开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Using JTDX to reduce LAG - SOLVED #JTDX #sBITX_v3


 

I've been using it with this modification for a few days.
The idea to look for a solution in the hardware was given by the fact that the error message came immediately after switching it on. Then I started following the hardware signal reception process and compared it to the factory datasheet and came to this solution. I still use the settings referring to LAG reduction, but now I'm more confident in setting a higher volume and a higher IF (incoming signal sensitivity) level. I also don't reduce the BW, as is stated in the recommended settings.
Here's the solution:
--
Gyula HA3HZ
?
?
?
?
I made the shielding with self-adhesive copper foil, on which I glued Kapton tape as an insulator. Both tapes are 50mm wide, about 30 cm are needed.
?
--eof


 

On Jan 1, 2025, at 10:55, HA3HZ <gyula@...> wrote:
In short, change the defaults.pcm.dmix.rate value in the alsa.conf file to 44100 (Audio CD 44.1 kHz) and feel free to use jtdx as you wish.
I tried; this was not sufficient by itself, I’m still getting this error.

I’ve been using wsjt-x, but I see various people report online that JTDX decodes more signals. I guess that’s why you use it?


 

Thank you for responding, you are the first to report the problem. Indeed, fixing this one line does not solve the problem, as I mentioned it together with the other settings. The monitor ribbon cable and the shielding between the RPi and the pcb greatly improve the quality of the incoming signal. What you did is the first step towards a good solution. I also went through these steps. The device in its delivered state cannot be used as described. What is described in the topic leads to the solution.
Indeed, I started using jtdx around 2017, following the childhood diseases of programming and using the radio, modem, PC I never encountered this message.
I was surprised when I searched with google and people complained about similar messages with wsjt-x. Mostly caused by RFI, lack of shielding, tangled wires. In this case, everything is in one place, so a more careful solution was needed.
--
Gyula HA3HZ