开云体育

"?unless I have read it incorrectly. Once pressed, the Frequency Step field will cycle through all of the step options until the button is released" Hi Dave, Yes, that's true but why would you hold

Steve - We have so far fingered and/or failed to proofread, not to worry. Question…as I don’t have the code in front of me. Are there numeric range checks following the strlen checks? Thx 73, Roy

I made some work on ALSA in my branch, to genlock it to the loopback, and also reduce the under/overruns. The secret is the period size and nr of periods you use. Also, using mmap'ed IO improves a

Hi Dave, Lemme do more tests to have a proper assessment, and if we'll need to force a lower clock on the CPUs, or not. In VARA, I can see a drop in almost 50% of target (where the process is running)

My fat fingers got me into trouble - the code should be modified to: if (strlen(callsign) < 3 || strlen(rst_sent) < 1 || strlen(rst_received) < 1){ N3SB - Paying the price for responding too

Hi Dave, Indeed, my main "production" sbitx is still on the Pi4 running Debian 11. But I'm in the process of migrating to the Pi 5 and Debian 12. Just realized we don't need the RTC in the sBitx

Yes, we should keep that in mind as we explore the dynamics of this code base some more.? One goal of mine is to make the code as responsive to the user as it can be.? I saw some issues in this

I was able to load macros in the web folder, but I haven't figured out a way to use the macros via telnet. Does anyone have ideas on how to run F1, F2, F3, etc via telnet? If so, then I can

Hello All. Thank you for your feedback, suggestions, and testing/using the app. Here are some things that I'd like to fix or add as time permits: * Add interaction with the QSO Logger (researching) *

Hi Gyula; In file sbitx_gtk.c, line # 1342 (approximate) you will find the line of code: if (strlen(callsign) < 3 || strlen(rst_sent) < 2 || strlen(rst_received) < 2){ Replace the two occurrences of

Some people are meant to find failing capacitors, others to fix buggy code. It's wonderful to watch both in action. -- Regards, Dave, N1AI

As per discussion in another thread, I'd be interested in any observations you make on the Pi 5 CPU temperatures once it's inserted in the sbitx enclosure. I assume you are doing that already?? And I

Steve, Your logic makes sense. Yes, you'll encounter some more oddities. For example, long callsigns are recorded as <...> in the log, but the same is true on the screen. Also, if there is no GRID at

I will have to do some more observations, but you very well could be right, because most of my comments were made based on the Pi being under heavy load and that probably isn't the case on sbitx. So,

Additional testing - so a single digit positive number like "5" will be rejected, but a two digit number like "05" is accepted. The number "15" is accepted and logged as a 15, and the number " 5"

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 05:54 AM, Rafael Diniz wrote: I agree with all of the above.? I want sbitx to be using a gpio library that is being actively maintained.? I have ment

OK - this logging issue is easy to duplicate. When either signal report is entered with either Sent or Received values positive, and without a leading "+" sign, the logging routine will reject the

Hi Gyula - Interesting. I'll have a look. That's helpful info. And Thanks for the video - looks like the Auto IF Gain is working well! 73; Steve, N3SB

I too was looking for a use of the main tuning knob button and my own software for my home brew bitx20 ?uses this very approach. Just one problem with the code though, unless I have read it

Jens, I have just the board option. I have to supply the RPI4, etc. For me the sBITX V3 has put the fun back in amateur radio. I have severe mobility issues and I love to play on the digital modes. My