Has there been any change with v3 to support a wider waterfall width (e.g. 100 kHz or wider)? -- Mike WA0YCN
|
Hi Mike:
I'm not sure what the rig uses for its ADC/DAC, but those play a limiting role in the meaningful range of the spectrum and waterfall displays. I'm no EE guy, but the hardware puts severe limits on what software can do to present information on the display.
Jack, W8TEE
On Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 09:22:31 PM EDT, Mike WA0YCN <mgassman@...> wrote:
Has there been any change with v3 to support a wider waterfall width (e.g. 100 kHz or wider)? -- Mike WA0YCN
-- Jack, W8TEE
|
You can¡¯t, because the crystal filter at 45 MHz and sampling rate using the inexpensive A/D will not allow a wider waterfall
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 30, 2024, at 22:14, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:
?
Hi Mike:
I'm not sure what the rig uses for its ADC/DAC, but those play a limiting role in the meaningful range of the spectrum and waterfall displays. I'm no EE guy, but the hardware puts severe limits on what software can do to present information on the display.
Jack, W8TEE
On Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 09:22:31 PM EDT, Mike WA0YCN <mgassman@...> wrote:
Has there been any change with v3 to support a wider waterfall width (e.g. 100 kHz or wider)? -- Mike WA0YCN
-- Jack, W8TEE
|
There is a 40 MHz crystal filter with 25 KHz bandpass that puts a physical limit on the span. - f
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You can¡¯t, because the crystal filter at 45 MHz and sampling rate using the inexpensive A/D will not allow a wider waterfall
Gordon Kx4z? ?
Hi Mike:
I'm not sure what the rig uses for its ADC/DAC, but those play a limiting role in the meaningful range of the spectrum and waterfall displays. I'm no EE guy, but the hardware puts severe limits on what software can do to present information on the display.
Jack, W8TEE
On Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 09:22:31 PM EDT, Mike WA0YCN < mgassman@...> wrote:
Has there been any change with v3 to support a wider waterfall width (e.g. 100 kHz or wider)? -- Mike WA0YCN
-- Jack, W8TEE
|
Farhan,
How about is we use this one ?
Raj
On 31/03/2024 9:18 AM, Ashhar Farhan
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
There is a 40 MHz crystal filter with 25 KHz
bandpass that puts a physical limit on the span.
- f
You can¡¯t, because the crystal filter at 45
MHz and sampling rate using the inexpensive A/D will not
allow a wider waterfall
Gordon Kx4z?
?
Hi Mike:
I'm not sure what the rig uses for
its ADC/DAC, but those play a limiting role in the
meaningful range of the spectrum and waterfall
displays. I'm no EE guy, but the hardware puts
severe limits on what software can do to present
information on the display.
Jack, W8TEE
On Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 09:22:31 PM
EDT, Mike WA0YCN < mgassman@...>
wrote:
Has there been any
change with v3 to support a wider waterfall
width (e.g. 100 kHz or wider)?
--
Mike
WA0YCN
--
Jack, W8TEE
|
Raj, The rejection is o?ly 40dB. You need at least 70 db opposite sideband rejection. When you design larger bandwidth, the out of passband rejection decreases
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Farhan,
How about is we use this one ?
Raj
On 31/03/2024 9:18 AM, Ashhar Farhan
wrote:
There is a 40 MHz crystal filter with 25 KHz
bandpass that puts a physical limit on the span.
- f
You can¡¯t, because the crystal filter at 45
MHz and sampling rate using the inexpensive A/D will not
allow a wider waterfall
Gordon Kx4z?
?
Hi Mike:
I'm not sure what the rig uses for
its ADC/DAC, but those play a limiting role in the
meaningful range of the spectrum and waterfall
displays. I'm no EE guy, but the hardware puts
severe limits on what software can do to present
information on the display.
Jack, W8TEE
On Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 09:22:31 PM
EDT, Mike WA0YCN < mgassman@...>
wrote:
Has there been any
change with v3 to support a wider waterfall
width (e.g. 100 kHz or wider)?
--
Mike
WA0YCN
--
Jack, W8TEE
|
Ashhar, thanks for the gentle correction on the IF frequency. Gordon KX4Z
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 1:30?AM Ashhar Farhan < farhanbox@...> wrote: Raj, The rejection is o?ly 40dB. You need at least 70 db opposite sideband rejection. When you design larger bandwidth, the out of passband rejection decreases
Farhan,
How about is we use this one ?
Raj
On 31/03/2024 9:18 AM, Ashhar Farhan
wrote:
There is a 40 MHz crystal filter with 25 KHz
bandpass that puts a physical limit on the span.
- f
You can¡¯t, because the crystal filter at 45
MHz and sampling rate using the inexpensive A/D will not
allow a wider waterfall
Gordon Kx4z?
?
Hi Mike:
I'm not sure what the rig uses for
its ADC/DAC, but those play a limiting role in the
meaningful range of the spectrum and waterfall
displays. I'm no EE guy, but the hardware puts
severe limits on what software can do to present
information on the display.
Jack, W8TEE
On Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 09:22:31 PM
EDT, Mike WA0YCN < mgassman@...>
wrote:
Has there been any
change with v3 to support a wider waterfall
width (e.g. 100 kHz or wider)?
--
Mike
WA0YCN
--
Jack, W8TEE
|