.
My initial idea was/is? to replace the "famous" Q90 with a three
transistor W7ZOI amp (gain = 15 dB) may be using even BFR106
instead of the MMBT3904.
The output power of this stage may be limited to about +3 dBm as
W7ZOI?? stated when using this amp in bidirectional mode. used in
a single direction the linear oputput may be higher.?? The next
stage has to deliver the necessary +14 dBm or even a bit more for
"headroom") -- for this stage a MMIC could be one choice or
another suitable "medium power transitor" with a high ft.?
Henning
Am 09.10.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Jerry
Gaffke via Groups.Io:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
First off, the uBitx as is does pretty well on 80/40/20 meters.
Power drops off on the stock uBitx as we go up to 15 and 10
meters.
There's 6 months worth of discussion in this forum about how
best to?
get power up to where it should be on those high bands.
Tough to do, most attempts failed when modifying the existing
uBitx power amp.
Grafting the QSX amp into the uBitx could mostly solve that.
Could also solve issues of power amp energy coupling back into
the IF amps,
especially if the power amp is off in it's own box.
But the current signal levels in the IF amps and mixers create
trouble with spurs
on those upper bands.? Not too much point in going to the QSX
power amp unless
we clean that stuff up first.? And while we're at it, improve
IMD and carrier leakage
in those IF amps and mixers as well.
?
If we assume we increase local oscillator CLK2 into the first
mixer at D1,D2 up to 7dBm,
then the maximum signal into it from the 45mhz IF during
transmit should be at least 10dB down
from that, or about -3dBm.? The mixer probably has a loss of
around 6dB, and the 30mhz LPF
might lose another dB.? So if we replace everything from Q90 on
out to the IRF510's with a
new power amp, that new amp will see a max of -10dBm, or 0.1mW
going in.
This new QSX amp has 26 dB of gain for 10W out (where 10W out is
+40dBm),
so needs 40dBm-26db = 14dBm going into the QSX amp (as Henning
has said).
We need at least an additional 24 dB of gain to go from -10 dBm
out of the 30mhz LPF
to +14dBm into the QSX amp.? That could easily be done with two
MMIC stages,
and there are many such MMIC's capable of delivering 14dBm of
power to the QSX amp.
Some extra gain in those two MMIC's would be good so we?can keep
the signal through
the mixers even lower, and have some headroom for an adjustment
such as RV1 of the uBitx.
Mouser 630-ADA-4743-TR1G
If you plan to bring the power up to 20W by boosting the supply
voltage into the QSX amp,
then you will need another 3dB of power going in, so
14dBm+3dB=17dBm into the QSX amp.
And at 20W, you would want heavier transmit LPF's than the ones
provided on the uBitx.
Also, it may be a good idea to have a 3dB attenuator between the
MMIC's and the QSX amp
to keep it stable.
It will be interesting to see how clean we can make the uBitx as
an exciter.
May need better transistors in the 45mhz stage, certainly want
less gain
on the two transmit side IF amps.? Want 7dBm of drive from the
local oscillators.
Perhaps the transformers in the mixers are not ideal, especially
at 45mhz.
Raj has made considerable progress in sorting this some of this
out.
?
I've got a QSX amp on order.?
Looking forward to playing with it.
But the uBitx has other issues to fix before we make use of the
QSX amp
to increase power out on those upper bands.
Jerry, KE7ER
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 07:54 AM, Henning Weddig wrote:
Hans,
I just ordered one of Your 10 W PA kits and quickly read over
the assembly instruction.
Concerning the UBITX: the PA delivers 26 dB of gain, so for
10 W output the input power for the PA is +40 dBm - 26 dB =
+14 dBm This power can be easily achieved with only one MMIC
e.g. one of the GALI amps--- or a discrete verions (BS170)?
As You also offer LPF kits, the problems of the uBITX can be
obsolete, but requires extra space for these extra boards.
One thing I m missing are the information about the P1dB
pointz ( 40 dBm)? and IMD performance.?
Henning Weddig
DK5LV
|
> I have just seen it on your website.? > Really nice. How much gain does it? > have if we exclude the first stage?
Well you know how these things are, every time you vary one thing, something else changes... so it's hard to be totally precise. But approximately the gain is split equally between the two stages. 13dB each.
> This kit won¡¯t make the spur and? > bandpass problems of the uBITx? > go away.? Period.? Those problems? > occur in the early stages of the? > uBITx.? To the contrary it has the? > opportunity to make them worse? > since the gain of the amp is flat? > from 3-20 MHz? It may, however? > be a nice replacement for the final? > two stages in the uBITx if you want? > to maintain a fairly flat gain in? > those two stages.? That¡¯s all.
Yes, exactly what I said in my initial post on this topic. The uBITX has many problems (or depending on your viewpoint, challenges, minor issues, what you get in an experimenter's radio etc etc.). This amp kit fixed at best, the final two stages only. Garbage in, garbage out...
What it does show is:
1) Good PCB layout, short traces and short leads work wonders
2) IRF510's are good for the job - it isn't necessary to spend $$ on fancy RD15HVF1 or its brothers and sisters or uncles and cousins...
3) Surface mount components aren't necessary to assure stability either.
Note... even Chinese IRF510's do a great job - once you find the right and reliable supplier. All Ferrites in the kit are sourced from Diz at , I'm a highly satisfied (and not insignificant) customer!
73 Hans G0UPL? ?
|
Hi All. Just remembered, the GQRP SPRAT magazine recently had an article for a +-30db amp based on the MMBTH10 if I remember correctly. It used 4 of them. Ill see if i can find more details to share I think this may make a good pre-driver for the QSX amp? 73 Nick.
|
Just one more comment to Hans. I have order a kit, going to build a monobander 10/11m SSB rig. But, I am just reading through the PA's manual, and really, your manuals are second to none!? Absolutely superb detailed instructions, very clear step by step.
Well done again. 73 NIck VK4PP
|
OK 13db gain for the final stage. As many of us have 0.7-1w qrps what is the (approximate) absolute maximum rating for the input power of the final stage without going nonlinear? 0.5w or more?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Il 09/ott/2018 21:13, "Hans Summers" < hans.summers@...> ha scritto:
> I have just seen it on your website.? > Really nice. How much gain does it? > have if we exclude the first stage?
Well you know how these things are, every time you vary one thing, something else changes... so it's hard to be totally precise. But approximately the gain is split equally between the two stages. 13dB each.
> This kit won¡¯t make the spur and? > bandpass problems of the uBITx? > go away.? Period.? Those problems? > occur in the early stages of the? > uBITx.? To the contrary it has the? > opportunity to make them worse? > since the gain of the amp is flat? > from 3-20 MHz? It may, however? > be a nice replacement for the final? > two stages in the uBITx if you want? > to maintain a fairly flat gain in? > those two stages.? That¡¯s all.
Yes, exactly what I said in my initial post on this topic. The uBITX has many problems (or depending on your viewpoint, challenges, minor issues, what you get in an experimenter's radio etc etc.). This amp kit fixed at best, the final two stages only. Garbage in, garbage out...
What it does show is:
1) Good PCB layout, short traces and short leads work wonders
2) IRF510's are good for the job - it isn't necessary to spend $$ on fancy RD15HVF1 or its brothers and sisters or uncles and cousins...
3) Surface mount components aren't necessary to assure stability either.
Note... even Chinese IRF510's do a great job - once you find the right and reliable supplier. All Ferrites in the kit are sourced from Diz at , I'm a highly satisfied (and not insignificant) customer!
73 Hans G0UPL? ?
|
this is a very well designed amp. the extensive use of feedback helps preserve linearity. we don't get the BS170 transistors in india for some strange reason. i might as well just order this to play with it.
- f
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
OK 13db gain for the final stage. As many of us have 0.7-1w qrps what is the (approximate) absolute maximum rating for the input power of the final stage without going nonlinear? 0.5w or more?
|
> OK 13db gain for the final stage. As many of us? > have 0.7-1w qrps what is the (approximate) absolute? > maximum rating for the input power of the final? > stage without going nonlinear? 0.5w or more?
I don't know the answer to this - it would need experiment and measurement. 0.5W is the right ballpark.?
73 Hans G0UPL
|